EVILpartyOfficial

@BrockRiddickIFB Proof only exists in mathematics. that said the observed reality around us is not possible on a flat earth.

Even if they had evidence... It wouldn't be satisfactory. Proof is all that will work. Evidence will never work. ONLY proof (exclusively) (and no, it is not up to us to know what such proof would look like... it is up to us to decide how proof DO NOT look like)

@aquavitae96 Actually I can. A social group with a shared belief system and bias towards to faces and pack bonding explains why religiosity developed quite nicely.

Atheist who accepts evolutionary theory cannot accept the fact that evolution has evolved the human brain to overwhelmingly select for religious belief. Ironic.

@darwintojesus God is responsible in the xtian belief system because he made you knowing what you would do AND has the power to prevent it

Knowledge doesn't cause anything, and it certainly doesn't remove responsibility. We all know what Germany did in WWII. Are we responsible for what they did because we know it? No, no we aren't. We know what they did, **because** they did it. It's not the other way around. God knows what we choose because that's what we choose. And because we freely choose to sin, God judges us. I mean think about it... imagine everyone is going around acting totally depraved and evil, but no one knows what they're doing. There's no "knower." Now add a "knower," nothing else changes. Someone now knows what they're doing. Are they now somehow not responsible for their actions because someone knows what they're doing? I hope you can see how absurd that is.

@PaulK0985 @GrizzledTexan @darwintojesus Again I didnt say it was a good thing? I know you have a script but I said "the AIM was to reduce spread through the population"

@TheHonestEvil @GrizzledTexan @darwintojesus WRONG AGAIN. Lockdowns caused 1000x more deaths and disease than you hoped Covid ever would...u are a fukin reetard.

This is a myth. Doing science requires blind faith in 15-30 totally unproven assumptions. Why is it that people who say they love science know basically nothing about it?

@PaulK0985 @GrizzledTexan @darwintojesus Notice how I didn't say stops transmission. But reduces it? I know the concept of viral load sounds complicated. But it boils down to "reduced contact with a contagion reduces the risk of infection" Whilst masks don't stop every droplet they do stop a lot reduce their size

@TheHonestEvil @GrizzledTexan @darwintojesus Incorrect. A mask does not stop viral transmission Covid virus is .125 microns,N95 masks have pore holes of .3 microns and surgical masks have pore holes ranging from 16 to 140 microns and droplets around .2 microns can be atomized and have a hang time in cloud form for 6-40 hrs

@GrizzledTexan @darwintojesus The people that told you otherwise lied to you. No one is saying lockdowns are good things with no consequences, but the aim was to reduce how quickly the disease spreads through the population

@GrizzledTexan @darwintojesus Here's the thing eith that phrase. You, and the majority of the public, dont understand the topic well enough to really investigate it. Masks and social distancing DO slow the spread respiratory, droplet spread infections, and DID slow the soread kf covid.

@darwintojesus @BasicHeresy I dont think you understand the correlation vs causation thing...

Firstly, correlation doesn't equal causation. Secondly you're assuming that in reality if you hold a true belief you'll get better results, but that's an assumption about reality, not something you can actually test. So you have at least two problems here and you're not even addressing what I actually said.

If you believe that only evidence justifies a belief... That itself "only evidence justifies a belief" is also a belief. But what's the evidence for that? Ultimately beliefs have to based in something besides evidence.

@NoWarChristian Oh I didnt even get to the war crimes, genocides and what amounts to the sex slavery that your god commands the isrealites to engage in...if you want to go there we can though?

@TheHonestEvil Rethinking it, I guess Israel could’ve put the poor in prison like America does, that sounds more loving.

@NoWarChristian Thats what the bible says is okay. They they are property. That they can be inherited. Hell exodus gives you a way to hold a man's wife and children hostage to essentially force him into chattel slavery...

@TheHonestEvil Property, depends on the context. Objects? No.

@NoWarChristian So to be clear, owning, and treating people as property and objects is totally fine?

@TheHonestEvil x.com/nowarchristian…

@NoWarChristian Did you actually think I'd make the claim that the bible explicitly condones chattel slavery without having read the bible?

@NoWarChristian Lev 25:44 - 45 Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property.

@NoWarChristian So to be clear, you dont think that owning and treating as objects and property is wrong? (And yes the bible explicitly allows and condones chattel slavery)

@TheHonestEvil My guy, I don’t consider slavery evil in itself. The transatlantic slave trade? Yes, evil. So, this dog isn’t gonna hunt.

@NoWarChristian Notice how you completely skipped answering the question? Lets make it more explicit, can yiu give me a single explicitly anti-slavery christian group or writing from before the 17th century?

@TheHonestEvil Well, at least you’re honest about your evil

@BrockRiddickIFB The reason we dont use the relativity equations for most human cases is that the newtonian approximation gives the same results in them and are much easier to understand and solve...

@BrockRiddickIFB As I said when you previously made this claim. Outside of relativistic scales the relativity equations simplify to newtons equations. And yes the Cavendish experiment fits relativity perfectly.

So... Given the premise that BOTH the Einsteinian General Relativity Gravitational THEORY (unproven) and the Newtonian Classical Mechanics Gravitational THEORY (unproven) cant be applicable (ONE, at Most): Some questions: 👇 Question 1: [25 Marks] So Newton's THEORY applies for everything BUT "the orbit of the planet Mercury"? Question 2: [25 Marks] So Einstein's THEORY does not apply to the explanation of what Cavendish imagined in his shed? Question 3a: [25 Marks] If you, by some warped logic of imagination, challenge the premise and baselessly ASSERT that BOTH Einstein and Newton were correct, then at WHAT POINT of mass does the Einsteinian General Relativity Gravitational THEORY (unproven) overwrite the Newtonian Classical Mechanics Gravitational THEORY (unproven)? Question 3b: [25 Marks] Assuming that there is a CONTINUOUS (analog) spectrum for the application of both; at what point do BOTH the Newtonian Theory and Einsteinian Theory apply? (or is the Switchover INSTANTANEOUS (discrete) in nature? Hint: But be careful... because your science priests saw Flat Earthers on the horizon, and they are now FORCED to retreat, retract, recede into the Imaginary World of the Hypothetical \ Conceptual \ Abstract Quantum realm... Looking for the Quantum Graviton Particle, Theory (unproven)... 😎👍 [TOTAL: 100]

@oliverburdick Can you name any of those "500 witnesses" mentioned by paul in that creed? Everytime this claim is made i am convinced xtians don't understand what the word evidence means.

The real facts:

@SteveMcRae_ No because "i am unconvinced that a super natural being that can be described as a god exists" Is not a truth claim about anything but my lack of belief... "I believe a god exists" inherently means you think you know a thing about reality.

This is a false analogy. One could easily reframe in the negative and argue by similar means that "Theism is a lack of belief in the non-existence of God"