Peter Watt

17.2K posts

Peter Watt

Peter Watt

@PeterAWatt

'We have seen no evidence that camouflage exists'. Views expressed are mine alone.

Birmingham, England เข้าร่วม Şubat 2014
659 กำลังติดตาม516 ผู้ติดตาม
Peter Watt
Peter Watt@PeterAWatt·
@hector_drummond If it is assumed that the jab saved 15-20 million lives then it is natural to conclude that the jab saved 15-20 million lives. Wrapping that up to look more complicated is a job for top experts.
English
0
0
0
6
Hector Drummond
Hector Drummond@hector_drummond·
Even in an article laying it some of the disastrous effects of the jab, the Telegraph has to temper it with the ludicrous claim that the jab saved 15-20 million lives.
Hector Drummond tweet mediaHector Drummond tweet media
English
3
0
5
194
Peter Watt
Peter Watt@PeterAWatt·
@LukeJohnsonRCP @AllisonPearson Surely the whole place should be converted into a lavatory? If it couldn't then make money it could be shut down? Red tape is always wise.
English
0
0
0
8
Luke Johnson
Luke Johnson@LukeJohnsonRCP·
I’ve opened hundreds of hospitality venues and the vast majority have toilets. However I think the law and society should be flexible, and no long established site should be shut down because they don’t have facilities. Rules should not be so rigid.
Paul Ovenden@OvePM

This is precisely the sort of nightmarish, anti-enterprise, anti-joy, stakeholder state red tape the government should be scrapping. Save the Regency cafe! thetimes.com/article/6d2789…

