Keith Chambers

@Rajatsoni Owning 10 will change you life

Owning 0.1 Bitcoin will change your life

@Rajatsoni let’s stop saying this

@MatthewBerman Everyone replying with hate is missing the point

this is so cringe...yuck

@aubreystrobel Low ego

Anthropic (valued at $380B) is looking to hire someone to lead Claude Comms. They want 12 years of experience and are paying $185K.

@TFTC21 My Dad used a red pencil to proof check and fix CAD designs for the Boeing 777 — the safest widebody aircraft ever built. Just saying ...

Jensen Huang: "If that $500,000 engineer did not consume at least $250,000 worth of tokens, I am going to be deeply alarmed. This is no different than a chip designer who says 'I'm just going to use paper and pencil. I don't think I'm going to need any CAD tools.'"

OpenAI’s Pro plan continues to delight me with each release. Well done @OpenAI team.

@kit_sats He missed permission-less

Could you explain Bitcoin this clearly in 30 seconds?

@EricTrump @AdamBLiv STRC pays 11.5%

Let me make this very clear: Big Banks (think JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, etc.) are lobbying overtime to block Americans from getting higher yields on their savings—while trying to block any rewards or perks from being given to customers. These banks, and others, pay rock-bottom rates on standard savings (often 0.01%–0.05% APY), even as the Fed pays them 4% or more. This massive spread fuels record profits, with almost none passed back to their customers / everyday depositors. Today, the banks are desperately targeting crypto/stablecoins, where platforms plan to offer 4–5%+ yields or rewards. The ABA and other lobbyists are spending millions trying to ban or restrict those yields via bills like the Clarity Act, crying “fairness” and using words like "stability"—when it's really about protecting their low-rate monopoly and preventing deposit flight. This is anti-retail, anti-consumer, and straight-up anti-American. Next time you see a big bank dropping billions on a shiny new Midtown Manhattan HQ, you know exactly where that money comes from: the non-existent interest rate they “pay” you! Fortunately, the big banks are losing this fight as customers wake up to the games… @worldlibertyfi

@z500_tj @HermesLux

@HermesLux Why do people not get that STRC is a 100% *variable* rate product? It won't need to pay anywhere near 11.5% in 6 months. As AUM flows in, they can/will drop rate (towards high MM rate, like 6-7%). Strategy wants low cost of cap. High teaser rate is to get max AUM right now

Strategy should probably just consider converting STRD, STRK, and STRF all into STRC.

@z500_tj @HermesLux I don’t see them lowering the rate in 6 months. If anything, I think the rate goes to 12%. They have raised the rate by .25% every single month — from 9.0% to 11.5%. Saylor says he wants MSTR to stand for MonSTeR with STRC being the vehicle. His goal is still BTC yield.

