raph รีทวีตแล้ว
Ord 0.27.0 is out!
This includes two important changes for galleries. 🧵
github.com/ordinals/ord/r…
English
raph
1.6K posts
raph
@raphjaph
code sculptor and ordinal theorist
UTC-3 เข้าร่วม Ekim 2021
606 กำลังติดตาม20.1K ผู้ติดตาม
raph รีทวีตแล้ว
Not merging the Ordinals BIP is a mistake.
The BIP process is supposed to document ecosystem conventions, not gatekeep them. If widely deployed standards can't be specified as BIPs, developers are left guessing when the process even applies.
The cost of that ambiguity is high.
For the microscopic benefit of excluding a single proposal the editors believe should not be a BIP, we risk discouraging future contributions. Fewer things that should be BIPs will likely become BIPs.
Immediately, I am now considering not submitting some in flight work of mine as a BIP.
English
@kanzure @xstoicunicornx The more you tweet, the more you fit this definition.
As one open-source dev to another, you should really find a different profession.
Maybe focus on your designer babies, playing God seems what you like to do.
raph@raphjaph
@kanzure You should provide your reasoning for closing. This reads like a decree from a capricious petty tyrant.
English
No one is entitled to space in the BIP repository, people can create their own documents and have.
English
raph รีทวีตแล้ว
Sorry for being inflammatory today. I don’t like being so negative on the TL.
But Bitcoin core devs and BIP editors have proven that the only thing they respond to is flame wars (ex: @nic_carter & quantum, knots guys & BIP-110)
They have created this dynamic themselves.
English
The reasons, no matter how valid, are often unacceptable to the supporters. I gave reasons for closing the Cat PR. Didn’t matter. Some will still screenshot, troll and grandstand over it. In this case, there was more group discussion than most would want to read and it would only be used for more trolling. One day, one camp is angry with you. Another day, it’s the opposing one. Another day, it’s a third one. It’s the nature of the thing.
English
raph รีทวีตแล้ว
Ordinals BIP rejected 🤬
"A BIP # is not an official endorsement and it is not officially a plan to add something to Bitcoin Core."
Just a bunch of political bullshit.
Hell Money@hellmoneypod
WW3, The Rise of Gold, and the End of Bitcoin On this episode of Hell Money, it's really over this time. Deep diving into the state of the markets, AI, quantum, and the ongoing BIP wars. Topics covered: - The state of Bitcoin markets & institutional adoption - Bitcoin for AI agents - Quantum and BIP 360 - BIP 110 and why Ordinals still doesn't have a BIP number - The astrological explanation for it all TIMESTAMPS 0:00 Intro & vibecoding 8:45 Bitcoin market crash discussion 14:35 Quantum FUD 17:00 Gold vs Bitcoin 19:55 AI agents for Bitcoin commerce 34:55 Hell Money University 37:35 BIP 360 quantum security proposal 44:44 BIP 110 censorship proposal 48:45 Restarting the Ordinals BIP war 52:50 Astrological vibe check & outro
English
English
English
@raphjaph @karmic_blob @kanzure @thatwagmigirl @rodarmor Ah, an "ordinal theorist" -- you'll be unhappy no matter what points are given. I'll pass.
English
@jonatack @karmic_blob @kanzure @thatwagmigirl @rodarmor So enlighten us please
What was the determining point?
English
Reckoned someone would say that. That wasn't the determining point. Each BIP is evaluated separately. BIP444/110 didn't have it easy either, and came close to being closed as well.
I didn't see the "attack the Bitcoin network" ordinals post until just now. It doesn't encourage one to see ordinals as an improvement to bitcoin. They also not do need to be a BIP to exist as they already do.
x.com/LeonidasNFT/st…
English
@jonatack @karmic_blob @kanzure @thatwagmigirl @rodarmor This reasoning makes absolutely no sense. BIP-110, which is orders of magnitude more controversial, was merged and assigned.
English
The editors discussed it periodically, without anyone feeling strongly enough to close or assign it. Good arguments can be made for either action, though while steelmanning it, more points and editors tended toward closing. Finally, in both BIPs 2 and 3, the more conservative option is preferred. github.com/bitcoin/bips/c…
English
@AgiRabbithole @kanzure Sure, it’s just concerning to see that people like @kanzure are in control of the BIP process and can’t even provide clear reasoning for the decisions they make.
English
I have closed the Ordinals BIP pull request. If you are interested, then you can still read the Ordinals BIP in the Ordinals git repository, I think. Don't worry, this isn't a "delete" action or anything - Ordinals still exists & I'm unable to destroy it even if I wanted to btw.
English