Mike Davis รีทวีตแล้ว
Mike Davis
313 posts

Mike Davis
@exphys117
S&C Coordinator | PhD Student @LSU
เข้าร่วม Eylül 2020
1.2K กำลังติดตาม242 ผู้ติดตาม

@Fred__Duncan Central fatigue takes a long time to become symptomatic. Even then the CNS recovers quickly.
Sleep 😴 is the priority.
English

Newsflash: you can’t “burn up the CNS” of a high school athlete for like a million reasons…but here a few:
1. Lack of myelination
2. Slow rate coding
3. Slow firing rates
4. Relative low % of motor unit recruitment
5. Lack of consistent motor behavior
6. Low contralateral control
Penn S&C@PennStrength
Volume & “new” is what burns the steak.
English

@timkettenring ↓
End-exercise peripheral fatigue constrained to individual critical threshold
Marcus Amann killed it
English

@timkettenring It’s all upstream.
Peripheral metabolic disturbance (H⁺, Pi, K⁺, lactate, etc.)
↓
Group III/IV muscle afferent activation (metabosensitive thin fibers)
↓
Inhibitory input to CNS → Reduction of central motor drive
↓
English

@timkettenring Well… you can eventually (kind of)
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih, pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih
English
Mike Davis รีทวีตแล้ว

Less than 1% of medical education focuses on nutrition… and 75% of med schools don’t require it at all.
@LSUHealthNO and @LSUHS are stepping up to lead the future of healthcare, starting with what fuels it.
#WBTTW



English
Mike Davis รีทวีตแล้ว

Humans with function-disrupting variants in the myostatin gene (MSTN) have increased skeletal muscle mass and strength, and less adiposity
nature.com/articles/s4146…
English

@DrNadolsky @GregLehman @mackinprof @SamueleMarcora I truly believe that a lot of practioner guys mean well there's just a disdain and opinion to be a coach you do not need it. There's definitely some opportunities to build bridges though. Having been on both sides and still on it I do not believe practice and theory need to be
English

Science takes time and I appreciate @mackinprof listing it.
Always good to see what a lot of us in the field have been doing for over a decade is scientifically sound.
Stuart Phillips (he/him)@mackinprof
1/ Big update in exercise science: ACSM has revised its resistance training Position Stand for the first time since 2009. That is a 17-year gap, and a lot has changed. 🧵pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12…
English

@nickd_ssc Are wrong per se. As far as what colleges sell to kids these days that's a huge mess.
English

@nickd_ssc Field work with your classes so there's this merging of hands on and education. But yeah these exercise science guys are enthusiasts just like a chemist, or BJJ black belt. I think there's value in it depending on what you want to do. I'm not sure PhDs are claiming practitioners
English

@nickd_ssc I think the problem lies in the overall academic model. If S&C became trade based (more so than it is now) it would be amazing.
Take core classes and then for the majority of it go learn/gain experience.
But there's some cool stuff happening in the field and lab.
English

@exphys117 The problem is that they could get the same experience by obtaining an easy certification, like the ACSMs and getting a job as a personal trainer. So why spend the time and money that could be spent gaining experience when the outcome is the same or worse?
English

@nickd_ssc But yeah I'm genuinely curious as to why out of all your applicants you couldn't hire one of them?
English

@exphys117 If you’re genuinely curious, this could be an interesting conversation. From your perspective, how does a degree in exercise science prepare someone to coach professionally? Do these programs have a responsibility to attempt to make them competitive candidates?
English

@nickd_ssc I think specific classes help make someone a better coach for example ex Phys, epigenetics, neuromuscular aspects of exercise, cardiovascular aspects, biomechanics and applied physics. Not saying you don't have to go out and seek a coach nor is picking up a book a bad thing.
English




