no_secrets
2.6K posts

no_secrets
@no___secrets___
web3sec | zk | opinions are my own
เข้าร่วม Aralık 2021
324 กำลังติดตาม300 ผู้ติดตาม

@outpxce Maybe good opsec is so rare that it is signal moreso than it hides people
English

@jaginger @frankmaraschino @gphelpsIII @TheJFreakinC Yes yes apply all the conditions you need until it makes sense. You seem to love and hate amendments at the same time
GIF
English

@no___secrets___ @frankmaraschino @gphelpsIII @TheJFreakinC In the context of enforcing immigration law where a MUNICIPAL EXECUTIVE ORDER says they can't (and that's what we were taking about) they absolutely can ignore that stupid XO. Stop being retarded.
English

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are proving once again that they are not targeting violent criminals…
They are targeting children and families.
On Sunday, agents were caught illegally operating in Minneapolis public parks, in direct violation of city orders, and then tear-gassing spaces designed for kids and families.
This happened at Powderhorn Park.
In the video, ICE agents are seen aggressively driving into the parking lot of a public park, on a Sunday… a day when families and children regularly sled, play, and gather there.
U.S. citizens are already in the park. They begin recording and blowing whistles.
An ICE agent then chases a U.S. citizen through the park, tackles him to the ground, and handcuffs him.
While that’s happening, other agents begin deploying tear gas, throwing canisters at U.S. citizens who are nowhere near them, filling the parking lot and the park itself with smoke.
Tear gas causes respiratory distress, burning eyes, nausea, and panic… effects that are especially dangerous for children.
And agents illegally deployed chemical agents anyway, in an open public park, with families nearby.
That is excessive use of force, and child endangerment.
And they did all of it while being explicitly prohibited from operating in the park in the first place…
The Minneapolis Mayor’s Executive Order 2025-02 bans civil immigration enforcement staging on city property.
On January 7th, 2026, the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board unanimously passed a resolution aligning with that order, explicitly prohibiting ICE from staging or operating in parks.
ICE did it anyway.
And it didn’t stop there…
Later, that same day, around 12:45 PM, ICE agents were seen sitting in Folwell Park, another public park.
A woman approaches them, calmly cites the order, and tells them they are not allowed to be there and need to leave.
ICE/Border Patrol are choosing spaces where children gather instead of places where actual crimes occur, then responding to public scrutiny by assaulting civilians and deploying chemical weapons.
If ICE/Border Patrol are willing to do this in broad daylight, on a Sunday, in front of families, while being filmed, after being explicitly told they are not allowed to be there…
Then they are not enforcing the law.
They are endangering children and assaulting anyone who dares to exercise their First Amendment rights, and say that’s not okay.
English

@jaginger @frankmaraschino @gphelpsIII @TheJFreakinC “the feds can do whatever they want” is plainly incorrect. Exit the denial stage pls
English

@no___secrets___ @frankmaraschino @gphelpsIII @TheJFreakinC LOL. Nothing I said was wrong fella. Now scram
English

@jaginger @frankmaraschino @gphelpsIII @TheJFreakinC Maybe don’t say things that are flatly wrong next time buddy
And be grateful you live in a country where the feds cannot in fact “do whatever they want”
English

@no___secrets___ @frankmaraschino @gphelpsIII @TheJFreakinC You are making no logical point regarding immigration law. Nice try
English

You are now deliberately concentrating your previously general statement that "the feds can do whatever they want" now that I have shown you how absurd it is. Now you have backpedaled to "the judges in every state"
The supremacy clause does not mandate universal, unconditional override of state law. For that to be the case, it would imply that there is absolutely zero ambiguity in deciding which one applies in which situation. And that is false. The 10th amendment acknowledges this by delegating any powers not explicitly delegated to fed govt to the states.
For heavens sake bro just understand what you are reading instead of looking for the little piece that confirms your biases (and no, i did not do this)
English

@no___secrets___ @frankmaraschino @gphelpsIII @TheJFreakinC Dude. "and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." Under no possible circumstances does this allow a municipal executive order to override Federal immigration law. Stop being retarded.
English

No, it does not. Read your own sources before citing them
“To prevent the federal government’s newly expanded powers from smothering state regulatory authority, the Court simultaneously narrowed the circumstances in which federal law displaced state law. Besides retreating from the “automatic” field preemption of the early twentieth century, the Court articulated a “presumption against preemption,” under which federal law does not displace state law “unless that was the clear and manifest purpose of Congress.”
English

@frankmaraschino @gphelpsIII @TheJFreakinC Dude. The Constitution literally says that the feds can do what they want. Might be better if you learn something before citing it
English

@FXStrypes @TypeErrorDev @HeroDividend He has sense of what matters, which is the result. Not three extra minutes that don’t contribute to the result
That is why he is trusted to protect a country, and you are trusted with a cubicle and excel spreadsheet
English

@TypeErrorDev @HeroDividend They were hired to be in the office 9-5pm which they are. You’d think someone in the military would have a sense of time and punctuality
English

@DMiller52325459 Nothing lame about pointing out the difference between nice pictures and what the human eye actually sees. Also I can still reply even if you didn’t address me and I don’t follow you. You do not control others’ words unless you restrict the post lol
English

@no___secrets___ This is 👆🏻 how you spend your time? I didn’t address you nor do you follow me, do you waste your time coming at people with that lame sauce… do better and I wish you a wonderful night ☺️
GIF
English

I’m rich because I’ve seen this with my own eyes.
Show me how rich you are!




Beatriz@mandolinaes
I’m rich because I’ve seen this with my own eyes. Show me how rich you are!
English

@tetsuoai He lied about the side lengths after sliding the triangles
Also he moved the halves out slightly
English

@iyugov @Math_files Alright bro
Let $x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_{26} \in \mathbb{R}$. Compute:
$$
(x_{25} - x_1)(x_{25} - x_2) \cdots (x_{25} - x_{26})
$$
You happy now?
English

@no___secrets___ @Math_files What's the problem of asking for a formal definition? Not so much cheap fun for everyone?
English

@iyugov @Math_files Stop being pedantic
You know the alphabet and you know exactly what it implies
English

@Math_files "..." is not a mathematical operator. Be more formal.
English

@coupleoceans Why in the hell would you go to New York in the summer
Unless it’s upstate new york
English

Question is riddled with ambiguous and reductive phrasing
80 percent chance a gene is inherited does not imply anything about the chance a given environment yields the same phenotype
A person who has a gene causing lung cancer can have the same chance of getting cancer as a person who grew up breathing in literal smoke every waking minute
English













