🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹

3.4K posts

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹 banner
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹

@chiefjonken

Ducati, Crypto, FinTech and Watch loving maniac with a political twist and I was called a nationalist tadger today 🤣 (03/04/26)

Scotland เข้าร่วม Ağustos 2020
348 กำลังติดตาม312 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹
Sign the Edinburgh Proclomation here, the fight for the Liberation of Scotland starts with the pen. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 j6uvd9gbb.cc.rs6.net/tn.jsp?f=001ec…
English
0
0
2
156
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹 รีทวีตแล้ว
Alan Shanks
Alan Shanks@AlanShanks4·
Can't have a bottle recycling scheme. Can't have a referendum. Can't have a bespoke immigration policy. Can't have devolved drug laws. Can't have devolved energy policy. Can't have devolved broadcasting.
YES Brechin@BrechinYes2

Can't have an oil refinery. Can't have a chemical plant. Can't have a Chinese Wind Turbine Plant. Can't have zonal Electricity pricing. Can't hear a whisper from 37 Scots Labour MPs.

English
47
319
548
10.7K
Sara Salyers
Sara Salyers@SSalyers2·
Currently making the case and making allies at the 61st HRC session in Geneva! See below for link to published submission (IPLSA with LS, Jerome Bouquet Elkaim et al.)
Christophe Dorigné-Thomson@thomsonchris

Indictment at the United Nations: A Report Submitted Directly to the UN Secretary-General Now Entered into the UN System Exposes Scotland as a Colony and Places the English Colonial State in the Dock Read the full report by Liberation Scotland and partners on the official UN website documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/… A document has now entered the official machinery of the United Nations. Circulated at the United Nations Human Rights Council (61st session), received by the Secretary-General, and registered under UN procedures, this report constitutes far more than an NGO submission. It is an intervention within the normative space of international law itself; and an indictment of the English colonial state. For Scotland as an English colony, it is nothing short of strategic. A Break in the Colonial Narrative For decades, the English colonial state has relied on a carefully constructed fiction. Scotland, the narrative insists, is part of a “voluntary union,” endowed with democratic representation, protected by devolution, fully exercising internal self-determination. It's a colonial lie. This report dismantles that fiction with clinical precision. It identifies Scotland not as a partner, not as a region, but as a territory under colonial sovereignty, explicitly placing it alongside cases such as New Caledonia and French Polynesia. This classification is not rhetorical but analytical, precise, legal, and comparative. It situates Scotland within the global structure of colonial domination. It strips away the British constitutional mythology and replaces it with a framework grounded in international law. Once that shift occurs, everything changes. Devolution Unmasked as Legal Assimilation At the core of the English colonial strategy lies devolution. Presented as a generous transfer of power, it has long been used to argue that Scotland already governs itself. The report exposes this mechanism for what it is. A colonial fraud. The Scotland Act 1998 is described as establishing administrative structures while preserving the overriding authority of the central, colonial English state, constituting a process of legal assimilation designed to negate Scotland’s status as a treaty partner. This is a devastating reframing. Devolution is no longer interpreted as autonomy. It is revealed as a technology of control, a system through which the English colonial centre maintains supremacy while projecting the illusion of self-government. Internal self-determination, in this light, is containment, certainly not liberation. The implication is profound. The English colonial state does not share sovereignty. It absorbs, restructures, subordinates, plunders. The Failure of Internal Self-Determination The report goes further. It demonstrates that systems of internal autonomy, wherever imposed under the authority of the dominant state, remain structurally incapable of delivering genuine self-determination. They operate within what the report identifies as a framework of hegemonic legal pluralism, where the colonised are permitted limited expression only within boundaries defined by the coloniser. Scotland’s constitutional reality is thus aligned with a broader global pattern. From New Caledonia to Okinawa, internal arrangements function not as solutions but as instruments of stabilisation for colonial rule. The conclusion follows with force. External Self-Determination & Decolonisation as the Only Solution The report states unequivocally that external self-determination is the only effective means of guaranteeing the rights of peoples subjected to such structures. This is not a suggestion but a doctrinal position grounded in international and UN law: -Article 1(2) of the UN Charter -The UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) -The UN General Assembly Resolution 1541 (XV) The implication is unmistakable. @UN @UNGeneva @UN_HRC @UNHumanRights @antonioguterres

