Bitsplaining

7.8K posts

Bitsplaining banner
Bitsplaining

Bitsplaining

@bitsplaining

Engineering manager @turnkeyhq. Attorney. Believer in disintermediation, decentralization, & scaling Ethereum. Opinions are my own. ex @ConsenSys, ex @OPLabsPBC

Los Angeles, CA เข้าร่วม Kasım 2009
3.1K กำลังติดตาม4.4K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Bitsplaining
Bitsplaining@bitsplaining·
@flaunchgg has so many interesting mechanisms! - set a chunk of trading fees as dev rev - you can also burn your token rather than dump it on holders. 💚 - the NFT "memestream" idea is so cool - you can sell the proceeds from your token to someone else! 🤯 And just IMAGINE when interop is live and you're hopping around liquidity pools across the Superchain! 🔴 🚀
English
153
3
254
4.1K
Bitsplaining
Bitsplaining@bitsplaining·
Bought my 9 year old a cheap $5 handheld fan, shaped like a lobster. She left it in an Uber today so now it’s a $35 fan haha. The things we do for our kids…
English
0
0
2
168
Austin Griffith
Austin Griffith@austingriffith·
We tested if ethskills actually helps AI models get Ethereum right. 64 evals. 2 models. With and without skill docs loaded. Results: • Claude Opus 4.6: 33% → 95% • GPT-5.4: 16% → 95% Thanks to @AnthropicAI for the idea, @escottalexander and @_carletex_ for surfacing it.
English
44
91
733
50.1K
Bitsplaining
Bitsplaining@bitsplaining·
@azaztrader01 Pretty happy with the stand on partial government shutdown. They just have to keep saying now, loudly. But it’s also time to build coalitions. Love seeing the Massie/Khana combo taking on the Epstein stuff. More of that.
English
1
0
1
16
azaztrader (福莫)
azaztrader (福莫)@azaztrader01·
@bitsplaining It's frustrating when they can't seem to agree on the basics of their job. Do you think there's a specific first step they should take?
English
1
0
0
11
Bitsplaining
Bitsplaining@bitsplaining·
I may not agree with senator Warren on crypto, but she’s absolutely right on this. Congress must take a stand. It’s literally their job to reign this madness in.
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein

BREAKING: @SenWarren has just called for the Democrats to Shut Down the government unless additional funds are not allocated to ICE: Warren: "I am a 'hell no.' We cannot give one more penny to Trump's ICE while its masked, poorly trained agents terrorize people across this country. It's time for the Senate to step up and stop ICE's violence."

