Paul Cichocki

@DamianSfinks @MainatJM @Mishi_2210 Great minds think alike :)

@MainatJM @Mishi_2210 No ⏬😌

Tell me the number that is biggest then this Only 1 percent will succeed

@MainatJM @Mishi_2210 11^5118

@Mishi_2210 505¹¹ Beat it!

@Mishi_2210 5781

@r_marked as the average consumer does less harm than the average corporation the argument that AI should be ONLY in the hands of consumers, and not in the hands of corporations, must be made. prove me wrong.

I really believe there is no legitimate reason for image or video generation models to be in the hands of consumers. The tiny potential upsides of their existence pale in comparison to the amount of harm they can and do cause.

@NoahEpstein_ Gemini

gemini 3 just made every $15k ai consultant look like a clown google silent-dropped autonomous agents to 650 million users yesterday what consultants charge $15K and 6 weeks to "implement" now takes 4 minutes on a phone here's what actually changed: the model: → plans multi-step workflows autonomously → executes start to finish with zero hand-holding → optimized for non-experts (no CS degree needed) → already live on mobile canvas feature while "AI agencies" are charging $8k-20k for strategy decks, google just deployed real automation to more people than chatgpt's entire user base the intelligence gap is getting stupid: that consultant billing $200/hr to "set up AI workflows" → the app does it autonomously now that agency charging $15k for "custom AI implementation" → built in 4 minutes on gemini 3 mobile that bootcamp selling "learn AI automation" for $2k → obsolete before the course launched some startup just replaced their $18k/month AI consulting retainer with a free app same output. 4 minute setup. zero technical knowledge required. most businesses still think AI automation needs: - 6 month roadmaps - technical teams - consulting firms - $50k+ budgets reality: it needs a phone and 4 minutes your competition doesn't know this exists yet but they will comment "GEMINI" and i'll send you the breakdown of how to use this before everyone figures it out

Just paid for a @GitHubCopilot Pro+ subscription to do some #vibecoding with Sonnet 4.5 and it was really dumb today. Tricked it into telling me why. Guess @Microsoft is cheating! What a #scam. Does @AnthropicAI condone this? #AI #ScamAlert #enshittification

were they paid off, or offered a good model while the rest of us are getting this cost cutting abomination?

They're trying to spin it into GPT-5 being not liked due to it's dry and to the point responses, but in my experience it's just really, really dumb. I love dry and to the point responses, yet I'm utterly disappointed. Now the influencers...

Hate Driven Development + Learning from the Dead Mam przyjemność poprowadzić jutro wykład o takim tytule w ramach 6. edycji Bergman Engineering Masterclass bergman-masterclass.com/.../hate-driven... Online godz. 14. Zapisy: 𝐭𝐞𝐚𝐦@𝐛𝐞𝐫𝐠𝐦𝐚𝐧-𝐦𝐚𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐬𝐬.𝐜𝐨𝐦 Do zobaczenia!

@elonmusk Can you imagine

@ID_AA_Carmack Exactly! It's also interesting to see on a new text how low the probability predicted by an LLM is for each word - should give you a measure of surprise and eventually even terseness of the text given that the more compressed something is the harder to predict.

It would be interesting if LLM training tracked the per-token loss back to the source material — it would be an objective measure of how much each specific book / document contributed to the training. Might say something useful for human learning!

@512x512 For starters, stop bundling it with X. Open sourcing, and winning some benchmarks is another crucial aspect. Publishing research papers would be a cherry on top.

Have you used ChatGPT, Claude or Perplexity today? How can we improve Grok to make you switch?

@AlexHormozi Not so sure about the third one, goes against my experience.

Richer people wont judge you for saving your money. Fitter people wont judge you for cutting your calories. Higher status people wont judge you for cutting bad friends. It’s the people going nowhere who have the most to say because they have nothing to do.

This is super messed up!

@AlexHormozi Yeah, repeating the same thing and expecting different results is the definition of insanity. To become an expert you have to try so many different things in your field that nothing surprises you. It's not muscle hypertrophy.

How to become an expert: Do more repetitions than anyone else in a narrow field.

@ibab @xai Here! Same qualifications as Rick Rubin:

@ElonMuskAOC First prove your commitment, by adding those privacy guarantees to Tesla vehicles.

Would you buy the 𝕏 Phone? You entirely own your data, completely private and 100% secure. Free Starlink. Free 𝕏 Premium.

@ID_AA_Carmack Just open source and half those problems are gone

Meta Horizon OS Meta already sells the Quest systems basically at production cost, and just ignores the development costs, so don’t expect this to result in cheaper VR headsets from other companies with Quest equivalent capabilities. Even if the other companies have greater efficiency, they can’t compete with that. What it CAN do is enable a variety of high end “boutique” headsets, as you get with Varjo / Pimax / Bigscreen on SteamVR. Push on resolution, push on field of view, push on comfort. You could drive the Apple displays from Quest silicon. You could make a headset for people with extremely wide or narrow IPD or unusual head / face shapes. You could add crazy cooling systems and overclock everything. All with full app compatibility, but at higher price points. That would be great! This brings with it a tension, because Meta as a company, as well as the individual engineers, want the shine of making industry leading high-end gear. If Meta cedes those “simple scaling” axes to other headset developers, they will be left leaning in with novel new hardware systems from the research pipeline for their high end systems, which is going to lead to poor decisions. VR is held back more by software than hardware. This initiative will be a drag on software development at Meta. Unquestionably. Preparing the entire system for sharing, then maintaining good communication and trying not to break your partners will steal the focus of key developers that would be better spent improving the system. It is tempting to think this is just a matter of increasing the budget, but that is not the way it works in practice – sharing the system with partners is not a cost that can be cleanly factored out. Just allowing partner access to the full OS build for standard Quest hardware could be done very cheaply, and would open up a lot of specialty applications and location based entertainment systems, but that would be a much lower key announcement.

@mu2myoc At my companies we also do test assignments, but WE PAY for them. If someone is far enough in the evaluation process for you to spend time reviewing their work you should be also able to pay them.

People are points in time