Texas First Politics

6.4K posts

Texas First Politics banner
Texas First Politics

Texas First Politics

@TXFirstPolitics

GOP consultant of over 200 campaigns offering analysis on American politics

Republic of Texas เข้าร่วม Ekim 2022
193 กำลังติดตาม444 ผู้ติดตาม
Texas First Politics
Texas First Politics@TXFirstPolitics·
Trump got exactly what he wanted in the negotiation - mineral rights, US sovereignty over current and future bases, missile defense, etc. You must consume legacy media if you didn't know we won. Key Changes in the 2026 Framework... Explicit tie to the "Golden Dome" missile-defense system: The 1951 pact was a general Cold War-era defense agreement. The 2026 framework specifically incorporates Trump's proposed integrated air/missile-defense initiative (modeled partly on Israel's Iron Dome) for protection against Russian/Chinese threats, with Greenland as a key site. European NATO allies are expected to cooperate or contribute. Potential limited U.S. sovereignty over base lands: The 1951 agreement granted the U.S. exclusive jurisdiction inside defense areas but kept underlying land sovereignty with Denmark/Greenland. The framework reportedly discusses ceding small specific parcels for new or expanded U.S. bases (modeled on UK sovereign base areas in Cyprus or a long-term lease like Guantánamo Bay). This remains under discussion and faces resistance. Formal mineral and critical-resource rights: The original treaty had no economic/resource component. The framework includes U.S. (and allied) access to Greenland's untapped rare-earth and critical minerals, which Trump has highlighted for strategic and economic reasons. (A 2019 U.S.-Greenland MOU on surveys existed but was narrower.) Stronger multilateral NATO/Arctic focus and adversary exclusion: The 1951 pact was bilateral (U.S.-Denmark under NATO). The 2026 version elevates NATO's role, with calls for European allies to increase Arctic surveillance, defense spending, and commitments to counter Russia and China (e.g., barring their military or mining operations). It frames the entire Arctic region more broadly. Political/diplomatic framing and "forever" reaffirmation: The framework drops any purchase or annexation talk, reaffirms the 1951 rights as permanent, and positions the U.S. as achieving its "strategic goals… at very little cost." It emerged as a face-saving de-escalation after Trump's threats, with ongoing working-group talks involving the U.S., Denmark, Greenland, and NATO.
English
0
0
0
6
A.C.M.
A.C.M.@a_c__01001101·
@TXFirstPolitics @InsiderGeo "we just want the leverage of the threat to negotiate a better deal" And yet, Texas Oblast resident, no better deal was reached. US retained all the same access it ever had, nothing was gained. Fucking bots on this site man, out of control.
English
2
0
2
40
GeoInsider
GeoInsider@InsiderGeo·
NEW: Denmark reportedly prepared for a possible U.S. attack on Greenland. In January 2026, Danish soldiers were flown to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq under Operation Arctic Endurance, carrying explosives and blood supplies, ready to defend the island if President Donald Trump attempted to seize it by force. Plans included destroying key runways to prevent U.S. aircraft from landing, ensuring that any attack would come at a high cost. The operation involved elite Danish units, including the Dragoon Regiment and Jægerkorps forces, alongside French alpine troops, with additional support offered by Germany, Norway, and Sweden. Sources emphasize that while European allies stood ready to assist, it was Denmark’s own planning and readiness that created the strongest deterrent, signaling clearly to the U.S. that Greenland would not be taken easily. The crisis escalated after the U.S. military operation in Venezuela on January 3, 2026, which made officials fear that Greenland could be next. Overnight, what had been a simmering concern became an urgent, all-hands-on-deck defense of the Kingdom, with Europe coordinating closely but leaving Denmark in the leading role. Sources describe the preparations as unprecedented since World War II. Soldiers were fully armed, deployed under the royal defense order, and ready for combat. F-35 fighter jets and naval assets were mobilized, while multiple European allies offered troops, air support, and naval presence. Operation Arctic Endurance was officially presented as a military exercise, but insiders stress there was nothing simulated about the readiness. Although President Trump later publicly ruled out military force, sources warn that the Greenland crisis is not over. Trump is here for three more years a high-ranking Danish source says. No matter what happens, the distrust and challenge to the Commonwealth will persist as long as he aims to go down in history by expanding U.S. territory. For French officials involved in the crisis, the past year under Trump has been a stark lesson: Europe must relearn the grammar of power and cannot assume that military support from the United States will always be available if Europe faces threats.
