Rossium

BULLISH

@RohOnChain gotta watch this to not miss the biggest opportunities of the next 10 years

i can't believe this 1 hour talk by the people who control the world's financial system including Ray Dalio, Jamie Dimon & Larry Fink literally told you exactly where the money is going for the next decade:

@TheGreekTrader @willo2_Poly okay, my bad. Was looking at another market so yeah, main problem here is Polymarket not learning from its own mistakes which cause hundreds of thousands in losses

@rossium @willo2_Poly That's the previous market. The rules weren't talking about an announcement but if MicroStrategy would "purchase". On our case it's the exact same rules but with sell instead of purchase.

Did @willo2_Poly really get scammed by Polymarket or was he just a greedy dude who full ported into 'free money' and got rekt? Let's dive into it. Yesterday I made a post explaining why I thought this market would resolve to NO while YES was trading at 65% (check the screenshot or my profile). Long story short, based purely on the written rules, this looked like a YES resolution. However, there was strong precedent for it resolving NO. A previous market with almost identical rules had been clarified so that information outside the market timeframe didn't count. This was public information, although not easy for a newbie to find. It was immediately shared in the Polymarket Discord, which is why I always recommend being active there. Another reason a YES clarification would've been bad is that we'd never know when a market is actually resolved. The market timeframe was already over. If information that comes out days or weeks later that can change the outcome, how long are traders supposed to wait before considering a market settled? There are already markets where confirmation arrives days or weeks later, yet they still resolve based on what was known within the timeframe. Changing that standard would create huge uncertainty and be disastrous for the platform. Now back to Willo2. Willo2 was buying thousands of shares that MicroStrategy sold Bitcoin by May 31, AFTER the news came out at 70%-80%. (he had a few shares already, that he had sold them before the news). He saw that even though everyone knew MicroStrategy had sold the Bitcoin, the market was still trading around 70-80%, while markets for later timeframes, like June 30, were trading at 99.9% and he kept buying YES. I think we can all agree this was a dumb and greedy move. You always have to remember that if something looks too good to be true, it probably is. You don't just go all in, on something that doesn't make sense, thinking you are smarter than everyone else. And if there had been no ambiguity in the rules, Willo2 would never have been in this position because the market would've been trading at 99.9% immediately after the news came out, not 70%, when he was buying. Anyway, no matter how Polymarket clarified this market, there was always going to be massive drama. If they clarified YES, they would've gone against their own previous clarifications, which had created some level of consistency on the platform and all the sharp traders who traded based on that precedent would've been rekt. The real reason for all this drama was the unclear wording of the market. If the rules had explicitly stated that only the announcement itself mattered, it would've been clear. Instead, the wording left room for interpretation about whether information outside the timeframe should count. For me, Polymarket's biggest mistake was not clarifying the market before May 31. People had already asked for clarification specifically to avoid this exact situation. My take is that it sucks that @willo2_Poly lost $500k and I genuinely hope he makes it back. But he lost it mainly because he was greedy af. The problem isn't that Polymarket resolved this market to NO. The problem is that the rules were ambiguous enough that reasonable people could argue either side and they didn't clarify it days ago to prevent all of this.

@beamnxw money glitch for voters

@rossium uma oracle design is completely broken for stuff like this

Polymarket just set a precedent that breaks trust in prediction markets. 'MSTR sells any bitcoin by May 31' market resolution text said YES if MSTR sells any BTC by the deadline. source: MSTR info + on-chain data. no mention of when it's disclosed. 8-K says the sale happened May 26–31. in-window. verifiable on-chain. then a clarification dropped saying confirmation outside the window doesn't count – importing an announcement-timing rule the text never had how does anyone – retail or institutional – trust a platform that rewrites rules after the event? imagine reading the resolution text, building convictioN, understanding how 8-K filings work. then a clarification drops that wasn't anywhere in the original rules and ruins all of it. a resolution standard you can only know after the event isn't a standard

