Annette

@DrJuma_M You cannot track a phone that never connects, the phone could be destroyed and people ringing the number will still get a ring tone.

CONFIRMED:The Phones of The Passengers aboard MH370 from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing China Kept on Ringing Months After the Plane Vanished But Authorities Blatantly Refused to Track via Triangulation.

@RadiantPhysics @Edward_767 @markyOmatic You do not consider the lack of debris sightings in that area a slight problem to it being a viable site?

@Edward_767 @markyOmatic It's a viable site because there was an acoustic signal detected there, which makes it more than an MH370 hunch.

With Ocean Infinity and Malaysia announcing the search for MH370 has ended due to rough seasonal weather and commercial engagements, it's time to search the acoustic anomaly of Ed Anderson, located near Java in more favorable seas. Read more here: mh370.radiantphysics.com/2026/03/10/a-c…

@marlinsmuller @LabratSR Well they need a chief engineer on board no matter what they are going to be doing, no point having a nice shiny new ship just sitting in port when it is ready to go, but for one of the crew needed. Wait and see where their first task will be.

@LabratSR Do you think this may have something to do with MH370?

#MH370 This is potentially very interesting. linkedin.com/posts/aleksand…

@_sato113_ @breakfastmeat1 @dyork55 @LabratSR @VesselFinder The map is in the surface search area of March 20th-27th 2014, it just shows the Tomnod maps (red) and the areas the USN P8 Poseidon did (yellow, the sat image is Tomnods 18h with my sightings as the green dots, pink area is the range of the sound event.

@aussie500 @breakfastmeat1 @dyork55 @LabratSR @VesselFinder where is this map from?

#MH370 Nothing new to report. Armada 86 05 is still dealing with 3.5 meter waves heights. They are moving slowly, just riding it out. Welcome to the Southern Indian Ocean. #vesseltracking by @VesselFinder

@Ventus_45 @jaysguitars It would be pointless, if it was buoyant enough to get that far, a net and some fish would not keep it in place long. ATSB missed their chance to get a nice big piece of MH370, which was probably one of the horizontal stabilizers, or a large part of one.

@jaysguitars It would be nice if Armada 8605 could spend a couple of days searching Kit Oliver's fishing spot off Robe SA. smh.com.au/national/a-tra… dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1… news.com.au/travel/travel-…

#MH370 #OceanInfinity Here is a look at Armada 86 05's track South of Australia. #vesselfinder

@Ventus_45 There was a very good reason for Fugro to choose a towed rig over AUV's. No matter how big a ship OI come up with, they are not taking those AUV's down to the wreckage area. Maybe when the time comes who ever does the search will have something a lot smaller to do the scanning.

@aussie500 I agree that it's much further south than the 34-36S, but they will need a ship like Seabed Constructor to go down there, or Island Pride (which OI has) or similar.

@Ventus_45 Well an Armada ship is all the search is likely to get, OI have plenty of them and they are cheap to run. But they can never go down the wreckage area with that lot, so they are not ever going to be getting their 70 million.

@Ventus_45 I do not see how the Armada ships failed to handle the weather, it is using AUV's that restricts the search time to calm weather. Next one will be yet another Armada ship, hopefully with better weather for the search.

@aussie500 x.com/Ventus_45/stat… #comment-39906" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">mh370.radiantphysics.com/2026/01/01/the…

@Ventus_45 I am sure they will continue the search at some point, they have not devoted 55 days to it yet, but it seems Armada 8605 is off the task now. I would have preferred just getting it over and done with, see if the 7th arc experts have learned anything from yet another failed search

@aussie500 If it makes you feel better, Mike Exner said yesterday that they are going back to the search. x.com/Airlandseaman/…

@Ventus_45 I admit defeat, the search was doomed to fail anyway, it just fails earlier than expected. They have before had a different destination with ETA, and still gone back to the search. But the ship is not going where expected, they are definitely not going to my area, so Samoa it is.

@aussie500 I they are going back to the Arc, saying that they are going to a different ocean, (which has to be via the southern ocean), with a specific ETA at destination, does seem to be a just a tiny little bit beyond childish.

@Ventus_45 Schedules can change and it would not be the first time they went somewhere other than their supposed immediate destination. We will have to wait and see first, if they stop at the calibration area.

@aussie500 I have to disagree. Simple navigation.

@Ventus_45 So long as Armada 8605 is not removed from the SIO, some will still get their hopes up.

@Ventus_45 Unfortunately they were not close enough to wave to the submarine.

@aussie500 Agree, second ship has gone. Probably a system glitch.

Falcon is returning to the dock, having completed her third run out to Armada 8605. So, will Armada 8605 sail at noon ? (only 40 minutes away).

@Ventus_45 Although my Marine Traffic page has been doubling the Armada 8605's on the screen, I am pretty sure there is not a ship in front of them.

@aussie500 Interesting. On my screen it does not identify either your submarine, or the other boat immediately in front of Armada. Perhaps the sub is going to submerge and get pictures of Armada 8605's hull etc as she transits overhead ! (conspiracy theory as requested).

@Ventus_45 I cannot trust Marine Traffic at the moment, must be heavy usage today. But on my screen I have....

@aussie500 What ? Which sub is that ? I don't see any.

@Ventus_45 Can we throw one in for the conspiracy theorists? That Australian sub just north of Rottnest Is. Is it actually still there, is Armada 8605 going to give them a wave as they go by?

@Ventus_45 My freebie Marine Traffic is on strike, shows Falcon back at Armada 8605, and the harbor cam stopped updating a while ago. Must be the Ocean Infinity secrecy clause at work.

@Ventus_45 I am confused, Falcon has been out there twice now, but it looks like she is returning to Armada 8605 for a third time? Or is Marine Traffic having her go the wrong way?

2/2 Falcon cast off from Armada 8605 at 01:38 UTC (09:38 local time) (eight minutes alongside Armada 8605) Falcon sailed back into harbour at 02:04 UTC (10:04 local time) (twenty six minutes inbound transit time).