Paul Chapman 🇬🇧

38K posts

Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 banner
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧

Paul Chapman 🇬🇧

@Paul_J_Chapman

Full Time Chemical Engineer | Part Time Photographer | On The Square 📐 | #BelieveInBritain | ➡️

Camberley, Surrey, UK เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2013
3K กำลังติดตาม2.2K ผู้ติดตาม
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
illuminatibot
illuminatibot@iluminatibot·
The World Economic Forum Just Said... "Climate Effects Gender & Gender Effects Climate" What The Hell Are They Talking About?
English
3K
2.6K
9K
151.3K
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
Chris Martz
Chris Martz@ChrisMartzWX·
Weather records were made to be broken. We have at best 150 years of instrumental data, maybe only 50 with good quality over a large area, on a planet that is 4.5 billion years old. To pretend that we have all the answers at this stage is a fool’s errand.
English
95
307
2.4K
23.4K
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
Laurence Fox
Laurence Fox@LozzaFox·
The only way to stop these organisations discriminating against vulnerable people is to defund and boycott them. @macmillancancer should know better than to politicise cancer. #BoycottMacmillan
Laurence Fox tweet media
English
205
1.4K
5.3K
57.2K
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
Andrew Lawrence
Andrew Lawrence@andrewlawrence·
Equal treatment for all. Not a penny more for these racist, heterophobic, money-grubbing cunts.
Andrew Lawrence tweet media
English
422
1.5K
6K
116.7K
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
Burnside
Burnside@BurnsideWasTosh·
@FraserNelson Worst central banker, worst Chancellor and worst energy minister for the current crisis. They are also all Fabians.
English
29
200
1.8K
13.5K
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
Bjorn Lomborg
Bjorn Lomborg@BjornLomborg·
The cheap green lie You are told that solar and wind are cheap But you need near-100% backup when no sun or wind, paying for two systems Data for 2024 shows that cramming in more solar and wind makes electricity overall more and more costly iea.org/data-and-stati… Threads&refs: x.com/BjornLomborg/s…
Bjorn Lomborg tweet media
English
74
317
833
45.4K
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
Burnside
Burnside@BurnsideWasTosh·
For a nation basically built of coal, gas and oil, and which pioneered nuclear electricity generation to have the most expensive energy in the world is the result of embracing eco-Marxism. Just like with healthcare.
Bjorn Lomborg@BjornLomborg

The cheap green lie You are told that solar and wind are cheap But you need near-100% backup when no sun or wind, paying for two systems Data for 2024 shows that cramming in more solar and wind makes electricity overall more and more costly iea.org/data-and-stati… Threads&refs: x.com/BjornLomborg/s…

English
18
324
1.3K
23.3K
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
#Marcher
#Marcher@MarcherReborn·
We’re literally an island made of coal, floating on a bed of shale gas, surrounded by seabeds full of oil and gas - we’re being governed by idiots and the opposition parties are failing to hold them to account. A national disaster
Climate Realists🌞@ClimateRealists

The Great British Steel 'fiasco': Labour signals end of virgin steel making to meet net zero commitments despite threat to national security amid wars raging in Middle East and Ukraine | Daily Mail Online dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…

English
60
674
3.1K
50.9K
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
Kate Hoey
Kate Hoey@CatharineHoey·
Kate Hoey tweet media
ZXX
20
63
288
5.2K
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧
I’M ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTED IN OUR PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM. There are now no legal consequences against any woman that induces her own abortion up to FULL TERM… for ANY reason. SICK. DEMONIC INFACT
English
425
1.2K
8.6K
85.2K
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
Dr. Calum Miller
Dr. Calum Miller@DrCalumMiller·
BREAKING: The UK House of Lords has just voted to legalise ABORTION UP TO BIRTH. We are led by truly evil people. Unspeakably wicked. They have no place leading us. Reform, Restore, and the Tories MUST commit THIS WEEK to overturning this if they enter government.
Dr. Calum Miller tweet media
English
972
3K
10.1K
495.2K
Paul Chapman 🇬🇧 รีทวีตแล้ว
Henry Winter
Henry Winter@henrywinter·
At some point, senior Premier League execs have to offer a proper explanation in public for their leniency towards Chelsea. They owe an explanation to fans of clubs punished more harshly. They owe an explanation to those clubs who did abide by the rules. They have to offer some explanation as to why PSR breaches are deemed far more serious than acts of "deception and concealment". Yes, these are the offences of a previous regime at Chelsea. But inconsistencies run through the PL's defence and their reputation is damaged. They can’t hide from a controversy of this magnitude.
English
756
2.2K
13.5K
701.7K