Muncha@_muncha_
[Pls excuse the repost since I accidentally deleted the og when trying to delete a qt. Since I'm reposting anyway, I've also combined the previously threaded note, and will also provide some additional context]
_
Reminder that we take AI accusations very seriously and always thoroughly investigate reports. CSP autosaves backups and the possibility of having multiple corrupted files without any access to any backups is highly unlikely. Thank you for keeping VGen free of AI.
_
To clarify: it’s definitely possible to have corrupt csp files.
However, it seems very unlikely to have multiple corrupt files for recent works that don’t match your usual anatomy / art style that just so happens to be the exact works we’re investigating.
If there is evidence of AI involvement, without the original files, and without a redraw that matches the anatomy / art style of the reported work - while we can never be 100% certain - cases like this will result in a temporary suspension.
If you feel we have made an incorrect decision, suspended artists are able appeal with additional evidence and we are happy to lift any administrative actions accordingly.
There is absolutely no reason why we would want to suspend an artist who hasn’t broken our ToS or policies.
Thank you for supporting human artists.
_
Added additional context:
Th og post was generally referring to our AI policy and warnings around file corruption. It was inspired by recent team chatters around a case we've been investigating but was made before I had the full context of that case.
If you are concerned about that case, please know it is actively being appealed and reviewed.
We always tell our team to only act on AI reports when we’re 90%+ certain, but being a manual human review, we do make mistakes and that's why we have an appeal process.
As mentioned above, there is absolutely no reason why we would want to suspend an artist who hasn’t broken our ToS or policies.
Thank you for your patience and support.