@edstromandrew TL;DR

My next prediction on #Bitcoin price is here. I don't make that many, but my track record is good. First the disclaimers. Nothing I say publicly is investment advice.  Do your own research. Unless stated otherwise, this post refers to things that could happen within 1 year from now. Also, none of this was triggered by the attack on Iran.  You know this because I tweeted yesterday (before the attack) that I would be posting this weekend. And reminder that if anyone talks to you about Bitcoin in certainties, run in the opposite direction.  NOTHING about Bitcoin is certain. Ok here we go. The Bitcoin BEAR MARKET is ONGOING. YOU WERE PREPARED because you paid attention when I predicted it with 60% probability in November.  (link below), and you did your own thinking and prudent planning. So what next? Right now price is ranging in the $60s.  This won't last forever. Now the path depends more on actual events and macro market conditions. Prior cycles suggest at least one more down leg sometime this year. This is not guaranteed, but I'll put 65% likelihood on it.  Basically 2-to-1 odds in favor of further pain. What could drive it?  Any of the following: 1. General bear market in U.S. or worldwide stocks, especially tech stocks 2. Ongoing global liquidity shrinkage 3. Major hack / security compromise 4. Major geopolitical event (e.g. hot war with China) 5. Major advance in AI causing fear about durability of encryption 6. Indications of strong Democratic wave in the November election 7. People selling to pay taxes 8. Clarity Act failing to pass 9. Many other things I haven't even thought of Am I buying anything BTC related right now?  Nope. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't.  The same ideas that I told Danny on WBD recently still apply.  If you're underallocated, then stacking makes sense.  If not then it doesn't.  I have found other areas to make attractive risk-adjusted returns but that doesn't mean others can.  But your situation is different from mine. If we get another major leg down do I expect to get greedy and buy BTC-driven assets? You betcha. Do I expect that final capitulation to be huge if my 65% scenario plays out?  Not really, though I'm calibrated to normal Bitcoin ranges, which are very wide. Would the $58k gang ride again?  Quite likely. Would we see a 4-handle?  I'd say 50% chance (within the 65% scenario = 33% chance overall). Would we see a 3 handle?  Not likely.  Maybe 15% chance overall from here and unlikely to last long. Reminder.  Bitcoin can still go to much lower levels or even zero.  I think those are low single digit percentage probabilities but they do exist. So what would the "$60k was the bottom" scenario look like? Something like the opposite of the aforementioned list of horrors.  Especially anything that adds liquidity to financial markets. Does any of this change my long-term thesis?  Nah. My book, Why Buy Bitcoin, went to press in 2019 when price was $8k.  The 10-year price target was $400k.  We're right on track.  Ok, maybe we're a little behind schedule right now. That's ok.  Patience is a virtue.  Don't panic.  Always be prepared for more downside in BTC price.  And be prepared for Bitcoin to realize its upside potential. I wish you all the best.

@armon I can’t stop laughing 🤣

This video is a masterpiece

@NateRybner @He1s_Sammy None but STRC pays 11.25% as tax deferred dividends. Still not $9000 a month tho.

you could literally - put $100k in a bank paying 9% interest - live off the $6,000/month interest payment why are people not doing this

@craigcitro @craigcitro I would love to work with you and see to it your team has plenty of GPUs to work! Can you connect me with the HM for this Compute Platform role? 🤔🙏 job-boards.greenhouse.io/anthropic/jobs…

come work with me! we're looking for people who have a SWE skillset but are also interested in the research side of things; I'm happy to chat!

@JLRINVESTIGATES Light ‘em up! 💡

This is creepy. Looks like a someone dressed in all black sitting on the steps by Nancy Guthrie's front door.

@yeticusminimus @TheBTCTherapist Exactly

@TheBTCTherapist Who is clavicles?

JUST IN: Clavicular says that people who buy Bitcoin are “a bunch of clown r*tards for buying into this sh*t.”

@Milajoy Yes

I'm curious. Do you hold the door open for the person behind you irregardless of their age, sex, color, bank balance, or religion?

@Vault256Hash @TrendingBitcoin 50% dip

@TrendingBitcoin The market can stay irrational, but it cannot stay solvent against the 21M. If you aren't stacking during this 30% dip, you're letting the institutions front-run your future.

#Bitcoin will hit $1,000,000 whether you like it or not 🚀

@brian_armstrong Honestly your best product to date!

Our crypto backed loan offerings are expanding. Now you can instantly borrow USDC against your XRP, DOGE, ADA, and LTC, as well as BTC and ETH.

@brankopetric00 Aurora Global Database offers cross-region replication in under a second — but applications can only write to a single region at a time.

@brankopetric00 With AWS Keyspaces (managed Cassandra), applications can read and write in both regions, with cross-region replication completing in under a second. This supports low-RPO second-level point-in-time recovery.

A client requires Multi-Region High Availability. Scenario: - Region A (Primary) - Region B (Standby) They want an RPO (Recovery Point Objective) of near-zero. If you choose asynchronous replication, you risk data loss during failover. If you choose synchronous replication, you introduce significant latency to every write. Physics says you cannot have both zero latency and zero data loss across oceans. Which compromise do you propose to the client?