Scott
1K posts
Scott
@scxttutd
Used to lurk FT. now just a burner. Saas Tech Eng always looking to learn more. I might get things wrong but at least an NBA team follows me🙂↔️
England, United Kingdom เข้าร่วม Temmuz 2020
82 กำลังติดตาม15 ผู้ติดตาม
@scxttutd @PaddyKeoghAF Glad to hear it.
Well done Scott, we got there in the end.
As you were Rory
English
This is quite clearly an advertisement which hasn't been labelled as one.
Rory Jennings ⭐ ⭐@Chelsearory
I’m predicting Ronaldo not to score at the tournament which is 6/1 with @Ladbrokes, you’re predicting him to score which is 1/12, so the odds favour you. But I’m so confident that Ronaldo is a spent force I accept your terms. £5000 to the winners charity. Game on.
English
@brucewayne606 @PaddyKeoghAF Again, I don’t think at any point I argued it was definitely an ad, only that there was enough reasonable belief the QT could be promotional.
Keep shifting the goalposts though
English
@scxttutd @PaddyKeoghAF I’m guessing Ladbrokes haven’t contacted you and said it is an ad? Not seen anything to confirm it is.
How’s the complaint the going? Guessing they haven’t spoken to you yet?
Guessing it’s still live, and not classed as an ad?
😎
English
@Jim_Sonweed @JSpurs___ @JacobCollierMP Really paraphrased what I was trying to say sorry.
My reply should have been really: “it’s apples and oranges in terms of easiness for the changes, the government can’t just flick a switch to make changes to private companies in the same way”
English
@scxttutd @JSpurs___ @JacobCollierMP Why would the government not have any jurisdiction over a business operating in the UK?
English
Labour’s reforms to driving test bookings already having an impact 👇
English
@brucewayne606 @PaddyKeoghAF You started at “there is nothing to suggest it’s an advert” and ended at “at a guess, it isn’t.”
If you’re guessing, then you’ve already conceded there are grounds for uncertainty. That’s been my point from the start.
Hope that helps 😘
English
@scxttutd @PaddyKeoghAF No confusion on my end, not labeled as an ad because, at a guess, it isn’t.
Unless you are referring to the video with Mark, Rory & Jamie, which does seem to be quite heavily branded.
Hope that helps 😘
English
@JSpurs___ @JacobCollierMP 2/2
And even then it doesn’t solve the biggest complaints.
Official resale can still happen on ticket platforms, and mandatory ID checks do absolutely nothing to stop dynamic pricing.
English
@JSpurs___ @JacobCollierMP 1/2
You’ve just proved my point.
Stopping resale of government owned driving test slots is a simple policy change. Your suggestion requires legislation, venue compliance, ID verification, transfer rules and enforcement across an entire private industry.
That’s not “easy”.
English
@JSpurs___ @JacobCollierMP Which definitely wouldn’t be as “easy” as saying “Hey you can’t resell governmentally provided driving tests privately”, is it?
English
@scxttutd @JacobCollierMP If only there was a way to pass legislation and laws to effect how a company operates in the UK 😂🤦♂️
English
@brucewayne606 @PaddyKeoghAF Is it? If I remember correctly my first response was me clearing up some confusion on your part.
On the comment that you made engaging with the topic…
You’re doing a 4/10 job at bait so far.
English
@scxttutd @PaddyKeoghAF If it’s in your head, for sure. The bigger issue is why it’s in your head, and letting it get to you.
Has the post been deleted yet?
English
@brucewayne606 @PaddyKeoghAF Ah so you are. Understandable, dealing with hypothetical scenarios can be a tricky concept❤️
English
@scxttutd @PaddyKeoghAF I can only deal in matters of fact. Have you reported the post, and raised your concerns about Rory to the authorities?
English
@JSpurs___ @JacobCollierMP Because the government don’t have any jurisdiction on ticketmaster?
English
@JacobCollierMP Consider you’re one of the worst governments to ever exist, you have actually done something pretty good here
Now you’ve shown how easy it is, why not also apply this to ticketed events and end touting and more rip off Britain?
Just a thought
English
@scxttutd @PaddyKeoghAF Depends if you think me engaging with a Ladbrokes post is an advert?
And if so, who is paying me?
English
@brucewayne606 @PaddyKeoghAF Replying to a post from Ladbrokes which Rory features in and then Rory replies with odds for both outcomes of an event and tags Ladbrokes in it?
You’re seriously saying there is “nothing” at all that suggests this could be an advert?
English
@scxttutd @PaddyKeoghAF There is nothing to suggest it is an advert, it’s an exchange on their post, initiated by Piers.
