Rick K

14.3K posts

Rick K banner
Rick K

Rick K

@RickK101

Lucky husband to wonderful wife and father to amazing children. Lover of facts and defender of reality. Liberalism and diversity are what make America strong.

New England เข้าร่วม Mart 2013
693 กำลังติดตาม260 ผู้ติดตาม
Irishrygirl
Irishrygirl@irishrygirl·
To those of you feeling like an idiot for voting for Trump, good that’s because you are.
English
294
3.1K
22K
198.2K
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@TafadzwaMarinda @begottensun You sound like a Flat Earther. You can learn to use your brain better. These will help: “Don’t Believe Everything You Think” by Kida “How We Know What Isn’t So” by Gilovich “The Skeptics Guide to the Universe” by Novella “The Demon-Haunted World” by Sagan
English
0
0
0
5
Gono Chirandu
Gono Chirandu@TafadzwaMarinda·
@RickK101 @begottensun Why did you stop going there on frequent basis. You didn't go there it was all propaganda. You wanted to appear more successful than USSR
English
1
0
0
11
K
K@begottensun·
They are NO astronauts currently going to the moon. It’s a Hoax. A distraction.
English
66
14
158
20.3K
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@Kultrider2010 Flat Earthers all around the globe agree with you. You’re among true mental giants. Be proud!
English
0
0
0
40
Jack Reacher🇦🇹
Jack Reacher🇦🇹@Kultrider2010·
Ich stimme dir zu. Wir (Apollo) waren niemals auf dem Mond. es war ein HOAX, eine filmische Meisterleistung von Stanley Kubrick ! Die Soviets haben geschwiegen, weil sie selber mit ihren Raumfahrten Dreck am Stecken hatten. Mit dem Rechenschieber und Sextanten zum Mond ? LoL 😂 Ein schönes Märchen. Schwarz/Weiss Fernseher und Vierteltelefon..
Grundrechte retten@Grund_gesetzt

Eine Beleidigung nach der anderen, nur weil ich sage, dass kein Mensch auf den Mond war. Das hier ist ein Ausschnitt eines Original-Nasa-Bildes der „Mondlandefähre Eagle auf dem Mond“. Ihr glaubt das? Ehrlich? Mit Klebeband, Alufolie und Zeltgestänge auf dem Mond?

