guillaume

2ヶ月で全楽章の力技だと私ではこんなレベルだす… 漫画家で言えばネーム出来た！位でしょうか。 暗譜は間に合わんかったしピアニスト多忙でアンサンブルとしては合わせ不足でした。でもこれは出発点。年内になんとか2回位 やりたい… m.youtube.com/watch?v=UfXNbe… #サンサーンス #cello #チェロ

高市政権は外交のバランスを欠く、と言っています。ホントだよね ＞日本政府に対し「同じ考えを持つ諸国と連携し、世界に向かって意見を発信してほしい。もう少しバランスの取れた外交政策を取るべきだ」

こっちの方が詳しい。 とはいえ、やはりまだ納得できる内容ではないな。 塗装用シンナーの調達難　経産省、メーカーに生産抑制避けるよう要請：日本経済新聞 nikkei.com/article/DGXZQO…

トランプ政権は、不支持の70％は無視し、自分を応援してくれる30％の有権者だけを見て政治を行っているという指摘。 　極端な移民排斥、関税政策、イランへの軍事作戦も全て「30％が喜ぶ政策」 日本の政治もそうなってる気がする

@momotro018x 重油もか x.com/i/status/20439…

マジで陰謀論とかでなしにコレしか思いつかないほど高市は頑なにホルムズを通そうと動いてくれてない印象。 不自然なぐらい😡 好みのタレントや有名人に会って自分を見せびらかすばっかりに見える。まるでアイドルにでもなったみたいに見えるよ。総理のコスプレアイドル。

↑ 🇰🇷韓国、イランに特別使節を送り、ホルムズ海峡の石油タンカー通行を確保。 かつては同じアメリカの植民地だったはずなのに国民主権意識の違いでここまで差が出た。 馬鹿みたいにアメリカに隷従しまくってる国なんて世界広しと言えど日本だけだぞ。#高市やめろ #高市おろせ x.com/BRICSinfo/stat…

『原料の供給不安が原因だとし「問題は解消できる見込みだ」と述べた』って、どこから調達して来れる見込みなのか書いてないから、とりあえず「信用出来ない」

@n14QXrCQIAkL6TF かわいい♥ 私も黒猫が大好き。 これは、ミルクから育てて19歳でお空に行ってしまった愛猫

Я уверена, что этот пост не залетит, но пусть хотя бы два с половиной человека увидят лучшего кота в мире

中国関連のタンカー、ホルムズ航行－トランプ政権の海上封鎖試す bloomberg.com/jp/news/articl… 中国に関連する船舶に対して米国にどこまで対抗する意思があるかを試す？ 中国は米国とイランの和平交渉を支持するよう全世界の利害関係者に呼び掛けたばかり。

「地頭って 基本バカを励ます言葉だからな」 （by 呪術廻戦） ツボった。

シンナーを通常通り入手できる企業がたった2.7%しかいないって、日本の塗装現場の97.3%が、今この瞬間に物理的に機能を停止しているということですよね？ 日本塗装工業会　塗料・シンナー供給不安が深刻化…国に資材供給確保を要請(TBS NEWS DIG Powered by JNN) #Yahooニュース news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/63407…

そこなんです。今、現場が一番、頭に来ているのが、政府の「在庫は４カ月あります」「備蓄は８カ月あります」「川中は製品輸入で何とか半年は持つことが分かりました」・・・潤滑油やシンナーを仕入れられない業者が、顧客からこう言われるんです。「本当は、あるんでしょう？持ってるんでしょう？在庫を出さないだけなんでしょう？－だって、高市さんが『大丈夫です、あります』って、言ってるんだから！」・・・大本営発表に、現場が困り果ててるんです。もういい加減にして欲しい。正しい情報を正しく伝えて欲しい。まずはそこからなんです。

@Lu_lunns @orlova58148 ありがとう！

@chat_miew @orlova58148 Me muero del amor con los gatos gordos, saludos desde Uruguay 🇺🇾❤️