GeoInsider tweet media
English
26
71
497
74.4K
Texas First Politics
Texas First Politics@TXFirstPolitics·
Canada's dairy supply management system—often dubbed a "cartel" by critics in the US and some Canadian think tanks—is a long-standing protectionist policy covering dairy, poultry, and eggs. It works through three pillars: Strict production quotas allocated to farmers to match domestic demand. Government-set high farmgate prices to ensure profitability. High tariffs (often 200–300%+, up to ~400% in some cases) on imports exceeding limited tariff-rate quotas (TRQs), effectively blocking most foreign competition. This system stabilizes prices and incomes for Canadian dairy farmers (about 10,000–12,000 producers, many in Quebec and Ontario) but keeps domestic milk prices roughly double those in the US and burdens consumers (extra ~$300–400 per household annually, hitting lower-income families hardest). The US views it as unfair protectionism that distorts trade, limits market access for American dairy farmers (who operate in a more open, market-driven system), and creates a major bilateral friction point. Under the USMCA (2020 successor to NAFTA), Canada granted some additional access via expanded TRQs, but disputes persist: US complaints focus on Canada's TRQ allocation methods (favoring domestic processors over US exporters), low fill rates (~42% average in recent years), and alleged non-compliance. Multiple dispute panels have ruled partially in the US's favor, but Canada has made only limited changes. President Trump and US dairy groups repeatedly highlight it as a key irritant, threatening tariffs or demanding more concessions in ongoing/renewal talks (USMCA review in 2026). In short: It's a domestic subsidy-like shield for Canadian farmers that blocks US dairy exports, fueling chronic trade tensions and accusations of unfair barriers despite USMCA improvements.
English
0
0
0
12
Pierre Poilievre
Pierre Poilievre@PierrePoilievre·
Canada and the United States have kept our continent free, secure, and prosperous for generations. We can build on that historic friendship to deliver affordability, strength, and security for both our countries. Thank you to the @fpa1918 for hosting us to share how tariff-free trade between trusted friends is the right path forward.
Pierre Poilievre tweet mediaPierre Poilievre tweet mediaPierre Poilievre tweet mediaPierre Poilievre tweet media
English
208
544
3.8K
49.7K
Texas First Politics
Texas First Politics@TXFirstPolitics·
@KasMol1986 @InsiderGeo "...full scale war with Europe" Bwahahahaha! No country in Europe can project power across the Atlantic. If we go to war, it will be IN Europe.
English
0
0
0
4
Kasper Moller
Kasper Moller@KasMol1986·
@TXFirstPolitics @InsiderGeo A dead European soldier is all it would take and then you would have a full scale war with Europe. And Trump… One of the most unstable leaders in the world since the 40’s. C’mon…
English
2
0
1
44
Texas First Politics
Texas First Politics@TXFirstPolitics·
Trump got exactly what he wanted in the negotiation - mineral rights, US sovereignty over current and future bases, missile defense, etc. You must consume legacy media if you didn't know we won. Key Changes in the 2026 Framework... Explicit tie to the "Golden Dome" missile-defense system: The 1951 pact was a general Cold War-era defense agreement. The 2026 framework specifically incorporates Trump's proposed integrated air/missile-defense initiative (modeled partly on Israel's Iron Dome) for protection against Russian/Chinese threats, with Greenland as a key site. European NATO allies are expected to cooperate or contribute. Potential limited U.S. sovereignty over base lands: The 1951 agreement granted the U.S. exclusive jurisdiction inside defense areas but kept underlying land sovereignty with Denmark/Greenland. The framework reportedly discusses ceding small specific parcels for new or expanded U.S. bases (modeled on UK sovereign base areas in Cyprus or a long-term lease like Guantánamo Bay). This remains under discussion and faces resistance. Formal mineral and critical-resource rights: The original treaty had no economic/resource component. The framework includes U.S. (and allied) access to Greenland's untapped rare-earth and critical minerals, which Trump has highlighted for strategic and economic reasons. (A 2019 U.S.-Greenland MOU on surveys existed but was narrower.) Stronger multilateral NATO/Arctic focus and adversary exclusion: The 1951 pact was bilateral (U.S.-Denmark under NATO). The 2026 version elevates NATO's role, with calls for European allies to increase Arctic surveillance, defense spending, and commitments to counter Russia and China (e.g., barring their military or mining operations). It frames the entire Arctic region more broadly. Political/diplomatic framing and "forever" reaffirmation: The framework drops any purchase or annexation talk, reaffirms the 1951 rights as permanent, and positions the U.S. as achieving its "strategic goals… at very little cost." It emerged as a face-saving de-escalation after Trump's threats, with ongoing working-group talks involving the U.S., Denmark, Greenland, and NATO.
