Gray

As promised, here’s a link to all $CDR animations I generated so far. Feel free to use them in your own posts and no need to credit me. Thanks to the original creator for the awesome cedar logo! imgur.com/a/x3mJFHF

Countries with death penalty for gay people: 🇮🇷 Iran 🇦🇫 Afghanistan 🇾🇪 Yemen 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia 🇲🇷 Mauritania 🇶🇦 Qatar 🇧🇳 Brunei Countries with death penalty for terrorists: 🇮🇱 Israel 🇯🇵 Japan 🇺🇸 USA 🇸🇬 Singapore 🇹🇼 Taiwan 🇹🇭 Thailand Guess which one European are outraged over.

“Children don’t make you happy” - The Daily Mail I'm no researcher, but I downloaded the dataset and looked for myself. The study's numbers say the EXACT OPPOSITE of the headline 👇🏻

The single most radicalizing moment of my life was watching Democrats from the balcony of the State of the Union refuse to stand for Iryna Zarutska's mother, seated 15 feet away from me. Now they're tearing down her murals. They never cared about immigrants, it was all a lie.

This post actually got me banned from the official Cedar telegram. Apparently this is FUD, but the 5 or 6 accounts who spend their whole day in there saying our project is basically one massive fraud are just fine. I gave the interim committee temporary and limited custody of $600,000 in operational funds 10 months ago and around 2/3rd of it has gone... on basically nothing. We no longer have the resources to even attempt to build anything additional for the ecosystem. Sorry to have to give this community a dose of realism. Apparently that's the only thing that our clearly corrupt moderators feel is worthy of moderation these days.

His name is Abel and he is one of the Christians that was k!lled in Jos yesterday.

I think that in recent years we have become too BBC-friendly They should concentrate more on making great programmes, and less on social engineering Social engineering is not what they are paid for

Can the "good Muslims" kindly tell the bad Muslims to stop k!lling Christians in Nigeria, please????????????

🚨ABSOLUTELY HORRIFIC CALL🚨 A London woman calls in and cries her eyes out in desperation "WE'RE NOT RACIST WE'RE PETRIFIED" "WHAT ARE THESE POLITICIANS DOING TO US. THEY'RE PUTTING EVERYONE IN DANGER" "I DON'T LEAVE THE HOUSE WITHOUT A MAN" - My local shop has had 3 stabbings. 1 Murder. - My friend was murdered last year - A girl I know was murdered in the park - I'm begging my son to leave the country - My cousin was murdered "OUR FRIENDS. OUR FAMILY ARE DYING"

Conspiracy theorists watching all their theories come true

Atlas Wallet: Development Update, End Q1 2026 We previously took Atlas out of external closed beta for a full infrastructure overhaul. This isn't simply a rebuild. It’s a complete refinement of the product, alongside addressing further legal and compliance work required for launch. Internally, management and our developers have been developing and testing 3-5 new builds per week over the last few months. Here’s where everything stands: Legal & External Dependencies - These are the elements that ultimately control launch timing. Website - The website is being rebuilt to reflect the final product, features, and UX. This cannot be completed until the build is fully locked, so it will be finalised close to launch. Status: In progress UK compliance (Section 21) - We’ve completed a large portion of the groundwork, including a UK-specific version of the website. What remains: • Final in-app disclosures (must reflect final build) • Geo-specific handling for UK users • Formal sign-off from a regulated UK approver Status: Partially complete, pending final build On / Off-Ramp Partners - We are integrated with 5 providers. • 3 fully complete • 2 pending compliance alignment (linked to final legal structure inc. UK Section 21) These remaining items cannot be finalised until just before launch. Status: 3/5 complete Atlas Banking (Fiat Features + BillPay) We have the opportunity to reintroduce banking features, including: • Instant transfers to bank accounts • Payments to friends/family • BillPay functionality • Crypto → fiat usability These were highly valued by users. However: • The ongoing cost structure is significant • Terms are still under negotiation We will only enable this when it makes financial sense and aligns with launch timing. Status: Under negotiation Core Product (Wallet & App) -- Wallet Import - We’ve rebuilt wallet import to allow a single seed phrase to restore all associated wallets, regardless of whether they were created on platforms like MetaMask, Trust Wallet or Phantom. This solves one of the biggest UX problems in DeFi. Status: Built and in testing Token List & Filtering - Once a wallet is imported, we’ve dramatically optimised token population. This improves the user experience, but just as importantly, it fixes a major inefficiency in our previous infrastructure, which was both costly and resource-heavy. It also now includes advanced filtering to remove spam, dust, and malicious tokens, resulting in a cleaner and more reliable portfolio view. Status: Mostly complete, final optimisation ongoing Notifications (App-Wide) - We are moving from wallet-specific notifications to a unified system across the app. This ensures users don’t miss activity, even with multiple wallets. Status: Near completion Markets section (New Feature Layer) - We’ve built a completely new Markets section within Atlas. This introduces features and information not previously available in the app, significantly enhancing visibility, usability, and overall user experience. Status: Advanced development Watch-Only Wallets - Rebuilt and simplified. Cleaner UX, better performance, easier tracking. Status: In testing Swaps - Optimised routing to ensure: • Faster execution • Better pricing • More efficient paths Status: Built and in testing Send & Receive - Core functionality has been fully optimised and tested. Status: Complete Language & Currency Support - • Multi-language support • Multi-currency display • API integrations complete Status: Complete NFTs - Following previous beta feedback we have substantially overhauled the entire NFT interface. This provides better coverage across all chains and significantly improved speed and reliability. Status: Advanced development Post-Beta Work - Help Centre & Support We will rebuild the help centre after reopening beta so it reflects: • Final UI • Real user behaviour • Beta feedback Status: Deferred to beta phase Our efforts continue at pace to move Atlas back into our external closed beta, where we will be able to better assess readiness to full launch.