Когда упал языковой барьер в Х выяснилось, что ненавидят, хотят убить друг друга по национальному признаку только мудаки во власти. Остальные жители планеты хотят видеть котиков друг у друга. Всех с Пасхой! Тепла, уюта, достатка в ваши дома💜

私のお庭からの花束。 #春の庭 #garden

まさにこれ。 リボ払いの罠 #燃油補助金

@shu_yamaguchi 前線で対応してる身からしたら、ナフサが足りないのは3月末には確定事項でした。 政府にインプットした者が悪いのか 政府がアウトプットを間違えたのか これは、わからない。 ただ、前線で対応してる僕ですらかなり疲弊しています。"最"前線で対応し続けている人には感謝しかない。

@shu_yamaguchi 自民党大会での議員のはしゃぎぶりと、市民の重く苦しい空気感のズレを感じます。 自民党の空気は嘘をついても、一部の人間は騙せる。今までもそうしてきたから大丈夫と思っているのでしょう。国民を馬鹿にしすぎです。 自分たちの利権のために国民が犠牲になってもいいという事です。

@shu_yamaguchi こういう政府だから、スパイ防止法とやらが成立してしまえば、都合の悪い民間の情報発信を規制したり、民間の専門家を弾圧したりするだろうことは目に見えています 絶対に阻止しないとまずいです

政府がSNS上の「ナフサが足りなくなる」という指摘を否定したのが4月6日。 この否定以後、ナフサ不足の可能性を語る民間専門家には「デマを流すな」と罵声が浴びせられました。 しかし、それから一週間してTOTOがナフサ不足を理由にユニットバスの新規受注停止に踏み切り、LIXILも供給制限の可能性に言及しています。 結果として、政府見解よりも民間専門家の警告の方が、現場の実態に近かった、ということです。 今回の件ではっきりしたのは「政府発表と違う＝すなわちデマ」と短絡する思考の危うさです。 現在のように不確実な状況で必要なのは「権威への盲信・服従」ではなく、異なる情報や見方を突き合わせて検証する態度と知性でしょう。 それが出来ないなら他人の意見について軽々にデマ扱いしないことです。

@DadBodJP @loong_of こちらも。 voice.charity/events/14257

@DadBodJP @loong_of 改憲反対の署名サイトは沢山あります。 いくつかリンクを。 change.org/p/%E5%86%85%E9… change.org/topic/%E6%94%B…