English
3
0
6
232
Bitsplaining รีทวีตแล้ว
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
Over the past year, many people I talk to have expressed worry about two topics: * Various aspects of the way the world is going: government control and surveillance, wars, corporate power and surveillance, tech enshittification / corposlop, social media becoming a memetic warzone, AI and how it interplays with all of the above... * The brute reality that Ethereum seems to be absent from meaningfully improving the lives of people subject to these things, even on the dimensions we deeply care about (eg. freedom, privacy, security of digital life, community self-organization) It is easy to bond over the first, to commiserate over the fact that beauty and good in the world seems to be receding and darkness advancing, and uncaring powerful people in high places are making this happen. But ultimately, it is easy to acknowledge problems, the hard thing is actually shining a light forward, coming up with a concrete plan that makes the situation better. The second has been weighing heavily on my mind, and on the minds of many of our brightest and most idealistic Ethereans. I personally never felt any upset or fear when political memecoins went on Solana, or various zero-sum gambling applications go on whatever 250 millisecond block chain strikes their fancy. But it *does* weigh on me that, through all of the various low-grade online memetic wars, international overreaches of corporate and government power, and other issues of the last few years, Ethereum has been playing a very limited role in making people's lives better. What *are* the liberating technologies? Starlink is the most obvious one. Locally-running open-weights LLMs are another. Signal is a third. Community Notes is a fourth, tackling the problem from a different angle. One response is to say "stop dreaming big, we need to hunker down and accept that finance is our lane and laser-focus on that". But this is ultimately hollow. Financial freedom and security is critical. But it seems obvious that, while adding a perfectly free and open and sovereign and debasement-proof financial system would fix some things, but it would leave the bulk of our deep worries about the world unaddressed. It's okay for individuals to laser-focus on finance, but we need to be part of some greater whole that has things to say about the other problems too. At the same time, Ethereum cannot fix the world. Ethereum is the "wrong-shaped tool" for that: beyond a certain point, "fixing the world" implies a form of power projection that is more like a centralized political entity than like a decentralized technology community. So what can we do? I think that we in Ethereum should conceptualize ourselves as being part of an ecosystem building "sanctuary technologies": free open-source technologies that let people live, work, talk to each other, manage risk and build wealth, and collaborate on shared goals, in a way that optimizes for robustness to outside pressures. The goal is not to remake the world in Ethereum's image, where all finance is disintermediated, all governance happens through DAOs, and everyone gets a blockchain-based UBI delivered straight to their social-recovery wallet. The goal is the opposite: it's de-totalization. It's to reduce the stakes of the war in heaven by preventing the winner from having total victory (ie. total control over other human beings), and preventing the loser from suffering total defeat. To create digital islands of stability in a chaotic era. To enable interdependence that cannot be weaponized. Ethereum's role is to create "digital space" where different entities can cooperate and interact. Communications channels enable interaction, but communication channels are not "space": they do not let you create single unique objects that canonically represent some social arrangement that changes over time. Money is one important example. Multisigs that can change their members, showing persistence exceeding that of any one person or one public key, are another. Various market and governance structures are a third. There are more. I think now is the time to double down, with greater clarity. Do not try to be Apple or Google, seeing crypto as a tech sector that enables efficiency or shininess. Instead, build our part of the sanctuary tech ecosystem - the "shared digital space with no owner" that enables both open finance and much more. More actively build toward a full-stack ecosystem: both upward to the wallet and application layer (incl AI as interface) and downward to the OS, hardware, even physical/bio security levels. Ultimately, tech is worthless without users. But look for users, both individual and institutional, for whom sanctuary tech is exactly the thing they need. Optimize payments, defi, decentralized social, and other applications precisely for those users, and those goals, which centralized tech will not serve. We have many allies, including many outside of "crypto". It's time we work together with an open mind and move forward.
English
745
659
3.9K
547.3K
Andreas Bigger
Andreas Bigger@andreaslbigger·
Introducing Edge, a high level, strongly statically typed, multi-paradigm domain specific language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). github.com/refcell/edge-rs
English
56
63
655
94K
stanley
stanley@stanleycyang·
I got tired of opening 5 browser tabs to compare LLM responses. So I built a CLI that sends one prompt to multiple models and streams the outputs side-by-side in your terminal. It's called yardstiq, it's open source, and it works with one command 👇
GIF
English
2
1
8
96
Bitsplaining รีทวีตแล้ว
Max Crypto
Max Crypto@MaxCrypto·
Day 59 of 2026:
English
727
43.4K
186.8K
6.7M
Bitsplaining รีทวีตแล้ว
Donald J. Trump
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump·
Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly-not skilled!
English
7.5K
76K
158K
0
Bitsplaining
Bitsplaining@bitsplaining·
@moo9000 The cost of running this infrastructure is very high. Higher for new chains that may have things configured in non-optimal ways. User payments don’t even come close to covering the cost. I get how it feels but this is an unfair take.
English
0
0
0
46
Mikko Ohtamaa
Mikko Ohtamaa@moo9000·
Some more mafia payments that your chain will encounter. RPC integrations - Alchemy integration $750k/year - Quicknode $500k/year Other - LayerZero $375k one time) -Hyperlane $50k/year - Chainlink $12M/3 years ($4M/year) I especially dislike RPC providers charging chains, because I am already paying for them as a customer. It's double-dipping.
Mikko Ohtamaa@moo9000

The cost of running the EVM chain, in terms of the external services cost needed, from Gnosis Chain: - Etherscan $400k/year (other chains quote $1M/year) - Tenderly $100/year - Dune $20/year - Server costs: $600k/year From Gnosis DAO $35M budget allocation snapshot.box/#/s:gnosis.eth…

English
47
18
313
69.9K
Bitsplaining รีทวีตแล้ว
Brian Krassenstein
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein·
BREAKING: CBS refused to air this Colbert interview with Democrat James Talarico, who is running for Senate in Texas, after being intimidated by Trump’s FCC rules. Trump is worried that democrats are about to flip Texas. SHARE EVERYWHERE!!
English
1.6K
26.3K
87.1K
1.7M
Dylan Bane
Dylan Bane@dylangbane·
AAVE is pivoting to InfraFi for solar panels in the long run which it believes is a $30-$50T fundable opportunity. As we note in the State of DePIN, financing underserved real world infra is the largest source of yield and growth for DeFi. InfraFi is set to breakout this year.
Stani.eth@StaniKulechov