This annoys all the right people.

Dear @BBCNews, stop this right now.

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Iranian woman goes BERSERK on a smug white liberal who is supporting the Islamic regime "Convince me of WHAT? Of R*PE?! Of women not having rights?! I am Iranian, I've been imprisoned by that regime!" "Iranians are ASKING for the bombs! Iranian youth are asking to be bombed, and you are standing here SUPPORTING a terrorist regime! What are you DOING supporting a terrorist regime?!" *Lib spouts off about Palestine* "This has NOTHING to do with Palestine. This is about a terrorist regime in MY COUNTRY." "I can't even go see my father's grave!!" Mad props to this woman! White liberals are clueless, all over the world. H/t @patriot_apranik

Speakers at the Democratic Party conference in Canada argue over their “gender equity cards” which allows them to skip the line to speak This is real

Red carpet for the former Al Qaeda leader Germany has lost the plot

Instead of deaf people just watching the actual artists perform, CBC puts a sign language interpreter on to perform air guitar & drum solos for them to watch along side of it. Whats going on in Canada? It’s a 24/7 nut house

Cedar DAO community, I can confirm that I have sent the following email to the law firms that claim to represent our project. This is the latest of many attempts to engage with them and resolve this situation. At this point, the community should be asking for evidence that firms being paid with resources intended for token holders are actually acting in their interests. ------------------- Dear Sirs, I have been advised to copy senior directors at your firm into this correspondence given the seriousness of the situation, the absence of any meaningful response over the past six months, and the escalating legal and reputational risk now attached to this matter. I understand that multiple Acting Committee members have reported to both Harneys and Horizons that they are also in direct opposition to Shawnte’s conduct. Despite this, there appears to have been little or no effective intervention. In the meantime, her continued publication and promotion of highly damaging and defamatory material (the latest available here: drive.google.com/file/d/1V4v_nC…) has, in my view, already resulted in tens of millions of dollars in losses to the community, alongside substantial personal and corporate damage to myself and Wallet Enterprises Ltd. It is now essential to establish, as a matter of urgency , whether this damage is the result of the unilateral actions of a single individual, or whether she is, as she continues to claim publicly, acting under the advice or with the support of one or both of your firms. At this stage, accountability can no longer be deferred. At the outset, it is important to restate a foundational point that has never been in dispute. While the project was always positioned as community-focused, and the token supply (with the exception of the clearly defined allocation to the founder and his team) was owned by the community, operational control was always separate. Marketing, development and operational responsibility sat with a defined operator, first the founder and subsequently a private company, with a specific budget allocated for that purpose. This distinction between community ownership of the token and privately controlled operations was clearly communicated, consistently understood, and formed the basis on which the project functioned from launch through to May 2025. I wish to draw your attention to a tweet that was published in September 2022 and remained online for 3 years that confirms these facts beyond refute: (see images) I am aware that the concept of “community ownership” is now being used to attempt to blur or override that distinction. That is a mischaracterisation. Community ownership of tokens and liquidity does not equate to community control over operations, nor does it provide a basis to retrospectively unwind or reassign operational authority that was clearly and publicly exercised by a private entity. Any attempt to conflate these two distinct concepts in order to justify retrospective intervention is, in my view, fundamentally flawed. I write to remind you of the underlying factual position. From late 2022 until May 2025, I was the CEO exercising operational control over the project’s marketing, development and operations through EverGrow Marketing Ltd. I was also the individual who assigned the mandate and responsibilities to what was deliberately described publicly as an interim or acting committee. That position was communicated clearly and repeatedly through public channels, including tweets and formal communications, examples of which are: (see images) "This week $EGC is officially moving under the ownership of our company EverGrow Marketing Ltd. Marketing funds will be moved to wallet address 0xd9996AB734C7dBBA1EFbb7298Bd0465c7E6D1C05 & the main team wallet will be moved to address 0x0fB4a0D1A629E8Bd38C9757296aE5A9F1C6C9E69" September 8th 2022 from official EGC account. The mandate given was limited, and specifically restricted to: - establishing the long-term DAO framework - reviewing and proposing a sustainable