QEInfinity

@VinnysCorner1 Everyone from Boston RN

True or False: you’ve seen at least 5 championships between your favorite NHL, NFL, MLB and NBA franchises

@landofthe80s Starman flip kick was the move

Who played this early wrestling game on the NES?

@Edelman11 Some crazy moments

Madness. Sports are the best.

@stats_feed I mean, motorcycles don’t have seatbelts.

🇺🇸 New Hampshire is the only state without seat belt requirements for adults.

@jimcramer Jim knows the drill now!!!

Always surprised that the Sunday night futures are down so little with no deal in sight. Down .50. I figure the big gunners will come in and take them down to 1.5% before we go to sleep

@BillyM2k If ever someone discovers teleportation or time travel, the incentive to share that discovery is extremely low

yeah getting any question answered in seconds by a super intelligent computer is cool and all but where are the teleporters

@josh_hammer @CPAC @fpmag Word of the day for the coordinated Hasbara influencers: “Podcaststan”. It’s like Sam Harris met Nassim Taleb. Very clever and original 🤣

The “retard Right” denizens of Podcastistan have launched an anti-MAGA—indeed, anti-American—insurrection. To hell with that. The idiots of the “retard Right” should go back to the hole whence they came. My @CPAC speech has now been adapted for @fpmag 🖋 frontpagemag.com/my-speech-at-c…

@Scaramucci Hillary didn’t need any help. I think even Bill would agree that she is vile with 0 likability.

Let me tell you exactly what Fox figured out in 1993. Roger Ailes looked around and asked — who’s the threat? Not Bill Clinton, the threat is Hillary Clinton. They spent billions of dollars over decades destroying her narrative. By the time she ran for president 51% of the country had a negative opinion of her before she said a word on the campaign trail. That’s the playbook. Now ask yourself — where’s the threat today? California. The fourth largest economy in the world. Agriculture, Defense, Hollywood, Silicon Valley, AI. — which is literally the exportation of American culture globally. A politician coming out of California from the left could beat the right decisively. So what do you do? Spend billions destroying the narrative around California. Make it synonymous with crime and homelessness and radical politics. Do it for two or three decades until the brand is toxic. Newsom has an image problem today the exact same way Hillary had an image problem. It was manufactured. Deliberately. Systematically.

@LeadingReport Shellenberger has become the “nothing to see here” guy. Rogan appearance was odd. No receipts, just raise enough doubt or lack of conclusive proof and assumes that equates to no there there despite the confluence of disparate factors pointing in the same direction

BREAKING: Jeffrey Epstein likely did not work on behalf of any intelligence agencies, according to Michael Shellenberger.

@SpecialSitsNews Unified party support but not popular support among constituents. Points to a corporate & political lobby issue

Not even Israelis want the war It is a battle of government regimes Most sane people want peace

The options in the poll are such that even the most critical voices would support 1 & 3, and likely 2. Ask about getting into the war in the first place, skepticism about the reasons for doing it, the influence of Israel in getting us into this particular war (still key ally), etc

How do we square this with all those creepy Woke Right groomer posts about every young man there being completely against Israel, the war, and Trump?

@WallStreetMav Ppl adding a hook up through an app as an add on to a DoorDash pizza and 7-11 run can’t be helping the situation.

Perhaps online dating websites/apps are one of the key reasons that the birth rate is declining. People below the age of 30 have forgotten how to meet others. Their expectations are out of whack based on what they see online.

@engineers_feed Honorable mention to the genius who created infinity. It’s like the lazy mathematician’s ultimate 'and so on, etc., forever' that somehow unlocks the deepest truths of the universe. Thanks for everything

To the person who invented zero: thanks for nothing

@beffjezos Middle managers

The main benefactors of suicidal empathy are the managerial parasitic class.

The concern lies around the fighting over anything that remains scarce. Pie growing the pie argument is solid and battle tested, but unequal access to what remains scarce stuff causes social unrest. Solving for permissioning access to resources (money) when capital eats up labor share leads may require an equity focused rethink in the future. Owners of capital have even greater weight in that system. Without any solve for access to that system, at the limit it will move toward an oligarch led type of communism

Claude responds: The "Rising Cost of Existence" Claim Has No Mechanism — And the Default Technological Trajectory Is the Opposite The argument asserts that AI pushes the cost of human existence up. This is stated, not argued. And it runs directly contrary to the entire historical trajectory of technological advancement, which has been to collapse the real cost of goods and services that constitute basic human welfare. Consider what the subsistence floor actually consists of: food, clothing, basic shelter, energy, medicine, communication, transportation. Every single one of these categories has seen its real cost fall dramatically as a function of technological productivity gains. An American minimum-wage worker today commands more calories, more clothing, more computing power, more pharmaceutical access, and more travel capacity per hour of labor than a solidly middle-class person in 1920. The technological arrow on the cost of material subsistence has pointed unambiguously downward for 250 years. AGI accelerates this, not reverses it. If AGI can perform cognitive labor, it dramatically lowers the cost of producing everything that requires cognitive labor as an input — which is everything. Drug discovery gets cheaper. Medical diagnosis gets cheaper. Legal services get cheaper. Engineering design gets cheaper. Agricultural optimization gets cheaper. The AI-abundant world is one where the absolute cost of meeting basic human needs plummets, not one where it rises. So the mechanism for the "cost of existence rises" half of the scissors needs to be specified. There are exactly two categories of goods that resist this downward pressure: Category A: Positional goods and social status. Being in the top 10% of income is by definition zero-sum. If AI makes everyone richer, relative rank competition intensifies. But this is about relative impoverishment, not absolute destitution. Confusing these two is a serious analytical error. Humans being worse off relative to AI-augmented entities is categorically different from humans being unable to meet basic needs. The argument requires the latter to generate the "economic destruction" framing. Category B: Location-constrained goods — primarily housing. This is the strongest version of the real concern. Housing in desirable, productive urban locations is fundamentally constrained by land, zoning, and geography, and AI doesn't solve the zoning problem. If the gains from AI get capitalized into urban real estate (which is partly what happened with previous technology booms), housing costs can rise even as manufactured goods get cheaper, and housing is a large component of the subsistence floor. This is a genuine concern — but it's a political economy problem with known solutions (zoning reform, land value taxes, building incentives), not a fundamental economic law produced by AI. Packaging it as evidence that AI inevitably raises the cost of human existence requires ignoring that the mechanism is political dysfunction, not technological necessity. The technology doesn't raise housing costs. Regulatory capture and NIMBYism raise housing costs. These are separable.

@BretWeinstein Now he’s paying it to X influencers

Netanyahu gave Hamas $35M a MONTH! Hopefully it's now clear that Israel had an obligation to the citizens of Gaza and the world, to remove Netanyahu BEFORE responding to October 7th. Imagine having your society destroyed, and children killed, by a man cleaning up his own mess.

🚨 MARK LEVIN: “[Trump] said no troops on the ground. I don't remember that in any campaign speech. But why would we need troops on the ground? … We've got to get the uranium.”

@scotthortonshow @SuperbubbleCo All that Hasbara $$

Man, fuck this algorithm. I’ve been seeing the same damn couple dozen tweets all day.

@megynkelly Mark prefers that you call it the Bibi gun

Micro is very mad. Micro doesn’t like it when you fight back. Micro prefers to be the only one hurling vile disgusting invective and he wants his female targets to sit back and take it. When a woman punches back at Micro he gets exasperated. Which is his default. Bc of his micropenis.