Rossa

Bitcoin feels this close to deciding if it wants to break up or down.

@BowTiedBull You don’t feel happiness ?

Literally feel nothing, wrote the same thing weekly for 7-8 months straight now and people are all PMSing getting their periods on the timeline Hopefully goes down more

@Puncher522 Dido. Sentiment feels like right buying range

I said it at $60K a few months ago, and I’ll say it again today. Stacking sats at $74K Bitcoin is an opportunity for generational wealth. Do as you will, but for me and mine, we are crushing the buy button on the world’s greatest asset & protocol.

@ZynxBTC @JoeCarlasare For the first time maybe ever, I thought about putting money in stocks from Bitcoin. Then thought we must be nearing a transition point then based on that.

This is probably the worst sentiment I have seen for Bitcoin in over a decade. AI stocks are going parabolic and the S&P 500 is at all time highs. Gold had its run. Everything is making money right now and it's almost hard not to. Everything except Bitcoin. The contrast makes it particularly brutal. It is not just the fact that Bitcoin is down, but also that every other asset is at or close to all time highs at the same time. The opportunity cost is massive especially for newcomers. It is tough but we have been here before. Staying the course.

@BitcoinIntelX @grok If I win , I’ll donate it.

Insanity. I worked for a company that had several developers and designers to build features like this. Now everyone can do it. I’m changing my tune from AI will replace jobs to AI is creating more and more builders.

@jesse_vermeulen I work on Codex

honest question: what do people do during the 5-10 min while Claude is running?

@nvk Not a commonwealth country

Common wealth countries don't have good anti-tyrany laws, and the bar to mobilize its army against its ppl is too low.

@IncomeSharks @Lee_in_Iowa Not true. Completely disconnected. Only a small cohort of population. Most people don’t have flashy items. They live normal lives, save and spend some disposable income. That disposable income expenditure by and large has replaced child expenses. The stats dont lie. You’re wrong

Well said. The younger generation wants a 2k iPhone, $200 phone plan, internet, streaming services, to eat out, work from home, drive a brand new BMW, wear designer clothing, and then wonder why they don't have money left over. The boomers barely spent, had to work the same job for 30 years, to be tiny houses with one family car. Sure it was easier to afford a home but very few would be willing to live like them and give up all the tech and nice things they have now.

Boomer here. I bought my first house after ten years of saving like crazy. And the interest was 14.5%. I don’t know where kids got the idea that they were due a house and new car at college graduation, but that’s NOT how it ever was.

@WorkflowWhisper OPSMAP

Every operations role being cut in 2026 maps to a workflow category. I've built in most of them. Here's the full breakdown: → Email routing and triage: 3-5 nodes. avg build time 4 hrs → Invoice processing and matching: 8-12 nodes. avg build time 7 hrs → Lead assignment and CRM updates: 4-6 nodes. avg build time 3 hrs → Status update aggregation: 3-4 nodes. avg build time 2 hrs → Onboarding checklist management: 6-9 nodes. avg build time 5 hrs → Report generation and distribution: 5-8 nodes. avg build time 4 hrs Every one of those is a client conversation. Every one of those is a workflow that pays for itself in week one. The full playbook - node breakdown, pricing guidance, client conversation script, and what to charge - is in the PDF. Comment OPSMAP and I'll DM it to you. (must be following for DM)

@AlexFinn All AI providers will consistently race to the bottom in cost. There’s too much competition and they all want to embed their platform into your business.

