❌〶he🎯racle™🍿

Some people actually think this image is real from Artemis II from NASA. This is the "original high resolution image" - Not from a camera but from ADOBE PHOTOSHOP and LIGHTROOM. As clearly shown in its own METADATA. #NASA #Artemis #lies

@CalebFulston @CryptoWhale

@X_the_Oracle @CryptoWhale Did you read my comment? I’m a photo editor, I know what raw files are. They might have to make one big composite because the subject is so large. Also, are you telling me that a billion dollar agency couldn’t edit metadata to hide some big conspiracy?

🌍 | Another photo of Earth released by NASA. And once again: no traces of airplanes, ships, or even satellites. Even though around 10,000-11,000 active satellitesare orbiting our planet, and more than 30,000 orbital objects are being tracked. And still, in these images- nothing.

@jbanj @klaw__21 That could be a photo of the night sky...add the globe in photoshop.

@klaw__21 @X_the_Oracle you’re literally seeing nikon d5 there. how much more braindead can you be?

Some people actually think this image is real from Artemis II from NASA. This is the "original high resolution image" - Not from a camera but from ADOBE PHOTOSHOP and LIGHTROOM. As clearly shown in its own METADATA. #NASA #Artemis #lies

@CalebFulston @CryptoWhale Its not an ORIGINAL CAMERA PHOTO its edited.

@X_the_Oracle @CryptoWhale Yes, most photographers edit their pictures before sending them. I don’t know how space photography works, but I’m assuming a lot of it needs to be edited together . At the ISS, they only see slivers of it because it’s so big. Also, if space was fake, couldn’t they just edit that

@X_the_Oracle That’s the real pic before they used photoshop to brighten it

@oh_womp @deadlinky ADOBE PHOTOSHOP DENIER!

@deadlinky @X_the_Oracle Poor guy thought he found the holy grail when he put it into the metadata viewer lol, poor soul..

@oh_womp @deadlinky Not CAMERA ORIGINAL.

@X_the_Oracle @deadlinky "Photoship and lightroom" yeah you have no idea what youre yapping about lol. But, I thought the metadata was faked!!! If you read it, it shows it was only in photoshop to be exported from the raw to a jpeg lmao

@GiovanniSagredo @TrendyNow1 Were you like this when you found out Santa isn't real Giovanni.

@X_the_Oracle @TrendyNow1 Again - There aren't too many things funnier to me than retards who think remote-controlled cameras are more complicated technological challenges than interplanetary spacecraft Do you think the ascent rate was a surprise? Y/N?

@oh_womp @deadlinky I did. It said it was edited in Photoshop and Lightroom.

@X_the_Oracle @deadlinky Yeah this guy is cooked.. you know at this point you should grab the entire metadata json and shove it into an AI, even grok lol, see what it says!

The same people who believe these bimbos went into space, believe we landed on the moon in the 60s.

@BoltonWriter @reality_revolt_ Edited in photoshop you seem to struggle with.

@X_the_Oracle @reality_revolt_ It also states the camera used. Or are we casually ignoring that bit of the metadata?

You’re shown carefully selected images, same clouds, same angle, supposedly 12 hours apart, and no one stops to think. A skydiver can film everything in high quality, but somehow a multi-billion dollar mission gives you blurry, choppy footage, and people just accept it. They show you fragments, they distract you when it matters, and as long as no one questions it, the illusion holds realityrevolt.com

@GiovanniSagredo @TrendyNow1 Yeah especially in 1972, using a remote controlled camera and able to send a video signal without a delay issue and perfectly pan the camera up following the Apollo 17 launch all from 384,400 km away from EARTH.

@X_the_Oracle @TrendyNow1 There aren't too many things funnier to me than retards who think remote-controlled cameras are more complicated technological challenges than interplanetary spacecraft 🤣

@GubbaHomestead NASA's "Original Highest Resolution" image of the Earth is edited in Adobe Photoshop and Lightroom as shown in the EXIF METADATA of the image.

Do you genuinely believe this is a REAL photo of earth from the Artemis crew? This video got me in trouble on another platform. Why? Because THEY don’t like it when you question the narrative and bring TRUTH to the people. That’s why.

@jasonwoody @DbauerBR549 @WaitingForPerot Ned Kelly would disagree with you.

@X_the_Oracle @DbauerBR549 @WaitingForPerot Run and hide confirmed. Thanks.

@KinorRapi All we want is the ORIGINAL UNEDITED IMAGE. Asking too much according to some.

@X_the_Oracle And so what ? Do you really think if NASA wanted to hide something they will leave metadata like that? Photos are post prod in LR or PS, it's not a secret

@kevconrad2 Yes I CAN. ADOBE PHOTOSHOP AND LIGHTROOM ALTERED.

@X_the_Oracle You can never prove it’s fake

@jasonwoody @DbauerBR549 @WaitingForPerot

@X_the_Oracle @DbauerBR549 @WaitingForPerot You gonna answer that question or run and hide?

@fucksteve_ They are taking both RAW/NEF and JPG files. The "Original Highest Resolution" file JPG has the Metadata they obviously edited as the long description is written in it and the editing was done also in Lightroom and Adobe Photoshop. WHY YOU TRIGGERED?

@X_the_Oracle It helps to take the dunce cap off before you speak. Every. Single. Digital. Photo. Shot in RAW format REQUIRES digital processing software. You can try to argue, but you'll only look dumber.

@X_the_Oracle You do know what lightroom is used for??

@oh_womp @deadlinky

@deadlinky @X_the_Oracle Yes lol hes likely a bot, funny thing is if you dig through the metadata it shows it was originally a NEF file *nikon raw*, then only used lightroom to export to a jpeg.

@X_the_Oracle You’re positing the image is “not real.” EDITED does not mean FAKE. To even get a camera raw into a file suitable for online uses you have to import it into software to save as PNG or JPG… So it doesn’t even have to be edited to come from photoshop or Lightroom.