replyguy

4.8K posts

replyguy banner
replyguy

replyguy

@replyguy02

panem et circenses

เข้าร่วม Ekim 2020
28 กำลังติดตาม100 ผู้ติดตาม
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@houseinhabit @RealCandaceO Again just use her logic….the fact that Candace felt the need to address and “debunk” this proves that you are correct and she is lying and these documents are real. GO MAXX and expose her.
English
0
0
1
1
Jessica Reed Kraus
Jessica Reed Kraus@houseinhabit·
Candace is spiraling because a document I’ve had for months was finally pulled into the public square. Instead of addressing it directly, notice how she pivots to a separate parking lot incident, conveniently ignoring the August case. According several sources, George Farmer has struggled with a serious drinking issue. He was reportedly arrested in August 2023, fled the scene, and was later found with a weapon before going to trial — details that seem to have been quietly “buried” with the usual protections afforded to the well connected, along with Candace’s ties to local law enforcement. This is her pattern. Imagine though if she uncovered this stuff about Erika. Deflection is the strategy. The accusations are almost always confessions. It’s exhaustingly pathetic. Sleuths, I’d encourage you to look deeper into other Nashville incidents. The Owens-Farmer household has its fair share of secrets, which explains her constant need to project. Also, her intellectual jabs are frankly comical coming from someone who only recently learned that lightning and thunder are connected, and still struggles to pronounce basic words in basic vocabulary. “Architecture.” Say it slowly. Then try “burial.”
Jessica Reed Kraus tweet media
English
119
115
571
13.2K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@NJBeisner At this point we should use her logic…. since she responded about the DUI against her husband saying it’s false then it must be true. Right? I mean according to her why respond to something that is false.
English
0
0
0
11
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
“Andrew Kolvet is growing increasingly angry, which I think is another sign that we are getting close. He was really angry about Druski.” Not only is this the 2nd time this week Candace has said she’s “getting close” (on top of saying it countless times the past 6 months), but also it’s normal for Andrew to be angry at the Druski skit. I’m angry at the Druski skit, and I have nothing to hide. Being righteously angry isn’t a sign of guilt. Again, this entire illogical notion that “you’re really angry, so I must he over the target/getting close” is predicated on people—including Christians—being numb to evil. If we react with indignation, that just means you’re right? No, that’s not how this works. God hates evil and commands us to as well. People aren’t supposed to shrug it off or have a non-reaction to it. And as far as her “getting close,” she’s six months in and has no articulable working theory. She’s implicated everyone from France to Mormons but has failed to expressly articulate how those people and entities worked together and who pulled the trigger—let alone prove it.
English
29
15
126
2.9K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@LadyGriz @ItsJuliansRum Exactly. There is no point in taking these freaks seriously no matter what Erika does it’s never gonna be good enough. That’s why I don’t get upset much when her or TPUSA dosn’t respond back to these animals.
English
0
0
0
2
Social distancing champ
@ItsJuliansRum And had she locked herself in a dark room instead, you all would be saying she's obviously guilty of murder, otherwise she would be out and about trying to carry on Charlie’s legacy.
English
1
0
5
237
JuliansRum
JuliansRum@ItsJuliansRum·
It’s worth noting that nobody would be mocking Erika Kirk if she didn’t act like a narcissistic sociopath in the wake of her husband’s murder
English
47
278
4.3K
34.3K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@ItsJuliansRum How how did she act like a “narcissist” by not locking herself in tha bathroom and crying all day? By not pulling her hair out and having a meltdown. Tell us specifically how you freaks want her to act every moment of every day
English
0
0
0
5
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@HiRezTheRapper What a surprise Candace is full of crap and is just a leftist grifter.
English
0
0
0
2
Hi-Rez The Rapper
Hi-Rez The Rapper@HiRezTheRapper·
I've watched a ton of Candace Owens' content on Erika Kirk, trying to figure out if I was being naive or missing something important. You can call Erika every name in the book, but Candace still hasn't provided any concrete evidence linking her to Charlie's murder.
English
34
8
124
2.5K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@KarlWuckert I wonder what he would think now....Wait, I don't need to. Charlie came to me in a dream and said Candace Tucker and Megyn are pieces of shit. Trust me, bro.
English
0
0
0
2
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@EricSpracklen How is he full of shit? Wow, you guys really have that low of an opinion on charlie don't you? To you guys, he was nothing more than a helpless baby who needed his bottle 24-7, and he was terrible at picking people out. fuck off.
English
0
0
0
2
Eric Spracklen 🇺🇸
Eric Spracklen 🇺🇸@EricSpracklen·