English
0
0
1
8
Texas First Politics
Texas First Politics@TXFirstPolitics·
@KXAN_News It actually launches this week, but the line at AUS is so long, you can't board until November.
English
0
0
1
24
Texas First Politics
Texas First Politics@TXFirstPolitics·
Apparently the Canadian education system is failing too... Yes, Alberta and Quebec are signature gathering to leave Canada. As of early 2024, only about 58% of the force is considered fully ready for operations, falling short of their 90% target. The Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) are currently experiencing a significant, long-term decline in operational readiness, with internal reports highlighting severe equipment, personnel, and training shortcomings. Youth unemployment in Canada is experiencing a significant crisis, with rates rising to 14.1% as of February 2026, marking the highest levels since the 2010s, excluding the pandemic era. The 15–24 age cohort is struggling, with over 850,000 young people not in employment, education, or training. Violent crime severity increased considerably in every province and nearly every major city over the last decade. In most provinces, the past few years have produced the highest levels of violent crime severity recorded at any point since the index began in 1998. Home ownership remains out of reach or heavily burdensome for most Canadians — particularly first-time buyers, lower/middle-income households, and those in high-cost provinces. Many rely on dual incomes, significant family help for down payments, or smaller/condo options to even approach ownership.
Texas First Politics tweet media
English
1
0
0
29
Texas First Politics
Texas First Politics@TXFirstPolitics·
Reality is hard. Your country is a joke. It's falling apart (literally). It can't defend itself. It can't employ its youth. No one can afford a home. Crime is through the roof. It takes six months to see a medical specialist, but being murdered by the state is a same day appointment. You sent 30 specialists to Iraq so we should ignore the massive security and economic risk you represent to North America? Just sit quietly and wait for annexation.
English
1
0
0
54
Texas First Politics
Texas First Politics@TXFirstPolitics·
I love to blame commies for most things, but this is simply not true. Hey Grok, did Canada meet its NATO spending targets under the Harper Government? - No, Canada did not meet its NATO defense spending targets under the Stephen Harper government (2006–2015). Hey Grok, Did the Canadian Dairy Cartel exist under the Harper Government? - Yes, the "Canadian Dairy Cartel" aka supply management system for dairy existed under the Stephen Harper government (2006–2015). Hey Grok, Did the Canadian government only come under criticism for letting their military degrade and shrink under Trudeau, or did the criticism exist under Harper too? - No, criticism of Canada's military degrading and shrinking was not exclusive to the Trudeau government—it existed under Stephen Harper's Conservative government (2006–2015) as well.
English
0
0
0
52
Vytautas Jokubauskas 🇱🇹 🇪🇺
@TXFirstPolitics @InsiderGeo You were nr 44 to even recognise our independence after spending our entire freedom movement pressuring to suspend it, fearingit would derail gorby reforms your imbeciles cheered for. What "wealth" did your clown possy ass allegedly gave to LT? Concrete numbers required.
English
1
0
0
15
Texas First Politics
Texas First Politics@TXFirstPolitics·
You are free to feel however you want. Doesn't change reality. You became a country again bc of the US Cold War on the Soviets. Your attitude today is exactly why it won't happen again. We gave Europe generations of American middle class wealth and look what you've done with it. A continent of welfare queens without a drop of self-respect or testosterone.
English
1
0
0
18
Texas First Politics
Texas First Politics@TXFirstPolitics·
@vytejok @InsiderGeo Imagine the arrogance and hubris to sit in a tiny backwater next to an expansive imperial dictatorship and whine about America, on the other side of the planet. How many times do y'all need to learn the lesson? At least once more apparently.
English
1
0
1
34
(((Tendar)))
(((Tendar)))@Tendar·
Bessent: „We have unsanctioned Russian oil (…) in the coming days we may unsanction Iranian oil.“ Just excellent. We have absolute pros at the helm of that ship.
English
72
339
3.1K
86.7K