Curious รีทวีตแล้ว
Curious
1.1K posts


@nadersfolly @EricLDaugh Those are mostly the fake MAGA crowd....
English


🚨 JUST IN: HISTORIC PHOTO released where at 10:15PM, President Donald Trump rushes into the Oval Office after an assassination attempt — analyzing intel on what happened
Flanked by Marco Rubio, Pete Hegseth, JD Vance, Stephen Miller and more
Goes hard.
American history 🔥🔥🇺🇸
📸 @DanScavino

English

@elle_kaye11 @EricLDaugh @ThePPseedsShow Not sure - but Miller is copping a feel as he gets his wife to safety...LOL
English

@EricLDaugh @ThePPseedsShow And this photo too. Why is he watching from behind the curtain? Seems rather odd.

English

@njeriand @SenFettermanPA @EvaKnott It’s because of what is/has been underneath…tunnels and a whole system that served the deep state and likely incriminates them….
English

@SenFettermanPA @EvaKnott I don’t understand why they don’t want the ballroom built. President Trump is no king, and the next presidents—socialist, Marxist, Democrat, Republican, or independent—will enjoy a safe and secure space.
TDS is a mental health issue that needs attention.
English

@BiltzBuilt @nicksortor @SenSchumer She was the journalist in charge of the event. Was sitting chatting with Trump seconds before!
English

@nicksortor @SenSchumer Lady in sparkle deserves a medal.
She literally got up to cover a protection gap for Trump.
Run it back.
Incredible

English

🚨 WOW! Even DEMOCRATS are calling on leftists to stop trying to KlLL President Trump
Democrat Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez:
“Please stop trying to murder the president.”
Are you going to call this out too, @SenSchumer?!
English

@Concernyiayia8 @KanekoaTheGreat That was a masters. He had an undergrad from Caltech - 2017
English

@KanekoaTheGreat Class of 2025? He's only been a teacher for a few months? Did he get fired or take time off?
English

@j2_robert @GuntherEagleman @Enewman113 Not sure - I go to a lot of Dodger games and every game they honor a veteran. The still get warm standing ovations...so I think he'd still get admiration!
English

@GuntherEagleman @Enewman113 Shame today, they’d probably join in?!
Obama and Biden set this country back years, morally I’m afraid!
#DemocratsHateAmerica
English
Curious รีทวีตแล้ว

🚨 50 YEARS AGO TODAY: Dodgers legend Rick Monday became an American hero.
Two protesters ran onto the field at Dodger Stadium trying to burn the American flag… and Rick Monday sprinted in like a damn boss and SNATCHED it right out of their hands.
No hesitation. No apologies. Pure patriotism
@TheVinScully with the call!
English

@Dearme2_ @DearS_o_n No. I’d rather get massively better in every area of my life and have people who “knew” me marvel at how much Imve changed. I want to inspire others that change is always possible!
English

@gotrice2024 @1776Diva There’s nobody on base right? Intentional and unnecessary
English

During a softball game, tensions can run high with the competitive nature of the sport. The batter was up, the first pitch ended with a failed bunt attempt. It bounced but the catcher recovered it quickly.
The second pitch was a clean strike. Then the catcher picks up the ball, takes a few steps back and throws it right at the batter’s head. The batter, stumbled and had to get medical attention, she ended up with a concussion.
The catcher claims she thought she was making a play and this was an accident but others were demanding she be ejected or kicked off the team because they felt it was intentional assault. What is your take on this, did she do it on purpose?
English
Curious รีทวีตแล้ว

Curious รีทวีตแล้ว

What if?
SPLC = DNC/GOP = USAID = CAIR = ABC = CNN = CBS = UN = PBS = BLM = LGBTQIA+ = NBC = HHS = WHO = WEF = BIS = AMA = CIA = MI6 = Red Cross = Open Society = Clinton Foundation =
A Global Monetary Washing Machine financed by A Global “Banking” Cartel hidden by a “Legal” Cartel financed by the “Banking Cartel” that finances “Team Players” of all colors, stripes and industries that “go along to get along” with the cult?
From @SPLC to @cityoflondon and everything in between, would you really be shocked?

