Xaviour 🧬

6.7K posts

Xaviour 🧬 banner
Xaviour 🧬

Xaviour 🧬

@OxSaviour

Gm

เข้าร่วม Temmuz 2022
363 กำลังติดตาม322 ผู้ติดตาม
Xaviour 🧬 รีทวีตแล้ว
IBRAHIM RABIU
IBRAHIM RABIU@IBRAHIMRABIUBB·
IBRAHIM RABIU tweet media
ZXX
31
3K
10.5K
76.5K
Peter Obi
Peter Obi@PeterObi·
“This Experience Will Not Repeat Itself” - Another Presidential Promise fails in less than 24 Hours. Less than 24 hours after President Tinubu stood at the Jos Plateau State airport on April 2, 2026, and promised the grieving Nigerian citizens, “I promise you that this experience will not repeat itself,” another brutal attack occurred in Nyamgo Gyel, Jos South LGA, resulting in the deaths of several innocent citizens. Since then, and only a week following that reassuring promise from the President, Nasarawa State has been plunged into grief as the Akyawa and Udege Kasa communities fled for their lives after gunmen killed at least 11 people. Many homes were reduced to ashes, and numerous families remain missing. In Zamfara State, 150 innocent Nigerians were abducted from the Kurfa Danya and Kurfan Magaji communities in one of the largest mass kidnappings in recent times. On the same day of the Zamfara kidnappings, terrorists in Borno State stormed Chibok, killing four officers and burning down homes. Yesterday, on Easter Sunday, Benue State was rocked by violence again, with over 17 Nigerians massacred, entire communities left in ruins, and many individuals still unaccounted for. Today, in Kaduna State, several innocent citizens were killed by terrorists inside churches, with many others abducted in the Ariko community of Kachia LGA. Yet we were told, “This experience will not repeat itself.” This represents a failure of leadership and responsibility, and sadly, Nigerians are paying for it with their lives. These attackers are not ghostly figures; our inaction emboldens them. How can a President make such a categorical promise and, mere hours later, the nation continues to count the dead across multiple states? The primary responsibility of any government is to protect lives and property; however, this responsibility is failing today. Nigerians are being slaughtered in their homes, in their communities, and in the very places they should feel safest. Even the President did not enter these communities, so who is truly safe in Nigeria? This is a national emergency. Nigeria is bleeding, and the situation is worsening and increasingly helpless. A New Nigeria is POssible. -PO
English
2.1K
15.3K
28.6K
612.9K
IMMACULATE 🌏✍️
IMMACULATE 🌏✍️@realjuwon·
@AIT_Online Concentrate on the last paragraph "in line with those provisions he was now assuming the position of interim National chairman".
English
1
0
1
350
Africa Independent Television
Leadership Tussle: Nafiu Bala Resigns As ADC Chairman By Funke Ogunlolu The 2023 Gombe governorship candidate and former national deputy chairman of the African democratic congress. Nafiu Bala has tendered his letter of resignation after declaring himself as the interim national chairman of the party. In the letter Addressed to the former national chairman of the party, Ralph Nwosu, Bala stated that his resignation was to pave way for smooth and effective coalition as well as restructuring the party. Bala assured that he is not abandoning the party and ready to serve in any capacity but the former Gombe governorship candidate was silenced on the David Mark-led interim leadership. The announcement came after the official handing over of ADC to the former Senate President and his team by the former national executive committee on Wednesday. During his declaration as the national chairman, Bala had accused Mark-led interim leadership of the ADC of hijacking the party through unconstitutional means and warned of impending legal action to challenge what he described as a “total surrender” of the party’s structure to external political actors. The former deputy national chairman emphasized that the party’s constitution clearly outlines the processes for leadership succession and that, in line with those provisions, he was now assuming the position of interim national chairman. (Editor: Paul Akhagbemhe)
Africa Independent Television tweet media
English
273
3.9K
3.3K
634K
Harry Da Diegot
Harry Da Diegot@trigottista·
Peter Obi behind Abacha in 1995
Harry Da Diegot tweet media
English
529
4.4K
16.3K
390.9K
Coventry City
Coventry City@Coventry_City·
Frank wetin be dat 😮‍💨
English
1.3K
6K
38.8K
887.8K
Xaviour 🧬 รีทวีตแล้ว
Peter Obi
Peter Obi@PeterObi·
Yesterday defenders of democracy, today's destroyers, What a shame. What an irony of history, that the acclaimed defenders of democracy and human rights who claimed to have fought for democracy during the era of General Sani Abacha now find themselves worse than the man they opposed. Today, General Sani Abacha, once presumed face of oppression, will be remembered as seemingly more democratic and more respectful of human rights than the so-called champions of activism from the NADECO days. Power indeed reveals character. A New Nigeria is POssible. -PO
English
3.4K
21K
39.8K
3M
Xaviour 🧬
Xaviour 🧬@OxSaviour·
@londonisred711 @Sheik_elizzy @lekan_olayinka1 Dear lord, how do you give a remark if you don't care about the context for the subject discussed? Again, whether Newton believed in trinity or not it's inconsequential to the discussion at hand. The fact is that he wasn't an atheist.
English
1
0
0
16
Lekan Olayinka
Lekan Olayinka@lekan_olayinka1·
I rarely do this but you’re forcing me to react with a laughing emoji 😂 “Newton believing in a cultural tool created by his own civilization.” Newton was English. Christianity is an offshoot from Judaism which is a monotheistic religion that dates back to the Stone Age Levantine population. Christianity is Middleeastern and it only spread abroad from there historically. Your sheer ignorance is bewildering. But let me grant your argument. Whether it was a cultural tool or not, he believed in a transcendental being. Not just him. I mentioned others. Around 65% of all Nobel Laureate since 1901 identified as Christians. But it is you, Biggest Mack, a Twitter user who has no intellectual capital beyond the narratives that the hubris of David Hundeyin exudes thinks believing in an infinite being is a sign of intellectual deficiency. You don’t know much. At all. And it shows. But if you’re confident, you can come on a space to make your claims. I’ll be more than glad to oblige you.
Biggest Mack@Big_Mck