English
8
7
50
7.4K
Peter Watt
Peter Watt@PeterAWatt·
@BasilTheGreat This approach should be extended. When you shop at Sainsbury's you should have to pay a fee to Tesco.
English
1
1
7
494
Kathryn Porter
Kathryn Porter@KathrynPorter26·
The North Sea WOULD cut bills!! We have marginal pricing for wholesale gas... The most expensive gas on the grid sets the price each day North Sea production is cheaper than imports. It will displace them starting with the most expensive cargo ie immediate drop in price In the summer we could potentially remove the need for LNG altogether... Bigger drop in price NBP already trades at a discount to TTF. Why? Because this is a PHYSICAL market. To equalise prices you need a way to move the gas from the UK to Europe We have 2 pipelines linking us which isn't enough to move all the gas you'd need to move to trade away the price difference THAT is why more North Sea production WOULD cut bills Plus it earns lots of tax revenues from the gas producers and the huge UK based supply chains that support them. That extra tax can be used to fund renewables subsidies instead of paying for them through bills which would create even bigger reductions in bills The @spectator needs to get writers who understand their subject. Someone working in renewables maybe isn't the best person to write about the gas market
English
13
134
391
5K
Tara Singh
Tara Singh@RenewableUKCEO·
Why wind power isn't “woke”, my piece in today's @spectator. The North Sea matters but won’t cut bills - we pay the global price for gas. Fracking is unpopular and wouldn’t change that. SMRs are promising but distant. Wind is the practical, affordable option to build right now. spectator.com/article/wind-p…
English
425
72
261
265K
Peter Watt
Peter Watt@PeterAWatt·
@thechefie @latimeralder A good example of saying something to get money. "My old garden wall fell down. I think it's earthquake damage. Can I have some money please?"
English
1
0
1
27
M C
M C@thechefie·
@latimeralder Government compensation package: In 2023, the Dutch government committed €22 billions for earthquake-related measures in Groningen and northern Drenthe. due to fracking
English
5
0
0
51
Latimer Alder
Latimer Alder@latimeralder·
Fracking: In UK fracking is almost unknown. But some people are frightened of it In USA its been done 1,500,000 times. And nobody much cares. Its 'business as usual'. Who is right? Fearty Brits or cool Yanks?
English
38
14
105
2.2K
M C
M C@thechefie·
@latimeralder UK: Every major fracking attempt in Lancashire triggered multiple earthquakes (dozens to nearly 200 in short periods), some felt by residents and causing minor damage. The 2019 moratorium followed evidence that larger events could not be ruled out
English
4
0
0
31
Latimer Alder
Latimer Alder@latimeralder·
Question for Mr Miliband Exactly how do the people of Britain today benefit from leaving our national energy assets (coal, oil gas) in the ground? And forbidding anyone to get them? It is his choice to do so. I'm sure he has an answer Any ideas what he will say?
Latimer Alder tweet media
English
69
115
257
4.5K
Peter Watt
Peter Watt@PeterAWatt·
@LizAnesth @ATabarrok Ha ha. You swallowed the cover story. Saying, "we want more people to buy more pills because we want to meet sales growth targets" wouldn't really cut the mustard.
English
0
0
0
5
Alex Tabarrok
Alex Tabarrok@ATabarrok·
Went to the dentist for a cleaning. Refused the blood pressure check, refused redundant x-rays, refused to sign a waiver for refusing the x-rays. Three nos to get one teeth cleaning. I am now known as a troublemaker.
English
470
100
2.3K
184.1K
Rufus🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🇬🇧
@DaleVince @KemiBadenoch Why are buying 50% of our oil and gas from Norway who get it from Notrth Sea? Norway is starting another 49 drilling sites, as with extraction there is a tax levy and huge number of jobs, why are we giving £25billion tax levy to Norway instead of to UK?
English
6
11
118
4.1K
Dale Vince
Dale Vince@DaleVince·
.@KemiBadenoch displays her total lack of understanding of the energy sector. She argues for more drilling in the North Sea to protect us from this energy crisis - seemingly oblivious to two very important facts. The first is we don't set the price of our north sea oil and gas - we let global markets do that. So in a crisis where global prices sky rocket, how can the answer can be to produce more globally priced oil here - it’s (energy market) illiterate to say so. The answer is to take control of our own energy pricing, starting with our own North Sea, as we have already with retail energy bills. Impose a price and profit cap. If we do this as part of an entire sector move - capping all wholesale prices, then we can combat this crisis and those that are coming next. The second very important fact Kemi seems unaware of is that it will take up to five years to produce anything new from our North Sea. So even if that could help us, it can’t help us with anything soon. And it won’t help us for long because our North Sea is all but empty, there’s 10% left. Our North Sea has been in decline for 30 years, shedding jobs and production capacity - because it’s running out - this has been going on for far longer than green energy has been a thing - to blame green energy for the decline of the North Sea is ignorant (of the facts). And Global markets have been filling the gap between what we make and what we use for decades now - Kemi seems not to know this either. As for energy bills, Badenoch seems unaware that the ‘green taxes’ we have on our energy bills were added by previous Tory governments. She seems also unaware that we spend vast sums subsiding fossils fuels - £17 billion a year at the last count. She operates in a fantasy environment, or would have us do - where green taxes have ruined the country and our oil and gas industry and all we need to do is drill more - it’s delusional. It’s straight out of the mouth of Trump.
English
524
558
1.7K
104.5K
Kevin Edger
Kevin Edger@KEdge23·
Keir Starmer said today at #PMQs, that he doesn’t have the power to make decisions on drilling oil and gas in the North Sea. He’s the prime minister, of course he does. Weak, weak, weak.
Kevin Edger tweet media
English
774
2.9K
13.8K
108.2K
Peter Watt
Peter Watt@PeterAWatt·