This guy is so full of sh*t. Why is he now doing speaking engagements?
English
103
89
788
16.2K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@NJBeisner Look at her grimace, I mean, come on, the woman oozes evil. She's a typical leftist takes joy in other people's suffering.
replyguy tweet media
English
2
1
8
527
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
God damn Candace Owens. God damn her fag husband. God damn her children. God damn her worthless family including her mother and father who hated her so much they kicked her out of the house. God damn her grandfather who’d be fuckin ashamed of her right now. God damn them all.
English
53
16
189
8.3K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@CinemaShogun Exactly you don’t have to be offended personally the whole blackface white face debate to me was retarded but these are the same people who got offended when people called Candace the DEI queen.
English
1
0
1
21
Cinema Shogun
Cinema Shogun@CinemaShogun·
I’m not offended by the Druski clip. So I’m not going to clutch my pearls like many others are doing. But I will say this… The same Candace Owens fans that are trying to convince you that the Druski clip is funny and you’re a bad person for not liking it…. Are the same Candace Owens fans that threw a hissy fit over an AI pony video and made weeks worth of content claiming it was a death threat. Therefore they’re not in a position to say anything at all.
Cinema Shogun tweet media
English
46
18
350
6.9K
Liberal Tear Creator™
Liberal Tear Creator™@LibTearCreator1·
The NaziTwins say that Christians and Muslims have more in common than Christians and Jews. Have they not heard of “Judeo-Christianity?”
English
95
23
117
4.3K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@gatorgar Wait really? He actually thanked that demon?
English
0
0
0
0
Gator Gar
Gator Gar@gatorgar·
Remember: When Jimmy Kimmel came back on the air after the network pulled his show for lying about Charlie Kirk’s assassin, one of just a few people he “thanked” for speaking out on his behalf was Candace Owens. Something to think about.
English
20
30
299
5K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@MeghanMcCain Because people like Candace are nothing but leftist grifters. Who feed off the pain and suffering of others.
English
0
0
0
0
Meghan McCain
Meghan McCain@MeghanMcCain·
I do not understand why Erika Kirk - who saw her husband get brutally assassinated on live television is a target of such evil and cruelty. Why are you all doing this to her? Have she and her children not suffered enough? Some of you were literally birthed in hell
English
4.9K
1.8K
26.3K
951K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@idontgiveadom @MeghanMcCain So your saying because she didn’t want to see blood gushing out of her husbands neck like Niagara Falls then that means she is guilty?……. Ya good luck with that. TR killed Charlie.
English
0
0
0
4
idontgiveadom
idontgiveadom@idontgiveadom·
🇺🇸 Erika did not Charlie’s death live on television. “I never saw the video, I never will see it," Erika told Waters... "I never want to see it, there are certain things you see in your life that you can never unsee.” The fact that the world cares more about who conspired to take out Charlie than those surrounding him or using him for their agenda speaks for itself. Maybe those who work as opinion columnist and tabloid newspapers think the peons are dumb enough to believe a fake narrative, but only those controlled by evil would push false narratives for personal or political gain. All lies are evil lies. And most shit….stinks.
idontgiveadom tweet media
English
8
18
508
17.6K
MichaelRapaport
MichaelRapaport@MichaelRapaport·
Has Candace Owens gotten any closer on solving the Charlie Kirk mrder?
English
334
49
1.4K
58.9K
GodFatherOfChaos
GodFatherOfChaos@godfatherofchao·
Candace Owens started the show today with sharing police scanner to show the time Erika Kirk landed which means Andrew Kolvet got on the plane to get to Charlie BEFORE Charlie was ever shot….😳
English
54
615
7.6K
367.6K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@SophiaRose95749 Yup and she is spitting on his grave and destroying his family and his legacy. Candace is a leftist fraud grifter.
English
0
0
1
3
Sophia Rosa
Sophia Rosa@SophiaRose95749·
He trusted you. He loved you. He shared his life with you for a time
English
520
210
2.6K
378.2K
Erin
Erin@erachel1213·
I just…. I’ve gotta get something off my chest, y’all. It’s eating me up. I cannot believe that @AndrewKolvet and @MrsErikaKirk did not hug in Provo after Charlie’s horrific death. This changes EVERYTHING. Case cracked wide open. All questions answered. All allegations of guilt confirmed. OH WAIT…… actually, it changes absolutely NOTHING. No one, let me repeat, NO ONE, gives a flying fuck where Andrew and Erika embraced one another in grief and friendship as they grappled with the shooting tragedy and loss of Charlie. And if you do, YOU are the problem.
Erin tweet media
English
98
13
170
10.1K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@Villgecrazylady It’s true Joe Kent could just be a regular run of the mill grifter like Candace.
English
0
0
0
2
Mel
Mel@Villgecrazylady·
This is retarded. Not everything is 4D chess. FFS just stop.
Sense Receptor@SenseReceptor