The whole point of not going back and forth with you is that you can’t even differentiate between an Isaac Newton believing in a cultural tool created by his own civilization and you, Lekan, all the way from Nigeria, believing in this tool of subservience manufactured and tweaked before exporting to you. As in, the very fact there’s 99% chance you would have been a Muslim if the vagina you popped out from belonged to a Northern Nigerian woman, is enough not to engage you in any serious intellectual conversation proves my point. It’s just like quoting Elon Musk who now appears to be pivoting to Christianity from atheism. When in fact, he’s only doing that cos the new Trump regime, which he’s party to, has resorted to the old colonial tool of religion for the purpose of recolonizing you. You are quoting a period when Christianity began shaping politics. Maybe you need familiarize yourself with why that was necessary, why it had to happen before it was exported to you, and the role it played in making you the indoctrination tool that you are today (incapable of thinking for yourself).

English
39
74
398
14.6K
Xaviour 🧬
Xaviour 🧬@OxSaviour·
@londonisred711 @Sheik_elizzy @lekan_olayinka1 Here is the problem, you did go out of the context to make your point. The fact is that Newton believed in a Supreme creator but you tried to waterdown this fact but it's inconsequential to the discussion at hand. This is the reason I didn't take you seriously
Xaviour 🧬 tweet media
English
1
0
0
20
curious
curious@londonisred711·
@OxSaviour @Sheik_elizzy @lekan_olayinka1 although i dont think all athiests are smart by default, this is the best yall can come up with,some form of ridicule ,without any substance..
English
1
0
0
47
curious
curious@londonisred711·
@Sheik_elizzy @lekan_olayinka1 everybody believed in God during that time ,not believing was heresy and had real consequences any rational person would belive in that condition..
English
1
0
0
69
Biggest Mack
Biggest Mack@Big_Mck·
The whole point of not going back and forth with you is that you can’t even differentiate between an Isaac Newton believing in a cultural tool created by his own civilization and you, Lekan, all the way from Nigeria, believing in this tool of subservience manufactured and tweaked before exporting to you. As in, the very fact there’s 99% chance you would have been a Muslim if the vagina you popped out from belonged to a Northern Nigerian woman, is enough not to engage you in any serious intellectual conversation proves my point. It’s just like quoting Elon Musk who now appears to be pivoting to Christianity from atheism. When in fact, he’s only doing that cos the new Trump regime, which he’s party to, has resorted to the old colonial tool of religion for the purpose of recolonizing you. You are quoting a period when Christianity began shaping politics. Maybe you need familiarize yourself with why that was necessary, why it had to happen before it was exported to you, and the role it played in making you the indoctrination tool that you are today (incapable of thinking for yourself).
English
34
9
57
17.5K
Lekan Olayinka
Lekan Olayinka@lekan_olayinka1·
You think believing in a transcendental being is a sign of intellectual deficiency. I told you already, you cosplay intellect because you don’t actually possess it. Here are five major scientists who believed in God: Isaac Newton Johannes Kepler Blaise Pascal Michael Faraday James Clerk Maxwell Newton wrote more theological treatises than scientific papers. But by your logic, these men lack intellect simply because they believed in God. You brought up Ethiopian Christianity. Their distinction is that they are more orthodox, maintaining strong continuity with 4th-century Christianity. That was the period when Christianity began to shape state power and political life. So what you’re indirectly praising is a form of Christianity that permeates governance, politics, and society as a whole. That’s a strange position for someone who claims “White Jesus” is imperialist. I can’t even engage you on cosmological or teleological arguments. It’s a sad state of affairs, waking up daily to convince yourself you have intellectual depth by parroting ideas that collapse under the lightest scrutiny. Sad.
Biggest Mack@Big_Mck