Deutsch
2
0
2
46
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@TafadzwaMarinda @begottensun If you’re wrong and we really did land on the Moon in 1969, would you care? Does being right or wrong matter that much to you?
English
1
0
0
16
Gono Chirandu
Gono Chirandu@TafadzwaMarinda·
@begottensun I am of the opnion that going to the moon thing was a cold war propaganda Americans filmed a movie and never went the moon.
English
2
0
1
1.1K
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@begottensun @ChikazheWinston Get offline and into the world. Did you know that amateur astronomers and radio operators are tracking Artemis? Are they all part of a grand hoax that only super clever people like you have figured out? Narcissism much?
English
0
0
0
28
K
K@begottensun·
@ChikazheWinston Bro. The videos is the astronauts are totally flawed. Wrong shadows , CGI. It’s a mess.
English
1
0
1
256
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@begottensun Wow, it’s sad that reality is so scary for you.
English
0
0
0
16
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@Bp_Richard_Min @NASA I’m sorry - are you serious? I suppose the Earth is Flat and nobody died at Sandy Hook. If you’re really this gullible, you might want to refrain from broadcasting it.
English
0
0
0
12
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@jwoodz56 @pbeisel Oh well... You're just in this for attention. No real, thinking person believes the Moon landings were a hoax. If a President can't keep one blowjob in the Oval Office a secret, then there's no way 1000s of people could maintain an Apollo hoax secret. Talk about idiotic.
English
1
0
0
65
Jay
Jay@jwoodz56·
@RickK101 @pbeisel So they can laugh at you idiots that see something like that and still believe it’s real
English
1
0
0
19
phil beisel
phil beisel@pbeisel·
For all you highly moronic moon conspiracy theorists... The moon landings happened. Here are four bulletproof reasons why the hoax theory collapses under its own weight. 1. We brought back 842 pounds of moon rocks and geologists worldwide have been slicing them open for 55 years Apollo 11–17 crews hauled back samples that scream "lunar origin" in every isotope, crystal structure, and chemical signature. These rocks have zero water content (Earth rocks almost always have some), solar wind particles embedded from billions of years of unfiltered space exposure, and microscopic glass beads formed by ancient meteorite impacts— stuff impossible to replicate with 1960s tech. Independent labs in the Soviet Union, Europe, Japan, and China analyzed them and confirmed: same age (3.7–4.5 billion years), same exotic minerals like armalcolite, same lack of oxidation. If NASA faked it, they'd have needed a secret lunar rock factory decades ahead of its time. Conspiracy theorists never explain how we pulled that off while simultaneously "faking" the tech to get there. These samples are still studied today in museums and universities— you can touch (protected) pieces yourself. 2. Laser reflectors are still on the Moon, and anyone with the right equipment can ping them right now Apollo 11, 14, and 15 crews placed corner-cube retroreflectors on the lunar surface. These are passive mirrors (no batteries, no moving parts) that bounce laser beams straight back to Earth. Observatories like McDonald in Texas, Apache Point in New Mexico, and facilities in France, Italy, and Australia have been firing lasers at them daily since 1969 and measuring the round-trip time to millimeter precision. The data proves the distance to the Moon (about 384,400 km) and how it's slowly receding (3.8 cm/year). China’s Chang’e missions and India’s Chandrayaan have imaged the exact landing sites, including the hardware and tracks. If it was faked, the hoaxers would have needed to secretly land mirrors on the Moon— or convince every laser-ranging scientist on Earth to lie for half a century. Spoiler: they didn’t. 3. Modern orbiters from multiple countries have photographed the landing sites in high resolution—footprints and all NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) has snapped razor-sharp images of every Apollo site since 2009. You can see the descent stages, rover tracks, astronaut footprints, and even the exact paths they walked. Japan’s SELENE, India’s Chandrayaan-2, and China’s Chang’e-2 and Chang’e-3 orbiters independently confirmed the same shadows, hardware, and disturbance patterns. These aren’t blurry NASA photos from 1969, they’re crisp, multi-spectral images taken decades later by rival space agencies. The geometry matches perfectly: the flag is still there (Apollo 11’s fell over during liftoff), the rover is parked where they left it, and the blast craters under the landers are exactly as predicted. A studio set on Earth couldn’t survive that level of global scrutiny from space. 4. The conspiracy would have been bigger, dumber, and leakier than the actual mission Over 400,000 people worked on Apollo. That’s engineers, technicians, contractors, secretaries, and janitors across dozens of companies and universities. Not one deathbed confession, not one leaked memo, not one whistleblower with hard proof in 55+ years? That’s statistically insane. The Soviets were tracking every second of the missions in real time with their own radar and radio telescopes— they hated America’s guts and would have screamed "fake" at the first glitch if they could. Instead, they congratulated the U.S. and kept quiet. Faking it would have required inventing better special effects, vacuum chambers, and propulsion tech than what actually existed while hiding it from the very people who built the real rockets. Occam’s razor doesn’t just cut here; it eviscerates the hoax. The footage, the rocks, the reflectors, the photos, the tracking data— they all line up perfectly because the landings were real. The moon is still up there, waiting for the next crew. The evidence isn’t "believable", it’s undeniable. If you’re still on the fence, go look at an LRO image of Tranquility Base or bounce a laser off those reflectors yourself. Remember: conspiracy theory is the sophistication of the ignorant.
English
522
546
3.3K
296.3K
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@mollymcmato @ophello @Freedom2speak17 @ManaByte ... the scientists that bounce lasers off the reflectors that the Apollo mission put on the Moon? Are they faking it? Are they part of the NASA's great hoax? How much money would any one of them make for selling the story of this great hoax to the press, @mollymcmato?
English
1
0
0
18
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@mollymcmato @ophello @Freedom2speak17 @ManaByte The hundreds of scientists that studied the 400+ pounds of Moon rocks brought back? None of them have reported the rocks were fake, so they're in on the hoax? How much do you think they're paid? And what about...
English
1
0
0
15
Jeremy
Jeremy@ManaByte·
NASA says some of the Apollo landing sites will be visible at the very beginning of the Artemis II lunar flyby on Monday. They’ll say exactly what ones in the daily briefing tomorrow. That means moon landing deniers are going to have real bad day on Monday.
English
947
1.5K
19.6K
540K
Paul White Gold Eagle
Paul White Gold Eagle@PaulGoldEagle·
Some people believe this happened, on the moon. In the 60s. Then the tech was lost. 😂😂😂 H/T Laura Aboli
English
592
775
4.8K
306.1K
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@JohnWJames3rd @Coinception2 @BBMagaMom @grok Look, John is displaying his galactic level gullibility by believing the Moon Hoax nonsense. How are you on Flat Earth and Sandy Hook, John? Just where on the “I will believe anything I see on Facebook” scale do you fall?
English
1
0
1
20
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@Markmcc21 @NASA lol - I was referring to your incorrect usage in your reply. Never mind.
GIF
English
0
0
0
15
Mark mccourt
Mark mccourt@Markmcc21·
@RickK101 @NASA Well it didn’t help, you’s meaning plural. You are (you’re) represents an individual
English
1
0
0
14
NASA
NASA@NASA·
These four astronauts are currently on a mission to fly around the Moon—and soon they'll break the record for how far humans have traveled from Earth! Meet our Artemis II crew 👇
NASA tweet media
English
4.8K
15.3K
140.4K
6.7M
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@PCSetaram Wow, really? How many people were in on it? The Russians watching the mission with their radios and telescopes? The space agencies from other countries that published pictures of the Apollo landing sites? The amateur radio operators that eavesdropped on Apollo? All in on it?
English
0
0
0
11
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@Markmcc21 @NASA I believe the English word you’re looking for is “you’re”, as in: “… the English language you’re now speaking …” Just trying to help.
English
1
0
0
15
Mark mccourt
Mark mccourt@Markmcc21·
@RickK101 @NASA Yes Rick Ross “you’s” despite not being grammatically correct is still an acceptable word just like “youse” which is most popular in England you know the country of origin of the English language your now speaking and trying to lecture me on.
English
1
0
0
18
Rick K
Rick K@RickK101·
@Markmcc21 @NASA I’ve no idea what your point is. Every Apollo from 8 onward went around the Moon. I think you’re operating with some very basic misunderstanding, but I don’t yet understand it. Please make your point in other words and I’ll try to help.
English
0
0
0
10
Mark mccourt
Mark mccourt@Markmcc21·
@RickK101 @NASA And yet no response to the fact Apollo 11 went to the far side of the moon. “You” people are just morons.
English
1
0
0
17