JJ

1.9K posts

JJ banner
JJ

JJ

@NonpareilAvatar

Aspiring Software Engineer, fitness enthusiast, Web3 explorer. CCO at @Avalonfinance_, Quality Assurance Manager @PolarFiGames, Ex Business Developer

เข้าร่วม Ağustos 2023
153 กำลังติดตาม55 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
With this account, I'll be focusing on posting my journey, life lessons, networking, and sharing knowledge across various topics that I find to be fruitful. Veni Vidi Vici
English
2
0
3
1.2K
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@bruhfool1 @ReallyAugmented @Spencer4npr @mhdksafa Of course, that’s why @ReallyAugmented blocked me after replying with this comment because he knows he can’t name drop anyone and he knows for damn sure he’s not getting off his grandmother’s couch, lifting up his belly rolls, to go fight in Iran
JJ tweet media
English
0
0
0
9
Mohamad Safa
Mohamad Safa@mhdksafa·
If the United States is at war, then Pete Hegseth is a war criminal. If the United States is not at war, then Pete Hegseth is a murderer. What Pete Hegseth ordered the military to do violates international law. Double tap strike on the B1 bridge in Iran while the rescue team were on-site is succession to target first responders assisting victims of the initial attack. Under the Geneva Conventions, you are obligated to rescue victims of the first attack. Abandoned any survivors and bombing them along with rescue teams is illegal, immoral, and a war crime.
English
1.5K
13.5K
36.9K
1.3M
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@njoyzgrl81 Invoking the deadliest day in Marine Corps history to justify a war requires one thing: proof Iran is about to do it again. That’s the entire point of “imminent threat.” Emotion doesn’t replace evidence.
English
0
0
0
13
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@njoyzgrl81 By this logic, every nation that has ever suffered an attack from any adversary is justified in launching preemptive war decades later. That’s not a doctrine, that’s a blank check for endless war. Joe Kent,with 11 combat deployments and 6 Bronze Stars,understands that distinction
English
2
0
0
8
Carissa
Carissa@njoyzgrl81·
To the “No imminent threat” shtbirds, The deadliest single day in U.S. Marine Corps history was October 23, 1983, when a suicide truck bomb destroyed the Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon, killing 220 Marines, 18 sailors, and 3 soldiers. It remains the highest single-day loss of life for the Corps since the Battle of Iwo Jima in 1945. How many more of these are acceptable?
English
18
30
131
2.7K
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@njoyzgrl81 241 Americans died in Beirut. Know who agreed there was no clear mission and pulled the troops out? Ronald Reagan. The man conservatives canonize made the exact calculation Kent is making now that keeping forces in a theater without strategic clarity costs American lives.
English
0
0
0
14
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@psujwj @MajToure You literally support an administration who doesn’t support our Constitution, you have no room to call anyone a commie. Nothing about you or what you stand for is American, supporting the firing of lifelong generals simply because they don’t support this war with Iran.
English
0
0
0
23
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@psujwj @MajToure You’re not even using the word correctly based on the context, so clearly you aren’t intelligent enough to engage in this conversation which would explain your pathetic excuse for rebuttals.
English
0
0
0
5
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@lonny_wilcox @njoyzgrl81 Is there was actionable evidence, why no arrest? This man has sacrificed his entire life for this country, so did his first wife, and you really believe he’d leak anything? You’re as gullible as they come, even now he doesn’t bad mouth or leak anything, while Trump trashes him.
English
0
0
0
31
Lonny Wilcox
Lonny Wilcox@lonny_wilcox·
@NonpareilAvatar @njoyzgrl81 Evidence is never announced before charges are filed. He was cut out of classified briefings months ago and the investigation started then because there was evidence he was leaking. We won't know what that evidence is until the trial and hopefully life imprisonment.
English
1
0
0
9
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@njoyzgrl81 “Imminent threat”has specific legal and military meaning:an attack is actively being planned or is about to occur.1983 bombing, however devastating, is historical precedent,not intelligence of a coming attack.Grief and tragedy are not a substitute for actionable threat assessment
English
0
0
0
3
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@njoyzgrl81 @njoyzgrl81 So you’re calling Joe Kent, and top intelligence officials shtbirds? Past events don’t constitute as an imminent threat, learn the definition of “imminent” before using the term.
JJ tweet mediaJJ tweet mediaJJ tweet media
English
3
0
0
20
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@njoyzgrl81 The Beirut bombing was carried out by Hezbollah with Iranian backing, against Marines who were already deployed to Lebanon. The threat materialized BECAUSE we were there. That’s not an argument for preemptive war with Iran. That’s an argument for not putting troops in harm’s way
English
0
0
0
44
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@lonny_wilcox @njoyzgrl81 There is zero evidence he leaked anything, even to this day. He’s asked for this supposed evidence of him “leaking” anything, but nothing has been provided at any time. It’s bullshit, he was ousted because he didn’t support a war that this administration wanted. Cut the bullshit
English
1
0
0
11
Lonny Wilcox
Lonny Wilcox@lonny_wilcox·
@NonpareilAvatar @njoyzgrl81 Traitors hold high positions is all they prove. He was cut out of the loop because he was a profligate leaker so had no idea what was going on that made Iran regime an imminent threat.
English
1
0
0
30
JayMC
JayMC@JayMCRocket21·
@NonpareilAvatar @MajToure Interesting. Why the change in terms from "senior generals" (very specific rank) and "senior flag officers" (less specific rank) when discussing what 1 admin did vs the other? And what about the other 4 previous admins?
English
1
0
0
19
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@psujwj @MajToure So next time you respond, how about having a rebuttal that isn’t displaying the emotional instability of a child, and instead some factual data that supports your ridiculous point of view that retired Generals and Secretaries Of Defense say is blatantly wrong.
English
1
0
0
10
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@psujwj @MajToure Not about 11 vs 12. It’s about firing the people running an active war with no explanation, blocking promotions of qualified officers based on race and gender, and replacing them with personal loyalists. That’s not strength. That’s how militaries get hollowed out.
English
0
0
0
4
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@psujwj @MajToure One official’s exact words when George was fired mid-war: “Here is a four-star general who is actively working to get equipment and people into theater, to protect U.S. forces, and you fire him? In the middle of a war?” But sure, tell me more about how it’s fine.
English
1
0
0
7
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@psujwj @MajToure Since 1951, no wartime commander had been dismissed. Obama fired, 4 generals over 8 years, mostly for misconduct. Hegseth fired 12+ in 14 months, including the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, the CNO, the NSA director, and now the Army Chief of Staff,during an active war with Iran.
English
0
0
0
24
JJ
JJ@NonpareilAvatar·
@psujwj @MajToure How will we survive?” Ask the 82nd Airborne soldiers heading to the Middle East whose Army Chief of Staff was fired mid-war, via a phone call, while he was actively coordinating their equipment and deployment. That’s not drama. That’s a real risk to real lives.
English
0
0
0
24