Gary

"He was fearful of being shot by law enforcement" We should all be infuriated that this imbecilic little pansy-ass was suddenly worried about being shot, after appointing himself judge, jury and executioner of Charlie Kirk. youtu.be/LtdfXxK1sXw?si…

@MrsKnight521 @Blue52795 @MrsErikaKirk Bravo Paige! 🎯💯

For those people saying, “If @MrsErikaKirk were truly grieving, she would’ve taken a year off for her kids and therapy”: Coretta Scott King led a march in Memphis DAYS after MLK’s assassination and kept fighting for civil rights for decades. Myrlie Evers-Williams jumped right into activism after Medgar’s murder, raised their 3 kids, and later ran the NAACP. Ethel Kennedy raised 11 children while pushing the Kennedy family’s political and social causes. Betty Shabazz, who was there when Malcolm X was killed, raised their 6 daughters, got her doctorate, became a prominent activist, and spent her life protecting his legacy. Elisabeth Elliot stayed in the jungle with the tribe that murdered her husband and kept doing missionary work. Some women are just built different. They throw themselves into their husband’s cause instead of falling apart. It’s called “immersion” and is common in grief. You might not like it, but you don’t matter. That woman will protect and continue her husband’s legacy, no matter how awful you people are.

Another myth, among dozens. There used to be a site called 9/11 myths, that documented and debunked all the similar made up myths and nonsense regarding 9/11. Archived now, if you go to 911myths.com. Folks like Gary here, @lisaknows429, and many others too numerous to mention are carrying on where 9/11 myths destroyer Mike Williams left off. Mike, call your office!

Who started the rumor that Charlie Kirk’s parents were suing Erika Kirk over control of his likeness? I’m suddenly seeing this all throughout my comments and can find no evidence of it.

Zionitis - The uncontrollable compulsion to blame Israel or Jews for everything bad in the world. Main cause: too much exposure to other sufferers of the disease. It's extremely contagious. Candyabetes - state of excess sugar circulating to the brain, cutting off specific synaptic pathways necessary for rational critical thinking. Main cause: too much exposure to Candace Owens' hypnotic rambling speech, wildly waving arms and darting eyes. This particular strain of diabetes is unfortunately uniquely contagious, as well. Preponderaversia: The irrational aversion to accepting the preponderance of the evidence against the perpetrator of a high-profile crime, along with the insistence on substituting an unrelated suspect or suspects more ideologically comforting, on the basis of no evidence whatsoever. Also extremely contagious. These conditions are almost always found to coexist within sufferers. If you have one, you're almost sure to have the others. Researchers are working furiously to find a cure, before they themselves become infected, rendering them unable to navigate normal avenues of evidence and common sense, and subsequently blaming Israel for their condition. Warning: Unaffected observers of individuals with these conditions may suffer serious scalp abrasions caused by excessive head scratching.

