Non-Prophet Organisation 🇮🇱 🇬🇧 الله ليس أكبر

The Green Party: where rainbow-haired Marxists and beard-stroking Imams finally found true love. 🌈🕌 At first glance it's weird—why would eco-vegans high on oat milk and pronouns team up with people who think solar panels are haram and climate change is just Allah's thermostat? But then it clicks: the policies are perfectly aligned when the real goal is making native Brits too stoned, too porn-addicted, too depressed, and too guilt-tripped to notice they're becoming dhimmis in their own country. By 2040 the Greens will have turned half the population into non-binary ketamine enthusiasts scrolling TikTok in their safe spaces, while the other half is quietly implementing the caliphate curriculum in schools and wondering why the Army now has a 'trigger warning' before battles. And the cherry on top? A flamboyantly gay ex-Jew (or whatever Zack Polanski is this week) somehow hypnotised an army of white lefty trust-fund brain-donors into voting exactly the way the mosque WhatsApp group told the ummah to vote. Genius, really. The ultimate own-goal coalition: pronouns meet prayer rugs, and Britain loses either way. 🇬🇧🕌 Katie called it years ago. They just made it official in 2026.

75% of Brits want North Sea oil & gas. That’s not a fringe view, it’s the majority. Energy policy should reflect reality, not ideology. Go all in on the North Sea. Back nuclear. Secure Britain’s future. The renewables debate is over.

As a young man I retained a sense that Britain was run by grown-ups, politicians and civil servants capable of making tough choices when required. I cannot believe they would, for instance, have allowed the situation we are now in, where a malevolent regime like the Iranian mullahs might have ballistic missiles capable of striking the UK, which we cannot shoot down. This has been coming for years, and yet - for reasons of cost or strategic neglect - Britain has no missile shield. The technology exists and several other Western nations are developing or deploying it. We have fallen behind in the most basic, profound and existential sense. Time was when such an epiphany would’ve resulted in drastic action. But there is absolutely no sense that our current crop of Labour MPs grasp what’s at stake. Many of us are resigned to managed decline. But this is something worse. In years to come we risk growing ever more vulnerable to hostile powers who wish us harm, and have the wherewithal to visit death at will to almost any part of our once impregnable island. The situation is not irremediable. The money could be found. Hard choices could be made which wouldn’t further drain the country of brains, talent and ambition. But our current Government will pass the chalice and waste years in the process. This goes way beyond party political point-scoring, because this is a failure that is a stain on our entire leadership class. Some will say nothing has changed: the Soviets threatened us with nuclear annihilation for decades. True. But they cleaved to a grim logic of deterrence. The world we are entering is one where truly rogue actors, who don’t care if we respond in kind, may already be capable of destroying the village, town or city where you and yours live. This is new. And our children will reap the whirlwind of our indolence and indecision.

Gobsmacking. Since July 2024: Inflation UP Unemployment UP Government borrowing UP Energy costs UP Employer Taxes UP Individual taxes UP Business rates UP Council Tax UP Nothing whatsoever to do with Iran.

This is a new low even for the BBC 👇

DRILL BRITAIN DRILL Delusional Red Ed Miliband has again misled the Commons. He will not answer why price of gas in US is just 1/3rd of UK gas…. Seemingly because it completely undermines his whole argument about Net Stupid Zero. We must maximise use of our own energy treasure of oil and gas.

Britain is under attack. Not by the far-Right. Not by white men. Not by Israel. Islamic extremism is a cancer that has overtaken British society. We have imported millions of fighting age men from countries that openly hate us and want to see the destruction of the West. Who want to conquer, not co-exist. Our politicians have spent years appeasing those same extremists, and crying “Islamophobia!” whenever the public tries to push back. Islamic extremism has infected every facet of our society. We are at war, we are losing, and the enemy is on the inside.

