Robert Johansson

I see that the sectarian Muslim MPs, the Green Party & pro-Palestine activists are all up in arms over Israel’s death penalty for Palestinian convicted terrorists. When Iran executed the 19-year-old champion, Saleh Mohammadi for protesting the Khamenei regime, they were silent.

BREAKING: Politico reports that Ukraine has offered to help break Iran’s naval blockade of the Hormuz Strait. Zelensky discussed the matter during his visit to the Gulf. Ukraine would share its know-how from breaking Russia’s naval blockade of Odesa in the Black Sea: The strategy would involve defense against air attacks, protection against sea mines, as well as coordinated operations by coastal artillery, the air force, and other units. Naval drones would play a decisive role.

There it is. Hamas admits 80% of the casualties in the Gaza War were combatants. There was no “genocide” Only the most accurate and targeted war in history.

Vet inte om staten vill det, men det finns helt klart ett driv från myndigheterna att tiva ner pga ideologi. Överimplementering av EU lagstiftning osv.

What gives these clowns the confidence and fatuous self-righteousness to speak with such authority on a subject they know literally nothing about? Do they do this on every issue, or just on the great moral demand of the age to hate a particular nation? Israel got the jump on the Egyptians, true, after they placed a naval blockade on Eilat, kicked out international peacekeepers, massed troops on the border and had their state radio announce that war was imminent. The blockade wasn’t an inconvenience, it was an existential threat. 90% of Israel’s oil came from Iran through the Port of Eilat in those years. Israel had oil reserves for maybe a few weeks, and then the country would start running out of fuel, including for tanks and planes. The blockade was a deliberate strangulation that would very quickly have reduced Israel’s capacity to actually fight a war. And it was deliberately intended to be a casus belli. Golda Meir in 1957 announced that the blockade of Tiran would constitute a casus belli for Israel. Nasser was challenging that claim. He knew that Israel now faced a choice: See its fuel supply dwindle to dangerously low levels, or respond with force. In other words, the blockade was the start of the war. But you know what? We don’t actually have to get this complicated. Because the 67 war had three fronts. And on the other two, it was the Arab side that started the shooting — in the simplest, most literal sense. Jordan on the eastern front and Syria in the north. Israel even politely asked the Jordanians not to attack, and Egypt had to lie to the Jordanians about the state of its military to convince them to enter the war. So to recap, on two of three major fronts, the Arab states attacked first. And only on the southern front, after absorbing numerous dramatic casus belli — aggressive actions that directly threatened Israel’s capacity to defend itself — did Israel pull the trigger first. And given that history, would a rational person still characterize Bill Maher’s description as “one hundred percent false?”

Over the past 25 years, Germany has pursued an energy transition by phasing out nuclear power and expanding solar and wind—at a cost of around €500 billion in subsidies. The result: installed capacity has more than doubled, yet electricity generation has declined. The reason is structural. Reliable, dispatchable power was replaced by weather-dependent sources. The consequences are severe: rising energy costs, falling competitiveness, and growing pressure on energy-intensive industries. The key question remains: How do you run an industrial economy on a system that produces less when it matters most?

År 2013 anslöt Naturvårdsverket landets kommunala avfallseldade kraftvärmeverk till EU:s system för handel med utsläppsrätter (dvs EU:s system för koldioxidbeskattning). Det fanns inget uttalat krav från EU, men NV ville göra detta för att minska andelen plast som eldades upp. Total kostnad för drabbade kommuner 2024 kan uppskattas till runt 3 miljarder kronor. En extra skatt från landets kommuner med kraftvärmeverk till EU. Från vård, skola och omsorg till Bryssels byråkrater.

@Lenkuh @RogerStrandahl Utan konstgödsel skulle det inte finnas mat till en 3-4 miljarder människor då det inte finnas näring nog i jorden. Men visst det är bönderna som gör fel medan de ser till att vi andra inte svälter ihjäl....

@RogerStrandahl Det hade inte varit några problem med gödsel eller bekämpningsmedel om bönder hade klarat av ett jordbruk på rätt sätt.

Det här. Gick snabbt. Konstgödsel en central vara för livsmedelsförsörjningen. På tal om den där rapporten som hävdar att Sverige kan förse sig med tillräckligt med protein i en svår situation. Verkligen? Bränsle och konstgödsel måste finnas. Beskrivet i bl.a. GP idag.

@OlofFlodin Vi har inte tillräckligt med mat till alla utan animalier...

ETC är ett sånt jävla skämt. Ungefär den enda kraftkälla som faktiskt fungerat stabilt och pålitligt i Ukraina har varit kärnkraft.

Vilken otrolig störd och pervers människa. Hur jävla rubbad får man vara för att kunna skriva såhär. Larijani var det som gav order om massakern som ägde rum mellan 8-9 januari då 30 - 40 000 människor mördades i Iran.