@LeilaniDowding @chrisxh558 Hospitals use energy, so they should all be closed. But to make the energy saving more permanent, they should be blown up.
English
0
0
1
4
leilani dowding 🌸🚜 ☮️
Terrorists blow up eight cooling towers at the Cottam power station in Nottinghamshire. Nope. Just Kidding…. it was our government, (the last one, the conservatives 2024 ) We did it ourselves ourselves for net zero… there is nothing left for emergencies
English
269
1.8K
8.3K
166.4K
Peter Watt
Peter Watt@PeterAWatt·
@MattGubba @tellingitstr8 We could lead the World in pioneering zero energy use. We could shut all hospitals as hospitals use energy.
English
0
0
0
3
Matt Gubba
Matt Gubba@MattGubba·
UK energy costs are now 4x higher than in the US. Not double. Not triple. Four times. And we’re told this is “progress”. Factories are shutting. Investment is leaving. Jobs are disappearing. Why? Because Labour is pushing Ed Miliband’s Net Zero lunacy at any cost. Shutting down our own energy. Blocking North Sea drilling. Forcing reliance on expensive imports. Then acting surprised when bills explode. This isn’t climate policy. It’s economic self-harm. Other countries back their own energy. Britain punishes it. This is ideology over common sense. And we’re all paying the price.
English
174
1.5K
4.3K
45.7K
Peter Watt
Peter Watt@PeterAWatt·
@LeilaniDowding @chrisxh558 Could not our coal and oil reserves be given to another country? Then those resources could be used, with no adverse effects on achieving our UK Green Targets?
English
0
1
1
15
Peter Watt
Peter Watt@PeterAWatt·
@formerlyknow @DavidGHFrost @Dieter_Helm I had dwindling petrol in my car so I drained that away rather than use it and bought an electric vehicle. Never use dwindling supplies of anything. I threw away a sack of potatoes yesterday as I could see they were dwindling.
English
0
0
0
31
fat lad
fat lad@formerlyknow·
@DavidGHFrost @Dieter_Helm Sticking to dwindling fossil fuel is going to be a lot more expensive. But your pay masters in the fossil fuel industry don't want to talk about that, eh Frosty?
English
4
0
1
240
David Frost
David Frost@DavidGHFrost·
In his latest blog, @Dieter_Helm explains in simple terms why the current renewables-heavy electricity grid is always going to be expensive: 👇
David Frost tweet media
English
32
212
594
28.9K
Neil Wilby
Neil Wilby@Neil_Wilby·
This is likely to raise some controversy: Head of Investigations at @ccrcupdate publicly and lavishly praising SIO Paul Hughes and his #LucyLetby investigation (H/T @DebbieK66580).
Neil Wilby tweet media
English
35
28
109
19.5K
Peter Watt
Peter Watt@PeterAWatt·
@ClaireCoutinho @tellingitstr8 Ed Miliband doesn't pick the apples and plums growing in his garden because 'the price of apples and plums is set in international markets'.
English
0
0
0
36
Claire Coutinho
Claire Coutinho@ClaireCoutinho·
Ed Miliband has a cult-like conviction in his own climate ideology. He is incapable of admitting that he is wrong – even with mountains of evidence stacking up against him. As the world gets more dangerous, his anti-North Sea fanaticism is making Britain weaker and poorer. Unfortunately, as more and more people sound the alarm, Miliband only becomes more convinced by his own righteousness. Today, the Conservatives will force a vote in Parliament calling for the emergency approval of the Rosebank and Jackdaw oil and gas fields in the North Sea – two fields that could be up and running by the end of the year. Turning our backs on domestic gas that could heat millions of homes would be madness in normal times, but it is sheer lunacy in the midst of a gas supply crisis. In government, I legislated to protect North Sea oil and gas licences and I approved Rosebank, even though I was told it would have put my own personal security at risk from climate extremists. It was controversial at the time, but to say times have changed would be an understatement. From the wind lobbyists at RenewableUK to the chair of Great British Energy - Miliband’s “clean energy” propaganda outfit - the head honchos of the green lobby say we should drill. The great and good of the Labour Left, from the Tony Blair Institute to the unions and Ed Balls, say so, too. The relative geopolitical stability we have had for most of my adult life is not something we can bank on in the years ahead. We need to pass on a country to the next generation that is strong and prosperous. That means making economic decisions based on rationality, not ideology. The North Sea is a blessing for our economy. When gilt markets are charging you a premium because they think we’re borrowing too much and earning too little, it is incumbent on the Exchequer to make the most of all growth opportunities we have. It is a blessing for our energy security, with the gas making up half of our domestic supply. But it is also a blessing for our environment, as the North Sea is much cleaner than importing LNG from abroad. However, for Miliband to admit this would expose the intellectual fraud at the heart of our net zero climate policy. Miliband’s agenda rests on the absurdity that carbon emissions only matter if they happen domestically. It incentivises the replacement of British industry with dirtier imports from abroad. The fact that North Sea gas displaces dirtier LNG doesn’t matter to our climate bean counters because foreign LNG imports aren’t counted in our domestic emissions targets. This is Net Zero irrationality in a nutshell. Fewer jobs in Britain for more carbon in the atmosphere – and yet to the religiously fervent, they will argue that this is Britain’s example of climate success. This is fantasy thinking we cannot afford. We must fast-track Rosebank and Jackdaw and lift the onerous bans and taxes on the North Sea to back Britain’s energy security. Kemi Badenoch knows it and Keir Starmer knows it. Unfortunately, so far, only one of them has had the courage to say so.
Claire Coutinho tweet media
English
402
1.6K
4.7K
87.9K
Cornish Seaside
Cornish Seaside@batholiver·
@johnredwood Excellent interview of Clair Coutinho on @TimesRadio more N.Sea gas could be piped ashore by Christmas if Milliband approves new licences. This gas is cheaper with less emissions than imported LNG. x.com/i/status/20363…
Claire Coutinho@ClaireCoutinho

