Ramit Sharma

2.7K posts

Ramit Sharma banner
Ramit Sharma

Ramit Sharma

@iosDev_ramit

Learn, Think, Code, Debug, Code, Debug, Debug, Debug...Crash .......... Create iOS | Indie Dev | CS | SwiftLang | Everything  |

เข้าร่วม Kasım 2019
730 กำลังติดตาม127 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Ramit Sharma
Ramit Sharma@iosDev_ramit·
Swift 6.2 concurrency journey: - Start single-threaded. - Introduce asynchrony for latency. - Embrace concurrency for performance - Leverage actors for robust state isolation.
English
0
0
0
92
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
Sean Allen
Sean Allen@seanallen_dev·
Let's go!
Sean Allen tweet media
English
4
4
118
5.2K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
Grady Booch
Grady Booch@Grady_Booch·
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. — A Tale of AI
English
5
13
84
5.3K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
Natalia Panferova
Natalia Panferova@natpanferova·
My new SwiftUI book is finally out 🎉 I wrote "The SwiftUI Way" for developers who feel like they are fighting the framework as projects grow in complexity. It will help you align your code with SwiftUI's internal expectations to avoid common pitfalls. books.nilcoalescing.com/the-swiftui-way
English
12
23
147
11.1K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Jensen Huang just told every college student on Earth the one thing that determines whether they get hired. It is not their GPA. It is not their degree. It is not their internship. Huang: “If I have a choice between two, I would hire the one who’s expert in using AI.” He did not say prefer. He said hire. One gets the job. One does not. The only variable is whether you learned to use the machine. Then he went down the list. Accountant. Hire the one who uses AI. Lawyer. Hire the one who uses AI. Marketing. Supply chain. Sales. Customer service. Every function. Same answer. The person who can command the model does not have an edge. They are the only candidate in the room. Everyone else is applying for a job that no longer exists. Huang: “If you’re a carpenter, if you’re an electrician, go use AI. If I were a farmer, I would absolutely use AI.” That line should demolish every assumption about who this technology is for. This is not a Silicon Valley tool for software engineers. This is infrastructure for anyone who builds anything with their hands or their head. A farmer who uses AI to optimize soil, predict weather, and manage yields is not competing with other farmers. They are operating at a level that used to take an entire department. An electrician who uses AI to model loads, simulate wiring, and quote jobs in seconds does not compete with other electricians. They compete with firms. One person with the model replaces the output of a team without it. That is not a prediction. That is Tuesday. Huang: “Every college student should graduate and be an expert in AI.” Not familiar with it. Not aware of it. Expert. The university system is still training students to execute the work. The market already moved. It wants the person who directs the machine that executes it. Four years of tuition. Thousands of hours of lectures. And if you walk out the door without mastering the one tool that redefines every industry you could enter, you burned all of it. Huang: “I want to see what it could do to elevate my job, so that I could be the innovator to revolutionize this industry myself.” That is the part most people miss. AI does not replace ambition. It multiplies it. The carpenter who learns the model does not lose their craft. They scale it. The pharmacist who learns the model does not become redundant. They become dangerous. One person. Deep skill. Full command of the machine. That used to be called a company. The question is no longer what do you know. It is what can you build with the machine that knows everything. And the people who cannot answer that are not falling behind. They already fell.
English
78
336
1.7K
292.3K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
Anthropic
Anthropic@AnthropicAI·
Introducing the Anthropic Science Blog. Increasing the pace of scientific progress is a core part of Anthropic’s mission. The Science Blog will feature new research and stories of how scientists are using AI to accelerate their work. Read the intro: anthropic.com/research/intro…
English
177
598
4.6K
318K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
shirish
shirish@shiri_shh·
THE APPLE APP STORE IS DROWNING IN AI SLOP people are treating the App Store like a Medium blog spitting out apps one after another. All with zero users and $0 revenue. Apple reviews that used to take hours are now stretching into WEEKS and even months > more than 550k apps were submitted just last year, highest in a decade.
shirish tweet media
English
330
293
2.8K
406K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
Mukul Sharma
Mukul Sharma@stufflistings·
My Mac Mini M4 was boring, so I knew I had to do something about it...
English
135
523
3.8K
355.6K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
objc.io
objc.io@objcio·
Swift Talk 484 The Layout Protocol (Part 1) We revisit an old layout challenge, and solve it with a custom layout. This episode is free to watch, enjoy! 😊 talk.objc.io/episodes/S01E4…
English
0
4
31
3.6K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
GREG ISENBERG
GREG ISENBERG@gregisenberg·
reminder that you’re not behind, it’s just moving too fast
GREG ISENBERG tweet media
English
177
110
955
42.6K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
0xMarioNawfal
0xMarioNawfal@RoundtableSpace·
Mercury just launched Insights - an AI view of your company's finances - Tracks where your money is going & why - Flags spend increases & breaks them down by vendor - Ask it anything about your financials directly
English
8
6
23
48.4K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
"Anywhere from $40 billion to $150 billion of leveraged loans packaged into US collateralized loan obligations could be disrupted by the AI boom," per JPMorgan
English
89
109
826
760.5K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
Chris Lattner
Chris Lattner@clattner_llvm·
26.2 has something for everyone: Large scale MoE's like Kimi2.5, wicked fast diffusion models, MXFP4 perf, consumer AMD/NV incl DGX Spark + Strix Halo, and more. Mojo gets AI skills, cond conformances, TStrings, and ... way more. All in the 7 weeks from 26.1🚀 Check it out!👇
Modular@Modular