Muslims and their useful idiots keep repeating this “Greater Israel” fantasy as if saying it enough times will make it real. It won’t. If Israel were truly driven by a grand expansionist vision, it would be the most incompetent empire in history. Decades of military strength, repeated battlefield victories, and yet no lasting expansion. That’s not how conquest works. In 1947–48 The United Nations proposed a partition plan, two states, one Jewish and one Arab. The Jewish leadership accepted. The Arab states rejected it and chose war instead, launching a coordinated attack through the Arab League. Israel’s first war was not a war of expansion, it was a war of survival. From 1948 to 1967, twenty years, Israel did not expand. No “Greater Israel,” no creeping conquest. Just a small country under constant threat. Then came 1967. Gamal Abdel Nasser openly called for Israel’s destruction, massed troops, and closed the Straits of Tiran. Facing annihilation, Israel struck preemptively and took control of the West Bank (then under Jordanian control), Gaza (under Egyptian control), Sinai, and the Golan Heights. That was a security response to an existential threat. And here is where the “Greater Israel” myth completely collapses. 1979: Israel signs peace with Egypt under Anwar Sadat. It returns the entire Sinai Peninsula, territory several times its own size. In 1994, Israel and Jordan signed a peace treaty, and Israel returned disputed lands as part of that agreement. A Lebanon: In 1982, Israel entered southern Lebanon not to expand, but because Palestinian militias had effectively taken over parts of the country and were launching constant attacks across the border. Lebanon had become a base of operations against Israel. Israel pushed in to remove that threat. And then in 2000, it withdrew. No annexation. No “Greater Israel.” Just left. Gaza: In 2005, Israel withdrew completely. Every soldier, every settlement removed. That territory was not kept, not annexed, given up. The Golan Heights: Strategic high ground overlooking northern Israel, used repeatedly to shell Israeli communities before 1967. Its control is about preventing that from happening again. Security, not hegemony. Yet still, according to the testimony of former Egyptian President Muhammad Hosni Mubarak, Israel offered Hafez al-Assad a withdrawal in exchange for peace, but he refused. Every territorial move Israel made was driven by security threats, not expansionist ideology. And when those threats were credibly reduced, Sinai, Lebanon, Gaza, Israel withdrew. So where is the “Greater Israel”? Where is this supposed empire? It exists only in propaganda. Israel has repeatedly traded land for peace, withdrawn from territory, and avoided permanent expansion even when it had the power to do so. Meanwhile, the same voices pushing this myth ignore the actual history of conquest and domination in the region, where expansion was not defensive, but ideological. Withdrawing from the West Bank today, under current conditions, would not be peace, it would be suicide. It would mean creating another Gaza overlooking Israel’s core population centers. No serious country does that. No nation hands strategic ground to forces committed to its destruction. So again: where is the “Greater Israel”? It doesn’t exist. It’s a narrative, useful, repeated, and detached from reality.

The most heinous crime of the 21st century 11 years ago, Islamic State burned 19 Yazidi girls to death in Iraq for refusing to convert and resisting being sex slaves. The girls were burned to death in iron cages while hundreds of people were cheering and applauding the killers.

I see muslims, I speak to muslims, I read the words of muslims, I see the actions of muslims I’m not gonna pretend that behind closed doors there won’t be the most disgusting, racist antisemitism you’ve ever heard being said by muslims Britain has a problem with muslim antisemitism It is the sin of the century for our leadership to push bollocks like that Adolescence film and not confront the racist extremism that is mainstream within the muslim world

If any other ethnic group had their existence denied, while being displaced by millions of imported people who commit crimes against them because of ethnic differences, this would be called a genocide. So why is it different when it happens to the English?

How come day by day here on X there are videos posted from Mosques all over this land, by Imams warning us, telling us, that they are here to take over, not to be friends, not to co exist, but to force us, by any means, even to kill us, if we dont follow Islam and Sharia law. This is allowed, but hey, what about Lucy Connolly, how come she got imprisoned, for a tweet, when the hate directed to us white Christians, is scary, threatening, violent, total harrassment, and extremely offensive. Someone needs to bring this up in Parliament..and demand answers ?

