Rebekah Newton

56 posts

Rebekah Newton

Rebekah Newton

@new93032

เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2023
8 กำลังติดตาม2 ผู้ติดตาม
Rebekah Newton
Rebekah Newton@new93032·
@AsaSupreme @drawandstrike So I can just claim you committed a crime. I don't have to have evidence and if you don't have an alibi, then the court can assume it was true. I don't think people should be able to accuse people without any evidence. Turns into a witch trial and mob justice quickly.
English
0
0
0
7
asa_supreme
asa_supreme@AsaSupreme·
@drawandstrike Yes if you’re suing someone for defamation about their claims, you’ll now have to prove them wrong by answering all those questions, that way the court can now determine that you were indeed defamed. Only in this case, CO never claimed any of such.
English
2
0
4
121
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit
A lot of dumb people don't know how this actually works in the real world. They think this is a TV show written by morons. "If I claim you were at such and such a place, on such and such a date, at such and such a time, where you COMMITTED A CRIME, **you have the fucking burden of proof, jack! NOT ME! I don't have to provide evidence of shit! YOU have to PROVE TO ME that you were NOT at such and such a place, on such and such a date, at that time, and that you DIDN'T plan a crime! Get busy, you loser!" It blew my mind that rational people even attempted to defend themselves against this bullshit. CANDACE 100% has the burden of proof for her allegations about Ft. Huachuca. Not Erika Kirk. Not Harpole. CANDACE. The person who advances the allegation bears the burden of proof. People who don't understand that or don't agree with it are either stupid or just trolling. If I say to you, "On such and such a day, at such and such a time, at such and such a place, DID YOU BEAT THE SHIT OUT OF YOUR WIFE?", what would your response to that be? Assuming you even felt you needed to respond to an insane statement. "No, I did not beat my wife on that day, at that time, at that place." You've already lost. You're playing the game with me. Watch what happens next: "Oh yeah? PROVE IT TO ME, ASSHOLE! You **prove** to me with EVIDENCE you didn't beat your wife at that time/place/date!" You attempt to reason with me. "Wait a minute. Why the fuck do **I** have the burden of proof here? You're the one saying I did this. What's YOUR proof?" And so what do I say next? "And there you have it. THIS MOTHERFUCKER IS SO SUSPICIOUS AND GUILTY HE CAN'T WON'T DO THE REASONABLE THING OF GIVING ME AN ALIBI. Look, just LOOK at that guilty face there!" If some lunatic wandered up to you on the street and babbled these accusations and demand you prove your innocence, you'd IMMEDIATELY see you are under no obligation to even engage that prick. You do not let them shift the burden of proof for onto you. You keep it squarely on them. And yet what unfolded for the past 7 months? This fucking chick literally played out the script I just wrote out up there on Erika Kirk and a whole lot of other people, and she fucking MONETIZED it. She threw around allegations and accusations like that Ft. Huachuca 'assassination planning meeting' and then DEMANDED that the people she accused of being there prove they weren't there doing what she claimed they were doing. And she spent months loudly chortling "Why aren't you defending yourself Erika?! Why are you silent? Where's your alibi? Where's your PROOF that what I'm accusing you of isn't true? That you didn't do it? Balls in your court, Erika! I'm waiting? Still no alibi? Why are not you meeting your BURDEN OF PROOF, ERIKA?!" It was always fucking ABSURD ON IT'S FUCKING FACE. And many of YOU out there fucking fell for it. If you fell for this dumb shit, you are a very dumb person. And you SHOULD feel bad about how dumb you are. Hopefully you learned something from a brutal lesson about WHERE THE FUCKING BURDEN OF PROOF ALWAYS WAS. On this evil witch below.
Brian Cates - Political Columnist & Pundit tweet media
Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)@TheMilkBarTV

Candace Owens mocked that, in the latest defamation lawsuit against her, Brian Harpole said he didn’t give her an alibi in December for the absurd claim he was at Fort Huachuca military base the day before Charlie Kirk died - because he didn’t want Candace to engagement farm off his response. Which is EXACTLY what she did. To Erika Kirk and others when they provided alibis for this exact wild claim. Even holding an X Space where she titled it "Fort Huachuca: Why it suddenly matters" - because people had provided alibis. Candace now claims that if Harpole had simply given her an alibi, she would have let the entire thing go. The COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what she actually did. In that Space, she directly argues that providing an alibi proves guilt. And says that if Erika and others hadn’t responded, she would have dropped it - Which is exactly what Harpole did. As always zero consistency. Entirely BS. These kinds of games won't fly in court.

