Kevin Hoepel

In 2019 I helped a startup go from 0 to 400k. Within one month. Something ChatGPT or whatever AI will never, like really never understand How Funnel Architecting & Google Search Campaigns found our Ideal Customer

Some people on X are sick! Lol, this dude keeps putting me on a list when confronted with facts. Crazy people. All that energy to make a list and add random people. Haha super sick

@NThisRoom @future_grandpa @skdh It's all love♥️. Matter fact i'm lauging. Proof is front of you. You can't stand it, you think your strategy is to repeat same image to disturb lol. Bro. I myself was a master demon one time HAHA. But have fun. It's all love. This was my last respond. I hope the facts reach you

@directRmarketer @future_grandpa @skdh lmao x.com/i/status/20349…

he's entirely right of course. even if you think he is wrong, at the very least physicists should think about why everyone else agrees they've lost the plot.

@NThisRoom @future_grandpa @skdh ❤️

@directRmarketer @future_grandpa @skdh lmao x.com/i/status/20349…

@NThisRoom @future_grandpa @skdh Hahah sick dude i have nothing left for you. Have a HAPPY life bro. I wish you well. If spamming x make you happy go and do that. Hope you had some joy, lol. Im going further with my work.

@directRmarketer @future_grandpa @skdh lmao x.com/i/status/20349…

@NThisRoom @future_grandpa @skdh how does it feel to be a loser, with a spam acccount, no life, not even a profile picture, and still being completely wrong @NThisRoom

@NThisRoom @future_grandpa @skdh HAHAHA you are a sick dude. But here the absolute facts. I literally told zero lies. But remain in your tiny fantasy land. I feel sorry for you something must be disturb you. Lol. Otherwise why trying to push to evoke a certain emotion. Crazy dude. Have a happy life. And wake up

@future_grandpa @skdh

@future_grandpa @skdh Oh yeah, and last punchline it fails at Planck scale (singularities) math causing infinite loops. Does not correspond well with quantum mechanics. 100% we lived a whole century in someone's metaphysical perception of reality. Could you close these holes with pure GR?

@NThisRoom @future_grandpa @skdh HAHAHA you are a sick dude. But here the absolute facts. I literally told zero lies. But remain in your tiny fantasy land. I feel sorry for you something must be disturb you. Lol. Otherwise why trying to push to evoke a certain emotion. Crazy dude. Have a happy life. And wake up

@directRmarketer @future_grandpa @skdh My genuine reaction to that information

@NThisRoom @future_grandpa @skdh Hahah you are a sick faceless dude, putting me on a list. Nothing to do with your life.. i see.. time to spam x faceless

@directRmarketer @future_grandpa @skdh per my last, schizoid x.com/i/status/20349…

@NThisRoom @future_grandpa @skdh Lol, i won't waste zero energy, have a nice day buddy

@directRmarketer @future_grandpa @skdh lmao x.com/i/status/20349…

@NThisRoom @future_grandpa @skdh You're stupid. I stated absolute facts. You can google them. Remain in your fantasyland happy bro. Wish you well

@directRmarketer @future_grandpa @skdh lmao

Editing product pages, etc. Literally, Claude can do it all. Unlike the stubborn API of Klaviyo, they should make their product more AI-ready, because soon people will iterate within AI; while they do more design & problem-solving than coding. Publish directly to their platform

I must say Shopify has best way forClaudee integration. Klaviyo was a super mess. Eventually found a workaround. 172 email templates in about 10 flows. Super headache. But Claude to Shopify is good. Publishing LPs will be an easier game. Soon new launch I will stickto o😬

@PaulBachman3 @ExploreCosmos_ Yeah that is maybe more mature. Instead of accepting things that do not exist like dark matter/energy.. yeah we just have to accept it, I guess, lol. It's just conflicting things always keep sticking. But indeed just have to accept the incompleteness

@directRmarketer @ExploreCosmos_ Let's just say the models are incomplete at best. Maybe in a few hundred years we will discover the theory of everything - if we don't destroy ourselves in the meantime.