Erika Kirk and TPUSA are of a certain agenda in the arena of politics and religion. Yes, they were of an agenda when Charlie Kirk led the organization too. A major fallout from Charlie’s assassination was the exposure of both the political and religious agenda of TPUSA. Charlie Kirk was a part of the original MAGA, and incredibly helped President Trump get elected through an innovative campaign strategy which worked around the mainstream media to win over young people throughout America with alternative media. If you don’t remember, the original MAGA agenda included no more foreign wars, DOGE, MAHA, holding the deep state accountable, dismantling the military industrial complex, stop illegal immigration, America First, exposing the Epstein Files, ANTI-CENSORSHIP/pro First Amendment, get government spending/debt under control, and more. Remember that? Original MAGA, what it ran on and promoted itself to be, was a movement of the every day American person and was worth fighting for. But things have changed… Charlie was outspoken about the release of the Epstein Files, DOGE, illegal immigration, he was an advocate for free speech, and was especially growing increasingly frustrated with neocon warmongers in our government. He called them out by name, and stood very firm against American continual involvement in Middle Eastern wars. He appreciated Israel as a place, but too questioned the neocon government under Bibi Netanyahu. He fought hard against a regime change war in Iran, this is well documented. This became a threat to what is best described as the Zionist agenda. That which supports Israel beyond was is prudent American foreign policy, because of entangled religious beliefs. Zionists - those who belief Israel is a God-ordained and protected nation, did NOT like where Charlie was going, both in media and among his donors. TPUSA had been and built and funded by Zionists, as Charlie was formed as a Christian Zionist his whole life. He was never supposed to turn, but he started hanging out with Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens too much. Charlie became a problem because he and his powerful organization, if they were to shift from the Zionist agenda, actually had the major influential power among young people to drive a wedge between the US and Israel. If Israel has an existential requirement to win the information war, as Netanyahu is quoted saying, then a TPUSA under Charlie Kirk posed a major problem. Charlie is now gone, and this is where Erika Kirk and the current TPUSA comes in, and the agenda they now advocate for. TPUSA Faith is a big part of this too. What we have seen, is President Trump and MAGA shift away from many of the promises they made to the American people that helped them win the election. Many of the issues that Charlie Kirk thought important like no new Middle East wars, Epstein Files, free speech, military industrial complex, DOGE and government spending, etc. However, we have seen the Erika Kirk led TPUSA just blindly follow these shifts. They are simply just an operative and mouthpiece for a MAGA that is not the same as it told us it was. MAGA has aligned with that Zionist lobby, and has gone against the advice Charlie Kirk was giving them in the last months of his life as it relates to Israel and its public image in the United States. He warned Trump and the administration that listening to what people like Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, Laura Loomer would result in INCREASED animosity against Israel, and even produce a rise in antisemitism. He was right… look at the environment we are now living in as Trump has been completely isolated in an echo chamber of Zionists who are getting their way… and instead of being a force, or voice of reason against that agenda, like Charlie Kirk was, TPUSA under Erika Kirk has now just become a part of that echo chamber. TPUSA serves now as the political operative for the neocon agenda, TPUSA Faith serves as the religious operative for Christian Zionism.

@JodyChaseTN Takes one to know one?

George Farmer’s a “drunk,” according to Laura Loomer… sure. But can she explain how she got home after harassing that uncomfortable guy at a bar while she was drunk? Or are we skipping that part? Accountability for thee, not for me. Classic.

@JohnMappin @GrahamAllen @RealCandaceO Wow John. Is this the same kind of serpent's tongue appeal that draws people into scientology? I think I get it now.

Dear Graham @GrahamAllen, Candace @RealCandaceO is not lying about this. I hope this helps you. Truth is important to us, and we will not have friends of ours libelled or mischaracterised by those who find the truth uncomfortable, or simply because it does not forward the narrative that they wish to push. The current attempt to rewrite history in this instance is repulsive to us. Such activity causes death and wars. It harms lives. What is true is that Candace has been incredibly gracious and patient with those involved in this matter, out of respect for the situation and for the lives affected and for those involved. If anything, Candace has erred in being too patient and too kind. I am sure that Mikey @Michael_McCoyy appreciates and understands Candace’s judgement, her timing, and her reasons for that. Charlie trusted Mikey McCoy more than any other paid executive at Turning Point at the time that he died. Finally, no amount of bigotry towards our religions, be it Christian, Scientologist, Muslim, or Jewish, is going to take away from that truth. Freedom of religion is guaranteed under the US Constitution and law, and we would politely ask you to improve your understanding of what constitutes religious bigotry and intolerance. Scientology is something that Charlie Kirk had immense respect for, and he used its discoveries personally to help him create, expand, and protect the educational institution that he created called Turning Point. Truth is truth. And this is true. Kind regards, John and Irina Mappin

@HerbsandDirt "I hope that helps." Yes, it does. But not in the way you think it might. It helps us separate the compassionate and rational from the dumb take grifters. You're the latter.

I don’t follow Candice Owens. I’ve never watched one of her shows in its entirety, ever. Yet Erika Kirk niggles my spirit more than any person ever has in my lifetime. Not everyone who questions her motives & actions even likes Candace Owens either. Being a widow doesn’t make you a good person. I hope that helps.

@NJBeisner Should have used the word captures instead of footage.

