SuperVisionado

Paperhands & shorters got REKT! KAT is up 30% 🚀 despite BTC failing to defend 70k 📉 🫡 @Bybit_Official @BithumbOfficial 🇰🇷 REAL REVENUE 💰 - Katana generates ~$8000/day - More than Ton, Sui, Cardano, etc REAL UTILITY ⚙️ - Remember: KAT is the only chain token that directs liquidity on the blockchain - Stakers decide where emissions go & that is a function that you're all underestimating in a bear DEFI TVL STEADY 🌊 - Currently: ~$364m - Reason: Sustained HIGH YIELDS 🧑‍🌾 Sushi: USDC/KAT 2447% 🧑‍🌾 Morpho: SOL 34% 🧑‍🌾 Katana: BTC 2% | ETH 4.9% | USDC 7.8% | USDT 8.2% CHAIN OWNED LIQUIDITY 🏄 - Currently: ~$453k - Growing sustainably from gas fees You're NGMI without KAT in your portfolio!

The state of CT over the years... 2021: buying jpegs at 2am 2022: crying about jpegs at 2am 2023: pretending jpegs never happened 2024: buying memes at 2am 2025: buying jpegs again to farm OpenSea 2026: AI Agents

This is exactly why we don't had an altseason. PumpFun jeopardized it.

When it comes to moving money, the method matters. It's not our first trillion.

Ethereum without L2s in 2021–2023 would’ve simply choked on fees. Rollups genuinely saved the ecosystem – they brought throughput, users, DeFi activity, and bought time so L1 wouldn’t collapse under its own load. But then an uncomfortable truth surfaced: generic L2s started pulling value toward themselves. Ethereum gave them security, liquidity, and brand, while most of the revenue was captured by sequencers and the teams themselves. As a temporary fix, the model worked. As a long-term “fair alliance,” not really. What’s next: the era of “just another cheap EVM L2” is basically over. The ones that survive won’t be the most Ethereum-aligned, but those with a real reason to exist – privacy, alternative VMs, institutional rails, ultra-high performance. The new logic is simple: Ethereum remains the settlement + security + liquidity layer, and L2s must do what L1 cannot. In short, the market is shifting from ideology to pragmatism: not “who’s aligned,” but “who’s actually useful and what people are willing to pay for.”

COMMUNITY TRAIT CONTEST 👹 Tell us a trait you’d love to see. We’ll pick the best one and include it in our collection🔥 Head, Ears, Body, Mouth, Eyes, BG LIKE, RT, TAG 3 FRIENDS TO ENTER

@Monstersnft_ @SDecays @Albertoramonsa @LFreakSonic @lymbothecat Nice NY baseball caps 😅

Most people think you need to start early to win big in crypto. Think again. - Vitalik (@VitalikButerin) wrote the Ethereum whitepaper at 19 (2013). - Brian (@brian_armstrong) co-founded Coinbase at 29 (2012). - CZ (@cz_binance) launched Binance at 40 (2017). - Michael (@saylor) made his first major Bitcoin bet at 55 (2020). - Kristoffer Koch bought 5,000 BTC for $27, forgot about it and woke up a millionaire From a teenager to someone in their mid-50s. All built serious wealth in the same market through conviction, building, or holding with no shortcuts or scams. There is no expiry date. So you’ve got time. Start whenever. Stay in.

@0xngmi LPs should not be paying for bad risk management

The Resolv USR exploit wasn't a bug - it was a feature working exactly as designed. And that's the problem. How USR minting works: you deposit USDC, then an off-chain service with a privileged key decides how much USR to mint for you. The contract checks the minimum but has no maximum. No cap. No ratio to collateral. Whatever the key holder says - gets minted. You could deposit $1 and mint billions. This design was live since day one. It wasn't a code bug. The threat model was simply: "the key won't leak." It did. Attacker got the key. Deposited $200K across two txs, minted 80M unbacked USR. Dumped on DEXes, walked away with ~$23M in ETH. Single point of failure: one private key, no on-chain sanity checks. No max mint ratio, no multisig, no timelock. One compromised key = unlimited money printer. The contract worked perfectly. That's the scariest part.

Resolv was audited 18 times. The exploited contract was reviewed. The vulnerability was never flagged. In December 2024, auditors reviewed this exact contract and found 5 issues, including a High severity bug in the fee function. One finding was literally called "Missing upper limit validation." But it was about price bounds in a different contract. The function that lets a single key mint unlimited tokens with no ceiling? Not mentioned. That's how audits work: a function restricted to a trusted role is "privileged, out of scope." Auditors verify code correctness, not whether trusting one key with unlimited power is a good idea. 18 audits couldn't prevent this. The flaw wasn't in the code - it was in the architecture.

I’m not calling the bottom. I’m not saying go all in. But, time after time, on virtually any and every pump, $CRONJe is among the top performers. And times like these, it’s great to pick two high-performing tokens and farm them… And even now we have been victims of the market and the chain, it has vastly outperformed virtually everything - without the farming worked in. Get ready for a rocky road during the upcoming months.

@SonicLabs Eid Mubarak!

Eid Mubarak from all of us at Sonic 🌙

@SmokeyTheBera Eid Mubarak! ☪️

Eid Mubarak to all of the brothers and sisters out there Eidi gifts from Berachain on the way soon 👀

Eid Mubarak!

@unfinished_kek @safe @0xPolygon What a multisig wallet has to do with Polymarket? Why do ppl keep asking the same question for any Polygon movement?

@safe @0xPolygon isnt it just polymarket?

🚨 JUST IN: @0xPolygon is seeing an unprecedented Safe deployment surge 260,000+ new Safe wallets deployed in the first 17 days of March 2026 That's 15x the monthly average for most of 2024. Something big is happening on Polygon right now

@safe @0xPolygon @grok what may be the most reasonable explanation to this surge of Safe deployments on Polygon blockchain?

"What's the real reason the Epstein Files were released?"