

NoToChina
1.8K posts

@NoToChina_org
https://t.co/oi26nh0TqR is a Web site dedicated to finding the best products you can buy that are NOT made in China.











Tokyo Crossed Out "China." Wrote In "Taiwan." 321 Lawmakers Just Buried 53 Years of Diplomatic Fiction. Japan's biggest parliamentary caucus rebranded for democracy — and Beijing's playbook is out of pages. For 53 years, Japan's most powerful pro-Taiwan caucus carried a fossil in its name: "華" (Hua) — the character for the Republic of China, a Cold War euphemism designed to avoid Beijing's tantrums. On June 11, 2026, that fossil was chiseled out. Meeting in Tokyo, the body formerly known as the Japan–China (Hua) Parliamentarians' Consultation Council (日華議員懇談会) voted to rename itself the Japan–Taiwan Friendship Parliamentarians' League (日本台湾友好議員連盟). Chairman Keiji Furuya — the same lawmaker Beijing sanctioned in March for "colluding with Taiwan independence forces" — explained it plainly: "It has finally become what it was always meant to be." To Asahi, he was sharper still: "Now that the Takaichi administration is in place, I decided this was our chance." This is not a cosmetic edit. It is a strategic re-coding. The numbers tell the story. The League now counts 321 lawmakers across both houses — roughly 45% of Japan's 713-seat Diet — a historical high, swelled by about 30 new members in the past year alone. In a parliament where consensus is granular and glacial, this is a tectonic shift. Nearly half of Japan's elected representatives now formally stand with a self-governing democracy Beijing refuses to recognize as one. The timing is sharper still. Furuya is a close ally of Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi — the woman who, on November 7, 2025, became the first Japanese premier to publicly state that a Chinese military strike on Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" triggering Japan's right of collective self-defense. Beijing's response — sanctions, démarches, and the freezing of Furuya's nonexistent China assets on March 30 — has not deterred a single lawmaker. It accelerated the migration. CCP coercion is now recruiting Tokyo into the very alignment Beijing tried to prevent. What the new name unlocks. By upgrading from 懇談会 (consultation council, the diplomatic minor leagues) to 議員連盟 (parliamentary league, Japan's standard format for ally-state caucuses), Tokyo has placed Taipei at structural parity with the UK, Australia, Germany, and the United States. According to Sankei, the League also signaled at the same meeting that Japan should correct textbooks still describing Taiwan as Chinese territory — a direct strike against Beijing's most cherished propaganda line. Beijing's reaction is the tell. As of June 12, the PRC Foreign Ministry had issued no on-record statement, deploying its propaganda outlets instead: Global Times dispatched its usual "Chinese expert," who labeled the rename a "deliberate provocation" certain to "draw a firm response." Translation: Beijing has no new lever. The standard playbook — fury, summon the ambassador, threaten retaliation — was burned through in November and March, and it failed. Takaichi did not retract. The League grew. Allies leaned in. When deterrence collapses into recycled threats from anonymous "experts," the loss is structural. The strategic read. This is the most consequential shift in Tokyo–Taipei ties since the 1972 break — executed without altering a single treaty, signed without lifting a single sanction, and impossible for Beijing to legally contest. Japan has just published the template for every democracy still hostage to Beijing's vocabulary: you do not need to abandon One-China to dismantle the One-China narrative. A pen and a parliamentary majority will do. Ottawa, Canberra, London, Berlin, Brussels, Seoul, Taipei — take notes. Beijing's red lines only hold when nobody crosses them. Tokyo just walked across, dropped 53 years of euphemism on the floor, and called the move "natural." That single word — "natural" — should haunt every chancellery still treating Taiwan as a problem to be managed rather than a partner to be named. The page has turned. Aric Chen | Insights



GSA Advantage is a great site. But why do all the contractors providing product information lie about country of origin? And why isn't anyone in the @USGSA doing anything about it? This hurts legitimate manufacturers. It needs to stop. Full story here: notochina.org/why-does-gsa-a…









Report to Congress on Defense of Taiwan — USNI News news.usni.org/2026/06/09/rep…





中共真是奇怪,中共高官的亲属们都做了美国人、德国人、澳大利亚人加拿大人……非要台湾人必须去做中国人

