Prompter

FREE Resources Below FREE Ebook with my best prompts --> promptllm.co FREE Guide to Claude Skills —> promptllm.co/claude-skills FREE Telegram Channel with my best AI Hacks --> t.me/PrompterLLM

@SenSanders This may be the funniest thing I have ever seen

I spoke to Anthropic’s AI agent Claude about AI collecting massive amounts of personal data and how that information is being used to violate our privacy rights. What an AI agent says about the dangers of AI is shocking and should wake us up.

top 5 prompts to change your life

@LawrenceDCodes @GeminiApp is this meant to be impressive?

wait a minute wow @GeminiApp

'Become a millionaire not for the money, but for what it will make of you in the process' - Jim Rohn

to achieve your goals you have to become a different person

@FT the golden days of AI are almost over. there will be laws within the next 12 months that slows this down

Create enough hallucinated legal arguments, flawed engineering calculations and backdoor-ridden code, and the slop vats fill faster than our capacity to tell good work from bad, writes Tim Harford.⁠ ⁠ Read his column on telling good AI from bad: ft.trib.al/j6Io85O

@r0ck3t23 humans will just be expected to increase the output rapidly. If they don't do that then they will lose their jobs

Everyone is afraid AI is going to eliminate their job. Jensen Huang says the opposite is true. Huang: “The fact of the matter is PCs made us more busy. The internet made us more busy. Mobile devices made us super busy.” Every technology wave in history that was supposed to destroy work instead created more of it. Not different work. More work. The pattern is consistent enough that dismissing it requires a real argument. Not just anxiety. Jensen has one more point before the fear narrative even gets started. Huang: “We are millions of truck drivers short. We are tens of millions of manufacturing workers short. Employment is very high, and yet many companies don’t have enough labor.” The current economy is not suffering from too much automation. It is suffering from not enough workers. Robots do not arrive into a world of abundance and displace people who have jobs. They arrive into a world of shortage and fill roles that cannot be filled any other way. Huang: “Robots will fill in that gap. As a result, all of our country’s economy will grow. And when the economy grows, most companies tend to hire more people.” The logic is clean. Shortages constrain growth. Growth constrained means wealth not created. Companies not scaled. Jobs not added. Robots remove the constraint. Economy expands. Hiring follows expansion. That argument is historically airtight. But history has also never seen a technology that could perform cognitive work at this scale. Every previous wave automated physical or mechanical tasks. This one is different in kind. Not just degree. The labor shortage is real. Jensen’s pattern recognition is legitimate. And the honest answer is that nobody knows with certainty whether this wave follows the same arc as every previous one. What is certain is that the people who bet against technology creating more work have been wrong every single time. So far.

@VaibhavSisinty the only good thing about it was they came up with the nme Meta

This is not Zuck's biggest failure. I see it differently. When the metaverse started, AI wasn't a thing. The bet made sense for that world. But the world changed. Completely. And here's what most people miss: Only weak leaders double down on a sinking ship to protect their ego. Strong ones cut losses and chase the bigger wave. That's not failure. That's the hardest call in business. My one rule? Never underestimate Zuck. Because the man just walked away from billions… to chase something 10x bigger. And if anyone is positioned to put an AI super agent in the hands of 3 billion people overnight… It's not OpenAI. It's not Google. It's Meta. The distribution is already there. Look at the comments on this 👇

@davidsenra the more you read about what Zuckerburg did the more you realise how insane it is.

“When Mark Zuckerberg started Facebook he had never had a job before. Not only had he not managed people, he had not worked for anybody. He started with zero [experience]. His learning curve was vertical. It's still vertical. He spends an enormous amount of time learning how to become better at running these things at large scale. He's still the founder and he's still the innovator and he's still a fountain of ideas on what to do. He's the classic example of the double threat. And then what happens is other founders look at that and they're like: Oh, I could do that too.” — @pmarca

@sweatystartup best thing you can do is lock into a $200 claude subscription today

AI about to get 20x expensive. These $200 / month claude subscriptions are burning $5,000 worth of credits. The bubble is going to pop and it will pop soon.

no one else find it baffling a company can just throw $80bn at a completely failed project and then continue like nothing happened?

@vasuman did people internally believe it was going to work? I remember at the time it just seemed too much of a leap to how the world currently operated

As someone who worked at Reality Labs: the Metaverse had real legs but was obliterated by middle management completely out of touch with how young people actually use technology. I built a V1 tool that game developers genuinely needed, and the moment it was done, it got shipped to a team in London (to die), and I was reassigned to a "higher-priority project" that zero developers asked for. Multiply that by every team, and you'll understand why this never took off yet cost 80 billion.

you cannot think your way out of a problem

>go to Claude and prompt it >" ask me 10 questions to identify the constraint in my business using the theory of constraint model by Eliyahu Goldratt after you have asked the questions give me a prompt to to build an app in claude code to solve said constraint" > copy and paste into claude code >repeat

buying one of these

gamification should be a prescription for ADHD

success = volume x environment