I believe some of the confusion stems from Frank saying he showed Charlie what he assumed at the time was drone footage, but it was actually pictures from a 360 degree stationary camera up high. Frank later corrected the record on this simple misunderstanding. If I remember correctly.

Yesterday, Candace repeated a lie that myself and others debunked back in November. She claims Brian Harpole and Frank Turek told conflicting stories about whether or not TPUSA had a drone up that day. In actuality, Brian Harpole DOES also mention the fact that there was a drone up that day at UVU. His story aligns with Frank Turek’s. It wasn’t security’s drone, and nobody ever said it was. But see, Candace never actually watched the full Shawn Ryan interview with Brian Harpole. She just watched clips her audience fed her. She’s sloppy and doesn’t do her due diligence. Either that, or she’s knowingly cutting out the part where Brian mentions that a drone was in fact up; it just wasn’t security’s. See my video from November below for more.

@none_ya1776 @Scout1712 Ironic comment from someone with such a user name. 🤣

@Scout1712 Erika is a lying ditz and a puppet. A literal robot. She always said mom's should stay home and raise their kids....magically she is proud to be a single Mom because her "mom" was a single mom (both have been debunked). It's gross and she needs to go home and fade away.

Show me anywhere, prove me wrong, where Charlie Kirk told people that if a husband dies their wife should stop staying at home with their young children and become a CEO. There was a life insurance plan in place for 10s of millions of dollars. He made sure Erika would never have to work and could stay home and be with their children. Prove me wrong.

Preponderaversia: The irrational aversion to accepting the preponderance of the evidence against the perpetrator of a high-profile crime, along with the insistence on substituting an unrelated suspect or suspects more ideologically comforting, on the basis of no evidence whatsoever.

@GrahamAllen None of you care about Charlie’s killer, doing everything to hide the fact that you are trying to send a innocent man to jail

Candace Owens is a LIAR! She spent weeks attacking Mikey McCoy making him a target from her cult to where he could barely live his life!!!! Now she expects us to believe HE was her LEAKER the whole time?!?!

Preponderaversia: The irrational aversion to accepting the preponderance of the evidence against the perpetrator of a high-profile crime, along with the insistence on substituting an unrelated suspect or suspects more ideologically comforting, on the basis of no evidence whatsoever.

Welp, it’ll probably go into 2028, by which point I hope our crowdsourced investigation has a solid theory. Candace has been sued many, many times and she knows how this works. @baroncoleman broke down the ridiculous lawsuit Harpole filed against Candace and I think it will be thrown out. Baron’s show is absolutely worth a watch—he’s a lawyer with 20+ years experience. I agree with Candace on the French First “Lady”. 🤷🏻‍♀️

@culturewarnotes 😴😴😂 👋

Erika is a narcissist, so there's no real reason to speak to her. There aren't any Jews, so they cannot be blamed for anything at all. Not a huge fan of Candace. She works her work, I mine. I admit to being a huge nerd about "innocent until proven guilty". So that's absolutely on point. Thank you for pointing that out. That's independent confirmation from a hostile source that I absolutely stand behind the rule of law. Yes, believing in US law and order, and having a good detector for grifters and con artists like Erika is a gift for which I do not desire a cure. Thank you for your interest, son. Now, go take your nap.

People say it is unfair to speak out against Erika Kirk because she "continues the work of her husband." Ok, name one video, blog, or podcast she has done in which she has directly championed any of the points her late husband promoted, such as: 1) insisting the US should not get involved in war with Iran 2) calling out Jewish donors who are trying to control the right-wing blogosphere 3) questioning the official Israeli narrative about what happened on October 7. 4) Promoting Charlie's positions on gun control or 2A rights. 5) Promotes Charlie's economic policies 6) Repeats Charlie's stance on election integrity and voter fraud Then explain why a woman would take her assassinated husband's position, knowing she could also be assassinated and thereby leave her children fully orphans. Provide links to commentary from Charlie that indicates he would support a woman doing that to his children. Explain where the Bible promotes a woman who chooses assassination over motherhood. Erika has vowed to make TPUSA “10 times better." Comment on what she is implicitly saying about the way Charlie ran TPUSA. Erika has said she has to work to support her kids, even though it is documented fact that Charlie left her at least $10 million in cash and estates. Comment on what she is implicitly saying about Charlie's financial competence when she publicly says she has to work.

