Restoration Times

@owenjonesjourno @FellRunnerUK Why do you want black men to be made impotent and incontinent then? “This screening has bad outcomes, so it should be reserved for blacks only” seems a weird take from a gay race communist.

@FellRunnerUK As someone whose WHITE FATHER died of prostate cancer, no I don't think that. However there is a trade-off because blanket screening leads to some unnecessary treatment causing e.g. impotence and incontinence. Getting the balance right is very hard.

My white dad died of prostate cancer. 1 in 4 Black men will get prostate cancer. That’s twice the rate of white people. This policy will save lives - and mean more NHS resources for others. This opportunistic race baiting is disgusting.

@fleetstreetfox They’re speaking out to save their special privileges that most British people didn’t even realise they had. And equality before the law is better and higher ideal than minorities carving out special rights and freedoms not accorded to the native population.

I am ashamed Sikh community leaders felt the need to do this. When a Christian commits murder, the Archbishop of Canterbury doesn't feel the need to say it wasn't a Christian act. Yet we're in a country where brown people of alternate faiths have to formally announce they're not all criminals. And ofc, if they hadn't done this, innocent Sikhs would suffer. That's why they did it. But come on, Britain, we're better than this.

@ACBC1742677 @MorgothsReview Nobody likes being told to “get in fucking line” I’ll agree. This is probably our last chance to save our selves through voting though, even if you think it’s impossible. The alternative is sectarian civil war, and our side is currently unarmed.

@RB_Commentary @MorgothsReview It's up to you. We're all adults with free will. I don't blame you. It won't achieve anything though. What I don't like is being told to "get in fucking line" & that this is our last chance. Again. You can't change the system by being a part of the system. Not in this country.

I’ve done my best to be patient with Clews but his account is just a relentless stream of slander, gossip, demoralisation and conspiracy bullshit.

@oldspeak_books But “Remigration Now” *is* an alternative viewpoint. Dixy sounds like a dimwit.

Dixy Chicken in London has a problem with my flag. Boohoo.

@LeoKearse No need to worry about what jews have to say about British patriotism, it’s not their business.

Nothing is more unpatriotic than dismissing British protest as thuggery

@ACBC1742677 @MorgothsReview So doing nothing is the alternative to voting? Well forgive me if I try one last time with Restore Britain then, because you don’t have to be a genius to work out that a slim chance is better than no chance.

@RB_Commentary @MorgothsReview There is no plausible alternative in this system. That's how it's set up. Look at the history of other countries to see how they changed their system. One thing I can guarantee, they didn't go to the voting booth and write X on a scrap of paper.

@AndrewHWestern What’s “never gonna happen” is you stopping eating all the pies, fatboy.

I’ll just mark that down in my file labelled “Never Gonna Happen”. Thank goodness. The cult is real.

@blaiklockBP Stick to British matters, Catherine.

@cull_trade Not actually very sharp at all, are you? Dumbass.

notice there are no books

@ACBC1742677 @MorgothsReview So what is your solution? Tired of hearing that there’s no point voting from people who can’t come up with a plausible alternative.

@MorgothsReview If you wanted to destroy a country & a people that is precisely what you'd want them to be doing until they are then so weak they'd be easy to kill off. You can't infiltrate & then dominate this system. It's not set up like that.

@narindertweets @policylaila Yes that would be terrible wouldn’t it? If you didn’t have double standards, you’d have none at all.

Miss New sheriff in Town @policylaila just casually defending Nigel Farage inciting riots and can't even condemn the violence seen in Southampton yesterday. And she thinks she is capable of running London? A woman who seems ok with riots if people are angry?

@jackbuchanan151 Why does every football melt have the same set of asinine opinions?

Anyone at these “riots” in our city of Southampton. You’re not fighting for a better, fairer future, you’re not fighting injustice. You’re pathetically being manipulated into race wars and dishonouring the memory of a young lad who called this place home. Shame on you all

@oldtomcotton An unpopular opinion, but probably a correct one.

Does Restore Britain believe and practise what it says? In his introduction to the new political party, Rupert Lowe says: ‘the decent men and women of this country have tried to use the ballot box to make their voices heard, only to have it thrown back in their faces by a political class that has forgotten who they are supposed to be serving’. The policy document Restore Britain’s Social and Cultural Foundations says: 'British Christians now have a political party that represents their views and stands ready to act on them. We are an historically Christian country, guided by Christian morality’ and adds, ‘a Restore Britain government would honour those moral traditions’. The use of gutter language in @RestoreBritain and @RupertLowe10 undermine these commitments. I define gutter language as profanity, obscenity and coarseness. This is not the language of ordinary, decent people and certainly not the language of historic Christianity. It is also not the language of mainstream politics. Yes, it is a language used in everyday speech by a lot of people, both the wealthy and the poor. But it is not the language of decent, British Christians, and most decent people, Christian or not, would not use this language at home or in public. I don’t care what people say on their private social media accounts, or the language they use. I understand people are angry, so am I, and some want to express their anger in strong language. I am not a wimp, I have been known to use coarse language myself in a private setting. Am I a hypocrite? No. My point is that, language that is OK for a private individual to use whenever and however they like, including social media, is not appropriate for a political party to use publicly. Restore Britain, remember who you are supposed to be serving. This is not a lads club, or a football fan group, or a stag do. We want to be a serious political party and it is a necessary discipline that our public discourse keeps within the bounds of public decency. You can say what you like and how you like in private. I have been canvassing for Restore Britain in Makerfield and I have defended its policies to my family and friends. I find this difficult when the language used by the organisation itself on its social media is crude—to decent people it is indefensible, even shameful. I want the party to grow, I have been encouraging people to join, but if the social media team don’t grow up and show some restraint I fear the party will never gain the full support it needs from decent, ordinary British people, including my friends and family. I've already had lots of abusive response to my previous comments on the language and I expect to get a lot more, I've also lost followers. I don't care. This not a popularity contest and Restore Britain is not a cult that I blindly follow right or wrong. I want Restore Britain to win, Rupert Lowe to be Prime Minister, and our policies to be enacted. All it needs is a little self-control at the top, and the practise of what we preach.