In a few weeks the most powerful AI model of all time Claude Mythos will release This makes me deeply nervous Not because of cybersecurity risks or anything like that But because it will quite obviously be significantly more expensive which will cause the wealth gap to explode Let me explain First the obvious: tokens aren’t getting cheaper. In fact, they’re getting significantly more expensive Almost every new version of ChatGPT and Claude brings a slight bump in price over the last one And plans haven’t been going down either, they’re only coming out with more expensive ones. ChatGPT Pro plan for $250 a month. Claude Max for $200. GPUs, RAM, CPUs all going up in price. And now Mythos, which the leaked blog post hinted won’t even be included in a plan. It will only be in the API for what will be an astronomical cost. And do you seriously doubt this won’t lead to an upcoming $2,000 a month Ultra plan that every other AI company will immediately copy? It’s one thing to make luxury items more expensive. It’s another thing to make intelligence more expensive. Intelligence that is critical to getting ahead in a crumbling economy. Let’s just call it what it is: using AI gives you an advantage against everyone else. Those with AI are keeping their jobs. Those not using AI are losing their jobs Now a new level of intelligence that will only be accessible to the rich is coming out. Only the rich will be able to use this super intelligence to create more economic value than others. What happens to the people that can’t afford Mythos? Or ChatGPT 6? They are left with a major disadvantage in the economic battlefield. Then on top of that, both OpenAI and Anthropic are going to IPO this year (it’s killing the middle class that this didn’t happen years ago, but that’s another story) They both are heavily incentivized right now to explode revenue as much as they can. They both are incentivized to make these new models as expensive as humanly possible. The middle class is already gutted. A middle class without access to the intelligence that the upper class will have will only gut them further. If a job position is between someone in the middle class with Claude Sonnet, and someone in the upper class with Claude Mythos, the Claude Mythos candidate with 100% get the job. It’s like a ballet dancer getting in a weight lifting competition with someone on insane amounts of steroids. Or say someone with Claude Opus has a genius idea for a business, and someone with Claude Mythos gets the same one. The one with Claude Mythos will release a significantly better product much much faster, crushing the person with Opus. I’m very pro-capitalist. In fact, I might be a radical capitalist. But at the same time this country (and this world) needs a middle class. I don’t know the answers or solution. There probably isn’t one. I honestly don’t even know what I’m trying to achieve with this post. I just have gotten incredibly scared over the last few days thinking about this scenario. I think the best plan of action at the moment is to just create as much economic value as you possibly can right now. (Ethically) earn as much money as possible. Save everything. If you want to compete in the future, you’re going to need to be able to afford the top tier intelligence. It’s critical for you and your family to survive. But in the meantime, don’t let anyone tell you intelligence is going to become “too cheap to meter”.

@danielsgoldman @ylecun @elonmusk @grok what other developed countries don’t require id when voting ?

This is such a dumb tweet @elonmusk. Right wing Heritage found 10 non-citizens votes out of 2 billion since 1992. The threat to our democracy is the SAVE Act, which denies voting rights to millions. Issue a free national ID to every citizen and I’ll happily support voter ID.

AI at work or just for yourself, give this a read. I’ve set up Claude like this and it’s incredible. My productivity has improved massively. A couple more MCP integrations on top of this with your specific softwares and it’s game changing.

I’ve connected Claude to Netsuite via MCP and it has been a game changer. What used to take hours for querying and building reports now takes minutes. The reporting capabilities are also better.

Crazy scale. These moments will be looked back on with such 20:20 hindsight.

@SMB_Attorney My company deals with contracts weekly. No lawyers needed. Commercial team gets it done now with AI. No lawyers needed.

You guys don’t get it yet. Everyone keeps saying AI is going to replace lawyers. I don’t think people understand how this actually plays out. Let’s say you use AI to draft a contract. The contract misses something important. A year later it costs you two million dollars. What do you do? Right now, you sue your lawyer. In the AI world, you’d sue the AI company. Two things can happen. Option 1: The AI company has liability for legal advice. If that’s the case, every AI company will immediately stop letting consumers use AI for real legal work. The liability risk is massive. Option 2: The AI company has no liability because of disclaimers. If that happens, every state bar in the country will say consumers are being exposed to unregulated legal advice and call it the unauthorized practice of law. And they’ll shut it down that way. Either path leads to the same outcome. Consumer AI will be limited to generic “Wikipedia-style” legal information and LegalZoom level document prep. But the real AI tools? Those will live inside law firms. Lawyers will use them to move faster, analyze more data, and run way more matters at once. The M&A lawyer doing 5 deals at a time will do 50. Trial lawyers will run far more cases simultaneously. The idea that AI replaces lawyers probably dies. The more likely outcome is that AI supercharges the best lawyers and makes the profession even more profitable than ever.