You're welcome to write a letter to Erika and let her know your concerns about issues being discussed. But as far as all your personal and rather offensive questions I doubt you'd get an answer. Why? Because it's none of your business. And, the notion that she or anyone at TPUSA is somehow responsible for Charlie's death is ridiculous on its face. I've perused your timeline, and I have a likely diagnosis for you: Zionitis - uncontrollable compulsion to blame Israel or Jews for everything bad in the world. Main cause: too much exposure to other sufferers of the disease.  It's extremely contagious. Candyabetes - state of excess sugar circulating to the brain, cutting off specific synaptic pathways necessary for rational critical thinking.  Main cause: too much exposure to Candace Owens' hypnotic rambling speech, wildly waving arms and darting eyes. This particular strain of diabetes is unfortunately uniquely contagious, as well. Preponderaversia: The irrational aversion to accepting the preponderance of the evidence against the suspected perpetrator of a high-profile crime, along with the insistence on substituting an unrelated suspect or suspects more ideologically comforting, on the basis of no evidence whatsoever.  Also extremely contagious. These conditions are often found to coexist within sufferers.  If you have one, you're very likely to have the others. Researchers are working furiously to find a cure, before they themselves become infected, rendering them unable to navigate normal avenues of evidence and common sense, and subsequently blaming Israel for their condition. Warning: Unaffected observers of individuals with these conditions may suffer serious scalp abrasions caused by excessive head scratching.

By the way, when does Erika's "I'm a poor widow" card expire? Trump's "I nearly got assassinated" card only lasted a couple of months and he never really used it. I mean, I don't remember him sobbing hysterically at the WHC dinner and begging to be taken home. Instead, the man who had part of his ear blown off with a bullet refused to leave the table because he wanted to watch what was happening, and he wanted the dinner to go on, because he had some good jokes to crack after the shooter got taken down. I'm pretty sure Charlie would have had a similar reaction. Competent leaders aren't thrown off by a few random gunshots. Also, why are you so interested in redirecting away from Charlie's points? Nobody seems to want to engage or "honor" Charlie's talking points. Here's a reminder of a few of them: 1) the US should not get involved in war with Iran 2) Jewish donors who are trying to control the right-wing blogosphere 3) the official Israeli narrative on October 7 is sus. 4) Charlie's opposition to gun control 5) Charlie's emphasis on economic policies 6) Charlie's stance on election integrity and voter fraud Why isn't Erika promoting the SAVE Act, for instance?

@CupEmpty @BriannaWu Yes thanks I was aware of that.

@gary5776 @BriannaWu Brianna is a man wearing women’s identity.

I’m sorry someone said you shouldn’t be CEO. But one of those people was your late husband. Charlie Kirk said women should “embrace their roles as mothers and homemakers.” He said that for women, having children was more important than a career. And he said women getting jobs instead of getting married led to “political hysteria.”

Tpusa didn't have drones up. Frank Turek was looking at shots from a ground based 360 degree camera he mistook for drone footage. He's talked about it. They may have been allowed to put up a drone briefly before the event for publicity shots but drones weren't allowed during the event.

@bertha_b83724 @WildManZig @TheMissyLerch As far as the lies on the show, he lied about the drone usage that day. He said he couldn’t legally fly drones, yet TPUSA had drones up shooting footage. He was misleading in his statements about conversations with local law enforcement.

