Patroklo

¿Eran los Nazis socialistas? NO. Hilo para tenerlo a mano cada vez que algún "no soy de derechas" lo suelte: indy100.com/article/nazi-s…

@TonyTantrums @TheSkepticWiz I see you still don't want to understand what is atheism. At least I know!

@Patroklo @TheSkepticWiz You're an idiot.

@TonyTantrums @TheSkepticWiz I guess I'll never know

@TonyTantrums @TheSkepticWiz I can't if you don't answer that first. You know.

@TennantRob Nothing to do with abortion or whatever. Totally different theme.

@TennantRob Exactly! Since in this part of the bible god is taken as all knowing, he knew all about Jeremiah even before he was born or conceived and he chose him. That's what god is saying here.

Even atheists know that abortion is against the Christian faith. They even know that embryos are life. Otherwise, destroying unborn endangered animals would not be a federal crime.

@TennantRob Yo can do it, but you only are sharing out of context verses that don't mean what you assert and you are not answering what I have said about when a human is considered like that.

@Patroklo I question your understanding of the book, and whether or not you have read it and studied it.

@TennantRob Also, about the miscarriage, we are talking about the act of causing it, and the punishment being a simple fine instead of something akin to a killing of a living being.

@TennantRob You are misinterpreting Jeremiah, there is only talking to him, and setting only him apart. You are getting all the context out of it:

@TennantRob As I have already said, this concept of anti abortion is an innovation out of the bible and more modern than the book itself.

@TennantRob meaning that until they draw their first breath then they are not considered human beings or even alive. That's why in the law, when a miscarriage happen (for example the law of a pregnant woman getting injured accidentally in a fight) it's not considered a killing

@TonyTantrums @TheSkepticWiz So, if you want, we can talk about this, but before that, do you understand that atheism only accounts about the existence or not of any god?

@Patroklo @TheSkepticWiz Defend your denial of God. Defend your position. You can't! Imagine defending a position with no evidence. Somewhat ironic, huh? 🤣😂

@daveek10 Atheistm doesn't claim that, it only deals with existence or not of any god. Cosmolofy is the science branch that deals with the big bang, and doesn't say that the universe came from nothing.

Atheism is genuinely one of the most stupid things on earth... You might not agree with the doctrines of religion but to think this earth we live in and the universe at large came from nothing is quite an intellectual dissonance

@TonyTantrums @TheSkepticWiz Before pivoting... do you at least understand what I have said?

@Patroklo @TheSkepticWiz You have borrow from Christianity to make knowledge claims though. 🤣😂

@TonyTantrums @TheSkepticWiz Atheism only accounts about the existence or not of any god, though.

@Patroklo @TheSkepticWiz That's exactly what you must believe to be a justified atheist, retard. Are you really this stupid? You can't even defend your laughable position. 🤣😂

@TonyTantrums @TheSkepticWiz

@Patroklo @TheSkepticWiz "I believe my ancestors magically evolved from rocks with an IQ of zero and magically became human brains, but I totally don't believe in magic." 😂🤣😂🤣😂

@Thedon9994 @darwintojesus The problem with hard solipsism is that it goes two ways, if theists use, it also works for atheists using it. It does not have a real answer, but nobody lives acting as it was something real.

@darwintojesus More of your dumb fuck nonsense That “brain in a vat” line is a scepticism thought experiment, not a free pass for believing anything. FYI/ We use evidence to rank what’s likely. Atheism isn’t blind belief- it’s withholding belief. “You can’t disprove X” ≠ “therefore God.”

We all believe in things without evidence, especially atheists.

@TonyTantrums @TheSkepticWiz

@TheSkepticWiz Atheist: "I don't believe in magic." Also atheist: "I believe my ancestors evolved from rocks. 😂🤣

@NReimen @TheSkepticWiz What's your definition of a religion? Maybe we have very different ones for what you say

@TheSkepticWiz Atheists are never religion-free. They are either Marxists, or Nitzschean, or Existentialists, and the like. No one is truly without religion