English
30
59
245
8.6K
Jackie Chea ⚖️
Jackie Chea ⚖️@Fair_and_Biased·
I have a feeling that the people who mock me for being a stay-at-home-mom are the SAME people who tell @MrsErikaKirk to quit her job and go take care of her kids. 🤔
English
49
22
630
4.8K
Rebekah Newton
Rebekah Newton@new93032·
@Fair_and_Biased @TheMcGloneCode Exactly. She connects all the dots and then lets her followers make the actual accusations. Then hides behind her followers like a coward claiming "I'm only asking questions" such gaslighting. It's honestly evil. And I can't believe how many people are willing to let her do it.
English
0
0
0
1
Jackie Chea ⚖️
Jackie Chea ⚖️@Fair_and_Biased·
@TheMcGloneCode That person would be ignoring, however, that Candace implied it with the express purpose of getting THEM to draw the conclusion. By saying that she technically hasn’t said it, all they’re doing is being useful idiots in her cause.
Jackie Chea ⚖️ tweet media
English
5
0
32
432
Jackie Chea ⚖️
Jackie Chea ⚖️@Fair_and_Biased·
Candace followers: “Candace never SAID Erika killed Charlie!” Also Candace followers: “Erika killed Charlie! Go watch Candace for evidence!”
English
117
147
1.2K
11.6K
Rebekah Newton
Rebekah Newton@new93032·
@Redxo_3 @Vand3l2 @MrsErikaKirk I agree she should be with her kids. I just don't think harassing her for going to a political dinner or for crying after hearing gunshots months after her husband was shot is appropriate either.
English
1
0
0
15
♱ Red ♱
♱ Red ♱@Redxo_3·
@new93032 @Vand3l2 @MrsErikaKirk I’m not a huge follower of Candace either. But Erika is the only parent left of her children. Being in all these events then crying “I just wanna go home” with relaxed security. She needs to be home with her kids.
English
1
0
1
19
Erika Kirk
Erika Kirk@MrsErikaKirk·
Saturday was yet another traumatic example of the evil in our country and the continued rise in political violence. I’m taking time to spend with my family. I will be joining The Charlie Kirk Show Wednesday at 12PM ET to briefly address what took place. Enough is enough.
English
14.6K
11.4K
103.9K
3.6M
Rebekah Newton
Rebekah Newton@new93032·
@Redxo_3 @Vand3l2 @MrsErikaKirk My husband would want the same thing in the event that something happened to him. (We've talked about it briefly before). And I, more than anyone else, would want to see his life's work live on. Why would you need proof of that? That's pretty normal husband and wife stuff.
English
0
0
1
15
♱ Red ♱
♱ Red ♱@Redxo_3·
@new93032 @Vand3l2 @MrsErikaKirk She’s not the person who’s keeping his legacy alive. She’s not obligated to step in and be CEO and say it was Charlie’s wishes when we have no proof of that. If she stepped out of the spotlight and put in a leader people actually respect then fine.
English
1
0
0
21
Rebekah Newton
Rebekah Newton@new93032·
@ashleybrianaeve They want to keep what Charlie built going... maybe it's because they love him? 🤷‍♀️ if something ever happened to my husband I'd want to keep his life work going too. I don't know why this is so hard for people to understand (even if they disagree with it).
English
0
0
0
7
Rebekah Newton
Rebekah Newton@new93032·
@ImGinnyRobinson Forgiving people and calling them out are two different things. She's still holding Tyler Robinson responsible after forgiving him.
English
0
0
1
198
Rebekah Newton
Rebekah Newton@new93032·
@Redxo_3 @Vand3l2 @MrsErikaKirk Also, though I agree the best place for her is with her kids... she probably feels conflicted to keep Charlie's legacy alive. He was a very public person unfortunately. So her attempting to follow in his footsteps, will be public too.
English
1
0
0
11
♱ Red ♱