Krig i Ukraina, krig i Iran, strul/stopp i Hormuzsundet och ändå är drivmedelspriserna bra mycket billigare än om man låter S+MP(+V+C) få utöva sin ”utopi” 🤷‍♂️🙃

Yeah, I know this is engagement bait bullshit from a European with no clue, but I see this kinda RETURN TO FARM post on X all the time, and it's always some idylic dreamscape of rural niceness, which makes it really fucking obvious to all of us who come from farming backgrounds that these people have zero fucking clue, and would probably end up wrapped around an auger on their first day. News flash. Farming is HARD. What these people are imagining is rural living on a big plot of land, where they've got income from something else, and maybe a couple of animals to keep down the grass and a little garden on the side. That's what I do now that I'm a rich guy. It's pretty awesome. I also know that if I had to make a living off this land I could probably do it (because unlike these weenies, I know how) but I don't want to, because it would absolutely fucking suck. Because in reality making a living off being a farmer is brutal. It's nonstop backbreaking labor where everything that can go wrong, will. And it will go wrong at absolutely the worst possible time. (especially if cows are involved!) Modern squishy internet people do not even sorta comprehend how hard farming is. I worked on dairy farms. I can't speak for the dirt farmers but I'm sure they've got their own set of wacky nonsense they get to put up with. It is LONG hours. I once did a stint opening up a new dairy where I worked 72 hours straight, with a couple of thirty minute naps in a truck or on the barn floor snuck in. There's nothing quite as fun as dealing with fifteen hundred pound animals and dangerous heavy equipment when you're so tired you're starting to see things that aren't there. Oh, and you'd better get real comfortable with blood, shit, piss, and death. Dealing with lots of farm animals is not for the squeamish. They're going to get sick, get injured, get stuck in infuriating and mysterious ways, and die stupidly on you. Every kind of livestock has got its peculiar way of being a pain in the ass. Cows are loveable, curious, stupid, and sometimes homicidal. I've been kicked, trampled, hooked, and smashed into/through fences. These sheltered idiot city people say crap like "go buy a farm" having zero comprehension of how much good farmland costs, or the insane costs of equipment, or livestock involved. If they saw what a good tractor cost they'd shit themselves. "Buy land"... Have you priced land? Oh, you can still buy cheap land, but it's usually cheap for a reason. As in you can't farm it, or it doesn't have water, or it's a nightmare hellscape of windy death. So farming is expensive to get into, hard to make a profit at, and insanely difficult the entire time. Oh yeah, and just when you think you've got it figured out, the government will absolutely fuck with you, because it's also super regulated. Yay. "skip the degree"... Lady, I got into college on an ag scholarship, and started out as an ag science major. Successful farmers are educated because this shit is complicated. (I then changed majors and got an accounting degree so I wouldn't have to pull calves at 3:00 AM, a decision which I have not regretted) These fuckers think farming is just strolling around in a sun dress picking wild flowers or some shit. Oh hell no. Farmers farm because they want to, and the juice is worth the squeeze for them.

Ideologin som ligger bakom miljöpartiet.

This is an incredibly important and troublesome myth, often blindly referenced by Western analysts in error. So here's what actually happened: The "first democratically elected leader overthrown by the US" line about Mossadegh collapses the actual constitutional reality of Iran in the 1950s. Iran did not elect prime ministers. Under the 1906 constitution, the Shah appointed and dismissed the prime minister from among members of the elected Parliament (Majlis). Mossadegh was appointed under that system. In August 1953 the Shah issued a royal decree dismissing him, an authority explicitly granted to the monarch. Mossadegh refused to comply, barricaded himself in office, and attempted to dissolve the Majles through a referendum that bypassed the constitutional order entirely. By that point the country was already in a constitutional crisis. Just as important is why the Shah moved against him. The dispute was not simply "Britain vs. Iranian nationalism." Iran at the time had no independent infrastructure to produce, refine, transport, insure, or sell its oil internationally. Full and immediate nationalisation without an operational framework effectively shut down the industry overnight. Mossadegh was sympathetic to the Soviet, and would likely have granted them the privilege to handle things. The Shah couldn't allow that. His strategy was to increase Iran's share of oil revenues while maintaining production and access to global markets, using that income to gradually build the domestic infrastructure Iran lacked. The plan was long-term: secure a larger revenue share now, develop capacity over time, and transition to full control once Iran could actually operate the industry. In other words, the dispute was partly about timing and state capacity, not simply sovereignty. Though the latter was important if the keys were to be given to the Soviets. And if you're wondering when that long-term horizon would have matured, well, it was a 25-year plan. That brings us to 1979.

Pratar vi om samma SD som försvarat Israel medan den samlade vänstern i Sverige stått på judehatarnas sida? x.com/DaisyM78234/st…

Det sjukaste SVT Aktuellt gjort. Se hela avsnittet på YouTube eller Spotify

Om din religion förbjuder att buga sig inför en människa så är din religion skit. Det borde ha varit DOs svar.

Ann Linde påstår nu i tv att hon står på iraniernas sida mot regimen. Tror hon verkligen att svenska folket redan glömt hennes och den "feministiska" sosseregeringens tidigare officiella besök till #Iran ? När hyckleriet når nya höjder @AnnLinde.