Dr Sam

216 posts

Dr Sam banner
Dr Sam

Dr Sam

@dr_sam_0

Biomedical Scientists | Agnostic | Science | Exploring Faith

เข้าร่วม Mart 2021
87 กำลังติดตาม41 ผู้ติดตาม
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
@__lilith666 It’s ironic how even the most flawed religious people become judgmental once you reveal you’re an atheist. I’ve never understood that reaction.
English
1
0
7
257
么 ꜱ ᴀ ᴍ ꪜ,
么 ꜱ ᴀ ᴍ ꪜ,@__lilith666·
Why do people think atheist are bad people😅
English
17
26
210
8.7K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
Pick a fruit , any fruit, then read the listed ingredients and explain how it's possible to claim that injecting such ingredients into your body makes you healthier. Go ahead, I'll wait.
Dr Sam tweet media
David Wolfe@DavidWolfe

English
0
0
0
3
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
@Polymarket How would online ivermectin sellers make money? 😭 They need another pandemic to sell ivermectin.
English
0
0
1
1.1K
Polymarket
Polymarket@Polymarket·
JUST IN: WHO chief assures hantavirus outbreak “is not COVID”
English
177
73
1.1K
108.9K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
@EriqueMonnie @KR3Wmatic @maklelan I don’t think you understand the argument I’m making. “They are one” is not found in the original version. The KJV got it wrong. This is wildly accepted by most bible scholars. Just google “Comma Johanneum” to read more about it.
English
1
0
1
18
JayPEGs
JayPEGs@EriqueMonnie·
@dr_sam_0 @KR3Wmatic @maklelan The verse just said they are one, so what’s your argument? The bible explain itself better than the quran that needs Hadith.
English
1
0
0
21
Yẹmí
Yẹmí@KR3Wmatic·
Is it true that the concept of the Trinity is not found in the Bible?
English
57
2
21
2.5K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
@athiestboi I’m an agnostic but I’ve got to admit, most critical scholars agree that Jesus existed. The gospels may not accurately represent what he did but he definitely existed.
English
1
0
0
66
Atheistboi
Atheistboi@athiestboi·
Is there any evidence that the individual Jesus ever existed?
English
44
7
26
1.8K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
1 John 5:7 in the KJV (“these three are one”), that’s the famous “Comma Johanneum”. It was added later by a scribe. It’s not part of the original text. As for the other verse, simply mentioning the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit does not mean they are co-equal, co-eternal, consubstantial persons sharing one divine essence.
English
2
0
1
66
JayPEGs
JayPEGs@EriqueMonnie·
@dr_sam_0 @KR3Wmatic @maklelan Matthew 28:19 (KJV) "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:" • 1 John 5:7 (KJV): "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
English
1
0
1
56
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
@DrNeilStone I think the mainstream media is partly complicit in causing this hysteria. They’re giving conspiracy theorists all the materials they need to cause panic.
English
1
0
0
158
Neil Stone
Neil Stone@DrNeilStone·
All those people saying about Hantavirus that you "WILL NOT COMPLY" Relax There's nothing to comply with
English
22
18
212
5.8K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
@catturd2 It’s a "miracle" for livestock and tropical parasites, sure. Other than that, it’s basically useless for any other disease.
English
1
0
6
509
Catturd ™
Catturd ™@catturd2·
Daily reminder ... Ivermectin is a miracle drug.
English
828
2.3K
16.7K
260.4K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
@MaryBowdenMD @ApuAkkad1 This is bottom-tier logic. People will try anything in life or death situations, but that doesn't excuse spreading misinformation or grifting your followers, especially for a disease that isn't even a current public threat.
English
0
0
0
147
Mary Talley Bowden MD
Mary Talley Bowden MD@MaryBowdenMD·
@ApuAkkad1 So if you were dying of hantavirus, would you wait for a clinical trial to prove ivermectin works or just try it?
English
81
79
1.3K
14.3K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
@ApoloJedi_ The "blind forces" didn't plan it; the lineages that used it simply outlived the ones that didn't.
English
0
0
0
37
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
Where do I even start? This is what we call an “ All or Nothing Fallacy”. it relies on a misunderstanding of how biological traits actually develop. Evolution doesn't start with "vision"; it starts with light sensitivity. A single light-sensitive protein (opsin) allows a microbe to move toward food or away from UV rays. Also, Opsins didn't appear out of thin air. They evolved from G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which cells already used to sense chemicals and hormones. Evolution "co-opted" an existing signaling system and tweaked it to respond to light. The claim that “fully formed eyes suddenly appear” is also false. Fossils show gradual increases in eye complexity, especially in arthropods and mollusks.
Divinely Designed@DivinelyDesined