I read through the lawsuit against Candace Owens and Mitchell Snow brought by Brian Harpole. The similarities to the defamation case against Karen Read and Turtleboy are uncanny. I mean, it felt like I was reading the same lawsuit. “Owen’s describes herself as as an “investigative journalist” “Owen’s regularly used her podcast and X account to promote conspiracy theories” “These platforms are monetized. The more followers she has the more views her content received, the more money she makes” “She is not subject to any oversight or professional ethics” Owen’s attempted to contact Harpole to “explain his side”. She used his silence to further her viewership and defamation against him. Same components: 1) Defamation 2) Conspiracy 3) Aiding and Abetting The lawsuit addresses public vs. private individuals as well. “He did not seek publicity” “His participation in the controversy was limited to defending statements made against him.” “Two podcast appearances” And, similarly, Candace Owens, is saying she is glad she is being sued because, you guessed it, the discovery phase🤣🤣🤣🤣

She could, but she's not obligated to, except in your own mind. She is. How would you have done in similar circumstances? I think you're suffering from an inferiority complex. You know you'd have been jello on the floor. I know I'd have been. She's better than both of us. She's honoring Charlie way above and beyond what most would have. She's never dissed him, and never would or will. What are you even talking about? No, you're a joke. Pretending to be all about "innocent until proven" while at the same time bashing an innocent widow for no other reason than you've got inner hate to vent. What's really going on with you dude? Share with the group.

@gary5776 Honey, nobody CAN answer those questions, INCLUDING ERIKA. She is not competent. That's pretty obvious at this point. She's also not honoring Charlie. She keeps dissing him publicly to raise herself up. She's a joke.

Nobody's obligated to answer your questions, least of all Erika. You're welcome to ask, but it looks like I'm the only one wasting my time attempting to explain to you why it's none of your business, just hers. Now you're going back to your previous questions, all the while avoiding addressing the reality of the preponderance of evidence against Tyler. Simply give us your case on that, and stop hiding behind red herrings.

We don't know what Tyler did or did not do. That's what the trial is for. The ballistics are - as the filing said - inconclusive. I am patient. I am the one who keeps saying we have no right to rush to judgement, we cannot assume the man is guilty until the evidence is presented. Everyone is attacking me for being patient, so it's kind of tone-deaf for you to urge me to be what you are not. You also rush to judgement about what I "really mean." Tyler is a mentally disturbed freak, a homosexual furry, a man who should have been institutionalized long ago so he could get treatment to become sexually normal. If the members of the LGBTQ+ community were institutionalized, as was the practice in decades past, the world would be a better place. That said, even a mentally disturbed freak like him deserves a fair trial without being judged guilty by assholes like you.

Don't call me an asshole dude. You're the one injecting your uninformed opinion about how Erika should conduct herself, and acting as uninformed junior deputy of the Tyler Robinson investigation. You're still not being honest about your opinion on Tyler's guilt. Forget the whole "innocent until proven guilty" red herring, tell us what you really think. This is a test. What level of critical thinking ability do you possess? Are you an honest broker, or an "asshole?"

No, Tyler is not on the level of craziness as George Zinn. Tyler seems to have considered his actions, and decided to go about what it took to carry out his demented wishes, planned for at least weeks. Zinn is on the level of the local homeless person claiming the moon landings didn't happen, like Candace. You've acknowleded what we know so far about the firearms balistics. 30 calibur consistent. Thank you. The rest will come at the trial. Be patient. You're hiding behind this whole "rule of law" red herring, which of course we all agree with, while at the same time functioning as junior partner in the internet slop Tyler Defense Team. We've all read your timeline. We know what you're really all about. It's obvious you really do care about Tyler being guilty or not. You're pulling for him, contrary to the preponderance of the evidence, aren't you?

Yes, George Zinn is crazy. Do you mean to imply Tyler Robinson is sane??? It doesn't matter: a confession, by itself, is not conclusive. People are innocent until proven guilty. As for the bullet, there is no bullet fragment match. ATF ballistics analysis of a deformed bullet jacket fragment recovered from Kirk’s autopsy was inconclusive. A later-unsealed ATF report (April 2026) confirmed the spent casing matched the rifle. The bullet jacket fragment was CONSISTENT with .30 caliber (matching the rifle’s chambering), but not a direct match. I don't actually care if Tyler is guilty or not. The point of my positions are to demonstrate I adhere to the rule of law. He has to be found guilty or innocent according to the rule of law. We don't get to say he is guilty until he gets convicted. That's how the rule of law works.

@realsashastone Good instincts Sasha. Continuing to follow you.

To any Conservative following me who supporters Tucker and Candace in your attacks against Trump, please unfollow me. Thanks.