For decades, we’ve lived with a mystery that is deceptively simple: galaxies aren’t following the rules. When astronomers measure how fast stars orbit within galaxies, something doesn’t add up. The outer regions rotate far too quickly, as if there were much more mass present than we can see. If Newton or Einstein were entirely sufficient to describe what’s happening, those outer stars should be moving more slowly. In fact, many of them should be flying off into intergalactic space. But they don’t. Something is holding galaxies together. One way to explain this is to assume that there is additional mass, an unseen component we now call dark matter. It does not emit or absorb light, but it does exert gravity. In this picture, galaxies are embedded in vast halos of invisible matter that provide the extra gravitational pull needed to keep stars in orbit. But there is another possibility. Instead of adding something new to the universe, maybe the problem lies in our understanding of gravity itself. Perhaps the laws we use, so successful on Earth and in the Solar System, break down on galactic scales. This is where MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) comes in. MOND proposes that gravity behaves differently at extremely low accelerations. With a relatively simple modification, it can reproduce the rotation curves of many galaxies without invoking dark matter at all. In that sense, it works remarkably well. But there’s an important nuance here. MOND is essentially an empirical rule, it tells us how galaxies behave, but not necessarily what underlying physical entity is responsible. Dark matter, by contrast, is a hypothesis about something real: a new form of matter that exists independently of the visible universe. And galaxies are only part of the story. When we look at galaxy clusters, the discrepancy becomes even more pronounced. The visible matter, mostly hot gas, is simply not enough to account for the gravitational effects we observe. Even with modified gravity, something extra still seems to be required. Gravitational lensing adds another layer of evidence. Massive objects bend light, allowing us to map where mass is located. In systems like the Bullet Cluster, something striking appears: most of the mass is not where the visible matter is. The gas from the collision slows down and lags behind, while the dominant mass component passes straight through. That’s a crucial observation. For many physicists, this is where the debate shifts, from “maybe gravity is wrong” to “something unseen must actually be there.” The early universe tells a similar story. The cosmic microwave background contains a detailed imprint of how matter was distributed just after the Big Bang. The pattern we observe matches extremely well with models that include dark matter as a distinct component. Reproducing that same pattern with modified gravity alone has proven extremely difficult. Then there is the question of how structure formed in the first place. Galaxies did not appear instantly, they grew from tiny fluctuations in density. Dark matter provides a natural explanation for this process because it does not interact with radiation, allowing it to collapse early and form the gravitational scaffolding that ordinary matter later falls into. Without dark matter acting as the cosmic “glue,” the universe simply wouldn’t have had enough time to assemble the galaxies we see today. Taken together, these observations point toward a consistent picture. Whatever is causing these gravitational effects behaves like additional mass, something that moves, clusters, and interacts gravitationally, but not electromagnetically. That is why most of modern cosmology leans toward the idea that dark matter is made of particles. Candidates such as WIMPs, axions, or other yet-undiscovered particles arise naturally in extensions of known physics, and experiments around the world are actively trying to detect them. Still, the story is not closed. Modified gravity remains an active area of research, especially because of its success on galactic scales. Some researchers are even exploring hybrid models that combine both ideas. But until we actually touch a dark matter particle, until we detect it directly, the case remains one of the greatest scientific whodunits of our time.

it should in realism have it's own affective dynamics, both influencing eachother, for it to be reality. Everything has dynamics. It can not just be a constant correction for where we go wrong. Otherwise again we don't describe dynamics of realism, but put placeholders for fit.

Yeah I realize DM is a big hoax and a logical fallacy. Our own models describing energy/mass gravity relational dynamics don't have fit everywhere. And a counter part 'dark' energy/mass gravity relational dynamics seem to have always fit with our models. Everywhere. Hoax.

This thought made me think twice. We see that energy is literally a constantly dynamic. The single reason for state change & an evolving cosmos. If dark energy were real wouldn't it also produce 'energy-like' dynamics? Wouldn't gravity be even stranger? x.com/directRmarkete…

@ExploreCosmos_ Even more deeply we've observed matter, stars, exploding/imploding, and energetic tensor release. Planets torn apart by tidal forces. Gas emerging from explosion/implosion. What dynamics would this invisible matter have in space, or are they a constant undynamic state? It's weird

@ExploreCosmos_ & why it's called dark energy, e=mc2, without energy no matter. But how can we otherwise explain the nature of gravitational like behavior that contradicts our own? Well if we put dark matter there, since matter & gravity are related, we can put it anywhere. Voila the math works!