@Hybridathlete All this says is you can’t do 50 press ups.

According to my standards, I can do 43. -chest to ground -full lockout with clear pause at top -no “resting” at the top -body in good plank the whole time Start “resting” at top for >.25 sec? Set’s over. Start worming up? Set’s over. Why such strict standards? Because without them, it’s impossible to gauge progress. And this applies to most things. If I do this standard this time and then next time I let myself rest at the top as long as I want, or not touch the ground, or not fully lockout, and I get 62, did I improve? I have no idea. And does that mean you shouldn’t ever do sets where you rest at the top, or where you don’t do full chest to ground. No! But for testing/comparison purposes, it’s important to have clear standards. And I think these are the easiest to implement to a wide audience. No additional equipment needed, just touch your chest to the ground and fully lockout. Very clear bottom and top of the movement, no ambiguous “arms at parallel” or “4 inches off the ground.” Simple and repeatable. Repost or comment with a video (side view) of your results. I don’t care how many you do, I just wanna see great reps!

@MattWalshBlog Yeah it sucks that you can’t ride bikes anymore.

It’s not just nostalgia. This was our childhood and it’s gone now. As a parent you can, through great effort, create the conditions for some version of this for your own children today. But the problem is that most of the other kids are screen addicted zombies who don’t really want to run around outside until the streetlights turn on. So an energetic, free spirited kid who’d rather climb a tree than stare at a screen ends up being kind of isolated. 30 years ago he’d have been the most popular kid in the neighborhood. Now the other kids in the neighborhood are home with the screen and he’s climbing the tree by himself.

@aakashgupta What a stupid argument to have. Not your point specifically, but simply engaging in it.

A human consumes about 2,000 calories per day. Over 20 years, that’s roughly 17,000 kWh of total food energy. Training GPT-4 consumed an estimated 50 GWh of electricity. That’s 3,000 humans worth of “training energy” for a single model run. And GPT-4 is already dead. OpenAI retired GPT-4o from ChatGPT on February 13th. The model that took 50 GWh to train got less than two years of flagship status before replacement. The human you spent 17,000 kWh “training” for 20 years produces economic output for the next 40 to 60 years. The amortization window on GPT-4 was shorter than a car lease. Now look at what replaced it. GPT-5.2, released December 2025, is OpenAI’s current default. The GPT-5 series consumes an estimated 18 Wh per average query according to the University of Rhode Island’s AI Lab, up to 40 Wh for extended reasoning. That’s 8.6 times more electricity per response than GPT-4. With 2.5 billion queries hitting ChatGPT daily and GPT-5.2 now the default model, the inference math gets staggering fast. Even at a blended average well below 18 Wh, you’re looking at daily electricity consumption that could power over a million American households. This is what Altman is actually doing. OpenAI hit $13 billion in annual recurring revenue but still isn’t profitable. They need you to think of AI energy consumption as natural and inevitable, the same way you think about feeding a child, because the alternative framing is that they’re burning through enough electricity to rival small countries while racing to build 1-gigawatt Stargate data centers. The food analogy makes the energy costs feel biological and unavoidable instead of what they are: an engineering and business choice that scales with every model generation. The comparison sounds clever at a fireside chat in India. It falls apart the second you do the arithmetic.

@ThisWeeknAI What’s best for managing slack and gmail? I want something to read my comms and present responses back to me to approve.

@socialwithaayan Shat ap

BREAKING: AI can now do market research like McKinsey (for free). Here are 12 insane Claude Opus 4.6 prompts that replace $5,000 consultant: (Save for later)