Francesca Albanese appeared today at the United Nations Human Rights Council to present her annual report. I was the first NGO to take the floor: “Ms. Albanese, in your report on torture, why is there not one single mention of Hamas’ horrific torture of Israeli hostages? You’ve said: ‘It’s not in my mandate.’ But on March 4th, you signed a UN statement condemning US and Israeli strikes in Iran. Are you mandated to speak on events a thousand miles away from your focus area, and not to say one word on the atrocities committed by Hamas on October 7th, and for two years after in their Gaza tunnels? And when you choose to speak on Iran, why is it only to defend the regime—after you refused to say a single word for the thousands of protesters they massacred? One year ago, the Council President announced that he spoke to you about your conduct, and that you acknowledged his considerations. However, on September 15, you said ‘380,000 children under five’ were killed in Gaza. Are you aware, this is more than the entire population of children under five in Gaza? On October 22, you reposted this statement: ‘Israel is the incarnation of evil.’ Yes or no, is this still your position? On January 6, you reposted this: ‘Israel is pure evil in a way the world has never seen before.’ Yes or no, is this still your position? Canada and Germany condemned you for antisemitism and Holocaust inversion. The French Prime Minister has called for your resignation. The UK has called for an investigation. Italy, Netherlands, Argentina and others condemned your conduct. When so many democracies speak with one voice, the problem is not them—it’s you.” Albanese did not respond.

Ed Miliband has a cult-like conviction in his own climate ideology. He is incapable of admitting that he is wrong – even with mountains of evidence stacking up against him. As the world gets more dangerous, his anti-North Sea fanaticism is making Britain weaker and poorer. Unfortunately, as more and more people sound the alarm, Miliband only becomes more convinced by his own righteousness. Today, the Conservatives will force a vote in Parliament calling for the emergency approval of the Rosebank and Jackdaw oil and gas fields in the North Sea – two fields that could be up and running by the end of the year. Turning our backs on domestic gas that could heat millions of homes would be madness in normal times, but it is sheer lunacy in the midst of a gas supply crisis. In government, I legislated to protect North Sea oil and gas licences and I approved Rosebank, even though I was told it would have put my own personal security at risk from climate extremists. It was controversial at the time, but to say times have changed would be an understatement. From the wind lobbyists at RenewableUK to the chair of Great British Energy - Miliband’s “clean energy” propaganda outfit - the head honchos of the green lobby say we should drill. The great and good of the Labour Left, from the Tony Blair Institute to the unions and Ed Balls, say so, too. The relative geopolitical stability we have had for most of my adult life is not something we can bank on in the years ahead. We need to pass on a country to the next generation that is strong and prosperous. That means making economic decisions based on rationality, not ideology. The North Sea is a blessing for our economy. When gilt markets are charging you a premium because they think we’re borrowing too much and earning too little, it is incumbent on the Exchequer to make the most of all growth opportunities we have. It is a blessing for our energy security, with the gas making up half of our domestic supply. But it is also a blessing for our environment, as the North Sea is much cleaner than importing LNG from abroad. However, for Miliband to admit this would expose the intellectual fraud at the heart of our net zero climate policy. Miliband’s agenda rests on the absurdity that carbon emissions only matter if they happen domestically. It incentivises the replacement of British industry with dirtier imports from abroad. The fact that North Sea gas displaces dirtier LNG doesn’t matter to our climate bean counters because foreign LNG imports aren’t counted in our domestic emissions targets. This is Net Zero irrationality in a nutshell. Fewer jobs in Britain for more carbon in the atmosphere – and yet to the religiously fervent, they will argue that this is Britain’s example of climate success. This is fantasy thinking we cannot afford. We must fast-track Rosebank and Jackdaw and lift the onerous bans and taxes on the North Sea to back Britain’s energy security. Kemi Badenoch knows it and Keir Starmer knows it. Unfortunately, so far, only one of them has had the courage to say so.

