profmaster455 รีทวีตแล้ว
profmaster455
2K posts
Tasnim, citing an informed source: The details published by the Wall Street Journal regarding Iran's proposal for negotiations are not based on reality in significant parts.
English
Sources for Al Mayadeen: The Iranian response, sent via the Pakistani mediator, included a clause regarding a ceasefire in Lebanon.
English
Sources for Al Mayadeen: Iran is insisting on the lifting of US sanctions and the release of frozen Iranian funds.
English
Sources for Al Mayadeen: Tehran is demanding the removal of OFAC restrictions related to Iranian oil sales.
English
Sources for Al Mayadeen: The Iranian response stipulates Iranian management of the Strait of Hormuz within the proposed understandings.
English
aljazeera: US President Donald Trump has accused Iran of “playing games” in his first public comment since Iran responded to a US proposal to end the war.
Trump’s comments came after Iranian media reported that Tehran sent to mediator Pakistan its response to the US proposal.
Israel’s relentless bombardment of Lebanon continues, with attacks killing dozens over the weekend and hitting the Nabatieh Governorate’s power station.
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) says any attack on Iranian oil tankers and commercial ships will be met with assaults on US bases and “enemy ships” in the region.
English
lol no. Its not a hoax.
Chess was not created by one single person, but rather evolved from the 6th-century Indian game Chaturanga, which is considered the earliest known ancestor of modern chess. Developed in the Gupta Empire, it spread to Persia and later Europe, evolving over 1,500 years into its modern form by the 15th century.
English
@LeSkipperse No it's a hoax India created a board game similar to chess but Iran crafted and designed the game
English
Never forget, the Persians created chess, the U.S. created checkers.
Iran and The IRGC is outsmarting the U.S. military generals and President like never seen before.
English
@calvinfroedge Panama is pretty cool tbh. Much better weather as well.
English
India is joining the UK led coalition to reopen the Strait of Hormuz
I guess they didn't learn their lesson from Russia
English
Is that really how many vessels are waiting? Number has been jumping around from 200 to 800, so I'm skeptical. Does anyone have a good handle on this in real time?
English
yup also add to the fact that it was Dravid's last ICC tournament as a coach, most of us cried that day because of all these factors. But that doesnt mean that today's victory is in any way less of an acheivement, we are used to winning so much in the last 12-24 months that we kind of take it for granted sometimes.
English
@worshipVK We have an icc trophy after 11 yrs . And now this our 3rd consecutive icc trophy. There is huge diff .
English
So the reason why there has been a full capacity crowd in most grounds in India during non Indian games is because tickets are being sold at 100-300 Rs. It is cheap and anyone can afford that.
English
@wagmiAlexander “it’s an honor to have their fully undivided attention at last”
My dude you’ve tweeted endless streams of misinformation about Uniswap for months and I replied once get a grip
English
The model in this industry has been businesses + founders that are infinitely profitable built on infinitely unprofitable tokens — now Uniswap has revenue and costs so they’re facing the music — it is an honor to have their fully undivided attention at last.
See you in Q2. 🫡
Hayden Adams 🦄@haydenzadams
These “revenue” comparisons from Alex are so misleading. It’s worth being precise about how these models actually work Aero takes 100% of LP fees and rebates them back to LPs via token emissions / liquidity incentives. In practice, this looks like: “we collect $100m in LP fees and distribute $100m in tokens to LPs based on token voting” This approach makes revenue numbers look large, but it doesn’t represent sustainable fees. It also puts a heavy thumb on the scale of where LP fees go and makes LP returns dependent on the price of a third token If Uniswap took 100% of LP fees and rebated them in tokens, reported “fees” would be close to $1B and just as meaningless Uniswap protocol fees are different by design. A portion of swap fees goes to the protocol, while the majority still goes directly to LPs. The objective is long-term sustainability, not inflated optics Our proposal starts conservatively, with a roadmap of additional fee sources being enabled over time. This lets the DAO learn each step. The real risk would be turning fees up too aggressively and only learning after liquidity leaves. Another misleading comparison from Alex is conflating token-emission LP rebates (which are required when all LP fees are taken) with Uniswap’s growth and development budget, which funds engineering, developer grants, and integrations across thousands of products worldwide As for annual fee burn: it’s too early to project. It’s only been live for a few days, several fee sources aren’t active yet, and volume is still ramping. More importantly, this is a long-term strategy, growth still comes first. The crypto market will grow massively from here, and Uniswap has the potential to see trillions in daily volume. Capturing that opportunity is the goal Early signals are solid: liquidity has been stable with fees on, the fee collection system is working smoothly, searcher efficiency is improving, and UNI is being burned daily. This is the start of a new era for Uniswap 🦄
English
@Djoko_UTD yeah, I do agree with this. So much potential to be honest.
English
It’s 200% Nick Kyrgios. He should’ve been a multiple grand slam winner and achieved much if he was serious..
Remember he was just 19 when he shocked the world by beating World No.1 Nadal at Wimbledon 2014….Waste or a talent
SK@Djoko_UTD
Which tennis player has absolutely WASTED his potential ???
English
@RudyDeFi @Polymarket @PolymarketTrade you might need to poke them more a little bit and share the analysis from one AI to another ... keep poking, keep asking questions and eventually you will tend to find a consensus.
English
I asked 3 different AIs to predict Avatar: Fire and Ash’s domestic box office (by Jan 31) on @Polymarket — and they couldn’t disagree more.
GPT-5.2: $355M (market ~15% rn)
Gemini3: $580M (~3% rn)
Claude4.5: $460M (~37% rn)
Same question. Totally different worlds.
Who do you think is closest — and what’s your take on the line?
English
@MacroCRG dont be so confident, price can be like this as well 😂😂
x.com/MacroCRG/statu…
CRG@MacroCRG
merry xmas
English