English
11
150
207
5.1K
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹
You dont need to ask for permission at all, we never entered the treaty in the first place, the Annexation of Scotland just needs to be recognised, once that is done our voting intention and all the other evidence is what matters, May should be ticketed as a plebiscite for Independence
English
2
2
5
376
Angus B MacNeil 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿
Streeting makes it spicier. Confirming UK Gov will not grant a ref on Scot indy. Anybody supporting Scottish independence should know we do NOT need a referendum. And should also know that 19 of 23 countries becoming independent of the UK since 1945 used elections for indy.
English
71
218
517
11.9K
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹 รีทวีตแล้ว
Craig Murray
Craig Murray@CraigMurrayOrg·
Scots are a people with the inherent and inalienable right of self-determination under the UN Charter. We have a right to national Independence It is impossible to believe both that Scots have a right to self determination, and that Independence requires permission from London
English
1.1K
3.5K
7.2K
2.3M
Iso Ledger
Iso Ledger@JamesDula82·
XRP HOLDERS! Most people are waiting for XRP to explode the second the CLARITY Act passes. They're going to misread everything that happens next. Let me break it down. There are 3 phases after regulatory clarity hits. They are not market cycles. They are mechanical transitions in a global settlement system. And they unfold in sequence — each one accelerating the next. PHASE 1 — The Unfreezing (0-90 days) This phase is quiet. Most people will think nothing is happening. Here's what's actually happening underneath: Compliance departments are green-lighting rails they couldn't touch before. Banks are beginning real corridor testing. Custodians are activating dormant pipelines. And here's the part most people completely miss — exchanges are losing access to supply. Once institutional custody becomes mandatory, banks, PSPs and regulated custodians become the only entities allowed to hold certain classes of digital assets. Exchanges become interfaces, not warehouses. They can't custody large amounts. They can't source from unregulated pools. They can't use offshore liquidity partners. Institutions outbid exchanges for every available token. Exchange order books thin out. Liquidity dries up. Retail thinks: "Price goes up because more people are buying." The real mechanic: Price goes up because exchanges can't get inventory. This is not a vertical explosion. It's a repricing to a new baseline that reflects reduced risk and reduced supply. Patient holders who understand this won't panic sell thinking they caught the top. Because the top is not in Phase 1. PHASE 2 — The First Violent Repricing (3-12 months) This is where the "violent" part actually belongs. Corridors activate. Payment demand becomes persistent and measurable. Velocity collapses as institutions hold inventory for throughput. Supply compression becomes structural, not speculative. Cross-border payments, FX, and liquidity-on-demand all converge on XRP. The asset stops behaving like a crypto token and starts behaving like a global settlement substrate. This is the air pocket. The moment the market realizes what it's actually holding. PHASE 3 — Institutional Standardization (1-3 years) This is the phase where the world forgets the old system existed. XRP becomes a standard liquidity substrate for cross-border settlement. Payment demand becomes continuous, not episodic. Banks, PSPs, and custodians hold mandatory inventory requirements. Institutional flows dwarf all prior market history. Price becomes a function of global throughput. Not hype. Not speculation. Settlement volume. This is the phase where your Phoenix arc aligns with the system itself. I've been in cold storage since before most people knew what ISO 20022 was. Phase 1 is coming. Don't sell it thinking you caught the top. The top lives in Phase 3. With XLS-66D You wont need to sell Never sell the goose, just the golden eggs! See you in Phase 3!
English
86
316
1.6K
99.4K
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹 รีทวีตแล้ว
Eòin J Màrtainn
Eòin J Màrtainn@EoinJMartainn·
Westminster claims 'no interest' in NI because they can't afford the trade friction. But they’re silent on Scotland because we’re the only thing backing their debt. They’ll manage an exit for a drain, but they’ll fight to keep the vault. We’re the collateral for their £8.8T debt via our energy and land. Scots are sovereign, #Itstime we stopped asking to leave the 'Union'. #ScotlandAColony
English
2
1
3
75
CaledoniaLad
CaledoniaLad@CaledoniaLad·
@Fergie_CJ The Gaelic language is concrete proof that Scotland was once a sovereign nation in its own right. Its very existence antagonises Scottish Unionists who would rather it had died out after they banned its use after Culloden. It’s our national identity,it’s alive & well. They failed
CaledoniaLad tweet media
English
6
62
103
1.2K
Fergie
Fergie@Fergie_CJ·
I'm in Shropshire and the trains are speaking Welsh - well, joint Welsh / English with Welsh leading. Even if the train isn't going to Wales (Transport for Wales run). How come Wales, with a Labour admin gets that, while even a whiff of Gaelic has unionists frothing in Scotland?
English
49
43
243
17K
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹 รีทวีตแล้ว
Popular Sovereignty
Popular Sovereignty@Douglas_Haribo·
Atwood believed Scotland had no right to exist as an independent country. His book was sentenced to be publicly burned in Edinburgh.
Popular Sovereignty tweet media
English
8
75
107
2.5K
🌚
🌚@Wthmoni·
Can you answer..?
🌚 tweet media
English
7.6K
444
9.9K
8.6M
zeusblxck
zeusblxck@zeusblxckthe1st·
Anyone who said a Raptor is better than a Hilux, here you go then??🤔
English
755
2.2K
12.9K
1.1M
Dr. Yousef 🇵🇸
Dr. Yousef 🇵🇸@yousef_ki1·
No words. If you see this video, put a dot to break the alghorithm.
English
6K
9.5K
25.2K
384.5K
Vince Langman
Vince Langman@LangmanVince·
What type of martial art is this?
English
3.2K
304
1.8K
256.5K
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹 รีทวีตแล้ว
Sara Salyers
Sara Salyers@SSalyers2·
How many times have we heard that Scotland has one of the best devolution settlements in the world? It’s a false claim. Both in the security of the devolved administration and re degree of self determination it’s one of the worst - especially given the rights of Scots in international law to which the U.K. is signatory and which are withheld. But our ‘Scottish government’ commissions reports saying we have a full measure of internal self-determination already? Maybe election tine is time to ask them why they aren’t demanding or implementing the culture and language rights, media rights, territorial and other rights which, as a recognised and distinct people and nation we are entitled to under international law? Why they sing from the same hymn sheet as the British state when it comes to our legal rights?
Liberation Scotland Committee@LiberationScot