I have nothing to prove to you regarding intellectualism. For me, it’s not a performance like it is for most of you. Imagine going back and forth with someone who believes in a sky daddy. Someone who’s drunk on western propaganda called White Jesus. And before start yapping about how your religion began in Africa, you should visit Ethiopia and see if the their brand of Christianity looks anything like yours. You believe in an imaginary deity, and that disqualifies you from any intellectual conversation. You should get a life, have some self respect, and stop worshipping those who enslaved your ancestors. For the issue at hand, I will leave this below. x.com/big_mck/status…

English
37
88
482
17.5K
Biggest Mack
Biggest Mack@Big_Mck·
This fraudulent narrative has to stop. This is the kind of flawed anecdote some African Christians copy to justify the enslavement of their own people. It’s sad, especially because it is based on a completely untrue. Slavery (transatlantic slavery) began with Europeans, particularly the Portuguese arriving on the coasts of Africa and kidnapping people indiscriminately. Yes, it started with kidnapping. From there, they moved to formalize and commercialize the practice, and eventually constructing slave dungeons to sustain the trade. They would approach natives and deceive them into believing they were building trading centers. By the time these structures were completed, it became clear that they were not trading posts but slave dungeons. Anyone who resisted was killed and their village burned. There were many rulers in Ghana who were either killed or exiled for resisting this idea. (Go and read about them). Once these Europeans had established and legitimized their slave dungeons, they began arming different groups along the coast to fight one another. War captives were then brought to these dungeons and sold. Many of those captured only realized they had been played when they found themselves together on the same European slave ships. It’s sad that our people don’t know their history.
Wilfred Reilly@wil_da_beast630

Ghana/Ashanti sold most of the slaves tho.

English
109
546
1.7K
65.7K
Xaviour 🧬
Xaviour 🧬@OxSaviour·
@_OKJ__ @MAgbogidi To repent is to believe in the sacrificial work of Jesus as the cure for sin. Secondly heaven is not a place rather it's a way of life which is to be lived on earth.
English
0
0
0
6
Kelvin O johnson
Kelvin O johnson@_OKJ__·
Wrong. I’ll start by asking you two simple questions … If a criminal repents of their sins and give their life to Christ, would they make heaven? Secondly, can a person make heaven without being a Christian? This two questions are clear … so I’ll be expecting a yes /no for both.
English
20
0
39
7.9K
Kelvin O johnson
Kelvin O johnson@_OKJ__·
One of The greatest issues with Christianity is its justice system. If a prisoner here was imprisoned for ra.ping a Hindu girl to death…but has now given his life to Christ , he will make heaven and enjoy eternity…while the girl he rap.ed to death would go to hell for not being Christian before she was killed. A stupid belief for real.
Oyindamola🙄@dammiedammie35

