@LintonWorm Chopping sideways for a couple months is considered a “relief rally”? 🤔
English
BrainTwisters
1K posts
$BTC
Target achieved
We just hit $73k exactly as planned, and the "relief rally" is now officially exhausted
While CT celebrates this bounce, the timing hasn't changed - the real capitulation window only opens in July
The crowd is still too comfortable, which means the true bottom is nowhere near
Expect the next leg down to begin shortly as we head toward the final floor
I warned you: don’t be the exit liquidity
THE REAL FLUSH IS ONLY JUST BEGGINING
NOTIFS ON!
Linton Worm (🍏,🪱)@LintonWorm
DON'T BE THE EXIT LIQUIDITY Most traders now make a fatal mistake - they look for price forgetting about timing The bullish sentiment which is currently circulating on CT is absolutely weak In reality we are still far from the bottom The history of BTC cycles does not lie: 2012: 405 days to the bottom 2016: 362 days to the bottom 2020: 376 days to the bottom Currently - the mathematical capitulation window opens only in July-November 2026 Everything that we see now is just a relief rally A trap for those who are in a hurry If you tell me that I am wrong here are my takes on why your "buy the dip" will not work: 1. The crowd still has money (this is bad for the bottom) 2. You still believe in narratives (they have to fall apart) 3. Liquidations have only just begun The bottom forms not where your limit orders are It is where you delete the exchange app out of disgust I will repeat once again - the window opens in July Until then - you are just someone else's liquidity REMEMBER MY WORDS!
English
@CryptoBullet1 By that logic, the bull market top hasn’t been reached yet either.
English
$BTC MVRV Z-Score
No way $60k was the Bear Market bottom. MVRV hasn’t even dipped into the green bottoming zone yet!
And in terms of timing, we still have 6 months of bear market left.
📉 Another major drop is inevitable, whether you like it or not
English
@chrismartenson But these are shortages caused by protesters at fuel depots, are they not?
English
@StockSavvyShay Yep. I personally liken what’s coming to the Industrial Revolution on Steroids.
English
$GOOGL DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis says AGI could be 10 times bigger than the Industrial Revolution and arrive 10 times faster.
AI may feel overhyped today, but he believes the real scale of what is coming is still massively underappreciated over the next decade.
English
This morning, I asked President Trump if he’s okay with the Iranians charging a toll for all ships that go through the Strait of Hormuz, he told me there may be a Joint US-Iran venture to charge tolls:
“We’re thinking of doing it as a joint venture. It’s a way of securing it — also securing it from lots of other people.”
“It’s a beautiful thing”
English
🔥🚨JUST IN: Hollywood actress Laura Benanti was in complete disbelief as not nobody recognized her on a plane.
Benanti: “Not a single one of them recognized me and I could not tolerate that obviously.”
English
@BOSSportsGordo It’s literally the proper way to go into a spot on the right hand side so that you don’t need to drive into the oncoming lane. 🤯
English
@EricLDaugh @grok Approximately how many boats went through the Strait of Hormuz per day a couple of months ago (before this conflict in Iran)?
English
🚨 BREAKING: President Trump just revealed Iran is sending 20 MORE oil boats through the Strait of Hormuz "as a tribute"
"As a sign of respect, 20 boats of oil. Big, BIG boats of oil, going through the Hormuz Strait. Starting TOMORROW MORNING, over the next couple days. A LOT of boats."
WOW!
This is on TOP of the previous 10 boats
English
@BRijswijk @IamTheImmortal When it turns into that kind of tone, I usually take that as my cue to step away.
Wish you all the best.
English
@brainteasers4u @IamTheImmortal I just don’t make shit up… if you want to, be my guest.
English
Didn’t mean to make so many of you mad I didn’t think religion was much of a thing anymore. Looked up on ChatGPT and I’m clearly not up to date on this stuff. So all of you telling me I’m low iq and have cte, which god should I pick? I’ll start looking through the 1000’s of them
Matt Brown@IamTheImmortal
How are people still tricked by this god stuff in 2026? I get it in 1026 when your entire world was a square mile in size. We see 13 billion light years in to the universe now and have science and technology. I don’t get it.
