Tj

@LetsFlareAgain @paratroopbrady 4/12/26 What about it

@paratroopbrady Note the date on the video.

I hope this kid is okay. He went flying. 😳

"we should talk about it" *Turns off replies*

@ThePubliusUSA Is this you?

@Matt_E_Baumann We need to chill says the guy posting like he's dunking on Orangeman due to his stage 10 TDS for something he can't even use. SMH

Y’all need to chill, my kids don’t even qualify for this. SMH my head.

Taxes are done!

You can't step into the political arena using your platform as a pope and then complain when you get political pushback That's a typical leftist, woke response

Well, @ShawnRyan762, I know my comparing you to @maddow seems like a joke to some, but I can assure you that it is not. As a former SEAL that has sat in briefing rooms in theater, run ops against jihadist networks, and built a platform interviewing many sharp people in both operations and intelligence, you of all people should understand how strategic warfare actually works. Despite all of that, you are sitting here and pushing posts like a cable news commentator with rimmed glasses on a communist news network, framing decisive pressure against the world's leading state sponsor of militant jihadist terrorism as "chaos" and "loss." Let's cut through this selective timeline you laid out: Trump issued a brutal, unmistakable warning over the Strait of Hormuz, the chokepoint Iran's regime was weaponizing to strangle global energy and fund its proxies. That wasn't just some bluster for fun, it was quite literally combatant messaging 101 in asymmetric conflict against an enemy that only respects raw and credible power. Jihadist Islamists like the IRGC, Hezbollah, Hamas, Houthis, and their ilk don't negotiate in good faith or respond to polite diplomacy, and you absolutely know this. They only respond to negotiations from positions of strength. If you do not negotiate that way, they will probe weaknesses, exploit hesitation, and interpret restraint as invitations to push attacks. History from the Beirut barracks to the USS Cole to Benghazi and to decades of proxy attacks has proven that. You've had guests that have spoken about these things, yet you act ignorant of them now? This apocalyptic rhetoric is the only language these people understand, and you know it. Iran blinked because of that rhetoric, floated a ceasefire tied to reopening the strait, and the administration secured a pause to lock in gains. That is not "lighting the world on fire then calling the fire department," you two bit propagandist, that is literally the way war has always worked. It is coercion through strength: downgrade the enemy's capacity, signal willingness to escalate decisively, then offer the off ramp on your terms. It's wild that you are ignorant about this. And then you cry about Israel hitting Beirut like the soft lefty you have turned into... Beirut is in Lebanon, mind you, which is a completely different country than Iran. Perhaps you need a geography lesson as well as a lesson on strategic level warfare? So yeah, that is not Trump chaos, that is Israel finishing the job against an Iranian proxy that has quite literally fired thousands of rockets and embedded itself among civilians in Lebanon for decades. And Lebanon was explicitly carved out of the US and Iran ceasefire for a reason, so even bringing it up here is silly and meant to distract. Also, Iran quickly "closed" the Strait back up because they are purveyors of taqiyya style negotiations, just like jihadists always are. But let's talk about how they "closed" the Strait, because everyone is being dishonest about that as well. They didn't actually close anything, they are just signaling that they will attack ships that cross through it. All it takes is one drone or one missile hitting one tanker and 20% of the world's oil shipping halts until insurance companies feel confident that the crazy Islamic terrorist regime in Iran won't sink any more hundred million dollar tankers. You also conveniently leave out the real reason for this war from the get go, which is curtailing China and China's Belt and Road Initiative and re-establishing the world order firmly behind the United States. I miss the days just months ago when you weren't a fully captured op... seeing what you and guys like Kent have become is truly disheartening. I hope the money is worth it.

@Ella_Vader_7 @thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash So then you agree with Dave and all the other re-posts?

@Tj_Az1 @thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash lol nice try at reaching, did you hurt yourself?

This tweet did not age particularly well @Shawn_Farash

@Ella_Vader_7 @thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash "AI Overview Yes, "sad" can be considered a label, particularly when it is used to identify, categorize, or describe a person's emotional state"

@Tj_Az1 @thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash Sad is not a label you dip shit it’s an emotion. Are you ESL or something?