project budget - developing strategies to grow and engage the community That was the full scope. It was never broader than this. It was consistently and explicitly communicated that this committee was temporary in nature, and that once these objectives had been fulfilled and a proper governance framework was in place, the community would vote to appoint a permanent structure. In her report, Shawnte relies on the wording of a later vote which omits this clearly stated limitation, and attempts to use that omission as a basis to assert that the committee was granted full and unrestricted authority over all past, present, and future matters. As lawyers, you will appreciate that this is not a tenable position. The absence of a previously stated limitation in subsequent communications does not extinguish that limitation, nor does it create new powers that were never granted in the first place. The mandate did not evolve into something broader. It remained exactly as originally defined. I did not grant the committee, and certainly did not grant Shawnte individually, any authority to retrospectively examine, reinterpret, or attempt to override decisions made by the founder in 2021 or by EverGrow Marketing Ltd between 2022 and May 2025. Nor was any authority granted to reclassify privately held tokens, assert control over assets, or conduct what has now become a sustained and highly damaging public campaign against me and Wallet Enterprises Ltd. For more than six months, a single member of that committee has used the position and the resources entrusted to it to pursue what can only be described as a personal vendetta. In doing so, she has repeatedly attributed her actions to legal advice from one of your firms, thereby lending apparent legitimacy to statements and publications that are highly damaging and, in my view, clearly defamatory. Her document linked above demonstrates the false premise on which she is operating. For example, she states: “This reflects execution of the Committee’s responsibilities, not an expansion of its authority.” She further asserts: “As a result, the current Acting Committee derives its authority directly from a DAO-approved vote and is not operating under a limited or pre-defined ‘interim’ mandate.” And: “The Committee’s authority arises from governance participation and is exercised on behalf of the DAO and its stakeholders.” These statements are fundamentally incorrect and represent a clear mischaracterisation of the authority that was granted. The committee was deliberately framed and communicated as temporary and limited in scope - the fact that it is repeatedly and publicly referred to as the ‘Acting’ or ‘Interim’ committee puts all this beyond doubt. It was not given authority to revisit historical decisions, to redefine token ownership, or to assert powers over structures and allocations that pre-date both the committee and any functioning DAO framework. This false premise fatally undermines the entirety of her report and any actions taken on its basis. That position is not mine alone. Several elected committee members have contacted you directly to state that they do not support Shawnte’s actions, and the last remaining legitimate committee member, Marios, has publicly and unequivocally rejected the entire premise of this report, and confirmed that despite it being positioned as official committee business, it is simply a self-authored report being misrepresented as an official communication. The factual position is straightforward. Project operations, marketing and development operated privately from 2021 until at least May 2025. The founder was allocated founder and team tokens under the original white paper without restriction. Those tokens were under his discretion. Certain rights and tokens were subsequently transferred to me under a private arrangement, which has never been publicly disputed by the founder, nor has any allegation of wrongdoing ever been made. Shawnte is now attempting to retrospectively relabel those privately assigned tokens as community-owned, and to go further by asserting that originally unrestricted private tokens, issued in a project that had no governance or voting mechanism throughout its existence, should now be treated as non-voting. She then relies on that position to justify unilateral actions, suppress genuine community governance, and continue publishing damaging material while claiming legal backing. I have seen no evidence supporting this position. There is no document overriding the original allocation. There is no evidence establishing DAO ownership of those tokens. There is no document granting the committee the powers she claims. Indeed there isn’t even formal documentation confirming the transfer of assets or powers from EverGrow Marketing Ltd to the committee, because no such permanent transfer was ever intended. The arrangement was temporary, trust-based, and limited in scope for the purpose of delivering a future DAO structure. This is in contrast to the fact that there was public communication and indeed documentation proving beyond refute that EverGrow Marketing Ltd did have full operational control and full ownership over the assets that are currently being misappropriated