Mr. Mehdi, an Iranian woman here. It’s honestly frightening how similar your words sound to those of my interrogator in an Iranian prison. I was shot in the eye by the Islamic regime in Iran during the Woman, Life, Freedom protests. Then they arrested me, and my interrogator told me the same thing you are saying now: “This is Masih Alinejad’s fault that you are blind now.” Do you realize how that sounds? It sounds exactly like the members of the Revolutionary Guard in our prisons. Many of us are familiar with your loud words always blaming the victims. But you know what? She is not a victim, she is my hero. If Masih didn’t exist, no one would have heard my voice and people like me.

BBC series The Capture has sparked controversy for an episode focused on anti-migrant terrorism, featuring a character aiming a sniper rifle at migrant children on a boat. There are NO children on the boats FALSE Narratives and Propaganda from the BBC to stir division and hate.

Can this silly little man not grasp that the traditional British values are under attack from Muslim belief systems, especially the Koranic demands to kill 'infidels'

Hello Jeff.... I have written on this extensively, and will address some of this below for you. Islam is an ideology, a complete, uncompromising system of beliefs, laws, and commands that demands total submission and seeks ultimate political and social dominance over the entire world. The word “Islam” literally means submission. It is not defined by what modern Muslims wish it to be, nor by cherry-picked interpretations, nor by the behavior of individual believers. It is defined exclusively by its authoritative sources: the Quran (the literal, eternal word of Allah), the Hadith (the authenticated sayings and actions of Muhammad), and the Sira (the authoritative biography of Muhammad). These texts are fixed, immutable, and considered perfect and final for all time. No ideology is entitled to immunity from criticism, especially not one that openly declares its mission to subjugate every person and every society under Islamic rule. Ideologies have no human rights. Only individuals do. Doctrinal Hierarchy of Submission At its doctrinal core, Islam establishes an unbreakable hierarchy of submission: Muslims submit completely to Allah and His final messenger, Muhammad. Women submit to men (Quran 4:34 explicitly grants men authority over women and the right to discipline them). All non-Muslims are ultimately required to submit to Islamic rule, pay the jizya tax in a state of humiliation, convert, or face war until Islam prevails (Quran 9:29, 9:5, 8:39, etc.). Restrictions on Alliances with Non-Muslims Islam explicitly prohibits Muslims from forming genuine friendships, alliances, or protective relationships with non-Muslims. This is repeated command-level doctrine: Quran 5:51 — “O you who have believed, do not take the Jews and the Christians as allies. They are [in fact] allies of one another. And whoever is an ally to them among you — then indeed, he is [one] of them.” Quran 3:28 — “Let not believers take disbelievers as allies rather than believers… except when taking precaution against them in prudence.” Quran 4:144 — “O you who have believed, do not take the disbelievers as allies instead of the believers.” Quran 9:23 — “O you who have believed, do not take your fathers or your brothers as allies if they have preferred disbelief over belief.” These verses create a permanent theological barrier: true loyalty, guardianship, and intimate friendship belong only to the Muslim ummah. Non-Muslims are structural outsiders, to be invited to Islam, tolerated under submission, fought until they submit, or (in certain contexts) eliminated as threats to the faith. This is not about “peaceful coexistence.” It is about strategic separation, followed by supremacy. Doctrinal Conflicts with Modern Human Rights The same foundational texts contain commands and permissions that are irreconcilable with modern universal human rights: Men are declared superior to women and given permission to beat disobedient wives (4:34). Women are described as intellectually deficient and their testimony worth half that of a man (Bukhari 2658, 304). Sexual enslavement of captured non-Muslim women is repeatedly permitted and regulated (Quran 4:24, 23:5–6, 33:50, 70:29–30; numerous hadiths). Apostasy, blasphemy, and homosexuality carry capital punishment in the clearest terms of classical Islamic jurisprudence, drawn directly from hadith and Muhammad’s example. Repeated curses are pronounced on Jews, Christians, polytheists, and hypocrites, often paired with calls to fight and kill until religion is “all for Allah” (9:5, 8:39, 2:191–193, etc.). On Hypocrisy and Apostasy Muslims who ignore, rationalize, or reject large parts of this doctrine, including those who live secular lives in the West, are, according to core Islamic teachings, engaging in hypocrisy (nifaq) or outright apostasy. The Quran repeatedly condemns hypocrites (munafiqun) as the most dangerous internal enemies of Islam, labeling them liars, cursed by Allah, and deserving of severe punishment (e.g., Surah Al-Munafiqun 63:1–8 explicitly calls them “the enemies, so beware of them. May Allah curse them!”). Apostates and blasphemers are viewed as traitors to the faith, often classified as enemies of Allah and His Messenger, warranting the harshest response in traditional jurisprudence, up to and including execution, to protect the ummah and the supremacy of the doctrine. These are not “misinterpretations.” These are plain-text doctrines upheld by every major school of Islamic jurisprudence for fourteen centuries. The ideology must be judged on its own texts and historical application, not on the personal character or selective practice of any believer. Bottom Line Critique Islam, relentlessly, honestly, without apology, as the totalitarian political-religious system it declares itself to be. Treat every Muslim you encounter as an individual human being deserving basic respect and kindness. But never confuse the two. Never soften or sanitize what the texts actually say in order to avoid discomfort. The doctrine is what it is. And it demands everything.

