ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
If you don’t speak, how would we hear your voice? How would we hear your message?
English
Ω Stormbreaker
3.4K posts
Ω Stormbreaker
@OlabodeAmen
🇳🇬🇬🇭 Product Manager || Mobility 📦and Finance 🏦 || @ridefraser || ex @keystonebankng @anakle
The Great Before เข้าร่วม Kasım 2013
455 กำลังติดตาม336 ผู้ติดตาม
English
@_Nsznn @Rileystill02 this is the end
hold your breath and count to 10
English
@onyilacreme @hackSultan Honestly, this is it. From battling a crippled economy to insecurity to politics to the lack of electricity to rape to religion, it’s a lot
English
@hackSultan This country's issues are numerous.
We wake up and sleep to issues!
And it is more than a regular occurrence now.
English
Ω Stormbreaker รีทวีตแล้ว
Good morning. Looks like everyone has moved on from this Ozoro matter.
I just want to say this : As a country, I understand we’re not a lot of twitter but we really lack collective focus on collective issues.
I pray the ladies involved get proper treatments and support and praying the perpetrators get punished.
1. Do not standby and watch sexual assault happen beside you. Stand against it and let your voice be heard.
2. Do not be directly involved in sexual assault.
3. Do not falsely accuse anyone of sexual assault.
Name cannot be blank@hackSultan
I don’t want to sound like a nuisance but it’ll be good to hear some update from the government and the police on this Ozoro matter, everything is dying down. I’m yet to actually see one person that was arrested.
English
I don’t get why people have to train for a marathon. It’s like super simple.
There’s just like 2 rules to running a marathon.
1. Start running.
2. Don’t stop.
naza is training for an ultra marathon@ChuGailx
English
Ω Stormbreaker รีทวีตแล้ว
@The_Ogundipe Statements like "this case will crumble" coming from a professional colleague are not innocent by any stretch of imagination. They are even unethical.
Curiously, I believe the HR guy has a prima facie case against the other guy. I did a write-up here:
x.com/i/status/20378…
joel ighalo ESQ.@_empighalo
Even if you think @bsong_HR does not have a good case, I don't think it is ethically correct for lawyers, as professional colleagues, to nit-pick or tear apart a process which came from another lawyer, who works in a reputable law firm like SSK, which unarguably has a standard of excellence to uphold. I believe that the letter passed through scrutiny and appraisal from the Dispute Resolution Practice Group and they assessed that their client has a prima facie case! I agree that the topic bordering on rape is sensitive but remember every case must be determined according to their peculiar facts. So here is my view: While I agree with the principle established by the Bane and Antidote concept, it should be noted that in English Defamation cases where this principle has been applied, the underlying philosophy is that "a defamatory statement cannot be judged in isolation if the SAME publication contains words that correct, explain or neutralise the defamatory sting." In Chalmers v. Payne (1835) 2 Cr. M. & R 56, 159 from which this principle originated, the court stated that: “If in one part of the publication something disreputable to the plaintiff is stated, but that is removed by the conclusion, the bane and the antidote must be taken together.” Now, can it be said that the tortfeasor's "defamatory statement" contained words which neutralised the defamatory sting? The tortfeasor even published his picture. 😂 Wouldn't it be a different thing if the other person had said, "you said all men are rapists so by your logic, you are the face of a rapist"? Remember that in defamation, the plain and ordinary meaning of the defamatory words must be considered. What some of us are trying to do is introduce context from the HR guy's tweets, that he said all men are rapists. Curiously, those tweets are no longer on the internet (I ran a search), and litigation is evidence-based. I hope nothing deters bsong from suing. Principles of law are meant to be tested because they ultimately enrich out jurisprudence.
English
Ω Stormbreaker รีทวีตแล้ว
When a demand letter or court process makes it to the public, there's something that feels wrong about colleagues publicly poking holes in it and saying things like: "This case will crumble", "This case cannot go anywhere".
As innocent as such comments appear, there's an unspoken and maybe unintended message that they pass to the public. A message that the lawyer who drafted such doesn't know his onions or that the process is ill-advised.
Apart from the fact that such moves hastily puts a question mark on the competence of such colleagues, it is also an indictment on those making such comments. It isn't a mark of professional courtesy or respect. In addition, there are ways we have been taught not to comment on pending matters.
I feel that comments of that nature should go behind the scenes between colleagues and not publicly.
English
@Essy_shalom @Awamaridiii Nah, it’s three ladies + 1 guy = One family and then three ladies - One family as well
English
You can literally see whose siblings are whose😹
Love it!
Jesi@jesidamina
When we took this sibling trip, we let everyone at immigration assume we were originally one family ❤️
English
@atulit_gaur It’s not logistically feasible, I watched a documentary where they stated that for researchers, it is extremely difficult to situate or secure structures due to extreme winds asides the cold.
You might place a structure in a location and it’s in another the next day.
English
genius, any reason why there aren't more data centers in antartica? will it accelerate the melting of glaciers or do we just don't wanna hurt penguins
senpai@Senpaisaysbye
Data center after realizing Antarctica has free cooling
English
Ω Stormbreaker รีทวีตแล้ว
Even if you think @bsong_HR does not have a good case, I don't think it is ethically correct for lawyers, as professional colleagues, to nit-pick or tear apart a process which came from another lawyer, who works in a reputable law firm like SSK, which unarguably has a standard of excellence to uphold.