Ed Miliband has a cult-like conviction in his own climate ideology. He is incapable of admitting that he is wrong – even with mountains of evidence stacking up against him. As the world gets more dangerous, his anti-North Sea fanaticism is making Britain weaker and poorer. Unfortunately, as more and more people sound the alarm, Miliband only becomes more convinced by his own righteousness. Today, the Conservatives will force a vote in Parliament calling for the emergency approval of the Rosebank and Jackdaw oil and gas fields in the North Sea – two fields that could be up and running by the end of the year. Turning our backs on domestic gas that could heat millions of homes would be madness in normal times, but it is sheer lunacy in the midst of a gas supply crisis. In government, I legislated to protect North Sea oil and gas licences and I approved Rosebank, even though I was told it would have put my own personal security at risk from climate extremists. It was controversial at the time, but to say times have changed would be an understatement. From the wind lobbyists at RenewableUK to the chair of Great British Energy - Miliband’s “clean energy” propaganda outfit - the head honchos of the green lobby say we should drill. The great and good of the Labour Left, from the Tony Blair Institute to the unions and Ed Balls, say so, too. The relative geopolitical stability we have had for most of my adult life is not something we can bank on in the years ahead. We need to pass on a country to the next generation that is strong and prosperous. That means making economic decisions based on rationality, not ideology. The North Sea is a blessing for our economy. When gilt markets are charging you a premium because they think we’re borrowing too much and earning too little, it is incumbent on the Exchequer to make the most of all growth opportunities we have. It is a blessing for our energy security, with the gas making up half of our domestic supply. But it is also a blessing for our environment, as the North Sea is much cleaner than importing LNG from abroad. However, for Miliband to admit this would expose the intellectual fraud at the heart of our net zero climate policy. Miliband’s agenda rests on the absurdity that carbon emissions only matter if they happen domestically. It incentivises the replacement of British industry with dirtier imports from abroad. The fact that North Sea gas displaces dirtier LNG doesn’t matter to our climate bean counters because foreign LNG imports aren’t counted in our domestic emissions targets. This is Net Zero irrationality in a nutshell. Fewer jobs in Britain for more carbon in the atmosphere – and yet to the religiously fervent, they will argue that this is Britain’s example of climate success. This is fantasy thinking we cannot afford. We must fast-track Rosebank and Jackdaw and lift the onerous bans and taxes on the North Sea to back Britain’s energy security. Kemi Badenoch knows it and Keir Starmer knows it. Unfortunately, so far, only one of them has had the courage to say so.

English
6
14
32
2.4K
John Redwood
John Redwood@johnredwood·
UK gas is four times the cost of US gas. There is no world price for gas by pipe. Domestic gas down a pipe is cheaper than imported liquefied gas. Why can’t BBC interviewers and government Ministers understand that?
English
388
2.1K
9.5K
164.9K