Wired Weasel

23.5K posts

Wired Weasel banner
Wired Weasel

Wired Weasel

@Wardance68

Isaiah 53 No greater love DO NOT send DMs

เข้าร่วม Ağustos 2015
435 กำลังติดตาม496 ผู้ติดตาม
AMASEEDSOWER
AMASEEDSOWER@DrShayPhD·
@hugdel @Wardance68 You were asked for the abominations of Protestantism, and your first exhibit was one man’s theology. That already tells everyone your case is thin. Calvin is not the measuring rod for Sola Scriptura. A man being wrong does not make Scripture insufficient. It makes the man wrong.
English
1
0
1
5
AMASEEDSOWER
AMASEEDSOWER@DrShayPhD·
The Catholic Church claims to have the foreskin of Jesus and five heads of John the Baptist. Additionally, the Catholic Church claims to have Mary's breast milk. They even celebrated the Feast of the Foreskin. As for Mary's breast milk, people line up and pay money to enter the Groto to view it. These people are programmed.
English
48
26
135
5.7K
Wired Weasel
Wired Weasel@Wardance68·
@hugdel @DrShayPhD Oh, one accusation, ok then. So use Scripture to prove him wrong, and please quote such Scripture. Oh, I forgot, Scripture is of little authority to you. What to do, what to do🤔
English
1
0
1
7
Hosanna in Excelsis
Ok. Let’s start one by one. The doctrine of double predestination by John Calvin. John Calvin’s doctrine of double predestination asserts that God, through an immutable and eternal decree, has sovereignly partitioned humanity into two groups: the **elect**, who are predestined for salvation by His mercy, and the **reprobate**, who are preordained for eternal damnation to manifest His justice. In this system, there is no genuine opportunity for the reprobate to be saved, as they are born into a state of total depravity and are systematically denied the irresistible grace required for repentance. Calvin argues that even the actions of the wicked are governed by the divine will, noting that they are "in a manner forced to be the ministers of his will," effectively making their condemnation an inevitable consequence of a destiny fixed before their birth. This is just an example of the abominations of protestantism. Do you want more?
English
2
0
0
21
Wired Weasel
Wired Weasel@Wardance68·
@hugdel @DrShayPhD No, no, no. I want you to give me a detailed list, since you are so well-informed about it, on these absurd or shocking things, not a video I'm not wasting time on. I'm sure you can, right?
GIF
English
1
0
1
28
Rain Drops Media
Rain Drops Media@Raindropsmedia1·
Woman eats 24 Popeyes biscuits back to back. 👀😳😭
English
699
147
1K
103.3K
Wired Weasel
Wired Weasel@Wardance68·
@hugdel @DrShayPhD I'm not Protestant, but I am quite curious. Please list these so-called "absurd or shocking things" and DO NOT post a bunch of RCC opinions, only unbiased facts.
English
1
0
0
31
Hosanna in Excelsis
I can also point our to absurd or shocking things that the protestant doctrine of sola scriptura has produced. Like crazy or harmful interpretations. Or thousands of sects. So, if you want to play the game of choosing the most shocking things a practice has produced, we are going to do the same
English
2
0
0
48
Wired Weasel
Wired Weasel@Wardance68·
@garrettham_esq @Wa0Sir @realmikolson Many of them couldn't even agree on who the Rock was. Tertullian, Cyprian, Ambrose: Peter was the Rock. St. John Chrysostom, St. Augustine: Peter's confession was the Rock. Some others: Jesus was the Rock. Is that not "core doctrine"? Why didn't they all agree?
English
0
0
0
6
Garrett Ham
Garrett Ham@garrettham_esq·
Vincent of Lérins answered this in 434: "what has been believed everywhere, always, and by all." The test isn't unanimity on every question. It's consensus on what the Church has always taught. On disputed questions the Fathers disagreed. On core apostolic doctrine—Real Presence, baptismal regeneration, apostolic succession, prayers for the dead—they agree with moral unanimity. That's what "consensus patrum" means. You're attacking a claim no Catholic makes.
English
1
0
0
7
Mikale Olson
Mikale Olson@realmikolson·
Chronological proximity to the apostles does NOT always = theological accuracy to the apostle’s teachings
GIF
English
21
6
108
1.9K
Val
Val@TrumpsHurricane·
This Black woman says “White people's happiness causes oppression, so they should stop feeling joy and give their money to black people.” What is your response to her ??
English
265
12
37
3K
Wired Weasel
Wired Weasel@Wardance68·
@ksorbs LGBTQ: Why don't people like us? People: ☝️
English
0
0
0
6
Kevin Sorbo
Kevin Sorbo@ksorbs·
Grown men doing disgusting things in front of children.
English
458
281
1.6K
44.8K
Liberta Cherguia 🇪🇺
Liberta Cherguia 🇪🇺@MbarkCherguia·
One year from today — what job do you see this graduate doing? 😏
English
1.1K
56
314
27.2K
Garrett Ham
Garrett Ham@garrettham_esq·
@Wa0Sir @realmikolson Ok. I'm not exactly sure what you meant by your first sentence, but the matter has been demonstrated. There is a ton of early Church writings on the subject. Apostolic succession appears in Church writings centuries before the final 27 book canonical list for the New Testament.
English
3
0
0
14
Wired Weasel
Wired Weasel@Wardance68·
@garrettham_esq @realmikolson Doesn't work that way. The burden of proof is always on the person making the claim (Apostolic succession), not the one disputing the claim🤣 "Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit." Latin for "the burden of proof lies on the one who declares".
English
0
0
0
4
Garrett Ham
Garrett Ham@garrettham_esq·
@realmikolson Maybe not. But twenty centuries later, the burden of proof is on anyone questioning the early Christian understanding of apostolic teaching.
English
3
0
1
74
Wired Weasel
Wired Weasel@Wardance68·
@realmikolson Exactly. RCC: The Apostles taught this, but let me tweak it just a touch so it sounds better to me.
English
0
0
0
5
Wired Weasel รีทวีตแล้ว
Scott Roberts
Scott Roberts@ScottRoberts·
Scott Roberts tweet media
ZXX
20
137
599
5.2K
Genius Tech
Genius Tech@Geniustechw·
TikToker gets triggered by the thumbs-up emoji, claiming that using it is rude. What say you?😂
English
178
5
19
2.7K