Here is a shocker. The Scotland Act 1998 is an ordinary statute. It could be repealed as easily as the Dentists Act 1984. Yet the UK tells the United Nations that this flimsy, unentrenched arrangement gives Scotland genuine internal self-determination under Article 1 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). That claim is bogus. A parliament that Westminster can abolish tomorrow is not a foundation for self-determination but rather a concession, revocable at will. See this comparison with a few proper regional governments. History repeats itself, we might add. The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty is the work of the 19th century English jurist A. V. Dicey. His claim was more grandiose still; yet this pre-1707 English parliamentary import is now the UK constitutional orthodoxy. Dicey compared the Treaty of Union - the very fount of the British constitution on which the "voluntary partner" thesis rests - to the Dentists Act of the day: one could be repealed by ordinary statute as easily as the other. This is the legal absurdity of the child (the British parliament) conducting a pre-conception assassination on the parent (the international treaty which is parliament's creator). Here is Dicey: "The principle of parliamentary sovereignty means neither more nor less than this, namely, that Parliament thus defined has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and, further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament. The Act of Union with Scotland (1707) is, from a legal point of view, just as much an ordinary law as the Dentists Act (1878). It can be repealed by the same body and in the same manner as the Dentists Act."

English
8
174
209
3.9K
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 JonnyBoy 🇮🇹
@J4m35c4mpb3ll I agree James and its why we must ensure the @theSNP does not get the second vote as they will be complicit in ensuring another once in a generation opinion poll is granted. We need as many pro indy candidates from other parties in there as possible to hold them to account.
English
0
0
3
581
James Campbell
James Campbell@J4m35c4mpb3ll·
Im going to make a prediction. In the very near future - the UK/English Gvt- will grant a s30 order for a Scottish Independence referendum. It will be granted because Scotland is at the UN for decolonisation - to stop c24 listing.
English
30
64
188
12.7K
The Daily Britain
The Daily Britain@dailybritainonx·
Is it time to let Scotland decide?
The Daily Britain tweet media
English
767
272
1.2K
49.9K