kent rasmussen

4.2K posts

kent rasmussen banner
kent rasmussen

kent rasmussen

@kentIDGC

city council member of the best little city on Earth

Garden City, ID เข้าร่วม Temmuz 2018
587 กำลังติดตาม179 ผู้ติดตาม
kent rasmussen
kent rasmussen@kentIDGC·
@HarrisBerton She did say “make” vs “melt”. Maybe I’m wrong but I thought actual steel production req’d coal.
English
2
0
0
36
Harris Berton
Harris Berton@HarrisBerton·
Why do people think we can't use electricity for high temperature heat when we currently use it to MELT STEEL??? Like where are you getting this?
English
2
0
4
269
kent rasmussen
kent rasmussen@kentIDGC·
@judgeglock I have one thought about this whole debate because I’m not smart enough to see potential second order effects. But it sure seems that “be careful what you ask for” applies here.
English
0
0
0
26
Judge Glock
Judge Glock@judgeglock·
In the Electoral College small parties’ effective vote share is zero, since if they can’t win a state they have no influence. Unless they have broad national heft they need to be subsumed. This leads to two great aggregations which is superior to the alternatives.
English
3
0
6
339
Judge Glock
Judge Glock@judgeglock·
The real argument for the Electoral College is one no one made at its creation and few make today. The Electoral College ensures our two party system. Without it you’d need a popular vote and a runoff or just a plurality to win, either way giving small parties much more power.
James Surowiecki@JamesSurowiecki

There's no good civic argument for the electoral college. It was arguably necessary to ensure the ratification of the Constitution, but it's an anti-democratic device that gives some American citizens far more voting power than others, based purely on where they live.

English
35
4
30
7.7K
NWS Boise
NWS Boise@NWSBoise·
❄️What we couldn't get for most of January, February and March is now falling in April. Webcam @BOGUSBASIN
English
1
14
75
6K
kent rasmussen
kent rasmussen@kentIDGC·
@jimmygandhi @sarthakgh That ignores state capacity which is real. But that means you stop being rightist. Deregulation (via supply side ideology) benefits both private and public entities.
English
0
0
0
7
Jimmy Gandhi
Jimmy Gandhi@jimmygandhi·
@sarthakgh "Abundance agenda" has always been a farce. You cannot regulate your way into abundance. You have to embrace supply side economics. But that means you stop being a leftist.
English
1
0
1
108
kent rasmussen
kent rasmussen@kentIDGC·
@atrembath Theirs is the worst “yeah but…” I’ve ever read. Couldn’t bring myself to read the whole thing.
English
0
0
0
21
Alex Trembath
Alex Trembath@atrembath·
A really embarrassing Ehrlich apologia from Mann, Gleick, and Holdren. Ehrlich had decades to reckon with his failed forecasts, and with the millions of forced sterilizations, coerced abortions, infanticide that he inspired. He never did.
Ted Nordhaus@TedNordhaus

Mann, who bristle at the suggestion that he is malthusian, insist that Ehrlich didn't really mean the part about forced sterilization, adding contraceptives to the water, and denying food aid to hungry populations. If it looks like a duck and quakes like a duck...

English
3
3
20
1.1K
kent rasmussen
kent rasmussen@kentIDGC·
@johnrhanger @TheBTI Nah…. You say “minimize climate risks”, they say meeting energy demand is top priority. You say “supports gas”, but fail to note because it’s necessary to meet demand and better than coal. You say attacks S, W, and batts, they say stop doing unnecessary subsidies.
English
0
0
0
40
John Raymond Hanger 
John Raymond Hanger @johnrhanger·
Good article! Koch money funding @TheBTI makes sense. BTI reliably minimizes climate risks, supports gas and attacks accelerated deployment of solar, wind and batteries. But donors who support speeding up decarbonization, at best. waste money at BTI. cleantechnica.com/2026/03/29/pro…
English
6
4
20
3K
kent rasmussen
kent rasmussen@kentIDGC·
@constans @loganb Everything about climate change back then was way overstated by both sides. Still is but improved (thx mostly to “abundance” framing). Swing voters got nervous about economic impact of Gore’s policies. Bush’s simpler message had a “stay the course” approach to the economy.
English
0
0
1
37
constans
constans@constans·
@kentIDGC @loganb You weren’t supposed to take the claim that global warming was fake seriously. It was pretty much meant as a joke to win the 2000 election that got out of hand
English
1
0
0
68
Logan Bowers 🏗️ 🏘️
In all seriousness, Gore was a really good communicator in this interview, contextualizing his climate message for a lay audience, and offering a balance of warning and hope. Reminder of how much the Supreme Court screwed the nation in 2000.
The Bulwark@BulwarkOnline