🤯Whitney Webb pitches mind-blowing theory on Joe Kent's real narrative purpose: engineer "anti-semitic, right-leaning domestic terrorists" to feed to the "pre-crime" machine: "[Kent's] an intelligence officer and top CIA guy." "Be careful in trusting 'former spooks' who come out of nowhere and are saying what you want to hear right away." "Basically, the first Trump administration defined the rising domestic terror threat because after 9/11 they've been building all this infrastructure for a war on domestic terror. Every administration has advanced it, Democrat and Republican. So who are they saying the domestic terrorists are? Anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists." "I worry when people from that exact nexus that existed in [Trump's first administration] come out and are trying to get Right-leaning populists in particular to do things that the Trump administration itself—even if no one else agrees with the definition—would define as anti-Semitic." This clip of Webb (@_whitneywebb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout(.)com, is taken from an interview with Jimmy Dore (@jimmy_dore) posted to Rumble on March 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Dore: "What do you make of Joe Kent?" Webb: "Yeah, so with Joe Kent, he's a intelligence officer and top CIA guy. I think a lot of stuff is going on right now, and I'm not exactly sure how I feel about it. But I think people should be careful in trusting former, quote–unquote, former spooks who come out of nowhere and are saying what you want to hear right away. Because a lot of times what happens is that these figures will do that to build up trust with the public and then they'll misdirect you somewhere else if you're not careful. "So I would advise vigilance and critical thinking, which is often in short supply, but should not be, about, that figure in, in particular. But I think— Dore: "So you think there's like, there might be some kind of a long-game plan with Joe Kent?" Webb: "Oh, yeah. So you saw—" Dore: "So, so I've heard this argument and, and that you know, don't take him as face value, that they're just setting him up to be the next Trump or JD Vance or something and then he's going to do all the horrible thing. So that's—" Webb: "They could. It's very possible, but I don't know how it'll go. But let me give you an example of why I'm really skeptical of him. "So when Trump was, I encourage people to go back and look at the first iteration of the Trump administration to understand what's happening now. And since my career in journalism began during Trump's first term, I thankfully remember a good amount of it. "So, about a year before the January Six event, there was this DHS official and this is the Trump administration, Elizabeth Neuman, I think her name was. She was basically saying, there's going to be a domestic terror event. We can see it building, but we can't quite stop it. It's another 9/11. Oh no. If only we had more surveillance powers and whatever, we could maybe stop this other imminent 9/11, whatever. "And so basically in that hearing, it was a hearing where she was testifying. Top officials from DHS and, and other intelligence agencies were basically painting who is the up-and-coming domestic terrorist profile in the United States, what Americans are domestic terrorists. "And so basically, the— I, I really wish I could remember the specific name of the hearing to direct people to that because it is on C-SPAN, still. But basically, the profile they gave were anti-Semitic Trump supporters or anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists. So I worry when people from that exact nexus that existed in Trump One come out and are trying to get Right-leaning populists in particular to do things that the Trump administration itself, even if it, no one else agrees with the definition, would define as anti-Semitic." Dore: "So, so what I— explain that again to me because you lost me a little bit right at the end. So you're saying that—" Webb: "Okay, so basically the first Trump administration defined the rising domestic terror threat because after 9/11 they've been building all this infrastructure for a war on domestic terror. Every administration has advanced it, Democrat and Republican. So who are they saying the domestic terrorists are? Anti-Semitic Right-leaning populists." Dore: "And so do you think Joe Kent is, is one of those?" Webb: "So before this era they had the domestic terror threat they were trying to put in front of you were obviously these groups of like Feds, like Patriot Front and the Proud Boys. And all of that. Okay, so how, if you, if, if you can't fake the demographic, how do you engineer the demographic?... "So basically if you have Trump officials that are part of this apparatus claiming right-leaning anti- Semites are domestic terrorists that need to be targeted by this infrastructure and the surveillance infrastructure, in pre-crime and all of that, that's been a part of this buildup of the war on domestic terror. And then you have people coming out and being like we're going to blame, you know, you know, saying what people want to hear because obviously Israel absolutely is intimately involved with getting us involved in the Iran war. "But the other side of it is you create— you, you signal boost that with people like Joe Kent potentially. And then you have people sort of muddy the waters between Israel and all Jewish people, which is not fair. And then you can have the Trump administration swoop in and you know, look at Alexis Wilkins. Foreign government operators are driving these narratives. "It's, it's like reverse Russiagate. And well, I mean I probably should have thought this theory a little bit more before explaining it on your show, but basically I worry that someone like Joe Kent is coming out of, out of nowhere to try and sort of engineer this problem that the US Government has had is we can't make domestic terrorists appear that fit our profile. "So now we want people to create a class of right- leaning populists who basically fit our definition. If we just define anti-Semites as people who are critical of Israel and then we can target these people with our domestic terror infrastructure. So I worry that could be happening."

English
209
28
442
27.2K
replyguy
replyguy@replyguy02·
@5149jamesli no they didnt you grifter scum, and you know it. None of you have presented anything. You people are nothing more than her dogs. ruf ruf
English
0
0
0
2