Steven Dickman 🇺🇦

16.2K posts

Steven Dickman 🇺🇦 banner
Steven Dickman 🇺🇦

Steven Dickman 🇺🇦

@cbtadvisors

Founder-CEO of CBT Advisors, a life sciences consultancy. Former venture capitalist w TVM Capital, fmr reporter Nature, Economist. Also @cbtadvisors.bsky.social

Cambridge, MA, USA เข้าร่วม Ekim 2009
2.3K กำลังติดตาม4.5K ผู้ติดตาม
WC
WC@Sanctuary_Bio·
I'll probably regret this but f it My dad was cooking for his entire extended family of like 10 when he was 10 in China. His dad/uncles would give him some money, and he would go the market, buy raw ingredients, and cook for the entire family.
English
12
1
102
17.5K
Steven Dickman 🇺🇦
Steven Dickman 🇺🇦@cbtadvisors·
Looks like @UpToDate is fighting back big-time against @EvidenceOpen. Is there room for them both? And how are they doing vs. the non-specialist chatbots? How about it, @brittanytrang? Thanks @VincentRK ! #medicalAI #AIfordoctors
Vincent Rajkumar@VincentRK

Here is the inside story on how @UpToDate does what it does. From my experience as an author/section editor for UpToDate for 20 years, here is how it works. It’s amazing! Every day a team of people @UpToDate scour the top medical journals (and major meeting abstracts) for articles of importance. In my case they pertain to myeloma and related disorders. Any article that is felt to be important is sent to a expert MD medical editor at UpToDate who reviews the paper. If the information is felt to be important, the relevant chapter is updated with this content, summarized in a few sentences in Word track and then sent to the author of the chapter who is a top expert in the field. As an author I have to review the update in detail and then make a decision whether to include the new information, and whether the way it has been incorporated is correct or needs to be edited. Once I make a decision, it is then reviewed by an expert section editor. For 15 years for me, the section editor was Dr. Robert Kyle! (Currently I’m the section editor and we have about 6 experts serve as authors on over 40 chapters pertaining to myeloma and related disorders). The section editor independently decides whether the author made the right call and either approves or we have a back and forth till we agree. The updated chapter is then reviewed again by the expert MD editor at UpToDate and then posted. For important phase III trials or FDA approvals we usually make the update within a week. Sometimes by the next day! With so many important papers, every week there are 2-3 updates pertaining to my chapters that go through the above process! It’s hard work but it keeps me ridiculously current. And more importantly it keeps the content accurate and current. This is not random addition of new information. It’s vetted information that’s added. Every UpToDate chapter is also peer reviewed annually. Each chapter also undergoes an annual author and editor review to make sure that the overall content and flow is good and to delete content that may be no longer important or accurate. The extraordinary process and rigor involved is why it’s such an invaluable irreplaceable resource. It is AMAZING and hard to replicate. UpToDate is easy to navigate. But the newly launched UpToDate Expert AI takes it to the next level! It makes the entire content available to query just like you query a top ranked LLM. But it’s not searching the random internet or a stack of published articles. It’s primarily trained and derives vetted and adjudicated UpToDate content. It will not randomly hallucinate. It will not list 10 options for treatment newly diagnosed myeloma but will give you what experts currently feel is the best option based on the latest evidence. All answers are referenced and pointing to specific content sections in UpToDate (which also has links to source material). So you can immediately get all the background information if you need more detail. Working with UpToDate has helped my career immensely. For the last 20 years it has been impossible for me to not know about every important study related to myeloma and related disorders as they get published! For 20 years, I have received a precise summary of every important article published in my field. More importantly I am forced to read them, review the source material, and make a judgment call. As a result I remember this stuff. A gift indeed!

English
0
0
1
402
Steven Dickman 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Steven Pinker
Steven Pinker@sapinker·
Advice for lawyers (or anyone else) on effective writing, by Judge David Weinzweig (author of Zen and the Art of Persuasive Writing).
English
1
108
984
296.6K
Steven Dickman 🇺🇦
Steven Dickman 🇺🇦@cbtadvisors·
“A mathematical proof in a journal is not just a certificate of truth. At its best, it is an explanation – a compact story that shows why something is true, what ideas matter, and how the result connects to others. Euclid’s proofs are still read 2,000 years later not because we doubt the theorems, but because we value the understanding of them. If the future of mathematics is about accumulating machine-checkable certificates, something precious may be lost.”
Ananyo Bhattacharya@Ananyo

I wrote about what the recent remarkable advances in AI for mathematics means for the subject--and for every creative human endeavour. "If mathematics can be hollowed out in this way, then every creative field is vulnerable." @spectator

English
0
3
4
1.3K
Peter Suzman
Peter Suzman@Biomaven·
Biotech fundamentals are uncorrelated with everything. Biotech stock prices are correlated with long rates, risk on/off. Unprofitable biotech stock prices are correlated with funding environment. And of course biotechs that are held by a lot of specialist funds do better than the retail and generalist biotechs - see this analysis.
STL Biotech@STL_Biotech

The strangeness of biotech From @verdadcap If youve been doing this a while, you probably knew or intuited much of this but nice charts and an interesting professional generalist perspective. Lack of correlation, specialist outperformance, etc mcusercontent.com/6dc62f307511d4…

English
2
7
66
15.9K
Steven Dickman 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Stephen Gibbons
Stephen Gibbons@Gibboanxious·
An excellent Visa commercial featuring Pierce Brosnan as James Bond.
English
0
3
11
1K
Biotech2k
Biotech2k@Biotech2k1·
I will shock you with this statement because I am a biotech investor for about 30 years. I don't buy companies because of "the science". I buy companies that have proven winning management teams and I stick with them for as long as they are winners. A winning management team is far rarer than a winning pipeline and its far more important to a company's success. A real winning management team is a rare gem. You have to stick with them once you find one. It takes a long time to get to know a management team. Only then will you really know. The key to biotech success is management. A good management could sell the daylights out of an average drug. A bad management will completely mess up even the most promising pipeline. I find many biotech investors do poorly because they only focus on the science.
English
7
5
167
18K
Steven Dickman 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Puru Saxena
Puru Saxena@saxena_puru·
CAREER OPPORTUNITY: RESEARCH ANALYST CLICK IMAGE FOR FULL DETAILS👇
Puru Saxena tweet media
English
4
8
65
48.5K
Biotech2k
Biotech2k@Biotech2k1·
I am far from an expert in the area of Seizure, but I am learning a lot about the space as I study my Seizure companies like $BHVN, $XENE and $PRAX. Anyone have any other good names in this space?
English
3
1
8
3.4K
Steven Dickman 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Scott Gottlieb, MD 🇺🇸
Scott Gottlieb, MD 🇺🇸@ScottGottliebMD·
Along with loss of other senior FDA staff, this is a significant setback for cell gene therapy. The advent of these advances was one of Pres Trump's first term triumphs, along with his efforts to expand access to them. The field now faces a harder future statnews.com/2025/06/18/top…
English
4
322
934
435.4K
Steven Dickman 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Isaac Kohane
Isaac Kohane@zakkohane·
Celebration of the life of Atul Butte. Join colleagues from three universities to celebrate him at 10 am PST on Saturday.
Isaac Kohane tweet media
English
6
74
247
38.4K
Steven Dickman 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Jamie Kennedy
Jamie Kennedy@jamierkennedy·
How much has Oakmont changed? I rewatched the 1994 US Open and compared the visuals from then to this year. Here's the evidence 🧵
Jamie Kennedy tweet media
English
449
267
5.1K
2.1M