I believe that the letter passed through scrutiny and appraisal from the Dispute Resolution Practice Group and they assessed that their client has a prima facie case!
I agree that the topic bordering on rape is sensitive but remember every case must be determined according to their peculiar facts.
So here is my view:
While I agree with the principle established by the Bane and Antidote concept, it should be noted that in English Defamation cases where this principle has been applied, the underlying philosophy is that "a defamatory statement cannot be judged in isolation if the SAME publication contains words that correct, explain or neutralise the defamatory sting."
In Chalmers v. Payne (1835) 2 Cr. M. & R 56, 159 from which this principle originated, the court stated that:
“If in one part of the publication something disreputable to the plaintiff is stated, but that is removed by the conclusion, the bane and the antidote must be taken together.”
Now, can it be said that the tortfeasor's "defamatory statement" contained words which neutralised the defamatory sting? The tortfeasor even published his picture. 😂 Wouldn't it be a different thing if the other person had said, "you said all men are rapists so by your logic, you are the face of a rapist"?
Remember that in defamation, the plain and ordinary meaning of the defamatory words must be considered. What some of us are trying to do is introduce context from the HR guy's tweets, that he said all men are rapists. Curiously, those tweets are no longer on the internet (I ran a search), and litigation is evidence-based.
I hope nothing deters bsong from suing. Principles of law are meant to be tested because they ultimately enrich out jurisprudence.
Felix The GenZ HR is HIRING@bsong_HR
Hello @iamklausenburg, you have a mail. I wish you all the best.
English
@BlehisBack These people are fucking ridiculous. Make them dey ginger, the matter go sha dey court.
English
Ω Stormbreaker รีทวีตแล้ว
This was the tweet, no?
He didn’t even allude to any position.
It was a call to stop bullying the OP for an opinion.
I’ve seen stretches, but this is the stretchiest stretch in history of stretching.
Anyways, may the best man win in court ♥️
Felix The GenZ HR is HIRING@bsong_HR
The entire gang-up against @ogheneovie_o is so ridiculous. You can't bully people for having an opinion. It's sick that most of you are on that lane (bullies). Everyone will be alright eventually.
English
@savndaniel Run am na. All of una sha like to dey open mouth, it’s tiring.
English
If I were briefed to do this matter, you would have known the definition of pain in capital letters. First, you wouldn't have liked my reply.
Felix The GenZ HR is HIRING@bsong_HR
Hello @iamklausenburg, you have a mail. I wish you all the best.
English
@OlanipekunTobiD Flames, you be my guy, but if you follow the matter well, you go see say this recourse dey necessary.
But no wham
English
When i saw this post, I was in traffic, and I laughed.
In an attempt to be smart by half, you took one part of his post and ran with it. Well, my good, Sir, the law doesn't work that way.
"To prove libel, the broad impression conveyed by the publication must be considered not the meaning of each word taken out of context...the publication has to be considered as a whole" - Thank you @NWLRonline for the assist.
He quoted your own post. You called all men rapists. What are you? A goat?
Please wrap this up before 12 pm today. This is DOA already.
Felix The GenZ HR is HIRING@bsong_HR
Hello @iamklausenburg, you have a mail. I wish you all the best.
English
Bruh, I been think say na Osimhen first
SCOREpion 🦂⚽🔥@Hakeem_Onitolo
For someone with a lean athletic build who has remained within a specific weight and body frame for years, I actually think it is easy to maintain. You just have to keep training and moving, and eating normally. Unless, of course, this is not the physique you're referring to.
English
Mr A: All of us in this room are thieves
Mr B: Ladies and gentlemen, Mr A is a foremost professional thief
Mr A: How dare you call me a thief?
You have defamed me, let’s go to court.
Meanwhile in Osakwe v. Union Bank of Nigeria Plc, the COA held that Self-publication does not count as defamation
Meaning If a person makes a statement about himself, or his own demography, it cannot be held as defamation if used by another party against him.
English
@jodambusta You go need understand the difference between libel and prejudice first. onye nzuzu
English
Ω Stormbreaker รีทวีตแล้ว
Tinubu MUST GO❗️
Tinubu MUST GO❗️
Tinubu MUST GO❗️
Tinubu MUST GO❗️
Tinubu MUST GO❗️
Tinubu MUST GO❗️
Tinubu MUST GO❗️
Tinubu MUST GO❗️
Tinubu MUST GO❗️
Tinubu MUST GO❗️
Filipino
@Joiceoflagos Wait what? I did this shit 30k 5 years ago
Which kind wahala be this one?
English
@BlehisBack @bsong_HR Blanket statement is simply Prejudicial or Stereotypical. Taking it one step to point fingers without proof over varying opinions is simply inviting a lawsuit.
English
It’s the exact point I kept trying to make on the said day.
You can disagree on the “all men” vs “not all men” conversation.
Some people firmly believe “all men” is the right framing, others think it’s an overreach and that “some men” is the more appropriate nomenclature.
That’s a valid debate. Have it.
But outright calling someone a rapist? That’s an entirely different territory. At that point, you have to be ready to stand by it and accept whatever consequences follow.
Felix The GenZ HR is HIRING@bsong_HR
Hello @iamklausenburg, you have a mail. I wish you all the best.
English