echo.hive

I am creating a new series! "Get Amplified" This is all about - getting creative - implementing fast - learning to learn fast - maximizing potential in the age of AI ( links below ) If you enjoy my projects, you will LOVE this and massively benefit from it too we will mainly use Cursor but the ideas are general and applicable everywhere this is about getting amplified by becoming amplifiable intro post has 10 of my latest open source projects from the video more videos to follow very soon

been using gstack over the last 24 hours and i am incredibly impressed it has insane skills and does stuff I didn't know was possible with skills the technical implementation here is fantastic!! highly recommend this to any founder! uplevels your thinking, helps you clarify what to work on next, and helps you execute i rarely promote stuff like this but Garry blew it out of the water with this one everyone should run gstack: 1. open claude in your codebase 2. prompt claude with this: "run git clone github.com/garrytan/gstac… ~/.claude/skills/gstack && cd ~/.claude/skills/gstack && ./setup"

CC Livestream x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

We're also sharing an early alpha of our new interface. cursor.com/glass

When will real-deal recursive self improvement(RSI) really kick in with AI that it becomes obviously noticeable? And cause incomprehensible speeds of intelligence propagation.

Composer 2 is now available in Cursor. It's frontier-level at coding, priced at $0.50/M input and $2.50/M output. There's also a faster variant with the same intelligence at $1.50/M input and $7.50/M output. Deets below!

go try composer 2 in cursor, its a good model

Introducing the all new vibe coding experience in @GoogleAIStudio, feating: - One click database support - Sign in with Google support - A new coding agent powered by Antigravity - Multiplayer + backend app support and so much more coming soon! x.com/GoogleAIStudio…

Composer 2 in @cursor_ai 🥳

@hive_echo imo it has already started but is only obviously noticeable by a population on the order of 10³. i imagine this population will increase to 10⁴ by summer, and 10⁵ by the end of the year. after that i think it's just a matter of how hard the takeoff is

I always thought this was inevitable! @Railway is amazing!

@JustJake For whatever it is worth, I always thought this was inevitable! Long time user of @Railway And I love it!

The demand for software (and compute) is unlimited 15k, gapping +40% w/w

y as a function of time explained as a song(or poetry) In mathematics, y as a function of t can feel like a quiet traveler tracing a path through time. Imagine t as the steady ticking of a clock, each moment unfolding a new position, and y as the echo of that movement, rising and falling in response. As t advances, y does not simply exist, it becomes, shaped by rules that feel both rigid and strangely alive. The equation that binds them is like a script, but the graph it produces is a story, one where every point is a memory of where time has carried the value. Seen this way, y(t) is less a cold expression and more a relationship, almost a conversation between motion and meaning. Sometimes it climbs, sometimes it dips, sometimes it pauses in stillness, but always it listens to t. And in that dependence lies a kind of poetry: a reminder that even in the abstract world of symbols, there is rhythm, change, and a quiet sense of direction, as if the numbers themselves are walking forward, one moment at a time.

Meet the new Stitch, your vibe design partner. Here are 5 major upgrades to help you create, iterate and collaborate: 🎨 AI-Native Canvas 🧠 Smarter Design Agent 🎙️ Voice ⚡️ Instant Prototypes 📐 Design Systems and DESIGN.md Rolling out now. Details and product walkthrough video in 🧵

@codetaur How do you think 5.4 and 4.6 compare? Now that you have tried both extensively

gf tellin me she thinks I need to resub to codex for my own mental health. naw son I'm taking 300mg of wellbutrin for my claudepression and grinding it out

Fine structure constant explained as an ambient techno mix: Before equations found their voice, before constants earned their name, there lingered in the laws of light a quiet, stubborn flame. The fine structure constant, so called, yet never fully known, a dimensionless and curious truth that stands entirely alone. No meter binds it, no second frames it, no kilogram lays claim, yet in quantum electrodynamics it threads through every aim. It governs how the electron greets the photon’s fleeting glance, in perturbation series and coupling strength, it sets the scale of chance. Its value, near one over one hundred thirty seven, feels too precise, too near to art, as if the cosmos whispered it rather than derived it from the dark. It hums within atomic spectra, in relativistic corrections small, where energy levels split and shift in patterns that enthrall. A man might call it coupling strength, a measure of interaction’s might, while a woman sees its gentler side, the way it tempers force with light. Between Planck’s constant, charge, and speed, it weaves a careful thread, renormalized yet constant still, wherever thought is led. Not too strong to break the form, nor weak enough to hide, it rests within that narrow band where stable worlds reside. And though the Standard Model holds it close, it does not tell us why, this number stands like quiet truth beneath the open sky. So physicists return again, through Feynman diagrams and loops, tracing paths of virtual exchange in elegant compute. They name the fields, define the terms, expand what they can see, yet still that number waits beyond, untouched by symmetry. It neither bends to deeper laws nor shifts with scale or place, a fixed and silent parameter in nature’s coded space. And in that stillness lies its pull, its strange, enduring role, a constant not just in equation, but a question in the whole.

big things are coming

GPT-5.4 can solve one face of a Rubik's cube!

@liamegan @codetaur

Simulating realistic water waves feels like it should require insanely complex math. It doesn't. It actually just takes 3 numbers per point, and 1 simple rule.

Any sufficiently simplified LLM tooling is indistinguishable from best LLM tooling