Pr!soners giving their lives to Christ 🥹🧎🏻‍♂️‍➡️

English
211
138
769
81.7K
Xaviour 🧬
Xaviour 🧬@OxSaviour·
@_OKJ__ Lol, the rapist is already serving for his crime which is justice. The gospel is to tell them about Jesus' love, if they believe it, it allows Jesus' spirit to live and express his love through them. Secondly heaven is God's way of life on earth and not a mortuary for the dead
English
0
0
0
5
Xaviour 🧬
Xaviour 🧬@OxSaviour·
Initial 2 Payout Caps: For the first two payouts, withdrawals are capped at 6% of the initial account size or $10,000 (whichever is lower). This restriction is removed after the 2nd successful payout. @GoatFunded why is this a rule?
Xaviour 🧬 tweet media
English
0
0
0
14
CAF Media
CAF Media@CAF_Media·
The CAF Appeal Board decided that in application of Article 84 of the Regulations of the CAF Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON), the Senegal National Team is declared to have forfeited the Final Match of the TotalEnergies CAF Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) Morocco 2025 (“the Match”), with the result of the Match being recorded as 3–0 in favour of the Fédération Royale Marocaine de Football (FRMF). cafonline.com/news/caf-appea…
English
35.4K
12.5K
40.6K
18.2M
Xaviour 🧬
Xaviour 🧬@OxSaviour·
@ssgiseverywhere @AttorneyF_ Nope you don't but your lord is Muhammad who married his son's wife and a 9 year old kid and interestly Allah commanded him so you're worse than a rapist sympathizer
English
1
0
0
22
Faithfulness Okom
Faithfulness Okom@AttorneyF_·
A Christian can say, “Christianity is perfect, Christians aren’t,” and rest easy, cos the standard of the faith is Christ Himself; who, notably, is also regarded as sinless even within Islamic theology. In that sense, the entire claim of Christianity stands or falls on a person whose moral perfection is central to the story. God anchored the faith in Christ rather than in some abstract or imagined ideal. On what comparable basis can a Muslim say Islam is perfect? The model of the faith is Muhammad, whose life includes actions that are morally troubling; marrying a 6 year old, marrying his adopted son’s former wife (who was also his cousin), participating in violent campaigns, and taking captives as concubines. If the perfection of a religion is tied to the life of its exemplar, that contrast raises serious questions about the standard being held up. So perhaps someone will say the perfection of Islam lies not in the life of its founder but in the ideal itself; submission to the one God. But what exactly is perfect about that ideal? The claim, at its core, is that God is one, He is great, and therefore human beings must submit. But submission by itself carries no intrinsic moral beauty; power can demand submission whether it is righteous or not. By contrast, the Christian ideal is not merely that God is one and must be obeyed, but that God loved the world and acted within history to redeem it. The center of Christianity is not a command to submit but a story of self-giving love: the Father sending His sinless Son to bear the weight of human sin so that those who were estranged might be reconciled and even adopted as sons and daughters. In that vision, the highest reality is not simply divine power but divine love, and obedience flows from gratitude rather than mere obligation. This is what perfect theology looks like. 👍🏾
highFashion@rahman_jago_

Islam is perfect, Muslims aren’t.

English
41
268
1.3K
75.7K
Xaviour 🧬
Xaviour 🧬@OxSaviour·
@ssgiseverywhere @AttorneyF_ Let me give you the benefit of doubt in Deuteronomy 22:30 A man shall not take his father's wife, nor discover his father's skirt. Can a father take its son's wife?
English
1
0
0
18
S.S.G🏴👺
S.S.G🏴👺@ssgiseverywhere·
@OxSaviour @AttorneyF_ U are proving my point. Bro. This is exactly why i have issues 😂 A rapist doesnt get punished if he rapes an UNBETROTHED VIRGIN. But, a rapist gets punished if he rapes a BETROTHED DAMSEL. So, you’re back to stage 1 again. 🤷🏽‍♂️ I’m illiterate right ?
S.S.G🏴👺 tweet media
English
2
0
0
31
Xaviour 🧬
Xaviour 🧬@OxSaviour·
@ssgiseverywhere @AttorneyF_ Deuteronomy 22:25 But if a man find a betrothed damsel in the field, and the man force her, and lie with her: then the man only that lay with her shall die: Did you read here first?
English
1
0
0
25
S.S.G🏴👺
S.S.G🏴👺@ssgiseverywhere·
@OxSaviour @AttorneyF_ The issue I have is with God not giving a rapist who rapes an unbetrothed virgin a punishment. Instead, God says if a virgin is raped, the rapist has to pay 50 shekels to the girls father, and he MUST marry the girl. Would u marry off your daughter to a rapist?
English
1
0
0
64