English
Crazy how we just repeated 2022 on Bitcoin and nobody talked about it...
$BTC
RonnieV@TheRonnieVShow
Present vs 2022... Bitcoin
English
It’s not random speculation—it’s reasoning from what we do know to what could explain it.
We do this all the time outside of science (ethics, logic, even everyday decisions). You don’t get certainty, but you can still get better or worse explanations.
If you rule that out entirely, then questions about meaning or purpose don’t get answered—they just get ignored. It sounds like you are content enough to be in the latter camp.
English
@brainteasers4u @IamTheImmortal I don’t see how speculation will get you any useful answers to those questions.
English
@jasonpizzino Institutions and AI agents coming online and this is your take? 🧐
English
Bitcoin is following a very similar bear market path to 2022 except this entire 4 year cycle happened on far less interest and volume/liquidity.
Lower highs for interest and volume is weak macro structure.
A new cycle low will form and a new rally will commence. However, unless a lot more interest and volume finds its way into Bitcoin, I’m not expecting a new ATH this decade.
English
Sure, it’s philosophical reasoning and not empirical proof.
But not all speculation is equal. Some explanations account for more of reality than others.
You can brush metaphysics aside and stick to a purely naturalistic view—but that doesn’t get one very far in addressing questions of meaning, purpose, or why anything exists at all.
English
@brainteasers4u @IamTheImmortal Which is nothing more than speculation at this point.
English
@orrdavid Unless you consider other countries now being motivated to put pressure on the USA.
English
@elonmusk Interesting that it only seemed to entering exponential growth when the dollar was fully de-coupled from gold in 1971 🤔
English
The uniparty in action
🪶Native Patriot 🇺🇸@LaNativePatriot
“The Republicans will fix it this time” “The Democrats will fix it this time”
English
@basedlayer Just sounds like basic economics to me? They can make more money (right now) doing option A over option B, so it should be no surprise they choose option A?
English
Bitcoin miners are selling their bitcoin to buy AI infrastructure
Marathon, Riot, Hut 8, Core Scientific.
The companies that literally produce bitcoin are deciding that AI compute is a better use of their capital than holding the bitcoin they mine
Don't think everyone's really sitting with how strange this is.
These are the people CLOSEST to bitcoin's monetary properties.
They run the machines and understand the halving math. They know the supply schedule better than anyone and they're choosing to sell.
The margins on AI hosting are so good right now that the opportunity cost of holding bitcoin is actually negative for them.
Think about that for a sec: It's CHEAPER to sell BTC and build data centers than to hold BTC and mine more of it
Wild times right now.
English
I agree we don’t know the physics past that point.
But this isn’t really a physics question—it’s a metaphysical one. Even if something always existed, the question still is: does it explain itself, or does it require an explanation?
“We don’t know the options” is fair—but for those trying to make sense of reality more broadly, it still leaves open the question of what kind of thing could ultimately account for everything else.
English
@brainteasers4u @IamTheImmortal Physics breaks down at the Planck time, so I think we just don’t know what the options are.
English
@matteopelleg What if AI makes those items better than humans, and the humans don’t know it’s produced by AI?
English
Nobody wants to read AI-generated books, watch an AI-generated movie or listen to an AI-generated song.
English
The “has to be” is within the argument, not me asserting certainty.
It’s: if contingent things need explanation and an infinite regress doesn’t explain anything, then something non-contingent follows.
If you disagree, which premise do you reject? Because you haven’t engaged with the argument itself.
English
When did I claim “it has to be”? I don’t see that in any of my posts?
What I have said is that if you follow the reasoning about contingent reality, it points toward something necessary.
You can reject that line of reasoning, but that’s different from saying I’m just asserting it without argument.
So you must be rejecting my line of reasoning, then? Which part of that line do you reject specifically?
English
@brainteasers4u @IamTheImmortal I’m agnostic about many topics. I’m an atheist because I don’t believe gods exist.
You keep claiming ‘it has to be’ without demonstrating why.
English