Simon

JUST IN - A broker for U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, attempted to make a large investment in major defense companies in the weeks leading up to the Iran War — FT

SECRETARY RUBIO: Here are the clear objectives of the operation. You should write them down: 1. The destruction of Iran’s air force 2. The destruction of their navy 3. The severe diminishing of their missile launching capability 4. The destruction of their factories 🎯

this angle is crazy. Hurley is a physcopath lmaooo

Gaza doctor tells The Grayzone how she treated a two year old child, Jawad Abu Nasser, who was tortured by Israel Dr. Bisan Ahmed says the child was abducted in Maghazi Refugee Camp with his father, then viciously abused to force his father into confession “I decided to be a voice for those who have none, for a 2 year old child who couldn’t express his first words, nor express the pain he felt”

After killing Ali Shuaib, the IDF accused him of being part of Hezbollah’s Radwan forces, releasing a photo of the Al Manar reporter in military garb. “Unfortunately there isn’t really a picture of it, it was photoshopped,” the IDF told Fox News about the source of the photo.

By far the best piece I have read on U.S. strategic options in Iran.

#عاجل ‼️انذار عاجل وخطير: نكرر تأكيدنا انه وفي إطار أنشطته الارهابية يقوم حزب الله باستخدام سيارات الإسعاف استخدامًا عسكريًا واسعًا. 🔸وانطلاقًا من ذلك نعود ونحذّر انه يجب التوقف فورًا عن الاستخدام العسكري للمرافق الطبية وسيارات الإسعاف ونؤكد أنه في حال عدم التوقف عن هذا النهج فإن إسرائيل ستعمل وفقًا للقانون الدولي ضد أي نشاط عسكري يقوم به حزب الله الإرهابي مستخدمًا تلك المرافق وسيارات الإسعاف

Here's our detailed investigation into the deadly strike on the Iranian town of Lamerd on the first day of the conflict, which munitions experts say was likely carried out with state-of-the-art US missiles.

Chinese Embassy Spokesperson’s Response to Media Question Regarding the Erroneous Comments on Xinjiang Question from the Media: Yesterday, when testifying at a hearing of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Industry and Technology regarding the Canadian federal government’s automotive policy, a Canadian scholar stated that there is “forced labor” in the production of Chinese electric vehicle components, so Canada should not import Chinese EVs. What is China’s take on this? Answer: The blatant lie spread by a handful of anti-China individuals about the so-called “forced labor” in China aims to achieve nothing but “forced unemployment”. What they want is simply to deprive the Chinese people of their right to pursue a happy life through hard work, disrupt the normal production and operation of Chinese enterprises, and suppress China’s development, which will also severely damage the stability of global supply chains. Their ulterior motive cannot be any clearer, and it seriously infringes upon the labour rights of the Chinese people. We strongly condemn and resolutely oppose it. The Chinese government has always adhered to the “people-centered” philosophy, attaching great importance to its citizens’ basic rights, including their labour rights. It is the overriding priority for the Chinese government to create jobs for people of all ethnic groups so that their rights to employment are protected and that they can live a decent and happy life. China-Canada EV cooperation is intrinsically mutually beneficial and win-win, as it brings tangible benefits to the people of both countries. And such cooperation is very much welcomed by the majority of the Canadian public. No matter how many times repeated, a lie is always a lie. Using the so-called “forced labor” as a pretext to smear and attack China will never be accepted. Using it to undermine China-Canada EV cooperation will find no support. And the anti-China forces’ ill-intentioned political manipulation of the so-called “forced labor” is doomed to fail.

"Again, what are you going to do?...You're still home." Ben McCollum on his players' frustrations down the stretch.