♱ Red ♱@Redxo_3·
@new93032 @Vand3l2 @MrsErikaKirk Candace Owens’s husband didn’t get shot in the neck and have to take care of her kids by herself though. Erika, who is leaving her two children to go on tours and show her face at events is. Candace works from home.
English
2
0
1
31
Graham Allen
Graham Allen@GrahamAllen·
Candace Owens is a LIAR! She spent weeks attacking Mikey McCoy making him a target from her cult to where he could barely live his life!!!! Now she expects us to believe HE was her LEAKER the whole time?!?!
English
907
789
5.4K
331.6K
Rebekah Newton
Rebekah Newton@new93032·
@Redxo_3 @Vand3l2 @MrsErikaKirk She is not producing these documentaries WHILE taking care of her children. I don't see her children on the podcasts or documentaries. She spends time away from her kids. So if that's your criticism of Erika, then it should be a criticism you have of Candace too.
English
1
0
0
15
♱ Red ♱
♱ Red ♱@Redxo_3·
@new93032 @Vand3l2 @MrsErikaKirk Candace produces from her home studio and home schools her children. Erika Kirk is the one who said she wanted to go home and their dad was shot in the neck yet she attends events leaving the kids with whoever else. Not normal for a “grieving” widow. Go home to your kids.
English
1
0
1
44
Rebekah Newton
Rebekah Newton@new93032·
@Redxo_3 @Vand3l2 @MrsErikaKirk I agree with what you're saying. But Candace runs a pretty large operation and is speaking to the public a lot more often. Those documentaries she makes don't just happen.. she spends hours away from her children to produce them. So if that's your issue then it's hypocrisy.
English
1
0
0
11
♱ Red ♱
♱ Red ♱@Redxo_3·
@new93032 @Vand3l2 @MrsErikaKirk No in fact he didn’t. He never once said she should be CEO. In fact he told women to stay home and raise their kids and prioritize that over careers. Erika isn’t continuing his legacy. The fact you guys deny your own eyes and ears is baffling.
English
1
0
1
21
Patriot 🇺🇸
Patriot 🇺🇸@BanZionism24·
Hey, I just saw your tweet under something with Brigitte Macron. You do realize that Candace Owens was not the original reporter on the case. It was Natasha Ray, and Xavier Poussard. These French journalist that I mentioned claimed that Bridget was born a male. And when they were sued, it wasn’t because of the claim that Bridget was born a male it was over Ticky tak bullshit. That’s why the case was dropped. Candace Owens gave these people a platform. She’s not even the original person who discovered this. And if you look at the lawsuit, they’re not suing Candace for her claiming Brigitte is a man. It’s the same bullshit to try to bankrupt Candace via nonstop lawsuits.
English
2
0
0
55
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
I have not retracted a single claim I have made about Erika Kirk. Stop with the b.s Twitter trends. I stand by every single statement I have made and have not edited any of my past statements in light of Brian Harpole’s lawsuit. I look forward to the power of subpoena.
English
3.1K
3.9K
37.9K
1.3M
♱ Red ♱
♱ Red ♱@Redxo_3·
@new93032 @Vand3l2 @MrsErikaKirk She should be home with her kids like Charlie said women should do and follow her husbands legacy. Not being in events with relaxed security…
English
1
0
0
21
Cristina Crisp
Cristina Crisp@CristinaCrisp3·
No, she actually spent hundreds of hours researching it, created a series, and Brigette isn’t even suing her for saying she was born male or that she is actually (allegedly 🙄) Jean Michele Trogneux. She investigates things that interest her, that she cares about enough to pour her energy into. It’s actually a fascinating series and there’s a whole book about it.
English
3
0
0
95