mendito

$MMTLP I've been saying for over a year that Wallstreet is the financial arm of the Deep State. Does anyone think it odd that the SEC Chair Paul Atkins makes 209k / year when Robert Cook, CEO of FINRA, who supposedly answers to the SEC made 4.1M? The only way this makes any sense in my world is @FINRA the Fin-ancial R- acketeering A-rm for the Deep State The @SECGov runs cover and provide protection for the above SRO, while lifetime appointed also Deep State Congress grants immunity. Obviously, not every member of Congress, but you can spot them easily enough. They are granted the Chairs of committees and have trading portfolios that make Warren Buffet blush. Wars are being fought as we speak, not for oil, not for nukes, but for our financial freedom and prosperity, that will end on Wallstreet, and send a message to the European Central Bank Cartel. We are 45 days from the new FED Chair, pay attention to Scott Bessent and the changes we see in our monetary system. The Clairity Act, digital currency, executive orders, it's all coming to a head. 435 days since Trump took office. We thought we would have resolved by now but this is the process not just a bandaid. Hang on to your mustard seed people it's about to get real. #Project2025IsReal

It wasn't an April Fool's prank. It was the 💣💣💣 no one saw coming... #FOIA 3 years ago today...THEY KNEW!!! #FINRAFraud The FOIA documents reveal extensive communications between senior FINRA officials and their SEC counterparts concerning issues with MMTLP trading. They knew there was a problem for more than a year and FAILED to protect investors. Key findings include: 💥Fourteen months prior to FINRA’s U3 trading halt, three FINRA committees—Market Operations, OTC Corporate Actions Team, and Market Fraud Team—were in active dialogue with SEC representatives re: MMTLP....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 2, 2022, a conversation took place between FINRA’s OTC Corporate Actions Team and an SEC representative regarding the proposed Meta/NBH spin-out transaction.....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 5, 2022, just one day before FINRA issued the first of two corporate actions, Sam Draddy noted that the “MMAT/MMTLP matter” had caught the attention of his Fraud Team and others, mentioning discussions with FINRA’s General Counsel and suspicions of fraud involving the two issuers, with “bluesheeting” already underway. They went forward with the corporate action despite RULE 6490.....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥Draddy, along with Boyle and Gibbons, arranged a Zoom meeting with SEC counterparts to discuss further....and they FAILED to protect investors. 💥On December 11, 2022, at 6:38 p.m. on a Sunday, FINRA CEO Robert W. Cook contacted an SEC official regarding a flood of shareholder complaints about the trading halt, some containing alleged threats (no evidence or law enforcement reporting evidence has been provided), prompting him to send his staff to work remotely while offering to brief his contact.....and they still FAIL to protect investors. 💥Concurrently, Stephanie Dumont, FINRA’s Executive Vice President of Market Regulation and Transparency Services, emailed an SEC contact to schedule an urgent meeting the next morning to discuss the MMTLP situation and the recent halt, copying Racquel Russell on the correspondence.....and still FAIL to protect investors. THEY KNEW. And for the first time, we no longer had to speculate...WE KNEW!!! Following this release and the public outcry, sources claim @SECGov held an emergency meeting to stop FOIA releases. The MMTLP Army did not receive another meaninful FOIA for over a year. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING???#Coincidence WE...ARE...NOT...GOIN...AWAY!!! #Relentless TRCH MMAT MMTLP

MMTLP- NO MORE EXCUSES!! After 3½ years, MMTLP holders are still waiting while regulators claim pulling share data & short records is 'too burdensome.' Newsflash: Nasdaq's March 2026 SEC-approved tokenized securities + DTC pilot + agentic AI make it a single immutable ledger. Real-time, queryable, no excuses. Telling us it's difficult in 2026 is false and unacceptable! @USDS @timburchett @annvandersteel @JDVance

MMTLP / MMAT / TRCH / NBH ⚖️Kelly v. FINRA (Case No. 2:25-cv-01195-APG-DJA) Filed: 03/30/2026 Response to FINRA’s Objection🏐 (⚠️Not legal advice) ⸻ ⚖️ Core Argument (Simple Version) 1. ❌ “Judge already ruled on immunity” — NOT TRUE FINRA says they’re already immune. Kelly: •Judge never ruled on immunity •Prior dismissal was for: •No private right to sue •Jurisdiction 👉 Immunity was never decided ⸻ 2. 🎯 The REAL issue Before immunity: 👉 “Did FINRA actually have authority to do this?” ⸻ 3. 🔥 What’s being challenged Two specific acts: •Changing corporate action language •Halting trading + removing final trading window 👉 Court has never analyzed if these were authorized ⸻ 4. 🧠 Why FINRA’s argument fails FINRA: “We’re immune” Kelly: •Those cases assumed authority •None asked: 👉 “Was this conduct actually authorized?” ⸻ 5. ⚖️ What Kelly wants 👉 Step 1: Did FINRA have authority? 👉 Step 2: THEN consider immunity ❌ Not the other way around ⸻ 🔥 Bottom Line 👉 FINRA is trying to skip a critical step •They want automatic immunity •Court must first confirm authority ⸻ 🧠 Why this matters If Kelly wins this point: 👉 FINRA must prove authority 👉 If they can’t → immunity weakens or fails ⸻ 💡 One-Liner 👉 “You can’t claim protection unless you prove you were allowed to do it.”@FINRA_Robbed_Me

You know that they know that WE'RE NOT GOING AWAY because we know THE TRUTH! I can do this all day, baby! R E L E N T L E S S #MMTLPARMY @laralogan @annvandersteel @stephmase22 @sunlightdisinf @kshaughnessy2 @FlyEaglesFly529 @JunkSavvy @elonmusk @DOGE @realDonaldTrump @RepLisaMcClain @realannapaulina @joerogan @TheRobbCarter @denniskneale @RareDealsHere @GenFlynn

$MMTLP $MMAT $TRCH REMINDER: Former Chief, SEC Office of Internet Enforcement, John Reed Stark, mentioning how easy it is to acquire blue sheet trade data...#WhatIsTheShareCount #MMTLPFiasco #WhatIsTheShareCount

DID YOU KNOW???... Waiver of the "Whistleblower Privilege": ✍️Voluntary Disclosure: Confidentiality protections for SEC whistleblowers are not absolute and can be waived by the whistleblower. If you publicly disclose the substance of what you told the SEC, a court may rule that you have waived confidentiality regarding the entirety of those communications on that specific topic. The "Fairness" Doctrine: ✍️In litigation, a party cannot use a "shield as a sword." If you use your SEC report to bolster your public credibility or defend your statements, "fairness" may dictate that the opposing party (the company) be allowed to see the actual communications to ensure your public account is accurate and complete. RE Judicial Privilege: ✍️In many jurisdictions, the judicial privilege doctrine does not protect statements made to the public, even if they are about a proceeding that has been filed but not yet served. While the privilege is broad, courts strictly distinguish between "judicial proceedings" and the "court of public opinion". In Texas, the position of the courts—reinforced by the Supreme Court of Texas—is that judicial privilege does not cover public or media statements, even if they relate to a filed or pending proceeding. How nervous do you think @SECGov and #UniversityLands are right now???...#Discovery MMTLP MMAT TRCH DISCLAIMER: Of course I used AI to research the topic. It's not like I used it to write my responses and filings...@NotLegalAdvise #GoogleIsAI 😇

@SECGov Avoid investing in US markets. The SEC colludes with brokers to defraud retail investors. When caught it deletes data to hide the wrongdoing. Look into MMTLP, SEC's avoiding the publics' questions and pleas for transparency. It HAS NOT improved since @SECPaulSAtkins took over.