English
@brucewayne606 @PaddyKeoghAF He’s not blaming Ladbrokes. The onus on specifying an advertisement lies on the poster.
English
@PaddyKeoghAF Think Piers started this, can’t prove anything of any wrong doing from Ladbrokes here I’m afraid.
English
Kvaratskhelia hits the 6-7 during celebrations 6️⃣7️⃣
@IliesPeeters 🎥
False bans exist btw. The class action is gonna be beautiful.
Also, their malware brick bullshit is illegal lol
TacticalBrit@TheTacticalBrit
There's been a lot of tech illiteracy on this today. But if you are compromising your own hardware to cheat in a video game, quite frankly, I couldn't care if they made your PC remotely detonate. what's with the weird correlation with Vtubers and artists being so pro cheater?
English
@KevinDahmer @notsorrycat The “paperweight” comment was tongue in cheek. Because those devices are only usable for cheats (as they’re currently set up before someone is pedantic) your PC will be stuck in the error cycle till you unplug them rendering them useless.
T
English
Damaging someones device is, in fact, illegal.
Terms of Service are not law, and they accomplish very little in court. "I didn't read them" is an actual legal defense. Bricking hardware meanwhile IS a real crime.
x.com/ManaByte/statu…
Jeremy@ManaByte
Let’s walk through how that courtroom drama plays out: Cheater: "Your Honor, Riot bricked my $6,000 PC!" Riot: "Actually, we just updated Vanguard to enforce standard Windows IOMMU security protocols. If they unplug the illegal hardware cheat device from their motherboard, the PC boots perfectly fine." Judge: "Wait, so your computer works, but your specialized cheating hardware doesn't?" Cheater: "Yes! It’s property damage!" Judge: [Bangs gavel so hard it breaks] "Case dismissed. Pay Riot's legal fees." You cannot sue a company because their security system successfully detected your exploit. Riot didn't destroy anything; they just rendered a cheating device useless for cheating. If you spent thousands of dollars on a DMA card just to click on heads in Valorant, your only legal recourse is to sue your parents for giving birth to someone so stupid.
English
@IsidoreCannus Dangerous? Also device banning is more effective than account banning
English
The problem is t with that, they pushed dangerous software into people's PC instead of just disabling the accounts access. That is textbook internet crime, straight from the 90s. The law is there and it should be applied. 18 U.S. Code § 1030
Jeremy@ManaByte
Let’s walk through how that courtroom drama plays out: Cheater: "Your Honor, Riot bricked my $6,000 PC!" Riot: "Actually, we just updated Vanguard to enforce standard Windows IOMMU security protocols. If they unplug the illegal hardware cheat device from their motherboard, the PC boots perfectly fine." Judge: "Wait, so your computer works, but your specialized cheating hardware doesn't?" Cheater: "Yes! It’s property damage!" Judge: [Bangs gavel so hard it breaks] "Case dismissed. Pay Riot's legal fees." You cannot sue a company because their security system successfully detected your exploit. Riot didn't destroy anything; they just rendered a cheating device useless for cheating. If you spent thousands of dollars on a DMA card just to click on heads in Valorant, your only legal recourse is to sue your parents for giving birth to someone so stupid.
English
@intheblueyonder @Freyy_is Yeah because you’re made to feel so welcome and attended to by confidently wrong AI set ups that everybody prefers to speak with as their first point of contact instead of a person…
English
@Freyy_is The funniest part of this is that everything she did can be reconstituted in 30 seconds by going over her email and access logs.
English
@fawnnivalen U are clearly not aware of what people are complaining about
English
If you are genuinely worried about Vanguard blue-screening your PC, the solution is incredibly simple:
Stop buying $200 DMA cards to cheat in a video game.
Riot isn't being "too intrusive," they're finally making cheating have actual consequences.
If you ruin competitive matches, you deserve to have your OS wiped.
English
@CilvisNova @curebores @Dovah_Spy Basically going to windows “hey you need to do something about this” and windows kicks in with the IOMUU manipulation. Think where I strayed was that it wasn’t technically vanguard controlling this, more so it’s kicking the warning to windows to act on it
English
@CilvisNova @curebores @Dovah_Spy You know what, I think you’re spot on, that’s a good spot in my mistake. (My backgrounds software) reframing my thinking based off what you’re saying. Vanguard is likely tricking the DMA with encrypted data (probably along with checking for obvious fraudulent firmware) it’s then-
English
So basically if one guy doesn't like you and works at Riot he can brick your pc.
Dexerto@Dexerto
Riot Games have “bricked” $6,000 DMA cheating devices with their Vanguard anti-cheat The hardware is denied access to game memory, so cheaters can't play Riot titles
English