and indeed being used to pay your fees. The consequences have been severe. Her report has been publicly promoted and pinned across social media channels my team built over many years, reaching tens of thousands of users, and presented as authoritative. The resulting harm to my professional reputation, to Wallet Enterprises LTD, and to the wider ecosystem is substantial and ongoing. I am also aware that there is overwhelming community opposition to her conduct, and that other committee members have publicly stated that they do not support her position and have raised concerns directly with legal representatives, including assertions that key facts have been misrepresented. In light of the above, I require urgent clarification on the following, supported in each case by the relevant documentary evidence: Advice and Positioning - Whether either of your firms has provided legal advice supporting the position that the committee has authority to retrospectively review and override decisions made by the founder in 2021 or EverGrow Marketing Ltd from 2022 to May 2025, and if so, please provide the written advice, opinion, or instruction evidencing that position. Token Classification - Whether either of your firms has advised that privately allocated founder or team tokens can be reclassified as community-owned, restricted, or stripped of governance rights absent any clear legal basis, and if so, please provide the legal analysis or documentation supporting that conclusion. Documentary Basis for Claims - What specific documentary evidence, if any, you have been provided with or have reviewed that would support: a) the alleged expansion of committee authority beyond its originally stated mandate b) any transfer, assignment, or vesting of assets from EverGrow Marketing Ltd to the committee or any DAO structure c) any legal basis for the reclassification or restriction of privately held tokensPlease provide copies of any such documents or identify them with sufficient particularity. Use of Your Firms’ Names - What steps, if any, you have taken to prevent your firms’ names from being used to legitimise public statements and publications that are causing substantial reputational and financial damage, and please provide any correspondence or instructions issued in this regard. Public Attribution of Your Advice - Whether either of your firms stands behind, and is willing to publicly confirm, the claims made by Shawnte in her report, which she has repeatedly attributed to your firms, and if so, please provide the documented basis upon which such support is given. Awareness and Independent Verification - Given that you have been made aware by multiple elected committee members that they do not support Shawnte’s actions, and that concerns have been raised regarding the accuracy of the information presented to you, what steps have you taken to independently verify the factual basis of the position being advanced, and please provide any records, notes, or correspondence evidencing that process. Ongoing Harm and Intervention - In light of your awareness of the ongoing publication of highly damaging material, and the significant losses already caused, what steps, if any, have been taken to mitigate or limit further harm pending proper verification of the underlying claims, and please provide any documented actions or advice issued in this regard. Engagement - Whether you are willing to engage directly with me without further delay to address these matters based on the actual factual and legal position, and to explain the basis for your firms’ refusal over the past six months to engage with the individual who proposed the DAO structure, assigned the committee its authority, and, as CEO of EverGrow Marketing Ltd, holds full legal authority over operations and assets, as confirmed by public announcements and documentary evidence. The powers and resources that were temporarily entrusted to the committee have, in my view, been misused and misappropriated. If your firms do in fact represent the interests of token holders, then you are expected to take appropriate steps to intervene in ongoing conduct that is causing clear and significant harm, and to engage with me without further delay. This situation has been allowed to continue unchecked for far too long. A single individual has been permitted to misuse her position, misrepresent the scope of her authority, attribute actions to legal advice, and cause substantial and ongoing damage. I now require a substantive response as a matter of urgency.

🚨BREAKING: A massive crowd of people have gathered in London in support of the American left’s No Kings protest. The country that literally has a King is protesting against America who doesn’t. Can’t make this stuff up.

Nothing has none more to discredit itself in recent years than the judiciary And that includes the medical establishment during Covid, and Congress with all of its disgusting and craven antics

A German Bundestag member convicted of molesting a 7-yr-old lobbied the court to bury his case without a public trial, arguing the trial would damage the German-Israeli Society, where he served as treasurer, invoking the Hamas attack on Israel as justification. The court agreed.