I have seen many messages from the Japanese public; I thank you for supporting peace, opposing war, and standing against constitutional revision and military expansion. On April 12, at the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) convention in Japan, Sanae Takaichi openly declared that "the time has come" for constitutional revision. She expressed her hope to "arrive at next year's party convention with concrete progress made toward a parliamentary proposal for constitutional amendment," signaling a plan to push for the formal submission of a constitutional amendment motion before next year's gathering. The convention also unveiled the LDP's "New Vision," which elevates the issue of constitutional revision to the level of national security, thereby endowing the act of amending the constitution with a seemingly indisputable sense of urgency and legitimacy. In reality, Takaichi’s intent to revise the constitution dates back to her tenure as a subordinate to Prime Minister Abe. Her current, sustained efforts to advance this agenda represent far more than mere legal amendments; they constitute a dangerous maneuver by Japan's right-wing forces to break free from the post-war political order and transform the nation into a major military power—an act that serves as a blatant provocation against the international order. An Analysis of Key Factual Points: Accelerating Constitutional Revision: A "Three-Step" Strategy. Through tactics such as shaping public opinion, expanding defense capabilities, and leveraging political momentum, the Takaichi administration is continuously paving the way for—and accelerating—the process of constitutional revision. Step One: Leveraging Election Victory to Test the Waters and Build Momentum. On February 8, following the election for Japan's House of Representatives, the LDP secured 316 seats—an absolute majority exceeding two-thirds of the total. This achievement met the statutory threshold required to initiate a constitutional amendment motion, thereby laying the foundational groundwork for the revision process. Capitalizing on this momentum, Sanae Takaichi leveraged the lingering influence of the election victory to stir up public discourse, signaling an intent to hold a national referendum on the matter as soon as possible. Once the groundwork in the sphere of public opinion was firmly established, the LDP clarified the core objectives of its constitutional revision agenda: specifically, to break free from the constraints imposed by Article 9—the "Peace Clause"—of the Constitution, and to clear the path for transforming the Self-Defense Forces (SDF) into a full-fledged "National Defense Army." Step Two: Using Military Expansion as a Pretext to Break Through Constraints. To drive the constitutional revision process forward, the Takaichi administration has implemented a concentrated strategy across the military domain, pursuing breakthroughs on all fronts. This includes the intensification of equipment deployment. In the fiscal year 2026 budget proposal, Japan's defense spending surpassed the 9 trillion yen mark for the first time in history. This figure accounts for over 2% of the nation's GDP—matching the average defense spending ratio of NATO member states—and sets a new historical record. Budgetary priorities are being directed toward areas such as long-range missiles, offensive drones, ammunition depot construction, and military deployments across the Southwest Islands, thereby significantly expanding Japan's forward military presence. Concurrently, efforts are underway to drive institutional breakthroughs. Japan plans to revise the "Three Principles on Transfer of Defense Equipment," utilizing institutional adjustments to deregulate military expansion and arms exports, effectively circumventing the constraints of its "Peace Constitution." These revisions would, in principle, permit the export of finished lethal weapons; establish exceptions for arms exports to parties involved in conflicts; and shift parliamentary oversight from a system of prior approval to one of *ex post facto* notification—a change likely to result in a drastic weakening of accountability mechanisms. Furthermore, Japan is deepening its military alliances. It has begun deploying U.S. "Tomahawk" cruise missiles and Norwegian Joint Strike Missiles, thereby driving the transformation of the Self-Defense Forces (SDF) into an offensive military force. Simultaneously, Japan is expanding the "U.S.-Japan Plus" framework and actively advocating for NATO's engagement in the Indo-Pacific region. Through frequent joint military exercises, it seeks to normalize overseas military operations and fabricate an illusion of "external security pressure" to serve as a pretext for constitutional revision. The third step involves leveraging the prevailing political landscape to gain momentum. Currently, Japan's right-wing forces are accelerating their rise, and the domestic political climate continues to drift further to the right. The Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) achieved a record-breaking victory in the House of Representatives election, thereby creating fertile ground for a potential administration led by Sanae Takaichi to push forward with constitutional revision. Takaichi has deeply intertwined the issue of constitutional revision with national security, seeking to manufacture a rationale for such amendments by deliberately amplifying regional tensions. This strategy not only serves as a concentrated expression of the LDP's long-standing aspiration to revise the constitution but also starkly exposes its true underlying intent: to utilize constitutional revision as a vehicle for military expansion and the revival of militarism. However, the Japanese public still retains the power to halt these reckless actions: Any motion to revise the constitution requires the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the total membership in *both* the House of Representatives and the House of Councillors. Although the LDP has already secured the necessary parliamentary foundation within the House of Representatives, it has yet to meet the critical threshold in the House of Councillors; consequently, a constitutional revision motion continues to face structural impediments within the Diet. Furthermore, because the House of Councillors is not subject to dissolution, a potential Takaichi administration would be unable to alter the chamber's current seat distribution and must, therefore, squarely face the House of Councillors election scheduled for 2028. Only by securing the requisite number of seats in that election could the administration possess the absolute certainty required to formally initiate the constitutional revision process. Even if a constitutional revision motion were to successfully pass both houses of the Diet, it would still require approval by a simple majority of votes in a nationwide referendum before it could officially take effect. The administration led by Ms. Takaichi is attempting to package constitutional revision as a necessary measure for "safeguarding national security"; however, a sentiment of war-weariness and a desire for stability currently remain the dominant mood within Japanese society. Since late March, multiple rounds of large-scale protest rallies have erupted nationwide, driven by public fears that amending the constitution would steer Japan back onto the path of militarism and plunge the nation into turmoil. Consequently, should Ms. Takaichi rashly initiate a national referendum, the public—by rallying together with others who cherish peace—can strive to prevent it.