Tim van de Hoef

29 posts

Tim van de Hoef banner
Tim van de Hoef

Tim van de Hoef

@drTPH

Interventional Cardiologist at University Medical Center Utrecht

Utrecht, Nederland เข้าร่วม Mart 2013
47 กำลังติดตาม96 ผู้ติดตาม
Tim van de Hoef รีทวีตแล้ว
EuroIntervention
EuroIntervention@EuroInterventio·
This study shows that coronary microvascular dysfunction, identified only by an impaired coronary flow reserve, was associated with increased rates of MACE and target vessel failure over a 5-year follow-up. #EAPCI ow.ly/L5mm50JwNe0
EuroIntervention tweet media
English
0
23
48
0
Ozan Demir
Ozan Demir@DrOzanDemir·
Comparison of Flow Study (Doppler vs Thermo) ➡️CFR-thermo overestimates CFR-Doppler (modest correlation) ➡️Commonly used CFR-thermo threshold 2.0 has poor diagnostic accuracy ➡️Optimal CFR threshold 2.5 (thermo OR Doppler) 🔗jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.… @JACCJournals #EuroPCR2022
Ozan Demir tweet media
English
9
40
96
0
Tim van de Hoef รีทวีตแล้ว
Andrew Sharp
Andrew Sharp@drandrewsharp·
Coronary Physiology Strikes Back?! ILIAS Registry shows that FFR guidance may be strengthened by the addition of coronary flow measurements in stable IHD. RCT needed here to change practice. #TCT2021
Andrew Sharp tweet media
English
1
10
33
0
Tim van de Hoef รีทวีตแล้ว
Matthias Götberg
Matthias Götberg@MGtberg·
iFR and FFR with similar outcome at 5-years! No difference in any subgroup or components of the composite outcome. “iFR is quicker, easier, cheaper and with no discomfort for the patient. iFR lowers the threshold for performing physiology!” @DLBHATTMD @TCTConference
Matthias Götberg tweet mediaMatthias Götberg tweet mediaMatthias Götberg tweet mediaMatthias Götberg tweet media
English
8
45
124
0
Cardiac Research
Cardiac Research@UKheartresearch·
Important messages - 1. Functional CMD has same poor prognosis as structural CMD. 2. High MR alone does not carry poor prognosis - it should not be used to diagnose CMD in isolation. For diagnosis - 1. Measure CFR 2. Then endotype by MR as may have therapeutic implications.
Cardiac Research tweet media
English
4
11
22
0
Tim van de Hoef รีทวีตแล้ว
R. Jay Widmer
R. Jay Widmer@DrArgyle·
Event rates 1/2 w/ #iFR deferral vs #FFR per @jerd10 in LAD & #ACS
R. Jay Widmer tweet mediaR. Jay Widmer tweet media
Minnesota, USA 🇺🇸 English
1
5
11
0
Tim van de Hoef รีทวีตแล้ว
C. Michael Gibson MD
C. Michael Gibson MD@CMichaelGibson·
ORBITA trial: PCI significantly reduced ischemia but no improvement in exercise time compared to placebo procedure #TCTDenver
C. Michael Gibson MD tweet mediaC. Michael Gibson MD tweet mediaC. Michael Gibson MD tweet media
English
5
27
40
0
Tim van de Hoef รีทวีตแล้ว
C. Michael Gibson MD
C. Michael Gibson MD@CMichaelGibson·
Dr. Al - Lamee discusses results of ORBITA Trial in this mornings press conference #TCTCDenver
C. Michael Gibson MD tweet media
English
2
8
20
0
Tim van de Hoef รีทวีตแล้ว
The BMJ
The BMJ@bmj_latest·
A substantial percentage of US journal editors received personal payments from industry and these payments were often large, finds #BMJResearch bmj.com/content/359/bm…
The BMJ tweet media
English
21
296
187
0
Tim van de Hoef รีทวีตแล้ว
Andrew Sharp
Andrew Sharp@drandrewsharp·
#orbita giant Rasha...
Andrew Sharp tweet media
English
1
6
11
0
Tim van de Hoef รีทวีตแล้ว
NL Heart Institute
NL Heart Institute@NL_heart·
The call for the 2018 Einthoven dissertation prizes is open. Deadline 5-1-2018. Check our website heart-institute.nl for details.
English
0
4
0
0
Tim van de Hoef รีทวีตแล้ว
Sukh Nijjer
Sukh Nijjer@SukhNijjer·
Here’s a clearer picture. Deferring lesions in the LAD using FFR is associated with a doubling in clinical events compared to iFR #TCTDenver
Sukh Nijjer tweet media
English
0
11
13
0