@polydao if you're not hitting limits, you're not doing enough

pov: you find out 60% of your Claude tokens were wasted the entire time an Anthropic engineer just explained why most users hit usage limits every day and have no idea it's their own fault > context rot kicks in after 300-400K tokens - dead weight from failed attempts and tool calls dilutes everything > /clear before new tasks, Esc + /rewind after failures, /compact around 250K tokens - most people skip all of this > Opus 4.8 added Dynamic Workflows, Effort control, and Fast mode - almost nobody uses them > /code-review replaced /simplify - if you're still using the old command you're doing it wrong > master CLAUDE.md and Skills and you triple useful work from the same subscription the people hitting limits every day aren't using Claude more they're using it worse save this before your next session

@gippp69 good for creators. I wish we could run opus 4.8 locally

THIS GIRL DEVELOPER CUT A $4,200/YEAR AI VISUAL STACK BY 99% - AND BUILT THE LOCAL VERSION FROM ONE LAPTOP she went through the whole setup herself from a raw camera feed to TouchDesigner, Ollama, local models and a live visual loop that runs without paying for every request she started with a normal laptop, opened TouchDesigner, connected the camera layer, then moved the “brain” local so the system could react without waiting on cloud tools then she removed the expensive parts - $120 API months, $80 render credits, plugin chains, visual software fees and the 6-tool stack most creators keep renting the final version is the crazy part - one interface handling visuals, particles, scene logic and realtime reactions while cutting the recurring cost from hundreds a month to roughly $2 she says creators are still overpaying 95%+ for workflows that can now live on one machine, and she already built the proof before most people realize the stack changed

@lagerskoy haha

@rossium Dude, you're really rich

Most people open Claude, ask one question and close the tab, never realizing they just touched maybe five percent of what it actually does It stopped being a chat box a while ago and became four tools that quietly erase the busywork your week is buried under > Chat for quick questions, the part everyone already uses > Cowork reads your real files, spreadsheets and documents and does the busywork > Code writes and ships working software, in the clip it builds a full app called Notespace > Projects and memory keep your context so you stop re-explaining yourself every morning > connectors plug it into Slack, Drive and your calendar so it acts instead of just answering The five percent most people use is the chat box and the other ninety five is everything they never bothered to open, which is exactly where all the saved time was hiding

@goatyishere is it really possible to predict sports

This Dude Made $3,588,720 Betting on Sports Most people lose money betting on sports One Polymarket trader did the opposite "sovereign2013" has generated over $3,588,720 in profit trading sports markets The craziest part? He's done it across more than 40,000 predictions Profile: @sovereign2013?via=goaty" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/@sovereign2013… Some of his largest publicly visible wins: > Arizona Wildcats: +$179,120 > Utah State Aggies (-10.5): +$114,244 > Tulane vs Temple: +$81,415 That's nearly $375,000 from just three trades This isn't a lucky parlay It's thousands of bets, repeated over years, with strict sizing and risk management While most people treat sports as gambling... Some traders treat it like a financial market Save this

@0x_fokki just saw video of 8 yo going to shop owners and selling them designs made with ai

🚨a 22-year-old made $20k last month with an iPhone and one insight no design skills. no team. no studio. just figured out that businesses need images and don't have time to make them. Midjourney generated 90% of the work. he uploaded, tagged, priced. > wallpaper subscriptions: $6,200 > stock photos: $5,400 > Etsy print-on-demand: $4,800 > Fiverr: $3,600 four free platforms. one phone. month 12: $20,000 the pack he spent two weeks refining made $180. the one he shipped the same day made $640. he documented the whole thing

@antisadh but can you run opus 4.8 :(

JENSEN HUANG SHOWED OFF A SERVER THAT RUNS EVERY AI MODEL ON EARTH. APPLE STORES SOLD OUT OF $599 MAC MINIS THE SAME WEEK FOR $3 A MONTH IN ELECTRICITY two months ago a developer posted his claude code bill on reddit, $170 in 10 days of work, the quality was magic but the bill was not the top reply said "i bought a mac mini m4, haven't paid anthropic since" and the thread exploded with developers doing the same math uber rolled out claude code to 5,000 engineers and watched bills hit $500 to $2,000 per person, burning through their entire $3.4 billion AI budget in 4 months the mac mini m4 starts at $599 one time, pulls 10 to 20 watts running 24/7, and costs $3 a month in electricity while a windows AI machine doing the same job costs $30 to $50 a month just to stay on ollama added support for the anthropic messages api in january 2026, so claude code itself connects to your local mac mini with one environment variable, same interface, zero API costs apple stores ran out of mac minis in 2026 because $599 one time beats $200 a month forever, that shortage is the most honest product review any machine has ever received the window is open, follow and bookmark before it closes