"You're 77 years old. Spring chicken — two years younger than Trump; younger than Biden. Maybe one more walk around the block?" "I'll give serious reflective thought to what you've said, Tim." @Timodc and @algore discuss the prospect of a Gore 2028 run.

English
3
2
45
1.7K
kent rasmussen
kent rasmussen@kentIDGC·
@constans @loganb I don’t remember any joke. What I *do* remember is that Gore was a H Clinton level terrible candidate, that a better dem candidate would’ve won easily. Obama won in 2008 because he was a great candidate. You can say GOP governance is the reason…..ok, but I disagree.
English
1
0
0
48
constans
constans@constans·
@kentIDGC @loganb You’re getting back to the earlier issue which was that everyone thinks global warming is happening and a problem, and the only reason anyone claimed otherwise was just as a semi-dubious joke for the purpose of winning the 2000 election. You just took it too seriously
English
2
0
0
57
kent rasmussen
kent rasmussen@kentIDGC·
@loganb I’d have listen to entire pitch for that case. American society isn’t led to bad results from any one input. If it contributed in this case, I would think it was minimal. I believe we had the right president for 9/11, and we avoided Gore’s climate extremism (degrowth lite).
English
1
0
0
47
Logan Bowers 🏗️ 🏘️
@kentIDGC Even conservatives should agree on this point retrospectively since the Iraq debacle led to the unraveling of the conservative tradition and takeover by Trump.
English
1
0
1
80
kent rasmussen
kent rasmussen@kentIDGC·
@humantransit Pretty sure that, on avg Canadian metros are more dense than American metros. That makes transit a much more viable alternative for lots more people.
English
0
0
0
59
Jarrett Walker
Jarrett Walker@humantransit·
Excellent piece on why Canada is better than the US at public transit. One thing it misses: There is just a lot more transit in Canada, measured in revenue hours / capita. More buses more frequently. Transit is more useful, so people use it.
Jerome Alexander Horne@jahorne

"Canada is far from a perfect model. But the disparity between Canadian and American transit is not an accident of geography or engineering: it is the predictable result of differences in political priorities." mironline.ca/how-canada-is-…

English
6
11
164
7.8K
kent rasmussen
kent rasmussen@kentIDGC·
@humantransit Just seems that fixed rail transit of all forms is going to become less viable due to new habits & far less work place density than the past. Ridership is just crucial. I love BART. It will be a sad day when/if it folds up, but seems we may be on the cusp of mobility innovation
English
1
0
0
41
Jarrett Walker
Jarrett Walker@humantransit·
San Francisco BART: The worst-case scenarios are actually worse than you've heard. Good overview of why the Bay Area’s transit backbone is in such bad financial shape. A lot can be blamed on 1960s-70s decisions. Still, here we are. missionlocal.org/2026/03/bart-d…
English
4
4
24
1.6K
𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝙲. 𝙼𝚊𝚗𝚗
Stanley Basin, Idaho. Source of the Salmon River, the biggest tributary of the Snake, which wriggles along the valley floor. Hard to imagine a more beautiful place.
𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝙲. 𝙼𝚊𝚗𝚗 tweet media𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝙲. 𝙼𝚊𝚗𝚗 tweet media
English
5
0
51
1.5K