English
Curious รีทวีตแล้ว
Curious รีทวีตแล้ว

@RavenGrace0613 Please, share away. I give "Paul Linebarger" the credit for that setup - he lays it all out in his book about psychological warfare.
Here is the audiobook:
rumble.com/v71blkq-psycho…
English
Curious รีทวีตแล้ว

I tested every major AI tool over 3 months.
Honest ranking for a professional in their mid-50s
who is not a tech person and does not want to become one.
1st: Claude
Best for anything requiring nuance, context, or judgment.
Drafting, analysis, meeting prep, client communication.
Holds complex context across a long conversation.
When you give it your actual perspective — not just a question —
the output reflects that perspective back in a useful way.
It also pushes back when you are wrong. That is rare.
This is the one tool I would keep if I could only keep one.
2nd: ChatGPT
Good for quick brainstorming and first-pass research.
Gets noticeably generic when you go into real specifics.
3rd: Perplexity
Best for research with sources attached.
Saves me from 45 minutes in a search engine rabbit hole.
Citations matter when you are sharing with clients.
Worth mentioning: Otter.ai
For call transcripts. I resisted for 4 months.
Now I use it on every significant call.
Briefing AI afterward with the actual transcript changes
how I follow up.
Did not make the list: anything requiring more than an hour
of setup before it did anything useful.
My time has value. Act like it.
You need 2 or 3 of these working well, not twelve.
Tomorrow: the exact workflow I built around these tools
and what it actually replaced.
English

@Prolotario1 @ginamilan_ Video 1:
"William Cooper - HOTT - Alex Jones Liar 9.26.2001"
Video 2:
"Bill Cooper & Alex Jones Y2k Lies & Motives"
Bill had Alex pegged almost 30 years ago.
English
Curious รีทวีตแล้ว

I know someone who had not updated his core process in over a decade.
Sharp instincts. Respected in his field.
His operations: habits formed years ago, a follow-up system that
depended entirely on him personally remembering things,
and a growing backlog he kept meaning to fix.
He had known it was a problem for 3 years.
He just never had the bandwidth to fix it.
When I showed him how I had rebuilt parts of my own workflow,
he said something I did not expect:
"I always assumed the setup would be the hard part."
It was not. The hard part was admitting how much time he had been losing.
Attempt 1: we built a system together.
He looked at it and said "I will never actually use this."
He was right. I had over-engineered it. We scrapped it.
Attempt 2: we started with just one bottleneck.
The single task costing him the most time each week.
What we found: 11 hours a week spent on work that existed
only to support the work he should have been doing himself.
The AI-assisted version took one afternoon to build.
Result:
9 hours recovered per week
2 significant client relationships reconnected in month one
First new business from those relationships within 6 weeks
The process was not his bottleneck.
The process was hiding the work he was actually built for.
At what point did you realize a system you built
was quietly working against you?
English
Curious รีทวีตแล้ว

Everyone says AI is a young person's game.
I am in my mid-50s. I think they have it exactly backwards.
What a 25-year-old with AI tools has:
· Speed
· Energy
· Comfort with the interface
· Ability to produce high volume output quickly
That is real. I am not dismissing it.
What I have with the same tools:
· 35+ years of context that tells me which outputs are correct
· Pattern recognition for which clients will push back and why
· The ability to spot the dangerous assumption in a clean analysis
· Relationships that took decades and cannot be replicated by a tool
The 25-year-old can generate 50 options in an hour.
I can tell you in 10 minutes which 3 are worth pursuing
and why the other 47 fail in practice.
Speed is now cheap. Judgment is not.
MIT research found that experienced professionals using AI
outperformed both AI alone and junior professionals using AI
on complex judgment tasks.
The combination is not additive. It is multiplicative.
I spent most of last year assuming the world was moving past me.
I was wrong. I was just behind on one tool.
If you are a professional in your 50s wondering if it is too late:
it is not. You have more to work with than you think.
Comment "AI" for the guide I built for professionals in our position.

English
