x.com/i/article/2023…

English
28
30
563
124.4K
DCinvestor
DCinvestor@DCinvestor·
i am guilty of not having had the grotesque imagination needed to realize that we are ruled, publicly and privately, by a dark and twisted transnational pedo class who believe they are above every rule, and in order to prove it to each other, they partake in the most extreme and most reprehensible of behaviors it is only being exposed now because people can communicate freely over the internet. and it was buried for decades because they control the traditional media i will never reflexively dismiss any “conspiracy theory” ever again
English
164
293
2.2K
42.4K
Bitsplaining
Bitsplaining@bitsplaining·
@BasedMikeLee What a waste of time. This law would not be constitutional as it would count as a poll tax. So much posturing. So little critical thinking.
English
0
1
1
60
Bitsplaining รีทวีตแล้ว
bryce 💀
bryce 💀@sadbryce·
Excited to introduce a new primitive: Transaction Management! Turnkey now enables the full transaction lifecycle end-to-end from construction to broadcast, with optional gas sponsorship built in. Big win win — easier for users (no gassing!) and easier for devs.
Turnkey 🔑@turnkeyhq

Introducing Gas Sponsorship⛽ Sponsor users’ gas fees while Turnkey enables the entire lifecycle: construction, nonce sequencing, gas estimation + payment, signing, broadcast, and status tracking. Live on EIP-7702 chains including @ethereum, @base, & @0xpolygon!

English
14
2
72
11.3K
Bitsplaining
Bitsplaining@bitsplaining·
I don’t know though. Independent commissions usually end up in witch hunts in every movie…
English
0
0
0
74
Bitsplaining
Bitsplaining@bitsplaining·
AI-related societal issues are really making me want to sue my lawyer brain again… feels so pivotal right now to decide how humanity and ai interface in the future.
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD@LuizaJarovsky

🚨 BREAKING: Taiwan enacted its basic law on AI, which includes, among other innovative provisions, detailed AI governance principles and LABOR RIGHTS for humans who lose their jobs due to AI. Other countries should take note: According to the law's third article, the research and application of AI in Taiwan should adhere to the following principles (read them carefully): 1. Sustainability: It should consider mental health, social equity, and environmental sustainability, reducing potential health risks or digital disparities, and enabling the public to adapt to the changes brought about by AI. 2. Human Autonomy: It should support human autonomy, respect fundamental human rights and cultural values ​​such as the right to personality, allow for human oversight, and implement a people-centered approach that respects the rule of law, human rights, and democratic values. 3. Privacy Protection and Data Governance: It should respect the privacy and autonomy of personal data, adopt the principle of data minimization, and avoid the risk of data leakage. 4. Security: Cybersecurity measures should be established throughout the research and application of AI to prevent security threats and attacks, ensuring the robustness and security of the system. 5. Transparency and Explainability: AI outputs should be appropriately disclosed or labeled to facilitate risk assessment and understanding of their impact on relevant rights, thereby enhancing the trustworthiness of AI. 6. Fairness: AI research and application should avoid risks such as system bias and discrimination, and should not result in discrimination against specific groups. 7. Accountability: Traceability should be maintained, and different roles in AI research and application should bear corresponding responsibilities, including internal governance responsibilities and external social responsibilities. For those familiar with the EU AI Act, the way the principles above are framed is more direct and comprehensive than the European framework. As I wrote a few times before, the EU missed an opportunity to be more explicit and broad when protecting fundamental rights in the context of AI development and deployment (which could help set a stronger regulatory precedent). Another interesting provision is Article 12, focused on labor rights. It says that, in response to the development of AI, the government must address skill gaps and ensure workers' occupational safety, health, and labor rights, including providing employment assistance to those unemployed due to AI, based on their work abilities. To my knowledge, this is the first AI law that expressly foresees labor rights for those who lose their jobs due to AI. Well done, Taiwan! - 👉 To learn more about recent AI governance developments, join my newsletter's 90,000+ subscribers (below). 👉 To upskill and advance your career, join the 28th cohort of my AI Governance training in March (link below).

English
0
0
1
189
Bitsplaining
Bitsplaining@bitsplaining·
@DCinvestor I love that it may be the beginning of the end. I have hoped for a while that this is an extinction burst. But I worry about hope without action. What are you doing to help make sure this country winds up on the right side of history?
English
0
0
0
236
DCinvestor
DCinvestor@DCinvestor·
Trump will 100% try to bomb his way out of the Epstein files and he will attempt protect Lutnick for as long as possible, because he can’t allow a crack in the dam but it will not work mark my words- this is the beginning of the end if you aren’t paying attention, start now
English
142
824
6.1K
129.7K