Rohan

Year 27 ✨ thank you God for Your lessons and protection

@Selfbasting @maximumpain333 Pretty much everything documented that Jesus said is by definition an inner teaching. It’s all meant for people to reflect on themselves and bring the light of consciousness into their lives. He never asked anyone to follow him or build churches in his name.

@maximumpain333 Pure fallacy backed by zero fact. No such "inner teaching" by Jesus ever proven anywhere or even written by anyone alive in the time of Christ.

THE SECRET ✨🙌🏾💫 © Corpus Hermeticum

@FredTusing1776 @maximumpain333 The church has completely brainwashed people to think that what Jesus was able to access in his lifetime is somehow not available to literally any human past present and future in this very lifetime.

@maximumpain333 This is from the spirit of the Antichrist! This is not Christianity at all! Jesus was not a Hindu nor an occultist! He is the Christ! If one is lost in the wilderness can they use positive thinking to find their way out? #Doctrines of #Demons

"The gates of hell are open night and day; Smooth the descent, and easy is the way: But to return, and view the cheerful skies, In this the task and mighty labor lies." Virgil

@theralkia Other than a few exceptions, the neo-spiritual marketplace flaunting false displays of purity, love and world peace can be extremely harmful to the minds of young men.

Philosophies/belief systems that all men in their 20s must scorn: - Atheism - Materialism - Rationalism - The redpill - The blackpill - Stoicism - Nihilism - Hedonism - Irony poisoning - Hustle culture - Utilitarian self-optimization What else?

@antoniogm Stoicism is actually highly spiritual - any impulse to forgo pleasure and egoic pursuits for something greater and more intangible is fundamentally a spiritual pursuit. When I read Aurelius and Seneca I was stunned by how similar it was to Eastern philosophy.

Stoicism is the philosophy of slaves (Epictetus), unjustly condemned men awaiting death (Seneca), and emperors of a dying empire (Marcus Aurelius). It became the philosophy of people who couldn’t control events, but still needed to feel sovereign over a dwindling sphere.

Eckhart Tolle youtu.be/3zcurl7QUCw?si…

Time to enter the Vanguard of life - where conflict, suffering, and loss are very real possibilities, but from which something beautiful and lasting can be created over time. God did not make me to be comfortable and passive.

@legitimatetiger Pickleball is a great option for anyone wanting to get into an active hobby, it’s good low-impact cardio, highly social, and also will teach you skill and strategy over time

Visions of Nepal

@catholiccreates @celestialbe1ng So I don’t think the tweet was about being a player actually engaging in multiple options, but rather being someone who *could* have other options due to their own quality. Then, the person or things you do focus on are even more special as you are choosing to forgo options.

@celestialbe1ng Nah. People are most attractive when they are self-possessed. It’s much more nobler to be very present and attentive to the relationship you are discerning and not become engulfed in the other. An immature person needs 5 other options in the background just in case

People are most attractive when they have options. Dependence and desperation make you easy to ignore. Build your exit strategy before you need it. There is nothing more magnetic than someone who simply doesn’t have to stay.

@balefulrays holy accurate. getting to the "other side" of ego/identity/attachment is an incredibly painful process full of loss, heartbreak, and social exile. absolutely not for everyone, but for some there's simply no other worthy path in life.

The things Satan fears the most are humiliation and financial loss. If you are shameless and unattached to material possessions, you are impervious to dark forces. But everyone else will think you are a demon because you’ll trigger an awareness of their own demonic attachments.

@AlexMillerwo @thedankoe I feel like what you’re describing is the “Matrix”. Reality does exist surely, but is transcendent of the subjective and not ever accessible to the human mind in its entirety.

@thedankoe "Reality" is just a Consensus Simulation for the average user. Most people call it "being realistic," but it’s actually a Self-Imposed Bandwidth Limit. They are running a version of life that has been Pre-compiled by other people's fears.

If you want a rare life, you have to be delusional. Doubt can enter your mind, and it can sound reasonable, but if you entertain it too much it will slowly drag you down into stagnation. I'd rather reap the lesson from massive failure than do nothing because it's not "realistic."

@__super_saiyan @Monopotandpan @conspiracyb0t I do see your point, this poor chap just stuck in the middle haha

@RohanBagga6 @Monopotandpan @conspiracyb0t Yes that is what Joe is doing. "He’s an adult he can do what he wants, does not equate to his competence at his job or as a person." is the kind of consideration not afforded to "anti-vaxxers", that's why Joe is acting this way.

Joe Rogan unloads on Dr. Peter Hotez for exclusively promoting vaccines while disregarding exercise, vitamins, and a healthy diet.

What Awakening Really Feels Like | Adyashanti youtu.be/OBK61RDWZ6I?si…

@__super_saiyan @Monopotandpan @conspiracyb0t To me it just seems like Rogan is trying to assert his dominance over the guy and basically publicly shame him. He’s an adult he can do what he wants, does not equate to his competence at his job or as a person.

@RohanBagga6 @Monopotandpan @conspiracyb0t In a vacuum no, but if you pay attention to how they talk about people who don't trust them and won't take their advice that's where you see the condescension.

@__super_saiyan @Monopotandpan @conspiracyb0t I believe that’s just hypocritical and not really condescending.

@Monopotandpan @conspiracyb0t The word you're probably thinking of is hypocrite, which he is also, but these are the people that scold others for not listening to health experts which I would consider condescending coming from him.

Allow everything to take the time that it takes

@alfkkifine Ah what the fuck this hit deep

The biggest lie society sells us is that women are the "emotional" gender and men are the "logical" ones. When you actually look at the dating market, the reality is the exact opposite. Men are the true romantics. Women are the pragmatists. A successful man, a CEO, a lawyer, a doctor will happily marry a woman who works as a cashier, a waitress, or is completely unemployed. He doesn't care about her status, her network, or her bank account. He marries her simply because she brings him peace, she is kind, and she makes him smile. He loves her for who she is, not what she can do for him. Now flip it. Ask a successful woman to marry a kind, loving, loyal man who works as a cashier. The answer is almost always a hard "No." Suddenly, "love" isn't enough. Suddenly, she needs "ambition." She needs "security." She needs a man on her level or higher. A woman rarely falls in love with a man’s soul; she falls in love with his trajectory. She loves what he can provide, where he can take her, and the lifestyle he unlocks. Men grow up thinking love is a fairy tale. They project their own capacity for unconditional love onto women. They think, "If I give her my heart, she will have my back." They learn the hard way that female love is performance-based. The moment he loses the job, the moment the confidence wavers, or the moment he stops being "useful," the "romance" evaporates. We call men "dogs" and "players," but men are the only ones willing to bet their entire lives on a partner who brings nothing to the table but her presence. Women love with a calculator in their hand. Men love with their eyes closed. And that is exactly why men are the ones who get destroyed they are trying to play a game of hearts with a gender that is playing a game of chess.

@Dearme2_ Playing pickleball - it changed my life

During your darkest period, what was the best thing you ever did for your mental health?