@thegreatest_sv the repos are public, the gap is in who actually sits down for 4 hours to set it up ( I won't )

>be like a skater on a pump track >you don’t push >you don’t grind >you just lean and the track carries you that’s Claude Code with the right repos >claude-mem -> never explain your project twice >karpathy-skills -> accuracy jumps 65% to 94% from one file >superpowers -> half your daily prompts become slash commands >github-mcp -> Claude reads the issue, writes the fix, opens the PR >you set it up once >then you just lean >15,576 repos indexed. most devs use 2-3. the top 5% run 30 agents with zero context loss everyone pays for the same subscription. not everyone gets the same results. 15 repos that close the gap below

@51bodila i had nothing more to say, cuz already deep into watching it lol

@rossium Huh,you copied my text XD but yeah, agree with you

Paul Tudor made $100M in one day, Stan Druckenmiller made 1 trade that broke the Bank of England on one RobinHood stage two $10B+ hedge fund CEOs gave a 30-minute trading masterclass completely free - two of the greatest traders in history will show you the most important rules of trading bookmark & watch - this is better than any paid course from fake traders

@polydao cheatcode

pov: you find out someone is making $6,200/month in views for $0.0002 CPM while you're paying $8 per 1,000 on Meta ads > one Claude Opus 4.8 skill installed > one message from his phone: "make 10 vids from channel and schedule them" > Claude scrapes viral hooks, stitches his CTA, auto-posts to TikTok/IG/YouTube 300K+ views. $6,200/month. 5 minutes of work. no camera. no editing. no team > 25,000x cheaper than TikTok ads full setup guide in the article👇

@Asteri_eth I burn my tokens on asking if I should it dessert or not

PEOPLE ARE BURNING THROUGH THEIR TOKENS IN 30 MINUTES AND BLAMING CLAUDE The problem isn’t with the model. The problem is how they’re using it A simple formatting question they set Max effort The 40th message in the chat the model re-reads the entire history from the beginning Every single time. Using your tokens Low effort costs 10 times less than Max Just get into the habit of routing tasks by level and your limit won’t run out by noon Tokens don’t disappear. You’re just paying for unnecessary processing

@ridark_eth ad agency business model is about to get unbundled by one person with a phone and Claude

this guy turned a raw 10-second phone clip into a multi-character media engine and pulled $19,400 in agency retainers this month he didn't rent a studio, buy expensive lighting, or hire actors → original clip: record yourself in a regular alleyway wearing black clothing → google flow upload: drop the raw mp4 file directly into the layout engine → omni flash prompt: "change clothing to premium white galabeya, preserve body weight and hand tracking" → asset injection: point at the empty space → render a white toyota sedan with exact matching shadows 30 minutes from zero to a flawless, physics-locked side-by-side demonstration video. earnings breakout from this single infrastructure setup: > brand deal 1 (local automotive): $8,500 > tech platform promo: $6,000 > dynamic ad variations contract: $4,900 most content agencies are still sending 5-man production crews to locations and charging clients $20,000 to shoot one clean commercial. he bypassed the entire physical production bottleneck using consumer hardware and a single web window.

@beamnxw thanks to it I just profited 15%

@rossium classic retail trap

shorted Iran Hormuz market at 25% this week. now it's at 2% the spike came from this Nikkei headline: 'Iran to open Hormuz 30 days after US deal' for retail it looked like an obvious YES the resolution criteria excluded any deal with fees. every leak said Iran was keeping the fees. retail traded the headline. the market resolves on the rules read the criteria before you trade the news.