@Ella_Vader_7 @thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash Sad could be considered a label. I see you re-post Smith saying fuck Maga and some other ppl being critical, does that mean you agree with them since you re-post?

@Tj_Az1 @thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash I said it was sad, you dipstick. I never called them DEMONIC, or BLACK pulled or NON MAGA

@Ella_Vader_7 @thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash "His repeated insults to those that dare disagree with Trump has been sad to see" "People should be allowed to be critical and voice their opinions without being labeled"

@Tj_Az1 @thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash Try it again, this time read for comprehension

@Ella_Vader_7 @thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash Ok got it, insults against Orangeman ok if it aligns with your feelings, disagree with those insults against Orangeman its bad and third world.

@Tj_Az1 @thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash Not the point. People should be allowed to be critical and voice their opinions without being labeled a “black piller” That’s what other third world countries do

@Ella_Vader_7 @thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash Do you agree with the repeated insults against Orangeman from the people that dare disagree with him?

@thevivafrei @Shawn_Farash Thank you!!! I have bed. Telling him this got months now. His repeated insults to those that dare disagree with Trump has been sad to see. You were great today on PBD BTW

@KevinVT90 @Planet__Alison @ABC Did I say the Feds don't have to prove anything?

@Tj_Az1 @Planet__Alison @ABC the feds are the ones who have to prove the evidence beyond reasonable doubt, genius. Not the other way around.

Tyler Robinson, the man accused of killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk, allegedly told his boyfriend, "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I took it," according to newly unsealed court documents. abcnews.link/CwbAbIa

@OttoSmi31 @TheRightMelissa @RealAlexJones You answered my original question with some wacked Candace tard conspiracy crap that had nothing to do with my question. Gtfo.

@Tj_Az1 @TheRightMelissa @RealAlexJones My words can be interpreted as written. No other implied meanings or conspiracies. You said they meant something else lol.

I have made it very clear that I no longer support Trump and I’m very thankful to him for making it clear that I have nothing to do with him. The new Trump is a rotting husk of the old Trump. I hope 47 enjoys Mark Levine being his spirit animal..

@Planet__Alison @ABC Do you have proof the Feds wrote the messages or are you just spewing out whatever is fed to you by you know who? I'm just asking questions!

@ABC Lol you mean the Feds who wrote the fake messages while Tyler was in police custody. Do you have one journalistic bone in your body or do you just spew out whatever is fed to you?

@OttoSmi31 @TheRightMelissa @RealAlexJones Says the dipshit that his idea of debate and argument is immediately moving the goalposts to some Candace tard level conspiracy. 🙄

@Tj_Az1 @TheRightMelissa @RealAlexJones You're arguing what you think I'm implying, rather than what I wrote. Debates and arguments are never won with insults, putting words in someone's mouth, or trying to read their mind. I take it you've never been married? 😂

@OttoSmi31 @TheRightMelissa @RealAlexJones You're insinuating that Trump knew it was a school and same for Charlie with your wording because you are fkn mental. And by the way, nice move of the goalpost from your original comment and my original reply. Idiot.

@Tj_Az1 @TheRightMelissa @RealAlexJones I did not claim he pushed the button to fire the missile, but the school was targeted. That's an objective fact. I did not say "he killed Charlie." Twisting words and name calling gets you nowhere. Maybe ask Ai to think of a better gotcha style comeback.

This tweet cites a Daily Beast re-write of another article, filled with anonymous sources who clearly lied, because the story has now been totally rebuked by both the Pentagon and by Cardinal Christophe Pierre. This is 100% garbage Fake News. The reporters who wrote it should immediately retract their stories, and the “influencers” who fell for it should delete their tweets.👇

@OttoSmi31 @TheRightMelissa @RealAlexJones Are you saying Orangeman purposely launched a cruise missile targeting a girls' elementary school? I just want to see what level of mentally ill you are, which is already pretty high by thinking he killed Charlie.

@Tj_Az1 @TheRightMelissa @RealAlexJones Did Trump have any problem taking out a school full of children in Iran? Nope. Not even the tiniest ounce of GAF. Would it shock me if Trump knew of a plot to take out Charlie and did nothing? No, it would not.

@CarriePrejean1 I’m sure he appreciates you getting his message re-tweeted though.