AI coding agents are only as good as the foundation they build on. Our latest 26.2 release ships Mojo 🔥 coding agent skills, purpose-built for writing and porting GPU kernels. Point Claude or Cursor at a CUDA kernel, get idiomatic Mojo back. Also in this release: FLUX.2 image gen at 3-4x PyTorch Diffusers speed with a 4.1x cost savings on B200. See everything in 26.2 ↓ modular.com/blog/modular-2…

English
7
19
170
36.6K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
0xMarioNawfal
0xMarioNawfal@RoundtableSpace·
Jensen Huang: “If that $500K engineer isn’t spending $250K a year on tokens, I would be deeply alarmed”
English
39
16
166
63.1K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
Andrew Curran
Andrew Curran@AndrewCurran_·
Terence Tao responding to a question on what advice he would give someone considering a career in math in 2026: 'Yeah, so we live in a time of change. It is, as I said, we live in a particularly unpredictable era. And I think things that we've taken for granted for centuries may not hold anymore. So, yeah, the way we... do everything, not just mathematics, will change. In many ways, I would prefer the much more boring, quiet era where things are much the same as they were 10 years ago, 20 years ago. But I think one just has to embrace that there's going to be a lot of change and that, you know, the things that you study, some of them may become obsolete or revolutionized, but some things will be retained. There'll be a lot of opportunities for things that you wouldn't be able to do before. So, I mean, in math, you previously had to basically go through years and years of education to be a math PhD before you could contribute to the frontier of math research. But now it's quite possible at the high school level or whatever, that you could get involved in a math project and actually make a real contribution because of all these AI tools and lean and everything else. So there'll be a lot of non-traditional opportunities to learn. So you need a very adaptable mindset. There'll be one for pursuing things just for curiosity, for playing around. And I mean, you still need to get your credentials. I mean, I think for a while it would still be important to sort of still go through traditional education and learn math and science and so forth the old-fashioned way for a while. Yeah, but you should also be open to very, very different ways of doing science, some of which don't exist yet. Yeah, so it's a scary time, but also very exciting.'
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp

The Terence Tao episode. We begin with the absolutely ingenious and surprising way in which Kepler discovered the laws of planetary motion. People sometimes say that AI will make especially fast progress at scientific discovery because of tight verification loops. But the story of how we discovered the shape of our solar system shows how the verification loop for correct ideas can be decades (or even millennia) long. During this time, what we know today as the better theory can often actually make worse predictions (Copernicus's model of circular orbits around the sun was actually less accurate than Ptolemy's geocentric model). And the reasons it survives this epistemic hell is some mixture of judgment and heuristics that we don’t even understand well enough to actually articulate, much less codify into an RL loop. Hope you enjoy! 0:00:00 – Kepler was a high temperature LLM 0:11:44 – How would we know if there’s a new unifying concept within heaps of AI slop? 0:26:10 – The deductive overhang 0:30:31 – Selection bias in reported AI discoveries 0:46:43 – AI makes papers richer and broader, but not deeper 0:53:00 – If AI solves a problem, can humans get understanding out of it? 0:59:20 – We need a semi-formal language for the way that scientists actually talk to each other 1:09:48 – How Terry uses his time 1:17:05 – Human-AI hybrids will dominate math for a lot longer Look up Dwarkesh Podcast on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify.

English
29
227
1.9K
417.3K
Ramit Sharma รีทวีตแล้ว
Lee Robinson
Lee Robinson@leerob·
Yep, Composer 2 started from an open-source base! We will do full pretraining in the future. Only ~1/4 of the compute spent on the final model came from the base, the rest is from our training. This is why evals are very different. And yes, we are following the license through our inference partner terms.
Fynn@fynnso

was messing with the OpenAI base URL in Cursor and caught this accounts/anysphere/models/kimi-k2p5-rl-0317-s515-fast so composer 2 is just Kimi K2.5 with RL at least rename the model ID

English
359
202
2.8K
1.4M