Vision is an absolute marvel of Divine Engineering. It requires a minimum of 3 systems working together from the start, or we don't see. 1. Eyes to capture light & convert into signals 2. Pathways to transport the signal 3. A brain to process it Evolution can't build it one step at a time, because there is no vision until all those systems exist and function together. Compounding the complexity further, each of those 3 systems themselves require a minimum number of more complex subsystems to function properly. For instance, all eyes require opsin proteins. Opsin is a highly complex protein that holds a special light-sensitive molecule called retinal; when a single photon hits the retinal, it instantly flips shape, triggering the opsin to change its 3D shape and trigger a precise cascade which converts the light into an electrical signal to be sent to the brain where it can be understood as vision. Opsin alone, is useless. It needs the retinal molecule plus the full cascade, or it does nothing. This is the case with ALL vision systems, confirmed over and over again the lab. No partially formed system produces any vision, or any other function for that matter. Many uninformed Evolutionists attempt to argue that we see different levels of complexity in vision systems, which they say is evidence that vision evolved gradually from simpler systems. But the evolutionary scientists themselves refute this. Even the very simplest possible system of vision - the infamous "light sensitive cell" - still relies on a similar highly complex, interconnected network of proteins and other molecules. Mainstream evolutionary science even teaches that vision systems evolved independently, from scratch, at least 40 different times. The reason is because many vision systems are so different, operating with such unique parts, that one simply could not have evolved from another. The fossil record itself refutes the concept of step by step construction of vision systems. Complex eyes appear early in the fossil record, fully formed & functional. There is no increasing complexity in the fossil record - it's a complete contradiction of evolutionary predictions. The vision system has all the Hallmark evidence of design. A complex, interconnected web of information processing systems with incomprehensibly precise timing & coordination between them all to produce a highly specialized function. Nature does not, and cannot, produce such a system, not with all the time and resources in the entire universe. Everything you see is a testament to the Power of our Creator.

English
7
0
2
1.5K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
Where do I even start? This is what we call an “ All or Nothing Fallacy”. it relies on a misunderstanding of how biological traits actually develop. Evolution doesn't start with "vision"; it starts with light sensitivity. A single light-sensitive protein (opsin) allows a microbe to move toward food or away from UV rays. Also, Opsins didn't appear out of thin air. They evolved from G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which cells already used to sense chemicals and hormones. Evolution "co-opted" an existing signaling system and tweaked it to respond to light. The claim that “fully formed eyes suddenly appear” is also false. Fossils show gradual increases in eye complexity, especially in arthropods and mollusks.
English
4
0
12
294
Divinely Designed
Divinely Designed@DivinelyDesined·
Vision is an absolute marvel of Divine Engineering. It requires a minimum of 3 systems working together from the start, or we don't see. 1. Eyes to capture light & convert into signals 2. Pathways to transport the signal 3. A brain to process it Evolution can't build it one step at a time, because there is no vision until all those systems exist and function together. Compounding the complexity further, each of those 3 systems themselves require a minimum number of more complex subsystems to function properly. For instance, all eyes require opsin proteins. Opsin is a highly complex protein that holds a special light-sensitive molecule called retinal; when a single photon hits the retinal, it instantly flips shape, triggering the opsin to change its 3D shape and trigger a precise cascade which converts the light into an electrical signal to be sent to the brain where it can be understood as vision. Opsin alone, is useless. It needs the retinal molecule plus the full cascade, or it does nothing. This is the case with ALL vision systems, confirmed over and over again the lab. No partially formed system produces any vision, or any other function for that matter. Many uninformed Evolutionists attempt to argue that we see different levels of complexity in vision systems, which they say is evidence that vision evolved gradually from simpler systems. But the evolutionary scientists themselves refute this. Even the very simplest possible system of vision - the infamous "light sensitive cell" - still relies on a similar highly complex, interconnected network of proteins and other molecules. Mainstream evolutionary science even teaches that vision systems evolved independently, from scratch, at least 40 different times. The reason is because many vision systems are so different, operating with such unique parts, that one simply could not have evolved from another. The fossil record itself refutes the concept of step by step construction of vision systems. Complex eyes appear early in the fossil record, fully formed & functional. There is no increasing complexity in the fossil record - it's a complete contradiction of evolutionary predictions. The vision system has all the Hallmark evidence of design. A complex, interconnected web of information processing systems with incomprehensibly precise timing & coordination between them all to produce a highly specialized function. Nature does not, and cannot, produce such a system, not with all the time and resources in the entire universe. Everything you see is a testament to the Power of our Creator.
English
86
181
679
17.3K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
@iluminatibot It’s just you bro. I took the vaccine and my immune system is just as good. This applies to the billions of people on this planet.
English
3
0
27
230
illuminatibot
illuminatibot@iluminatibot·
"Is it just me or are people dropping like flies ever since 2020?" "It's almost as if something has happened to their immune systems."
English
46
180
499
24.7K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
@DrFrankTurek Yes, Flood myths, divine sons, apocalyptic saviors, resurrections. Most of these themes existed long before Christianity. The difference is Christians mock every other mythology and turn around and say their version is “historical fact.”.
English
2
0
1
127
Frank Turek
Frank Turek@DrFrankTurek·
Is Christianity a copycat religion?
English
96
4
44
12.3K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
No worldwide flood layer. No interruption in ice cores or tree rings. Ancient civilizations continued without disruption Millions of species couldn’t fit or survive on one wooden boat Animal migration after the flood makes no sense biologically or geographically No evidence of a human/genetic bottleneck from only 8 people.
English
1
0
3
104
Yẹmí
Yẹmí@KR3Wmatic·
What is the best scientific proof to debunk Noah's Ark myth?
English
36
0
10
1.3K
Dr Sam
Dr Sam@dr_sam_0·
COVID conspiracy Twitter really turned some of y’all into quack virologists. Hantavirus has been studied for decades and there’s still no universally proven antiviral cure, but somehow you cracked it with ivermectin and vitamins.
Joe Tippens@JoeTippen

Good news... THE HANTAVIRUS is a SINGLE STRAND RNA VIRUS. Other Single Strand RNA viruses: - Sars-Cov2 (COVID-19) - RSV - Marburg - Ebola Therefore, we already know the cure. A Zinc Ionophore combined with Zinc. 👉HCQ 👉IVERMECTIN 👉QUERCETIN + VITAMIN C Thank you Dr. Zelenko RIP 🙏

English
0
0
0
127