@Christinegracex No. You’re going to have to stand and fight for your birthright.

Where can white British people move to, that is safe? is there anywhere left?

@ForeverScept The West Yorkshire police are well known for their incompetence and cowardice. In East Leeds, children can force them out of their estates.

During the HareHills riots in Leeds there wasn’t a riot police to be seen. No men getting bashed in with shields or stomped in the head. Police vans, buses were torched. Wonder what the difference could have possibly been?

@owenjonesjourno @Steve_Laws_ So we can use Henry’s death for political point-scoring as long as we’re smarmy little sodomites? Good to know the rules.

@Steve_Laws_ Hi Steve: You support 'remigration' for everyone you deem to be of non-British heritage. So for clarity: You would have deported Henry Nowak, wouldn't you?

Deport all Sikhs.

@icebather @frankwrighter @WillColeshill @TRobinsonNewEra Irrelevant. Frank stands on the shoulders of giants.

@frankwrighter @WillColeshill 🤣 who is taller , you or @TRobinsonNewEra ?

Support independent journalists.

In 1985 PC Keith Blakelock was brutally murdered by a pack of African savages who were rioting in Tottenham. A Black MP, Bernie Grant, openly endorsed and celebrated the murder, joking that the ‘police got a bloody good hiding’ Other savages wrote rap songs celebrating the murder of Blakelock, who was just doing his job. This is how the foreign invaders have always treated the police, whilst we’ve always had their back. That’s over with now I’m afraid, we’ve tolerated a lot over the past couple decades, including the horrific cover up of the rape gangs, but now they’ve finally lost the natives. You’re on your own.

Je me suis longtemps passionné pour la psychologie, et une période m'obsède plus que toutes les autres. L'après-guerre. Le moment où des chercheurs se sont posé la question la plus dérangeante du siècle: comment l'Allemagne nazie avait-elle transformé des pères de famille ordinaires en bourreaux de camp? La réponse, ils ne l'ont pas trouvée chez des monstres. Ils l'ont trouvée chez des hommes parfaitement banals. Hannah Arendt a appelé ça la banalité du mal. L'historien Christopher Browning, en étudiant le bataillon de réserve 101 (des policiers d'âge mûr, des pères, des commerçants), a montré que ce ne sont pas des fanatiques qui ont fusillé des civils, mais des hommes normaux incapables de désobéir au cadre dominant. Puis vint Milgram. À Yale, environ deux tiers de gens ordinaires ont infligé ce qu'ils croyaient être des décharges mortelles, simplement parce qu'une autorité en blouse blanche le leur ordonnait. L'expérience de la prison de Stanford a montré la même chose sous un autre angle: donnez à quelqu'un un rôle et un cadre, et il s'y conformera jusqu'à l'inhumain. La leçon n'est pas allemande. Elle est humaine. Le mécanisme s'active dès qu'un cadre moral dominant fait craindre la sanction sociale plus que ne compte le témoignage de ses propres yeux. L'individu cesse de voir ce qu'il voit. Il voit ce que le cadre l'autorise à voir. Maintenant, regardez Southampton. Henry Nowak, 18 ans, poignardé, allongé au sol, répète aux policiers « j'ai été poignardé », « je ne peux plus respirer ». Réponse de l'officier: « I don't think you have, mate. » Pendant ce temps, son meurtrier retourne la situation d'une phrase: il aurait été victime d'une agression raciste. Quatre mots ont suffi pour déplacer le soupçon de l'agresseur vers la victime. Et l'officier a obéi. Pas à un ordre. À un cadre. Un cadre qui lui a appris, pendant des années, qu'une plainte pour racisme est l'accusation la plus dangereuse de sa carrière. Plus dangereuse, dans son réflexe conditionné, qu'un corps qui se vide de son sang devant lui. Exactement le mécanisme de Milgram, de Browning. Un homme normal qui cesse de croire ses propres yeux parce qu'un cadre moral lui a appris ce qu'il devait craindre. C'est précisément ça qui me terrifie. Souvenez-vous: le monde entier s'est agenouillé pour quatre mots, « I can't breathe ». Des entreprises, des gouvernements, des stades entiers. Henry a prononcé les mêmes mots, en train de mourir. Il n'y aura ni genou à terre, ni hashtag, ni minute de silence. Parce que sa mort ne sert pas le cadre. Elle le contredit. Et un système qui apprend à une société entière à faire passer l'accusation de racisme avant les faits, avant le corps, avant la vie, n'est pas une posture morale inoffensive. C'est une machine à fabriquer des hommes qui, face à un enfant en train de mourir, choisissent les menottes.

Only Whites value each individual life, sympathize with the suffering of strangers, have their eyes fixed on what is wrong in the world, while calling into question their own comforts. These values are totally alien to Sikhs, Blacks, Indians, Chinese, Semites, and Amerindians. These groups only care about their kin groups. For them, there is no such thing as fairness, truth, honesty, or impartiality outside their group. What's even worse, these groups exploit White morals for their own ends without concerns about lying, cheating, and deception. Whites are doomed if they continue celebrating diversity while pathologizing White ingroup behaviors. These groups don't have a moral compass, their societies are tribal, inhumane, backward, and conniving precisely because they lack White morals.