This is insane. The BBC just dropped a propaganda film where an English extremist is sniping a child on an illegal migrant dinghy. 1. There are NO children on the boats 2. There has NEVER been an attack on an illegal migrant, they attack English children

Even worse than the latest antisemitic attack on United Hatzalah ambulances overnight is the sickening virtue signalling by the very cadre of politicians and public officials who have encouraged and endorsed this conduct for years. Still now, they continuously stoke the fires of Jew-hate in the UK. Give me a break. After supporting hate marches on British streets with people chanting for mass murder and globalising the intifada, and embracing antisemitic lies, incitement and the demonisation of Jews and Israel, their posts today are beyond pathetic, and they will remain accountable for the inevitable future attacks.

Please read. I held off posting about this because I know a lot of people in Golders Green and have been getting in touch with them all this morning. The entire Jewish community of Golders Green right now is shook but I will tell you what, they aren’t cowering, they are doing what Jews do best. Showing strength and coming together. There is a lot of fierceness, anger and rightly so. None are surprised, not a single Jew in the UK is likely surprised. It was the same with the Manchester synagogue attack. This government, along with the London Mayor and Met police that have allowed hate marches every week through the streets of London for two and a half years. The judicial system letting terrorists supports and Jew haters off the hook. The Prime Minister refusing to proscribe the IRGC and pandering to Islamists. It’s all been very obvious that these events would get more frequent and targeted as the perpetrators become more emboldened by the lack of push back and consequence. You politicians can keep saying “antisemitism has no place in our society” - well clearly it does. It’s become embedded institutionally. Universities, the NHS, the BBC, the Police, the Judicial System, Foreign Policy, the Home Office, Councils and many MPs in Parliament are all riddled with it. The ones that aren’t are complacent about it or let it spread out of fear of offending a certain “demographic” of voters. I will tell you now. Almost every Jewish family in the UK since the Hamas attacks on October 7th 2023 has seriously considered leaving Britain - due to this Nazi like hatred fuelled by Islamism, Anti-Israel propaganda and the “Pro-Palestine” movement. But this is bigger than you may think, much bigger. It’s not just an issue for Jews. This is serious. There’s a reason they say Jews are the canary in the coal mine. It affects everything. No exaggeration. Read any history book. History has shown, throughout millennia, that when antisemitism goes unchecked, societies fail. Jew hatred is a cancer that needs to be surgically removed - not ignored and allowed to fester. It attacks and it rots. Because when the Jews leave, who comes after.