Catherine Dubuque 🐉
31.6K posts

Catherine Dubuque 🐉
@catdebuque
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” ― George Orwell, 1984
NYC เข้าร่วม Nisan 2009
972 กำลังติดตาม1.1K ผู้ติดตาม
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว

@KonstantinKisin Today, politicians and police declare:
"Don't politicise Henry Novak's death."
The very same politicians and police who knelt for a convicted felon in America and turned his death into a global political event.
Stratospheric levels of hypocrisy"

English
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว

The police arrested Henry Nowak as he lay curled up on the floor, quietly pleading for help and comfort.
The police reaction was to callously bind his hands and read him his rights.
The video is horrific. It will bring the most hardened people to tears, it is pitiful, you will weep before you rage at the injustice.
6 Months later, Starmer watches the video and his first thoughts are, ELON MUSK

English

@BenMullin His insubordination and vicious attacks should have had him thrown out of the room from the outset.
English

@Glinner Keep it coming hard and fast! Will play out very well in midterms. Sane people want nothing to do with insidious ideology.
English
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว

Holy.
@SJSU knowingly recruited a man to give them a competitive edge. The coach lied & hid it from the team.
He went as far as to say anyone who disagrees with his allowance to play "needs to get therapy & leave SJSU."
Pull federal funds NOW. foxnews.com/outkick-sports…
English

@TTExulansic I find this impossible to believe. A blow powerful enough to knock a tooth out would result in significant bruising and swelling. These people are mentally unwell. Exercise common sense.
English
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว

The West has created an utterly evil state religion where an accusation of “racism” is the gravest offense that can be committed, even worse than rape or murder!
So if police show up at a crime scene and a British boy is bleeding out and an immigrant says the British boy is racist the cops will cuff the dying British boy.
English
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว

Polite notice to schools still breaking the law by failing to provide single sex bathrooms: you will be sued and you will lose 👇
Legal Feminist@legalfeminist
A Scottish primary school broke the law by failing to provide single-sex toilets: DE and FG v West Lothian Council.
English

@prageru Yeah, though let's be clear: It's the lionesses who hunt and bring home 90% of the food. Not sure what lions build. They certainly protect and procreate, but I'm with the lionesses.
English
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว

@RichardDawkins The astonishing thing is that quite intelligent and well educated people believe that men really can change into women.
Here is a world class medic making the point as strongly as he can. FOUR years ago!
youtube.com/watch?v=LGR_pN…

YouTube
English
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว
Catherine Dubuque 🐉 รีทวีตแล้ว

After being fired from CBS, former “60 Minutes” correspondent Scott Pelley yesterday said that “new management has instructed me to inject falsehoods and bias into a politically sensitive story. I’ve been told to include assertions that are unverified.”
Those are remarkable claims for which Pelley presented no evidence. Indeed, it would be extraordinary for CBS to demand such things of a correspondent, either verbally or in writing, given the reputational risk to the network.
A more likely explanation is that Pelley disagreed with someone at CBS and then declared a difference of opinion to be a demand to lie. Support for this interpretation comes from the fact that he claimed Tuesday that CBS’s new management, led by Bari Weiss, was trying to kill “60 Minutes,” something for which he also did not provide evidence.
Moreover, the accusation makes no sense. CBS Editor-in-Chief Bari Weiss took the job to rebuild CBS News, not to wreck it, and a ruined “60 Minutes” would hurt her. Paramount’s owners did not pay billions for the network to burn its best asset for spite. So the simpler reading is that Pelley is the one stretching the truth.
Doing so appears to be a habit for Pelley. He told The New York Times, “I have been in combat in Afghanistan. I have been in combat in Iraq,” but being in a combat zone as a journalist is not the same as being “in combat.” The remark is yet more evidence of Pelley’s propensity to exaggerate to the point of lying.
For decades, mainstream liberal journalists have displayed remarkable levels of arrogance, even as they get major stories wrong.
Consider the case of CBS News’ former anchor Dan Rather. In the fall of 2004, two months before the election, Rather presented documents purporting to show favoritism in George W. Bush’s National Guard service. Experts called them forgeries. CBS apologized: “We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry,” Rather said. On air, he added, “I want to say, personally and directly, I’m sorry.”
But then, a decade later, Rather told Variety he still stands “100 percent” behind the report and reframed the apology.
Or consider NBC’s Katie Couric. In her 2016 documentary “Under the Gun,” editors inserted roughly eight to nine seconds of silence after she asked Virginia gun owners how to keep guns from felons and terrorists without background checks, making them look stumped. The raw audio revealed that they answered immediately.
Couric’s first instinct was to defend what she did, saying she was “very proud of the film.” Only after sustained backlash did she apologize.
In her 2021 memoir “Going There,” Couric admitted she cut Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s harshest anthem-kneeling comments from her 2016 interview. Ginsburg had said kneeling players showed “contempt for a government that has made it possible for their parents and grandparents to live a decent life, which they probably could not have lived in the places they came from.”
NBC’s “Meet the Press,” in the spring of 2020, aired a clip of Attorney General Bill Barr that omitted part of his answer, misleading the public.
When Catherine Herridge interviewed Barr for CBS Evening News, she asked what history would say about his decision to drop the case against a former National Security Advisor to President Trump, Michael Flynn. The Obama administration’s FBI had illegally targeted Flynn for entrapment and prosecution. Barr replied that ”history is written by the winner. So it largely depends on who’s writing the history.”
"Meet the Press'" anchor at the time, Chuck Todd, said on air that Barr “didn’t make the case that he was upholding the rule of law. He was almost admitting that, yeah, this is a political job.’” But “Meet the Press” had left out the second part of Barr’s answer to Herridge, in which he said, “But I think a fair history would say that it was a good decision because it upheld the rule of law.”
The safeguards the journalism profession built against error did not work when it mattered. The corrections, the editors, the fact-checkers, and the standards desks all sat in place while the press got the border, trans medicine, climate, the sixth extinction, Russiagate, the Hunter Biden laptop, Covid and much else wrong. Gerth described how reporters sought to “shoot the messenger” rather than grapple with evidence contradicting the Russia collusion narrative...
x.com/shellenberger/…
Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning journalism and to read the full article!
English











